Insect herbivore faunal diversity among invasive, non-invasive and native Eugenia species: Implications for the enemy release hypothesis

Florida Entomologist

Volumn 89, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 475-484

  Liu, Hong ^a,d   Stiling, Peter ^a   Pemberton, Robert W ^b   Peña, Jorge ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b INVASIVE PLANT RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological invasion; Endophagous insect; Herbivore fauna; Introduced species; Invasive species; Non invasive species; Oligophagous insects

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; DICOTYLEDON; HERBIVORE; INSECT; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; PLANT-INSECT INTERACTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES RICHNESS;

FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

HEXAPODA; MYRTACEAE;

EID: 33847160429     PISSN: 00154040     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1653/0015-4040(2006)89[475:IHFDAI]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. AGRAWAL, A. A., AND P. M. KOTANEN. 2003. Herbivores and the success of exotic plants: a phylogenetically controlled experiment. Ecol. Lett. 6: 712-715.
2. BLOSSEY, B., AND R. NÖTZOLD. 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants - a hypothesis. J. Ecol. 83: 887-889.
3. BÜRKI, C. B., AND W. NENTWIG. 1997. Comparison of herbivore insect communities of Heracleum sphondylium and H. mantegazzianum in Switzerland (Spermatophyta: Apicaceae). Entomologia Generalis 22: 147-155
4. CAPPUCCINO, N., AND D. CARPENTER. 2005. Invasive exotic plants suffer less herbivory than non-invasive exotic plants. Biol. Lett. 1: 435-438.
5. CARPENTER, D., AND N. CAPPUCCINO. 2005. Herbivory, time since introduction and the invasiveness of exotic plants. J. Ecol. 93: 215-321.
6. COLAUTII, R. I., A. RICCIARDI, I. A. GRIGOROVICH, AND H. J. MACISAAC. 2004. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol. Lett. 7: 721-733.
7. CRAWLEY, M. J. 1997. Plant Ecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
8. DEWALT, S. J., J. S. DENSLOW, AND K. ICKES. 2004. Natural-enemy release facilitates habitat expansion of the invasive tropical shrub Clidemia hirta. Ecology 85: 471-483.
9. FRENZEL, M., AND R. BRANDL. 1998. Diversity and composition of phytophagous insect guilds on Brassicaceae. Oecologia 113: 391-399.
10. GANN, G. D., K. A. BRADLEY, AND S. W. WOODMANSEE. 2001. Floristic inventory of south Florida database. Institute for Regional Conservation, Miami.
11. HINZ, H. L., AND M. SCHWARZLAENDER. 2004. Comparing invasive plants from their native and exotic range: what can we learn for biological control? Weed Tech. 18: 1533-1541.
12. JOSHI, J., AND K. VRIELING. 2005 The enemy release and EICA hypothesis revisited: incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores. Ecol. Lett. 8: 704-714.
13. KEANE, R. M., AND M. J. CRAWLEY. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evo. 17: 164-170.
14. LEVINE, J. M., P. B. ADLER, AND S. G. YELENIK. 2004. A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 7: 975-989.
15. LINDELÖW, A., AND C. BJÖRKMAN. 2001. Insects on lodgepole pine in Sweden - current knowledge and potential risks. For. Ecol. Manage. 141: 107-116.
16. LIU, H. AND P. STILING. 2006. Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a review and meta-analysis. Biol. Invasions 8: 1535-1545.
17. MAIA, V. C., M. S. MENDONCA JR., AND H. P. ROMANOWSKI. 1996. Eugeniamyia dispar gen.n. and sp.n. (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae, Lasiopteridi) associated with Eugenia uniflora L. (Myrtaceae) in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 13: 1087-1090.
18. MARON, J. L., AND M. VILÀ. 2001. When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95: 361-373.
19. MARTIN, F. W., C. W. CAMPBELL, AND R. M. RUBERTE. 1987. Perennial edible fruits of the tropics - an inventory. Agriculture Handbook No. 642. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.
20. MITCHELL, C. E., A. A. AGRAWAL, J. D. BEVER, G. S. GILBERT, R. A. HUFBAUER, J. N. KLIRONOMOS, J. L. MARON, W. F. MORRIS, I. M. PARKER, A. G. POWER, E. W. SEABLOOM, M. E. TORCHIN, AND D. P. VAZQUEZ. 2006. Biotic interactions and plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 9: 726-740.
21. MITCHELL, C. E. AND A. G. POWER. 2003. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421: 625-627.
22. PARKER, J. D., D. E. BURKEPILE, AND M. E. HAY. 2006. Opposing effects of native and Exotic herbivores on plant invasions. Science 311: 1459-1461.
23. RUEHLE, G. D., H. MOWRY, L. R. TOY, AND H. S. WOLFE. 1958. Miscellaneous tropical and subtropical Florida fruits. Revised by G. D. Ruehle. Florida Agriculture Exp. Sta.Bull. 156A: 116.
24. SCHALL, R. 2000 (November 4). New Pest Advisory Group Data: Myllocerus undatus, an Asian Grey Weevil. United States Department of Agriculture, APHIS, PPQ.
25. SCHIERENBECK, K. A., R. N. MACK, AND R. R. SHARITZ. 1994. Effects of herbivory on growth and biomass allocation in native and introduced species of Lonicera. Ecology 75: 1661-1672.
26. SIEMANN, E., AND W. E. ROGERS. 2001. Genetic differences in growth of an invasive tree species. Ecol. Lett. 4: 514-518.
27. SIEMANN, E., AND W. E. ROGERS. 2003. Herbivory, disease, recruitment limitation, and success of alien and native tree species. Ecology 84: 1489-1505.
28. SNYDER, J. R., A. HERNDON, AND W. B. ROBERTSON. 1990. South Florida rockland, pp. 230-277 In R. L. Myers and J. J. Ewel [eds.], Ecosystems of Florida. Univ. of Central Florida Press, Tampa.
29. STASTNY, M., U. SCHAFFNER, AND E. ELLE. 2005. Do vigour of introduced populations and escape from specialist herbivores contribute to invasiveness? J. Ecol. 93:27-37.
30. STRONG, D. R., J. H. LAWTON, AND R. SOUTHWOOD. 1984. Insects on Plants: Community Patterns and Mechanisms. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
31. TORCHIN, M. E., AND C. E. MITCHELL. 2004. Parasites, pathogens, and invasions by plants and animals. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2: 183-190.
32. WILLIAMS, J. R. 1954. The biological control of weeds, pp. 95-98 In Report of the Sixth Commonwealth Entomological Congress, London.
33. WILLIAMSON, M. 1996. Biological Invasions. Chapman and Hall, London.
34. WOLFE, L. M. 2002. Why alien invaders succeed: support for the escape-from-enemy hypothesis. American Nat. 160: 705-711.
35. WOLFE, L. M., J. A. ELZINGA, AND A. BIERE. 2004. Increased susceptibility to enemies following introduction in the invasive plant Silene latifolia. Ecol. Lett. 7: 813-820.
36. WUNDERLIN, R. P., AND B. F. HANSEN. 2003. Guide to the Vascular Plants of Florida. 2nd ed. Univ. Press of Florida, Gainesville.
37. ZAR, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall International, Upper Saddle River.