Response of native insect communities to invasive plants

Annual Review of Entomology

Volumn 59, Issue , 2014, Pages 119-141

  Bezemer, T Martijn ^a   Harvey, Jeffrey A ^a   Cronin, James T ^b  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY NIOO KNAW   (Netherlands)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Enemy release; Exotic plant; Metapopulation; Natural enemy; Parasitoid; Pollinator; Population dynamics

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIOTA; FOOD CHAIN; HERBIVORY; INSECT; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ANIMALS; BIOTA; FOOD CHAIN; HERBIVORY; INSECTS; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; POLLINATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 84891917548     PISSN: 00664170     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162104     Document Type: Article

References (154)

1. Agosta SJ. 2006. On ecological fitting, plant-insect associations, herbivore host shifts, and host plant selection. Oikos 114:556-65
2. Agrawal AA, Kotanen PM. 2003. Herbivores and the success of exotic plants: A phylogenetically controlled experiment. Ecol. Lett. 6:712-15
3. Agrawal AA, Kotanen PM, Mitchell CE, Power AG, Godsoe W, Klironomos J. 2005. Enemy release? An experiment with congeneric plant pairs and diverse above- And belowground enemies. Ecology 86:2979-89
4. Awmack CS, Leather SR. 2002. Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47:817-44
5. Baguette M, Blanchet S, Legrand D, Stevens VM, Turlure C. 2013. Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 88:310-26
6. Bais HP,Vepachedu R,Gilroy S, Callaway RM, Vivanco JM. 2003. Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion: From molecules and genes to species interactions. Science 301:1377-80
7. Bais HP, Weir TL, Perry LG, Gilroy S, Vivanco JM. 2006. The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57:233-66
8. Bartomeus I, Vila M, Steffan-Dewenter I. 2010. Combined effects of Impatiens glandulifera invasion and landscape structure on native plant pollination. J. Ecol. 98:440-50
9. Bezemer TM, van Dam NM. 2005. Linking aboveground and belowground interactions via induced plant defenses. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:617-24
10. Bowers MD, Stamp NE,Collinge SK. 1992. Early stage of host range expansion by a specialist herbivore, Euphydryas phaeton (Nymphalidae). Ecology 73:526-36
11. Braasch J, Kaplan I. 2012. Over what distance are plant volatiles bioactive? Estimating the spatial dimensions of attraction in an arthropod assemblage. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 145:115-23
12. Brown WP, Zuefle ME. 2009. Does the periodical cicada, Magicicada septendecim, prefer to oviposit on native or exotic plant species? Ecol. Entomol. 34:346-55
13. Cappuccino N, Arnason JT. 2006. Novel chemistry of invasive exotic plants. Biol. Lett. 2:189-93
14. Cappuccino N, Carpenter D. 2005. Invasive exotic plants suffer less herbivory than non-invasive exotic plants. Biol. Lett. 1:435-38
15. Carpenter D, Cappuccino N. 2005. Herbivory, time since introduction and the invasiveness of exotic plants. J. Ecol. 93:315-21
16. Carroll SP, Boyd C. 1992. Host race radiation in the soapberry bug: Natural history with the history. Evolution 46:1052-69
17. Carroll SP, Fox CW. 2007. Dissecting the evolutionary impacts of plant invasions: Bugs and beetles as native guides. Glob. Change Biol. 13:1644-57
18. Castells E, Berenbaum MR. 2008. Resistance of the generalist moth Trichoplusia ni (Noctuidae) to a novel chemical defense in the invasive plant Conium maculatum. Chemoecology 18:11-18
19. Chapman RF. 2003. Contact chemoreception in feeding by phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 48:455-84
20. Chase JM, Amarasekare P, Cottenie K, Gonzales A, Holt RD, et al. 2005. Competing theories for competitive metacommunities. In Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities, ed.M Holyoak, MA Leibold, RD Holt, pp. 335-54. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
21. Chew FS. 1981. Coexistence and local extinction in two pierid butterflies. Am. Nat. 118:655-72
22. Chittka L, Schurkens S. 2001. Successful invasion of a floral market - An exotic Asian plant has moved in on Europe's river-banks by bribing pollinators. Nature 411:653-53
