Cognitive comparison of 3D interaction in front of large vs. small displays

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 117-123

  Tyndiuk, F ^a   Lespinet Najib, V ^a   Thomas, G ^b   Schlick, C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^b INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

Cognitive aids; Display size; Interaction; Virtual reality; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DISPLAY DEVICES; USER INTERFACES; VIRTUAL REALITY;

COGNITIVE SCIENCE; DESKTOP DISPLAY; INTERACTION TASK; USERS PERFORMANCE;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 33748676515     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. B. Allen. Individual differences and the conundrums of user-centered design: two experiments. Journal of the american society for information science, 51(6):508-520, 2000.
2. W. Arthur, M. Strong, J. Jordan, J. Williamson, W. Shebilske, and J. Regian. Visual attention: Individual differences in training and predicting complex task performance. Acta psychological, 88:3-23, 1995.
3. L. Backman and R. Dixon. Psychological compensation: A theoretical framework. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2):259-283, 1992.
4. K. Bystrom, W. Barfield, and C. Hendrix. A conceptual model of the sense of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual Environments, 8(2):241-244, 1999.
5. S. Card, T. Moran, and A. Newell. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, 1983.
6. A. Dillon and C. Watson. User analysis in hci: the historical lesson from individual differences research. International Journal of Human computer studies, 45:619-637, 1996.
7. H. Mallot, S. Gillner, S. Van Veen, and H. Blthoff. Behavioral experiments in spatial cognition using virtual reality. Spatial Cognition: an interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1404, 1999.
8. E. Patrick, D. Cosgrove, A. Slavkovic, J. Rode, T. Verratti, and G. Chiselko. Using a large projection screen as an alternative to head-mounted displays for virtual environments. In proceedings of CHI 2000, volume 2, April 2000.
9. M. Posner and S. Boies. Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78(5):391-408, 1971.
10. I. Poupyrev, S. Weghorst, M. Billinghurst, and T. Ichikawa. A framework and testbed for studying manipulation techniques for immersive vr. In In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST), pages 21-28, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1997.
11. M. Schuemie, P. Van der Straaten, M. Krijn, and C. Van der Mast. Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 4(2):183-201, 2001.
12. K. Stanney, R. Mourant, and R. Kennedy. Human factors issues in virtual environments: A review of the literature. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual Environments, 7(4):327-351, August 1998.
13. N. Swaminathan and S. Sato. Interaction design for large displays. Interactions, 4:15-24, 1997.
14. D. Tan. Exploiting the cognitive and social benefits of physically large displays. Master's thesis, School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh Pensylvania, 2004.
15. D. Tan, D. Gergle, P. Scupelli, and R. Pausch. With similar visual angles, larger displays improve spatial performance. In proceedings of CHI 2003, New York, 2003. ACM Press.
16. D. Tan, D. Gergle, P. Scupelli, and R. Pausch. Physically large displays improve path integration in 3d virtual navigation tasks. In In Proceedings of CHI 2004, conference on human factors in computing systems, 2004.
17. B. Witmer and M. Singer. Measuring presence in virtual environment: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3):225-240, 1998. http://mitpress.mit.edu/journals/PRES/ps00734.pdf.
18. P. Zimmermann and B. Fimm. Test for attentional performance. PsyTest, 1994.