Depth in box spaces

Seeing and Perceiving

Volumn 25, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 339-349

  Pont, Sylvia C ^a   Nefs, Harold T ^b   Van Doorn, Andrea J ^a   Wijntjes, Maarten W A ^a   Te Pas, Susan F ^c   De Ridder, Huib ^a   Koenderink, Jan J ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b Electrical Engineering Mathematics and Computer Science   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

perspective cues; pictorial depth; Pictorial shape; vision as user interface

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCREENS; HUMAN OBSERVERS; INVERSE OPTICS; PERSPECTIVE CUES; PICTORIAL DEPTH; PICTORIAL SHAPE; VIEWING DISTANCE;

GEOMETRY;

USER INTERFACES;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SIZE PERCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 84863977877     PISSN: 18784755     EISSN: 18784763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/187847611X595891     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Cutting, J. E. (1986). The shape and psychophysics of cinematic space, Behav. Res. Methods, Instrum. Comput. 18, 551-558.
2. Forsyth, D. A. and Ponce, J. (2002). Computer Vision: AModern Approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood, NJ, USA.
3. Gombrich, E. H. (1961). Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
4. Hecht, H., Van Doorn, A. and Koenderink, J. J. (1999). Compression of visual space in natural scenes and in their photographic counterparts, Percept. Psychophys. 61, 1269-1286.
5. Hoffman, D. (2009). The interface theory of perception: natural selection drives true perception to swift extinction, in: Object Categorization: Computer and Human Vision Perspectives, S. Dickinson, M. Tarr, A. Leonardis and B. Schiele (Eds), pp. 148-165. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
6. Ittelson,W. H. (1952). The Ames Demonstrations in Perception. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
7. Koenderink, J. J. (2011). Vision and information, in: Perception Beyond Inference. The Information Content of Visual Processes, L. Albertazzi, G. J. Van Tonder and D. Vishnawath (Eds), pp. 27-57. MIT Press, Bradford Book, Cambridge, MA, USA.
8. Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J. and Todd, J. T. (2009). Wide distribution of external local sign in the normal population, Psychol. Res. 73, 14-22.
9. Konkle, T. and de Oliva, A. (2011). Canonical visual size for real-world objects, J. Exper. Psych.: Human Percept. Perform. 37, 23-37.
10. Lorenz, K. (1973). Die Rückseite des Spiegels: Versuch einer Naturgeschichte des menschlichen Erkennens. Piper-Verlag, München, Germany.
11. Mark, J. T., Marion, B. B. and Hoffman, D. D. (2010). Natural selection and veridical perceptions, J. Theoret. Biol. 266, 504-515.
12. Murase, H. and Nayar, S. K. (1995). Visual learning and recognition of 3-D objects from appearance, Int. J. Comput. Vis. 14, 5-24.
13. Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
14. Panofsky, E. (1925). Die Perspektive als symbolische Form. Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg.
15. Panofsky, E. (1927). Die Perspektive als symbolische Form. B. G. Teubner, Leipzig and Berlin.
16. Panofsky, E. (1991). Perspective as Symbolic Form. Zone Books, New York (English trans.).
17. Perkins, D. N. (1972). Visual discrimination between rectangular and non-rectangular parallelepipeds, Percept. Psychophys. 12, 396-400.
18. Perkins, D. N. (1974). Compensation for distortion in viewing pictures obliquely, Percept. Psychophys. 14, 13-18.
19. Pirenne, M. H. (1970). Optics, Painting and Photography. Cambridge University Press, London, UK.
20. Poggio, T. (1984). Low-level vision as inverse optics, in: Proc. Sympos. Computat. Models Hearing and Vision, M. Rauk (Ed.), pp. 123-127. Academy of Sciences of the Estonian S.S.R., Estonia.
21. Sedgwick, H. A. (1991). The effects of viewpoint on the virtual space of pictures, in: Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments, S. R. Ellis, M. K. Kaiser and A. J. Grunwald (Eds), pp. 460-479. Taylor and Francis, London, UK.
22. Tarr, M. J. and Buelthoff, H. H. (1998). Image-based recognition in man, monkey, and machine, Cognition 67, 1-20. (Pubitemid 128431115)
23. Tinbergen, N. (1951). The Study of Instinct. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
24. Yang, T. and Kubovy, M. (1999). Weakening the robustness of perspective: evidence for a modified theory of compensation in picture perception, Percept. Psychophys. 61, 456-467.