Geometric calibration of head-mounted displays and its effects on distance estimation

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 589-596

  Kellner, Falko ^a   Bolte, Benjamin ^b   Bruder, Gerd ^c   Rautenberg, Ulrich ^d   Steinicke, Frank ^c   Lappe, Markus ^b   Koch, Reinhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^d VOLKSWAGEN AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

distance perception.; HMD calibration; Optical see through

Indexed keywords

AVERAGE DISTANCE; DISTANCE ESTIMATION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; GEOMETRIC CALIBRATIONS; HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAYS; IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL REALITY; IMMERSIVE VR; LINE CORRESPONDENCE; OPTICAL SEE-THROUGH; OPTICAL SEE-THROUGH DISPLAY; USER ADJUSTMENT; USER CALIBRATION; USER INTERACTION; VIRTUAL VIEW;

AUGMENTED REALITY; CALIBRATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ESTIMATION; EXPERIMENTS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

HELMET MOUNTED DISPLAYS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEAD; HUMAN; MALE; ROTATION; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEAD; HUMANS; MALE; ROTATION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84858436239     PISSN: 10772626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2012.45     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. P. L. Alfano and G. F. Michel. Restricting the field of view: perceptual and performance effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70:35-45, 1996.
2. R. S. Allison, I. P. Howard, and J. E. Zacherx. Effect of field size, head motion and rotational velocity on roll vection and illusory self-tilt in a tumbling room. Perception, 28:299-306, 1999.
3. K. Arthur. Effects of field of view on task performance with headmounted displays. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pages 29-30, 1996.
4. M. Axholt, M. Skoglund, S. D. Peterson, M. D. Cooper, T. B. Schoen, F. Gustafsson, A. Ynnerman, and S. R. Ellis. Optical see-through head mounted display direct linear transformation calibration robustness in the presence of user alignment noise. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings (HFES), 54(28):2427-2431, 2010.
5. T. Banton, J. Stefanucci, F. Durgin, A. Fass, and D. Proffitt. The perception of walking speed in a virtual environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14(4):394-406, 2005. (Pubitemid 41365733)
6. S. Ellis and K. Nemire. A subjective technique for calibration of lines of sight in closed virtual environment viewing systems. Proceedings of the Society for Information Display, 1993.
7. H. Frenz, M. Lappe, M. Kolesnik, and T. B̈uhrmann. Estimation of travel distance from visual motion in virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 4(1):1-18, 2007.
8. A. Fuhrmann, D. Schmalstieg, and W. Purgathofer. Fast calibration for augmented reality. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST), pages 166-167, 1999.
9. A. Fuhrmann, D. Schmalstieg, and W. Purgathofer. Fast calibration for augmented reality. Technical Report TR-186-2-99-16, Institute of Computer Graphics and Algorithms, Vienna University of Technology, Favoritenstrasse 9-11/186, A-1040 Vienna, Austria, May 1999.
10. Y. Genc, F. Sauer, F. Wenzel, M. Tuceryan, and N. Navab. Optical seethrough HMD calibration: A stereo method validated with a video seethrough system. In Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality (ISAR), pages 165-174, 2000.
11. Y. Genc, M. Tuceryan, and N. Navab. Practical solutions for calibration of optical see-through devices. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pages 169-175, 2002.
12. S. J. Gilson, A. W. Fitzgibbon, and A. Glennerster. Spatial calibration of an optical see-through head-mounted display. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 173(1):140-146, 2008.
13. M. A. Hagen, R. K. Jones, and E. Reed. On a neglected variable in theories of pictorial perception: truncation of the visual field. Perception and Psychophysics, 23:326-330, 1978. (Pubitemid 9156744)
14. R. I. Hartley and A. Zisserman. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 0521540518, second edition, 2004.
15. S. Hassan, J. Hicks, L. Hao, and K. Turano. What is the minimum field of view required for efficient navigation? Vision Research, 47(16):2115-2123, 2007. (Pubitemid 47064463)
16. V. Interrante, L. Anderson, and B. Ries. Distance perception in immersive virtual environments, revisited. In Proceedings of Virtual Reality (VR), pages 3-10. IEEE Press, 2006.
17. V. Interrante, B. Ries, J. Lindquist, and L. Anderson. Elucidating the factors that can facilitate veridical spatial perception in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of Virtual Reality (VR), pages 11-18. IEEE Press, 2007. (Pubitemid 47208182)
18. A. Janin, D. Mizell, and T. Caudell. Calibration of head-mounted displays for augmented reality applications. In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (VRAIS), pages 246-255, 1993.
19. S. E. M. Jansen, A. Toet, and N. J. Delleman. Effects of horizontal fieldof-view restriction on manoeuvring performance through complex structured environments. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV), pages 189-189. ACM Press, 2008.
20. J. A. Jones, J. E. Swan II, G. Singh, and S. R. Ellis. Peripheral visual information and its effect on distance judgments in virtual and augmented environments. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV), pages 29-35, 2011.
21. R. S. Kennedy, N. E. Lane, K. S. Berbaum, and M. G. Lilienthal. Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(3):203-220, 1993.
22. S. Kuhl, W. Thompson, and S. Creem-Regehr. HMD calibration and its effects on distance judgments. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV). ACM Press, 2008.
23. J. M. Loomis and J. M. Knapp. Virtual and Adaptive Environments, chapter Visual Perception of Egocentric Distance in Real and Virtual Environments, pages 21-46. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ., 2003.
24. E. McGarrity and M. Tuceryan. A method for calibrating see-through head-mounted displays for AR. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality (IWAR), pages 75-84. IEEE Computer Society, 1999.
25. R. Messing and F. H. Durgin. Distance perception and the visual horizon in head-mounted displays. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 3(2005):234-250, 2.
26. C. B. Owen, J. Zhou, A. Tang, and F. Xiao. Display-relative calibration for optical see-through head-mounted displays. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pages 70-78. IEEE Computer Society, 2004. (Pubitemid 40682388)
27. W. Robinett and J. P. Rolland. A computational model for the stereoscopic optics of a head-mounted display. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1):45-62, 1992.
28. A. F. Seay, D. M. Krum, L. Hodges, andW. Ribarsky. Simulator sickness and presence in a high field-of-view virtual environment. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pages 784-785. ACM Press, 2002.
29. K. M. Stanney and R. S. Kennedy. The psychometrics of cybersickness. Communications of the ACM, 40(8):66-68, 1997.
30. F. Steinicke, G. Bruder, M. Lappe, S. Kuhl, P. Willemsen, and K. H. Hinrichs. Natural perspective projections for head-mounted displays. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG), 17(7):888-899, 2011.
31. A. Tang, J. Zhou, and C. B. Owen. Evaluation of calibration procedures for optical see-through head-mounted displays. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pages 161-168, 2003.
32. M. Tuceryan, Y. Genc, and N. Navab. Single-point active alignment method (SPAAM) for optical see-through HMD calibration for augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11:259-276, June 2002.
33. M. Usoh, E. Catena, S. Arman, and M. Slater. Using presence questionaires in reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(5):497-503, 1999.
34. R. Warren and A. H. Wertheim. Perception & Control of Self-Motion. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990.
35. P. Willemsen and A. A. Gooch. Perceived egocentric distances in real, image-based, and traditional virtual environments. In Proceedings of Virtual Reality (VR), pages 275-276. IEEE Press, 2002. (Pubitemid 34410047)