The effect of perspective on presence and space perception

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2013, Pages

  Ling, Yun ^a   Nefs, Harold T ^a   Brinkman, Willem Paul ^a   Qu, Chao ^a   Heynderickx, Ingrid ^a,b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MONOCULAR VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSPECTIVE; QUESTIONNAIRE; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPACE PERCEPTION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84892428788     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078513     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Witmer BG, Jerome CJ, Singer MJ (2005) The factor structure of the presence questionnaire. Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 14: 298-312.
2. Wiederhold BK, Wiederhold MD (2005) Virtual reality therapy for anxiety disorders: Advances in evaluation and treatment. Washington, DC: Amrican Psychological Association. 225 p.
3. Wilhelm FH, Pfaltz MC, Gross JJ, Mauss IB, Kim SI, et al. (2005) Mechanisms of virtual reality exposure therapy: the role of the behavioral activation and behavioral inhibition systems. Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback 30: 271-284.
4. Shafer DM, Carbonara CP, Popova L (2012) Spatial Presence and Perceived Reality as Predictors of Motion-Based Video Game Enjoyment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 20: 591-619.
5. Cutting JE (1986) The shape and psychophysics of cinematic space. 18: 551-558.
6. Sedgwick HA (1993) The effects of viewpoint on the virtual space of pictures. In: Ellis SR, editor. Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments. 2 ed. London: Taylor & Francis. pp. 460-479.
7. Todorovic D (2005) Geometric and perceptual effects of the location of the observer vantage point for linear-perspective images. Perception 34: 521-544.
8. Rogers S (1995) Perceiving pictorial space. In: Epstein W, Rogers S, editors. Perception of space and motion: Handbook of perception and cognition. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 119-163.
9. Juricevic I, Kennedy JM (2006) Looking at perspective pictures from too far, too close, and just right. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 135: 448-461.
10. Pont SC, Nefs HT, van Doorn AJ, Wijntjes MWA, Pas SFT, et al. (2012) Depth in Box Spaces. Seeing and Perceiving 25: 339-349.
11. Todorovic D (2009) The effect of the observer vantage point on perceived distortions in linear perspective images. Attention Perception & Psychophysics 71: 183-193.
12. Vishwanath D, Girshick AR, Banks MS (2005) Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place. Nature Neuroscience 8: 1401-1410.
13. Goldstein EB (2001) Pictorial perception and art. In: Goldstein EB, editor. Blackwell handbook of perception. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 344-378.
14. Koenderink JJ, Doorn AJV, Kappers AML, Todd JT (2004) Pointing out of the picture. Perception 33: 513-530.
15. Shepard RN (1990) Mind sights. New York: Freeman. 228 p.
16. Kellner F, Bolte B, Bruder G, Rautenberg U, Steinicke F, et al. (2012) Geometric calibration of head-mounted displays and its effects on distance estimation. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 18: 589-596.
17. Hendrix C, Barfield W (1995) Presence in Virtual Environments as a Function of Visual and Auditory Cues. Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '95, Proceedings: 74-82.
18. Lin JJW, Duh HBL, Parker DE, Abi-Rached H, Furness TA (2002) Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. Ieee Virtual Reality 2002, Proceedings: 164-171.
19. Ni T, Bowman DA, Chen J (2006) Increased display size and resolution improve task performance in information-rich virtual environments. Graphics Interface 2006, Proceedings: 139-146.
20. Cherni H, Kadri A, Taruella A, Joseph P-A, Roy CL, et al. (2011) Virtual information display for cognitive rehabilitation: choice of screen size. Journal of CyberTherapy& Rehabilitation 4: 73-81.
21. Howard IP, Rogers BJ (2002) Seeing in depth, Vol. 2: Depth Perception. Toronto: I Porteous. 626 p.
22. Schlosberg H (1941) Stereoscopic depth from single pictures. American Journal of Psychology 54: 601-605.
23. Ames A (1925) The illusion of depth from single pictures. Journal of the Optical Society of America and Review of Scientific Instruments 10: 137-148.
24. Koenderink JJ, Vandoorn AJ, Kappers AML (1994) On So-Called Paradoxical Monocular Stereoscopy. Perception 23: 583-594.
25. Vishwanath D, Hibbard PB (2013) Seeing in 3D with just one eye : Stereopsis without binocular vision. Psychological Science 24: 1673-1685.
26. Landy MS, Maloney LT, Johnston EB, Young M (1995) Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision research 35: 389-412.
27. Tyndiuk F, Thomas G, Schlick C (2005) Cognitive Comparison of 3D Interaction in Front of Large vs. Small Displays. In Virtual Reality Software and Technology: 117-123.
28. Youngblut C, Perrin BM (2002) Investigating the Relationship between Presence and Performance in Virtual Environments. IMAGE 2002 Conference, 8-12 July, Scottsdale, AZ.
29. Romano DM, Brna P (2001) Presence and reflection in training: Support for learning to improve quality decision-making skills under time limitations. CyberPsychology & Behavior 4: 265-277.
30. Usoh M, Arthur K, Whitton MC, Bastos R, Steed A, et al. (1999) Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments. Siggraph 99 Conference Proceedings: 359-364.
31. Ling Y, Nefs HT, Brinkman WP, Qu C, Heynderickx I (2013) The relationship between individual characteristics and experienced presence. Computers in Human Behavior 29: 1519-1530.
32. Sylaiou S, Mania K, Karoulis A, White M (2010) Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68: 243-253.
33. Bach M (1996) The Freiburg Visual Acuity test - Automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optometry and Vision Science 73: 49-53.
34. Regenbrecht H (2002) Measuring presence in augmented reality environments: design and a first test of a questionnaire; Porto, Portugal.
35. Schubert T, Friedmann F, Regenbrecht H (2001) The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10: 266-281.
36. Wobbrock JO, Findlater L, Gergle D, Higgins JJ (2011) The Aligned Rank Transform for Nonparametric Factorial Analyses Using Only ANOVA Procedures. CHI 2011 Session: Research Methods: 143-146.
37. Field A (2009) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE. 821 p.
38. Criminisi A, Reid I, Zisserman A (1999) A plane measuring device. Image and Vision Computing 17: 625-634.
39. Czerwinski M, Tan DS, Robertson GG (2002) Women take a wider view. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Changing our world, changing ourselves - CHI '02: 195-202.
40. Steinicke F, Bruder G, Kuhl S (2011) Realistic perspective projections for virtual objects and environments. ACM Transactions on Graphics 30: 1-10.
41. Hoffman HG, Prothero J, Wells MJ, Groen J (1998) Virtual chess: Meaning enhances users' sense of presence in virtual environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 10: 251-263.
42. Ling Y, Brinkman W-P, Nefs HT, Qu C, Heynderickx I (2012) Effects of stereoscopic viewing on presence, anxiety and cybersickness in a virtual reality environment for public speaking. Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 21: 254-267.