23. Chun YJ, Van Kleunen M, Dawson W. 2010. The role of enemy release, tolerance and resistance in plant invasions: Linking damage to performance. Ecol. Lett. 13:937-46
24. Cincotta CL, Adams JM, Holzapfel C. 2009. Testing the enemy release hypothesis: A comparison of foliar insect herbivory of the exotic Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.) and the native sugar maple (A. saccharum L.). Biol. Invasions 11:379-88
25. Colautti RI, Ricciardi A, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ. 2004. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol. Lett. 7:721-33
26. Coley PD, Aide TM. 1991. Comparison of herbivory and plant defense in temperate and tropical broadleaved forests. In Plant-Animal Interactions: Evolutionary Ecology in Tropical and Temperate Regions, ed.PW Price, pp. 25-49. New York: Wiley
27. Cronin JT 2004. Host-parasitoid extinction and colonization in a fragmented prairie landscape. Oecologia 139:503-14
28. Cronin JT. 2007. From population sources to sieves: The matrix alters host-parasitoid source-sink structure. Ecology 88:2966-76
29. Cronin JT, Haynes KJ. 2004. An invasive plant promotes unstable host-parasitoid patch dynamics. Ecology 85:2772-82
30. Cronin JT, Reeve JD. 2005. Host-parasitoid spatial ecology: A plea for a landscape-level synthesis. Proc. R. Soc. B 272:2225-35
31. Dangremond EM, Pardini EA, Knight TM. 2010. Apparent competition with an invasive plant hastens the extinction of an endangered lupine. Ecology 91:2261-71
32. Davalos A, Blossey B. 2011. Matrix habitat and plant damage influence colonization of purple loosestrife patches by specialist leaf beetles. Environ. Entomol. 40:1074-80
33. Dempster JP, Atkinson DA, French MC. 1995. The spatial population dynamics of insects exploiting a patchy food resource. II. Movements between patches. Oecologia 104:354-62
34. Dethier VG. 1980. Food-aversion learning in two polyphagous caterpillars, Diacrisia virginica and Estigmene congrua. Physiol. Entomol. 5:321-25
35. DickeM. 1999. Are herbivore-induced plant volatiles reliable indicators of herbivore identity to foraging carnivorous arthropods? Entomol. Exp. Appl. 91:131-42
36. Dietzsch AC, Stanley DA, Stout JC. 2011. Relative abundance of an invasive alien plant affects native pollination processes. Oecologia 167:469-79
37. Dillemuth FP, Rietschier EA, Cronin JT. 2009. Patch dynamics of a native grass in relation to the spread of invasive smooth brome (Bromus inermis). Biol. Invasions 11:1381-91
38. Ding JQ, Blossey B. 2009. Differences in preference and performance of the water lily leaf beetle, Galerucella nymphaeae, populations on native and introduced aquatic plants. Environ. Entomol. 38:1653-60
39. Dost́al P, Allan E, Dawson W, Van Kleunen M, Bartish I, Fisher M. 2013. Enemy damage of exotic plant species is similar to that of natives and increases with productivity. J. Ecol. 101:388-99
40. Ehrenfeld JG. 2010. Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 41:59-80
41. Elton CS. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. London: Methuen
42. Engelkes T, Wouters B, Bezemer TM, Harvey JA, Van der PuttenWH. 2012. Contrasting patterns of herbivore and predator pressure on invasive and native plants. Basic Appl. Ecol. 13:725-34
43. Ernst CM, Cappuccino N. 2005. The effect of an invasive alien vine, Vincetoxicum rossicum (Asclepiadaceae), on arthropod populations in Ontario old fields. Biol. Invasions 7:417-25
44. Eycott AE, Stewart GB, Buyung-Ali LM, Bowler DE,Watts K, Pullin AS. 2012. A meta-analysis on the impact of different matrix structures on species movement rates. Landsc. Ecol. 27:1263-78
45. Fielding DJ, Conn JS. 2011. Feeding preference for and impact on an invasive weed (Crepis tectorum) by a native, generalist insect herbivore, Melanoplus borealis (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 104:1303-8
46. Forister ML, Scholl CF. 2012. Use of an exotic host plant affects mate choice in an insect herbivore. Am. Nat. 179:805-10
47. Fortuna TM, Vet LEM, Harvey JA. 2012. Effects of an invasive plant on the performance of two parasitoids with different host exploitation strategies. Biol. Control 62:213-20
48. Fortuna TM, Woelke JB, Hordijk CA, Jansen JJ, Van Dam NM, et al. 2013. A tritrophic approach to the preference-performance hypothesis involving an exotic and a native plant. Biol. Invas. 15:2387-401
49. Frenzel M, Brandl R. 2003. Diversity and abundance patterns of phytophagous insect communities on alien and native host plants in the Brassicaceae. Ecography 26:723-30
