Rumen methanogenic genotypes differ in abundance according to host residual feed intake phenotype and diet type

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 586-594

  Carberry, Ciara A ^a,b   Waters, Sinead M ^a   Kenny, David A ^a   Creevey, Christopher J ^a,c  

^a ANIMAL AND GRASSLAND RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^c ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

16S RRNA GENE CLONE LIBRARIES; END-PRODUCTS; FEED EFFICIENCIES; METHANE EMISSIONS; METHANOGENIC COMMUNITY; OPERATIONAL TAXONOMIC UNITS; PYROSEQUENCING; RUMEN FLUIDS;

ANIMALS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; METHANE; METHANOGENS; RNA;

NUTRITION;

ABUNDANCE; BACTERIUM; DIET; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GENOTYPE; METHANE; METHANOGENESIS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; PHENOTYPE;

RNA 16S;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CATTLE; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METHANOBACTERIACEAE; METHANOBREVIBACTER; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; RUMINANT STOMACH;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; CATTLE; GENOTYPE; METHANOBACTERIACEAE; METHANOBREVIBACTER; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; RUMEN;

EID: 84892448211     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03131-13     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Hobson PN, Stewart CS (ed). 1997. The rumen microbial ecosystem. Blackie Academic & Professional, London, United Kingdom.
2. Demeyer DI. 1991. Quantitative aspects of microbial metabolism in the rumen and hindgut, p 217-237. In Jouany JP (ed), Rumen microbial metabolism and ruminant digestion. INRA, Paris, France.
3. Wolin MJ, Miller TL, Stewart CS. 1997. Microbe-microbe interactions, p 467-491. In Hobson PN, Stewart CS (ed), The rumen microbial ecosystem. Blackie Academic & Professional, London, United Kingdom.
4. Moss AR, Jouany J-P, Newbold J. 2000. Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Ann. Zootech. 49:231-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/animres:2000119.
5. Zinder SH. 1993. Physiological ecology of methanogens, p 128-206. In Ferry JG (ed), Methanogenesis: ecology, physiology, biochemistry and genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.
6. Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar TD, Castel V, Haan C. 2006. Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
7. Van Nevel CJ, Demeyer DI. 1996. Control of rumen methanogenesis. Environ. Monit. Assess. 42:73-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00394043.
8. Crews DH. 2005. Genetics of feed utilization and national cattle evaluation: a review. Genet. Mol. Res. 4:152-165.
9. Nkrumah JD, Okine EK, Mathison GW Schmid K, Li C, Basarab JA, Price MA, Wang Z, Moore SS. 2006. Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance, and feeding behavior with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 84:145-153.
10. He Z, Xiao S, Xie X, Zhong H, Hu Y, Li Q, Gao F, Li G, Liu J, Qiu G. 2007 Molecular diversity of microbial community in acid mine drainages of Yunfu sulfide mine. Extremophiles 11:305-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00792-006-0044-z.
11. Fitzsimons C, Kenny DA, Deighton MH, Fahey AG, McGee M. 2013. Methane emissions, body composition, and rumen fermentation traits of beef heifers differing in residual feed intake. J. Anim. Sci. 91:5789-5800. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6956.
12. McDonnell R, Hart KJ, Boland TM, Kelly AK, McGee M, Kenny DA. 2009. Effect of ranking on phenotypic residual feed intake and diet on ruminal methane emissions from beef heifers, p 42. In Proceeding of the Agricultural Research Forum, Tullamore, Ireland, 12 to 13 March 2009.
13. Zhou M, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Guan LL. 2009. Assessment of the microbial ecology of ruminal methanogens in cattle with different feed efficiencies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:6524-6533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02815-08.
14. Zhou M, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Guan LL. 2010. Characterization of variation in rumen methanogenic communities under different dietary and host feed efficiency conditions, as determined by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:3776- 3786. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00010-10.
15. Durunna ON, Mujibi FDN, Goonewardene L, Okine EK, Basarab JA, Wang Z, Moore SS. 2011. Feed efficiency differences and reranking in beef steers fed grower and finisher diets. J. Anim. Sci. 89:158-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2514.
16. McAllister TA, Cheng KJ, Okine EK, Mathison GW. 1996. Dietary, environmental and microbiological aspects of methane production in ruminants. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 76:231-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjas96-035.
17. Popova M, Martin C, Eugene M, Mialon MM, Doreau M, Morgavi DP. 2011 Effect of fibre- and starch-rich finishing diets on methanogenic Archaea diversity and activity in the rumen of feedlot bulls. Anim. Feed Sci. 166:113-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.060.
