Psy2 targets the PP4 family phosphatase Pph3 to dephosphorylate Mth1 and repress glucose transporter gene expression

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 452-463

  Ma, Hui ^a   Han, Bong Kwan ^b,c   Guaderram, Marisela ^b   Aslanian, Aaron ^a   Yates III, John R ^b   Hunter, Tony ^a   Wittenberg, Curt ^b  

^a SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES   (United States)

^b SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c School of Integrative Plant Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLIC AMP DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE; EVH1 PROTEIN; GLUCOSE; GLUCOSE TRANSPORTER; HXT PROTEIN; MTH1 PROTEIN; PHOSPHOPROTEIN; PHOSPHOPROTEIN PHOSPHATASE; PHOSPHOPROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 3; PROLINE; PSY2 PROTEIN; RGT1 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME BINDING; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE REPRESSION; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEPHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; PROTEIN TARGETING; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; CYCLIC AMP-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASES; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; ENZYME ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GLUCOSE; GLUCOSE TRANSPORT PROTEINS, FACILITATIVE; IMMUNOBLOTTING; MUTATION; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PHOSPHOPROTEIN PHOSPHATASES; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN BINDING; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TWO-HYBRID SYSTEM TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84892461284     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00279-13     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Johnston M, Kim JH. 2005. Glucose as a hormone: receptor-mediated glucose sensing in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33:247-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST0330247.
2. Flick KM, Spielewoy N, Kalashnikova TI, Guaderrama M, Zhu Q, Chang HC, Wittenberg C. 2003. Grr1-dependent inactivation of Mth1 mediates glucose-induced dissociation of Rgt1 from HXT gene promoters. Mol. Biol. Cell 14:3230-3241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E03-03-0135.
3. Schmidt MC, McCartney RR, Zhang X, Tillman TS, Solimeo H, Wolfl S, Almonte C, Watkins SC. 1999. Std1 and Mth1 proteins interact with the glucose sensors to control glucose-regulated gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:4561-4571.
4. Schulte F, Wieczorke R, Hollenberg CP, Boles E. 2000. The HTR1 gene is a dominant-negative mutant allele ofMTH1and blocks Snf3- and Rgt2-dependent glucose signaling in yeast. J. Bacteriol. 182:540-542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.2.540-542.2000.
5. Lakshmanan J, Mosley AL, Ozcan S. 2003. Repression of transcription by Rgt1 in the absence of glucose requires Std1 and Mth1. Curr. Genet. 44: 19-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00294-003-0423-2.
6. Tamaki H. 2007. Glucose-stimulated cAMP-protein kinase A pathway in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 104:245-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1263/jbb.104.245.
7. Spielewoy N, Flick K, Kalashnikova TI, Walker JR, Wittenberg C. 2004. Regulation and recognition of SCFGrr1 targets in the glucose and amino acid signaling pathways. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:8994-9005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.20.8994-9005.2004.
8. Moriya H, Johnston M. 2004. Glucose sensing and signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through the Rgt2 glucose sensor and casein kinase I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:1572-1577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0305901101.
9. Kim JH, Johnston M. 2006. Two glucose-sensing pathways converge on Rgt1 to regulate expression of glucose transporter genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 281:26144-26149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M603636200.
10. Polish JA, Kim JH, Johnston M. 2005. How the Rgt1 transcription factor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is regulated by glucose. Genetics 169:583-594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.034512.
11. Gingras AC, Caballero M, Zarske M, Sanchez A, Hazbun TR, Fields S, Sonenberg N, Hafen E, Raught B, Aebersold R. 2005. A novel, evolutionarily conserved protein phosphatase complex involved in cisplatin sensitivity. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4:1725-1740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M500231-MCP200.
12. Cohen PT, Philp A, Vazquez-Martin C. 2005. Protein phosphatase 4: from obscurity to vital functions. FEBS Lett. 579:3278-3286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2005.04.070.
13. Chen GI, Tisayakorn S, Jorgensen C, D'Ambrosio LM, Goudreault M, Gingras AC. 2008. PP4R4/KIAA1622 forms a novel stable cytosolic complex with phosphoprotein phosphatase 4. J. Biol. Chem. 283:29273- 29284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M803443200.
14. Lyu J, Jho EH, Lu W. 2011. Smek promotes histone deacetylation to suppress transcription of Wnt target gene brachyury in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Cell Res. 21:911-921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.47.
15. Zhang X, Ozawa Y, Lee H, Wen YD, Tan TH, Wadzinski BE, Seto E. 2005. Histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) activity is regulated by interaction with protein serine/threonine phosphatase 4. Genes Dev. 19:827-839. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1286005.
16. Lee DH, Chowdhury D. 2011. What goes on must come off: phosphatases gate-crash the DNA damage response. Trends Biochem. Sci. 36:569-577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2011.08.007.