50. Garćia-Robledo C, Horvitz CC. 2011. Experimental demography and the vital rates of generalist and specialist insect herbivores on native and novel host plants. J. Anim. Ecol. 80:976-89
51. Gibson MR, Richardson DM, Pauw A. 2012. Can floral traits predict an invasive plant's impact on native plant-pollinator communities? J. Ecol. 100:1216-23
52. Gratton C, Denno RF. 2006. Arthropod food web restoration following removal of an invasive wetland plant. Ecol. Appl. 16:622-31
53. Graves SD, Shapiro AM. 2003. Exotics as host plants of the California butterfly fauna. Biol. Conserv. 110:413-33
54. Hagen EN, Bakker JD, Gara RI. 2010. Aerial arthropod communities of native and invaded forests, Robinson Crusoe Island, Chile. Environ. Entomol. 39:1159-64
55. Hambäck PA, Stenberg JA, Ericson L. 2006. Asymmetric indirect interactions mediated by a shared parasitoid: Connecting species traits and local distribution patterns for two chrysomelid beetles. Oecologia 148:475-81
56. Han XM, Dendy SP, Garrett KA, Fang L, Smith MD 2008. Comparison of damage to native and exotic tallgrass prairie plants by natural enemies. Plant Ecol. 198:197-210
57. Hanski I. 1999. Metapopulation Ecology. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
58. Hanula JL, Horn S. 2011. Removing an invasive shrub (Chinese privet) increases native bee diversity and abundance in riparian forests of the southeastern United States. Insect Conserv. Divers. 4:275-83
59. Hartley MK, Rogers WE, Siemann E. 2010. Comparisons of arthropod assemblages on an invasive and native trees: Abundance, diversity and damage. Arthropod Plant Interact. 4:237-45
60. Harvey JA. 2005. Factors affecting the evolution of development strategies in parasitoid wasps: The importance of functional constraints and incorporating complexity. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 117:1-13
61. Harvey JA, Biere A, Fortuna T, Vet LEM, Engelkes T, et al. 2010. Ecological fits, mis-fits and lotteries involving insect herbivores on the invasive plant, Bunias orientalis. Biol. Invasions 12:3045-59
62. Harvey JA, Bukovinszky T, van der Putten WH. 2010. Interactions between invasive plants and insect herbivores: A plea for a multitrophic perspective. Biol. Conserv. 143:2251-59
63. Harvey JA, Fortuna TM. 2012. Chemical and structural effects of invasive plants on herbivoreparasitoid/ predator interactions in native communities. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 144:14-26
64. Harvey JA, Gols R. 2011. Development of Mamestra brassicae and its solitary endoparasitoid Microplitis mediator on two populations of the invasive weed Bunias orientalis. Popul. Ecol. 53:587-96
65. Harvey KJ, Nipperess DA, Britton DR, Hughes L. 2012. Australian family ties: Does a lack of relatives help invasive plants escape natural enemies? Biol. Invasions 14:2423-34
66. Hawkes CV. 2007. Are invaders moving targets? The generality and persistence of advantages in size, reproduction, and enemy release in invasive plant specieswith time since introduction. Am.Nat. 170:832-43
67. Haynes KJ, Cronin JT 2003. Matrix composition affects the spatial ecology of a prairie planthopper. Ecology 84:2856-66
68. Haynes KJ, Cronin JT. 2006. Interpatch movement and edge effects: The role of behavioral responses to the landscape matrix. Oikos 113:43-54
69. He KS, RocchiniD,Neteler M, Nagendra H. 2011. Benefits of hyperspectral remote sensing for tracking plant invasions. Divers. Distrib. 17:381-92
70. Hein AM, Gillooly JF. 2011. Predators, prey, and transient states in the assembly of spatially structured communities. Ecology 92:549-55
71. Herrera AM,Carruthers RI, Mills NJ. 2011. No evidence for increased performance of a specialist psyllid on invasive French broom. Acta Oecol. 37:79-86
72. Hierro JL, Callaway RM. 2003. Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion. Plant Soil 256:29-39
73. Hierro JL,Maron JL,Callaway RM. 2005.Abiogeographical approach to plant invasions: The importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. J. Ecol. 93:5-15
74. Hochkirch A, Mertes T, Rautenberg J. 2012. Conspecific flowers of Sinapis arvensis are stronger competitors for pollinators than those of the invasive weed Bunias orientalis. Naturwissenschaften 99:217-24