18. Carberry CA, Kenny DA, Han S, McCabe MS, Waters SM. 2012. Effect of phenotypic residual feed intake and dietary forage content on the rumen microbial community of beef cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78: 4949-4958. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07759-11.
19. Kelly AK, McGee M, Crews DH, Jr, Fahey AG, Wylie AR, Kenny DA. 2010. Effect of divergence in residual feed intake on feeding behavior, blood metabolic variables, and body composition traits in growing beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 88:109-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2196.
20. Wright AD, Pimm C. 2003. Improved strategy for presumptive identification of methanogens using 16S riboprinting. J. Microbiol. Methods 55: 337-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00169-6.
21. Zarda B, Hahn D, Chatzinotas A, Schönhuber W, Neef A, Amann RI, Zeyer J. 1997. Analysis of bacterial community structure in bulk soil by in situ hybridization. Arch. Microbiol. 168:185-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002030050486.
22. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792-1797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340.
23. Huang Y, Niu B, Gao Y, Fu L, Li W. 2010. CD-HIT suite: a web server for clustering and comparing biological sequences. Bioinformatics 26: 680-682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq003.
24. Guindon S, Lethiec F, Duroux P, Gascuel O. 2005. PHYML online-a web server for fast maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic inference. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:W557-W559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki352.
25. O'Sullivan ó, Coakley M, Lakshminarayanan B, Claesson MJ, Stanton C, O'Toole PW, Ross RP. 2011. Correlation of rRNA gene amplicon pyrosequencing and bacterial culture for microbial compositional analysis of faecal samples from elderly Irish subjects. J. Appl. Microbiol. 111:467- 473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05067.x.
26. Li W, Fu L, Niu B, Wu S, Wooley J. 2012. Ultrafast clustering algorithms for metagenomic sequence analysis. Brief. Bioinform. 13:656-668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs035.
27. Wu D, Hartman A, Ward N, Eisen JA. 2008. An automated phylogenetic tree-based small subunit rRNA taxonomy and alignment pipeline (STAP). PLoS One 3:e2566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002566.
28. Li W, Godzik A. 2006. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22:1658- 1659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158.
29. Maidak BL, Olsen GJ, Larsen N, Overbeek R, McCaughey MJ, Woese CR. 1996. The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP). Nucleic Acids Res. 24:82-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/24.1.82.
30. Muller J, Creevey CJ, Thompson JD, Arendt D, Bork P. 2010. AQUA: automated quality improvement for multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 26:263-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp651.
31. Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DM, Clamp M, Barton GJ. 2009. Jalview version 2-a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25:1189-1191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033.
32. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688-2690. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446.
33. Letunic I, Bork P. 2007. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics 23:127-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl529.
34. Good IJ. 1953. The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika 40:237-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2333344.
35. Reeder J, Knight R. 2009. The 'rare biosphere': a reality check. Nat. Methods 6:636-637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0909-636.
36. Huse SM, Welch DM, Morrison HG, Sogin ML. 2010. Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering. Environ. Microbiol. 12:1889 -1898. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02193.x.
37. Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bolton E, Bryant SH, Canese K, Chetvernin V, Church DM, Dicuccio M, Federhen S, Feolo M, Fingerman IM, Geer LY, Helmberg W, Kapustin Y, Krasnov S, Landsman D, Lipman DJ, Lu Z, Madden TL, Madej T, Maglott DR, Marchler-Bauer A, Miller V, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Ostell J, Panchenko A, Phan L, Pruitt KD, Schuler GD, Sequeira E, Sherry ST, Shumway M, Sirotkin K, Slotta D, Souvorov A, Starchenko G, Tatusova TA, Wagner L, Wang Y, Wilbur WJ, Yaschenko E, Ye J. 2012. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:D13-D25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1184.
38. Martin C, Morgavi DP, Doreau M. 2010. Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4:351-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109990620.
39. Lin C, Raskin L, Stahl DA. 1997. Microbial community structure in gastrointestinal tracts of domestic animals: comparative analyses using rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 22:28l- 294.
40. Whitford MF, Teather RM, Forster RJ. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of methanogens from the bovine rumen. BMC Microbiol. 1:5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-1-5.
41. Janssen PH, Kirs M. 2008. Structure of the archaeal community of the rumen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:3619-3625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02812-07.