17. Mendoza MC, Du F, Iranfar N, Tang N, Ma H, Loomis WF, Firtel RA. 2005. Loss of SMEK, a novel, conserved protein, suppresses MEK1-null cell polarity, chemotaxis, and gene expression defects. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:7839-7853. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.17.7839-7853.2005.
18. Prehoda KE, Lee DJ, Lim WA. 1999. Structure of the enabled/VASP homology 1 domain-peptide complex: a key component in the spatial control of actin assembly. Cell 97:471-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80757-6.
19. O'Neill BM, Szyjka SJ, Lis ET, Bailey AO, Yates YR, III, Aparicio OM, Romesberg FE. 2007. Pph3-Psy2 is a phosphatase complex required for Rad53 dephosphorylation and replication fork restart during recovery from DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:9290-9295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703252104.
20. Fromont-Racine M, Rain JC, Legrain P. 1997. Toward a functional analysis of the yeast genome through exhaustive two-hybrid screens. Nat. Genet. 16:277-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng0797-277.
21. Hsiung YG, Chang HC, Pellequer JL, La Valle R, Lanker S, Wittenberg C. 2001. F-box protein Grr1 interacts with phosphorylated targets via the cationic surface of its leucine-rich repeat. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:2506-2520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.7.2506-2520.2001.
22. Keogh MC, Kim JA, Downey M, Fillingham J, Chowdhury D, Harrison JC, Onishi M, Datta N, Galicia S, Emili A, Lieberman J, Shen X, Buratowski S, Haber JE, Durocher D, Greenblatt JF, Krogan NJ. 2006. A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates H2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Nature 439:497-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04384.
23. Rigaut G, Shevchenko A, Rutz B, Wilm M, Mann M, Seraphin B. 1999. A generic protein purification method for protein complex characteriza-tion and proteome exploration. Nat. Biotechnol. 17:1030-1032. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/13732.
24. McDonald WH, Tabb DL, Sadygov RG, MacCoss MJ, Venable J, Graumann J, Johnson JR, Cociorva D, Yates JR, III. 2004. MS1, MS2, and SQT-three unified, compact, and easily parsed file formats for the storage of shotgun proteomic spectra and identifications. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 18:2162-2168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1603.
25. Yates JR, III, Eng JK, McCormack AL, Schieltz D. 1995. Method to correlate tandem mass spectra of modified peptides to amino acid sequences in the protein database. Anal. Chem. 67:1426-1436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac00104a020.
26. Peng J, Elias JE, Thoreen CC, Licklider LJ, Gygi SP. 2003. Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome. J. Proteome Res. 2:43-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr025556v.
27. Tabb DL, McDonald WH, Yates JR, III. 2002. DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 1:21-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr015504q.
28. Obenauer JC, Cantley LC, Yaffe MB. 2003. Scansite 2.0: proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:3635-3641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg584.
29. Jouandot D, II, Roy A, Kim JH. 2011. Functional dissection of the glucose signaling pathways that regulate the yeast glucose transporter gene (HXT) repressor Rgt1. J. Cell. Biochem. 112:3268-3275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcb.23253.
30. Zaman S, Lippman SI, Schneper L, Slonim N, Broach JR. 2009. Glucose regulates transcription in yeast through a network of signaling pathways. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5:245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2009.2.
31. Kuchin S, Vyas VK, Kanter E, Hong SP, Carlson M. 2003. Std1p (Msn3p) positively regulates the Snf1 kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 163:507-514.
32. Lafuente MJ, Gancedo C, Jauniaux JC, Gancedo JM. 2000. Mth1 receives the signal given by the glucose sensors Snf3 and Rgt2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 35:161-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365 -2958.2000.01688.x.
33. Oler AJ, Cairns BR. 2012. PP4 dephosphorylates Maf1 to couple multiple stress conditions to RNA polymerase III repression. EMBO J. 31:1440- 1452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.501.
34. Reinders A, Burckert N, Boller T, Wiemken A, De Virgilio C. 1998. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cAMP-dependent protein kinase controls entry into stationary phase through the Rim15p protein kinase. Genes Dev. 12:2943-2955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.18.2943.
35. Smith A, Ward MP, Garrett S. 1998. Yeast PKA represses Msn2p/Msn4pdependent gene expression to regulate growth, stress response and glycogen accumulation. EMBO J. 17:3556-3564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.13.3556.
36. Gorner W, Durchschlag E, Martinez-Pastor MT, Estruch F, Ammerer G, Hamilton B, Ruis H, Schuller C. 1998. Nuclear localization of the C2H2 zinc finger protein Msn2p is regulated by stress and protein kinase A activity. Genes Dev. 12:586-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.4.586.
37. Rodriguez A, Roy J, Martinez-Martinez S, Lopez-Maderuelo MD, Nino-Moreno P, Orti L, Pantoja-Uceda D, Pineda-Lucena A, Cyert MS, Redondo JM. 2009. A conserved docking surface on calcineurin mediates interaction with substrates and immunosuppressants. Mol. Cell 33:616-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.030.
38. Shi Y. 2009. Serine/threonine phosphatases: mechanism through structure. Cell 139:468-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.006.
39. Willems AR, Lanker S, Patton EE, Craig KL, Nason TF, Mathias N, Kobayashi R, Wittenberg C, Tyers M. 1996. Cdc53 targets phosphorylated G1 cyclins for degradation by the ubiquitin proteolytic pathway. Cell 86:453-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80118-X.