75. Holt RD, Lawton JH. 1993. Apparent competition and enemy-free space in insect host-parasitoid communities. Am. Nat. 142:623-45
76. Huey RB, Gilchrist GW, Hendry AP. 2005. Using invasive species to study evolution: Case studies with Drosophila and salmon. In Species Invasions: Insights into Ecology, Evolution, and Biogeography, ed. DF Sax, JJ Stachowicz, SD Gaines, pp. 139-64. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
77. Ims RA, Yaccoz NG. 1997. Studying Transfer Processes in Metapopulations: Emigration, Migration, and Colonization. London: Academic
78. Isaacs R, Tuell J, Fiedler A, Gardiner M, Landis D. 2009. Maximizing arthropod-mediated ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: The role of native plants. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7:196-203
79. Jogesh T, CarpenterD, CappuccinoN. 2008. Herbivory on invasive exotic plants and their non-invasive relatives. Biol. Invasions 10:797-804
80. Johnson SD, Peter CI, Nilsson LA, Agren J. 2003. Pollination success in a deceptive orchid is enhanced by co-occurring rewarding magnet plants. Ecology 84:2919-27
81. Jonsen ID, Bourchier RS, Roland J. 2001. The influence of matrix habitat on Aphthona flea beetle immigration to leafy spurge patches. Oecologia 127:287-94
82. Kaartinen R, Roslin T. 2011. Shrinking by numbers: Landscape context affects the species composition but not the quantitative structure of local food webs. J. Anim. Ecol. 80:622-31
83. Kaiser-Bunbury C,Müller C. 2009. Indirect interactions between invasive and native plants via pollinators. Naturwissenschaften 96:339-46
84. Kandori I, Hirao T, Matsunaga S, Kurosaki T. 2009. An invasive dandelion unilaterally reduces the reproduction of a native congener through competition for pollination. Oecologia 159:559-69
85. Karban R, Baldwin IT, Baxter KJ, Laue G, Felton GW. 2000. Communication between plants: Induced resistance in wild tobacco plants following clipping of neighboring sagebrush. Oecologia 125:66-71
86. Keane RM, Crawley MJ. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:164-70
87. Kearns CA, InouyeDW,WaserNM. 1998. Endangered mutualisms: The conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29:83-112
88. Keeler MS,Chew FS. 2008. Escaping an evolutionary trap: Preference and performance of a native insect on an exotic invasive host. Oecologia 156:559-68
89. Kingsolver JG. 1985. Thermoregulatory significance of wing melanization in Pieris butterflies (Lepidoptera: Pieridae): Physics, posture, and pattern. Oecologia 66:546-53
90. Lau JA, Strauss SY. 2005. Insect herbivores drive important indirect effects of exotic plants on native communities. Ecology 86:2990-97
91. Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, et al. 2004. The metacommunity concept: A framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7:601-13
92. Liu H, Stiling P. 2006. Testing the enemy release hypothesis: A review and meta-analysis. Biol. Invasions 8:1535-45
93. LiuH, Stiling P, Pemberton RW. 2007. Does enemy release matter for invasive plants? Evidence from a comparison of insect herbivore damage among invasive, non-invasive and native congeners. Biol. Invasions 9:773-81
94. Liu H, Stiling P, Pemberton RW, Pena J. 2006. Insect herbivore faunal diversity among invasive, noninvasive and native Eugenia species: Implications for the enemy release hypothesis. Fla. Entomol. 89:475-84
95. Logue JB, Mouquet N, Peter H, Hillebrand H, Metacommunity Work. Group. 2011. Empirical approaches to metacommunities: A review and comparison with theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26:482-91
96. Lopezaraiza-Mikel ME, Hayes RB, Whalley MR, Memmott J. 2007. The impact of an alien plant on a native plant-pollinator network: An experimental approach. Ecol. Lett. 10:539-50
97. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA. 2000. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10:689-710
98. Mangla S, Inderjit, Callaway RM. 2008. Exotic invasive plant accumulates native soil pathogens which inhibit native plants. J. Ecol. 96:58-67
99. Maron JL, Vila M. 2001. When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95:361-73
100. Meiners SJ. 2007. Native and exotic plant species exhibit similar population dynamics during succession. Ecology 88:1098-104
101. Meiners T, Obermaier E. 2004. Hide and seek on two spatial scales - Vegetation structure effects herbivore oviposition and egg parasitism. Basic Appl. Ecol. 5:87-94