42. Wright A-D, Ma X, Obispo N. 2008. Methanobrevibacter phylotypes are the dominant methanogens in sheep from Venezuela. Microb. Ecol. 56: 390-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9351-x.
43. Hook SE, Wright A, Denis G, McBride BW. 2010. Methanogens: methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies. Archaea 2010: 945785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/945785.
44. Pei C, Sheng-Yong M, Cheng Y, Zhu W. 2010. Diversity, abundance and novel 16S rRNA gene sequences of methanogens in rumen liquid, solid and epithelium fractions of Jinnan cattle. Animal 4:20-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109990681.
45. Gu M-J, Alam MJ, Kim S-H, Jeon CO, Chang MB, Oh YK, Lee SC, Lee SS. 2011. Analysis of methanogenic archaeal communities of rumen fluid and rumen particles from Korean black goats. Anim. Sci. J. 82:663-672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00890.x.
46. Poulsen M, Schwab C, Borg Jensen B, Engberg RM, Spang A, Canibe N, Hojberg O, Milinovich G, Fragner L, Schleper C, Weckwerth W, Lund P, Schramm A, Urich T. 2013. Methylotrophic methanogenic thermoplasmata implicated in reduced methane emissions from bovine rumen. Nat. Commun. 4:1428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2432.
47. Skillman LC, Evans PN, Strompl C, Joblin KN. 2006. 16S rDNA directed PCR primers and detection of methanogens in the bovine rumen. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 42:222-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01833.x.
48. Acinas SG, Sarma-Rupavtarm R, Klepac-Ceraj V, Polz MF. 2005. PCRinduced sequence artifacts and bias: insights from comparison of two 16S rRNA clone libraries constructed from the same sample. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:8966-8969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.12.8966-8969.2005.
49. Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Huber JA, Mark Welch D, Huse SM, Neal PR, Arrieta JM, Herndl GJ. 2006. Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored "rare biosphere." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:12115- 12120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605127103.
50. Podar M, Abulencia CB, Walcher M, Hutchison D, Zengler K, Garcia JA, Holland T, Cotton D, Hauser L, Keller M. 2007. Targeted access to the genomes of low-abundance organisms in complex microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:3205-3214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02985-06.
51. Hajishengallis G, Liang S, Payne MA, Hashim A, Jotwani R, Eskan MA, McIntosh ML, Alsam A, Kirkwood KL, Lambris JD, Darveau RP, Curtis MA. 2011. Low-abundance biofilm species orchestrates inflammatory periodontal disease through the commensal microbiota and complement. Cell Host Microbe 10:497-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2011.10.006.
52. Hansen EE, Lozupone CA, Rey FE, Wu M, Guruge JL, Narra A, Goodfellow J, Zaneveld JR, McDonald DT, Goodrich JA, Heath AC, Knight R, Gordon JI. 2011. Pan-genome of the dominant human gut-associated archaeon, Methanobrevibacter smithii, studied in twins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:4599-4606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000071108.
53. Johnson KA, Johnson DE. 1995. Methane emissions from cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2483-2492.
54. Moss AR, Givens DI, Garnsworthy PC. 1995. The effect of supplementing grass silage with barley on digestibility, in sacco degradability, rumen fermentation and methane production in sheep at two levels of intake. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 55:9-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00799-S.
55. Doreau M, van der Werf HMG, Micol D, Dubroeucq H, Agabriel J, Rochette Y, Martin C. 2011. Enteric methane production and greenhouse gases balance of diets differing in concentrate in the fattening phase of a beef production system. J. Anim. Sci. 89:2518-2528. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3140.
56. McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD, Morgan CA. 2002. Animal nutrition, 6th ed. Longman, Harlow, United Kingdom.
57. Dennis SM, Arambel MJ, Bartley EE, Dayton AD. 1983. Effect of energy concentration and source of nitrogen on numbers and types of rumen protozoa. J. Dairy Sci. 66:1248-1254. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(83)81931-6.
58. Taylor CD, McBride BC, Wolfe RS, Bryant MP. 1974. Coenzyme M is essential for growth of rumen strain of Methanobacterium ruminantium. J. Bacteriol. 120:974-975.
59. Leahy SC, Kelly WJ, Altermann E, Ronimus RS, Yeoman CJ, Pacheco DM, Li D, Kong Z, McTavish S, Sang C, Lambie SC, Janssen PH, Dey D, Attwood GT. 2010. The genome sequence of the rumen methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium reveals new possibilities for controlling ruminant methane emissions. PLoS One 5:e8926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008926.
60. Rouvière PE, Wolfe RS. 1988. Novel biochemistry of methanogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 263:7913-7916.
61. Pielou EC. 1966. Shannon's formula as a measure of species diversity: its use and misuse. Am. Nat. 100:463-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/282439.