102. Memmott J, Waser NM. 2002. Integration of alien plants into a native flower-pollinator visitation web. Proc. R. Soc. B 269:2395-99
103. Moles AT, Bonser SP, Poore AGB, Wallis IR, Foley WJ. 2011. Assessing the evidence for latitudinal gradients in plant defence and herbivory. Funct. Ecol. 25:380-88
104. Montero-Castaño A, Vila M. 2012. Impact of landscape alteration and invasions on pollinators: A metaanalysis. J. Ecol. 100:884-93
105. Morales CL, Traveset A. 2009. A meta-analysis of impacts of alien versus native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co-flowering native plants. Ecol. Lett. 12:716-28
106. Morón D, Lenda M, Sḱ orka P, Szentgyörgyi H, Settele J, Woyciechowski M. 2009. Wild pollinator communities are negatively affected by invasion of alien goldenrods in grassland landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 142:1322-32
107. Müller C. 2009. Role of glucosinolates in plant invasiveness. Phytochem. Rev. 8:227-42
108. NovotnyV,Miller SE, Cizek L, Leps J, Janda M, et al. 2003. Colonising aliens: Caterpillars (Lepidoptera) feeding on Piper aduncum and P. umbellatum in rainforests of PapuaNewGuinea. Ecol. Entomol. 28:704-16
109. Ode PJ. 2006. Plant chemistry and natural enemy fitness: Effects on herbivore and natural enemy interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51:163-85
110. Orrock JL, Christopher CC, Dutra HP. 2012. Seed bank survival of an invasive species, but not of two native species, declines with invasion. Oecologia 168:1103-10
111. Parker IM, Gilbert GS. 2007. When there is no escape: The effects of natural enemies on native, invasive, and noninvasive plants. Ecology 88:1210-24
112. Parker JD, Burkepile DE, Hay ME. 2006. Opposing effects of native and exotic herbivores on plant invasions. Science 311:1459-61
113. Parker JD, Hay ME. 2005. Biotic resistance to plant invasions? Native herbivores prefer non-native plants. Ecol. Lett. 8:959-67
114. Pennings SC, Ho CK, Salgado CS, Wieski K, Dave N, et al. 2009. Latitudinal variation in herbivore pressure in Atlantic Coast salt marshes. Ecology 90:183-95
115. Pergl J, Müllerov́a J, Perglov́a I, Herben T, Pyšek P. 2011. The role of long-distance seed dispersal in the local population dynamics of an invasive plant species. Divers. Distrib. 17:725-38
116. Powell KI,KrakosKN, KnightTM.2011. Comparing the reproductive success and pollination biology of an invasive plant to its rare and common native congeners: A case study in the genus Cirsium (Asteraceae). Biol. Invasions 13:905-17
117. Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, Mcpheron BA, Thompson JN, Weis AE. 1980. Interactions among three trophic levels: Influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11:41-65
118. Procheş S,Wilson JRU, Richardson DM, Chown SL. 2008. Herbivores, but not other insects, are scarce on alien plants. Austral Ecol. 33:691-700
119. Pyšek P, Jaroš́ik V, ChytŕyM, Danihelka J, Kühn I, et al. 2011. Successful invaders co-opt pollinators of native flora and accumulate insect pollinators with increasing residence time. Ecol. Monogr. 81:277-93
120. RecartW,Ackerman JD, Cuevas AA. 2013. There goes the neighborhood: Apparent competition between invasive and native orchids mediated by a specialist florivorous weevil. Biol. Invasions 15:283-93
121. Reeve JD, Cronin JT. 2010. Edge behaviour in a minute parasitic wasp. J. Anim. Ecol. 79:483-90
122. Reeve JD, Cronin JT, Haynes KJ. 2008. Diffusion models for animals in complex landscapes: Incorporating heterogeneity among substrates, individuals and edge behaviours. J. Anim. Ecol. 77:898-904
123. Roschewitz I, HückerM, Tscharntke T, Thies C. 2005. The influence of landscape context and farming practices on parasitism of cereal aphids. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 108:218-27
124. Russell FL, Louda SM, Rand TA, Kachman SD. 2007. Variation in herbivore-mediated indirect effects of an invasive plant on a native plant. Ecology 88:413-23
125. Schemske DW, Mittelbach GG, Cornell HV, Sobel JM, Roy K. 2009. Is there a latitudinal gradient in the importance of biotic interactions? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40:245-69
126. Schlaepfer MA, Sherman PW, Blossey B, Runge MC. 2005. Introduced species as evolutionary traps. Ecol. Lett. 8:241-46
127. Shapiro AM. 2002. The Californian urban butterfly fauna is dependent on alien plants. Divers. Distrib. 8:31-40
128. Siemann E, Rogers WE, Dewalt SJ. 2006. Rapid adaptation of insect herbivores to an invasive plant. Proc. R. Soc. B 273:2763-69
129. Stamp NE, Bowers MD. 1993. Presence of predatory wasps and stinkbugs alters foraging behavior of cryptic and non-cryptic caterpillars on plantain (Plantago lanceolata). Oecologia 95:376-84
130. Stone C, Chisholm L, Coops N. 2001. Spectral reflectance characteristics of eucalypt foliage damaged by insects. Aust. J. Bot. 49:687-98
131. Stout JC,Morales CL. 2009. Ecological impacts of invasive alien species on bees. Apidologie 40:388-409
132. Strauss SY, Lau JA, Carroll SP. 2006. Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: What do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecol. Lett. 9:354-71
133. Strayer DL. 2012. Eight questions about invasions and ecosystem functioning. Ecol. Lett. 15:1199-210
134. Suwa T, Louda SM. 2012. Combined effects of plant competition and insect herbivory hinder invasiveness of an introduced thistle. Oecologia 169:467-76
135. Tallamy DW, Ballard M, Dámico V. 2010. Can alien plants support generalist insect herbivores? Biol. Invasions 12:2285-92
136. TallamyDW, Shropshire KJ. 2009. Ranking lepidopteran use of native versus introduced plants. Conserv. Biol. 23:941-47
137. Thies C, Roschewitz I, Tscharntke T. 2005. The landscape context of cereal aphid-parasitoid interactions. Proc. R. Soc. B 272:203-10
138. Thijs KW, Brys R, Verboven HAF, Hermy M. 2012. The influence of an invasive plant species on the pollination success and reproductive output of three riparian plant species. Biol. Invasions 14:355-65
139. Tscharntke T, Brandl R. 2004. Plant-insect interactions in fragmented landscapes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 49:405-30
140. Valdovinos FS, Ramos-Jiliberto R, Flores JD, Espinoza C, Ló pez G. 2009. Structure and dynamics of pollination networks: The role of alien plants. Oikos 118:1190-200
141. Vanparys V, Meerts P, Jacquemart AL. 2008. Plant-pollinator interactions: Comparison between an invasive and a native congeneric species. Acta Oecol. 34:361-69
142. Vet LEM, DickeM. 1992. Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37:141-72
143. Vila M, Bartomeus I, Dietzsch AC, Petanidou T, Steffan-Dewenter I, et al. 2009. Invasive plant integration into native plant-pollinator networks across Europe. Proc. R. Soc. B 276:3887-93
144. Vinson SB. 1976. Host selection by insect parasitoids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 21:109-33
145. Vitousek PM, Dantonio CM, Loope LL, Rejmanek M, Westbrooks R. 1997. Introduced species: A significant component of human-caused global change. N. Z. J. Ecol. 21:1-16
146. Wagner DL, Van Driesche RG. 2010. Threats posed to rare or endangered insects by invasions of nonnative species. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55:547-68
147. Watling JI, Nowakowski AJ, Donnelly MA, Orrock JL. 2011. Meta-analysis reveals the importance of matrix composition for animals in fragmented habitat. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20:209-17
148. White EM, Sims NM, Clarke AR. 2008. Test of the enemy release hypothesis: The native magpie moth prefers a native fireweed (Senecio pinnatifolius) to its introduced congener (S. madagascariensis). Austral Ecol. 33:110-16
149. White EM, Wilson JC, Clarke AR. 2006. Biotic indirect effects: A neglected concept in invasion biology. Divers. Distrib. 12:443-55
150. Wiens JA. 1997. Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology. In Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution, ed. I Hanski, ME Gilpin, pp. 43-62. San Diego, CA: Academic
151. Wingfield MJ, Roux J, Wingfield BD. 2011. Insect pests and pathogens of Australian acacias grown as non-natives - An experiment in biogeography with far-reaching consequences. Divers. Distrib. 17:968-77
152. Youngentob KN, Renzullo LJ, Held AA, Jia XP, Lindenmayer DB, Foley WJ. 2012. Using imaging spectroscopy to estimate integrated measures of foliage nutritional quality. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3:416-26
153. Zollner PA,Lima SL. 1999. Search strategies for landscape-level interpatch movements. Ecology 80:1019-30
154. Zuefle ME, Brown WP, TallamyDW. 2008. Effects of non-native plants on the native insect community of Delaware. Biol. Invasions 10:1159-69