Combined effects of Impatiens glandulifera invasion and landscape structure on native plant pollination

Journal of Ecology

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 440-450

  Bartomeus, Ignasi ^a   Vilà, Montserrat ^b   Steffan Dewenter, Ingolf ^c  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Alien plant; Bumblebees; Competition; Invasive plants; Landscape complexity; Landscape context; Mass flowering; Pollination services; Pollinator diversity; Raphanus sativus

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; AGRICULTURAL LAND; BEE; CACTUS; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DATA ACQUISITION; ENDANGERED SPECIES; FLOWER VISITING; FLY; HABITAT LOSS; HERB; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INVASIVE SPECIES; LAND COVER; LAND USE; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; NATIVE SPECIES; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POLLINATION; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; SEED; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

APIS MELLIFERA; APOIDEA; IMPATIENS; IMPATIENS GLANDULIFERA; RAPHANUS SATIVUS;

EID: 77749279706     PISSN: 00220477     EISSN: 13652745     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01629.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Aguilar R, Ashworth L, Galetto L, Aizen MA. Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 2006, 9:968-980.
2. Aizen MA, Asworth L, Galetto L. Reproductive success in fragmented habitats: do compatibility systems and pollination specialization matter? Journal of Vegetation Science 2002, 13:885-892.
3. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1974, 19:716-723.
4. Albrecht M, Duelli P, Müller C, Kleijn D, Schmid B. The Swiss agri-environment scheme enhances pollinator diversity and plant reproductive success in nearby intensively managed farmland. Journal of Applied Ecology 2007, 44:813-822.
5. Arbuckle JL. Amos 5.0 Update to the Amos User's Guide 2003, Smallwaters Corporation, Chicago, IL
6. Bartomeus I, Bosch J, Vilà M. High invasive pollen transfer, yet low deposition on native stigmas in a Carpobrotus-invaded community. Annals of Botany 2008a, 102:417-424.
7. Bartomeus I, Vilà M, Santamaría L. Contrasting effects of invasive plants in plant-pollinator networks. Oecologia 2008b, 155:761-770.
8. Beerling DJ. The impact of temperature on the northern distribution limits of the introduced species Fallopia japonica and Impatiens glandulifera in North-West Europe. Journal of Biogeography 1993, 20:45-53.
9. Beerling DJ, Perrins JM. Biological flora of British Isles: Impatiens glandulifera. Journal of Ecology 1993, 81:367-382.
10. Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SPM, Reemer M, Ohlemuller R, Edwards M, Peeters T, Schaffers AP, Potts SG, Kleukers R, Thomas CD, Settele J, Kunin WE. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 2006, 313:351-354.
11. Bjerknes AL, Totland O, Hegland SJ, Nielsen A. Do alien plant invasions really affect pollination success in native plant species? Biological Conservation 2007, 138:1-12.
12. Brown BJ, Mitchell RJ, Graham SA. Competition for pollination between an invasive species (Purple loosestrife) and a native congener. Ecology 2002, 83:2328-2336.
13. Burd M. Bateman's principle and reproduction: the role of pollinator limitation in fruit and seed set. Botanical Review 1994, 60:83-139.
14. Cariveau DP, Norton AP. Spatially contingent interactions between an exotic and native plant mediated through flower visitors. Oikos 2009, 118:107-114.
15. Carvalheiro LG, Barbosa ERM, Memmott J. Pollinator networks, alien species and the conservation of rare plants: Trinia glauca as a case study. Journal of Applied Ecology 2008, 45:1419-1427.
16. Celesti-Grapow L, Di Marzio P, Blasi C. Temporal niche separation of the alien flora of Rome. Plant Invasions: Ecological Threats and Management Solutions 2003, 101-111. Child LE, Brock JH, Brundu GPrack KPyšek PWade PMWilliamson M. eds, pp, Backhuys, Leiden
17. Chittka L, Schürkens S. Successful invasion of a floral market. Nature 2001, 411:653-653.
18. Conner JK, Davis R, Rush S. The effect of wild radish floral morphology on pollination efficiency by four taxa of pollinators. Oecologia 1995, 104:234-245.
19. Crawley MJ. Statistical Computing. An Introduction to Data Analysis Using S-Plus 2002, Wiley, Chichester, UK
20. Dicks LV, Corbet SA, Pywell RF. Compartmentalization in plant-insect flower visitor webs. Journal of Animal Ecology 2002, 71:32-43.
21. Ellstrand NC. Multiple paternity within the fruits of the Wild Radish, Raphanus sativus. The American Naturalist 1984, 123:819-828.
22. Gathmann A, Tscharntke T. Foraging ranges of solitary bees. Journal of Animal Ecology 2002, 71:757-764.
23. Grace JB. Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems 2006, Cambridge university press, Cambridge, UK
24. Hejda M, Pyšek P. What is the impact of Impatiens glandulifera on species diversity of invaded riparian vegetation? Biological Conservation 2006, 132:143-152.
25. Herrmann F, Westphal C, Moritz RB, Steffan-Dewenter I. Genetic diversity and mass resources promote colony size and forager densities of a social bee (Bombus pascuorum) in agricultural landscapes. Molecular Ecology 2007, 16:1167-1178.
26. Hobbs RJ. Land-use changes and invasions. Invasive Species in a Changing World 2000, 31-54. Mooney HAHobbs RJ. eds, pp, Island Press, Washington, DC
27. Hulme PE, Bremner ET. Assessing the impact of Impatiens glandulifera on riparian habitats: partitioning diversity components following species removal. Journal of Applied Ecology 2006, 43:43-50.
28. Kearns CA, Inouye DW, Waser NM. Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1998, 29:83-112.
29. Klein AM, Vaissière BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 2007, 274:303-313.
30. Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren B, Lebuhn G, Minckley R. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land use change. Ecology Letters 2007, 10:299-314.
31. Larson DL, Royer RA, Royer MR. Insect visitation and pollen deposition in an invaded prairie plant community. Biological Conservation 2006, 130:148-159.
32. Lloret F, Médail F, Brundu IC, Moragues E, Rita J, Lambdon P, Hulme PE. Species attributes and invasion success by alien plants on Mediterranean islands. Journal of Ecology 2005, 93:512-520.
33. Lopezaraiza-Mikel ME, Hayes RB, Whalley MR, Memmott J. The impact of an alien plant on a native plant-pollinator network: an experimental approach. Ecology Letters 2007, 10:539-550.
34. Memmott J, Waser NM. Integration of alien plants into a native flower-pollinator visitation web. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 2002, 269:2395-2399.
35. Moragues E, Traveset A. Effect of Carpobrotus spp. on the pollination success of native plant species of the Balearic Islands. Biological Conservation 2005, 122:611-619.
36. Pyšek P. Invasion dynamics of Impatiens gladulifera. A century of spreading reconstructed. Biological Conservation 2005, 74:41-48.
37. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2008, http://www.R-project.org, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available at:
38. Rathcke B. Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. Pollination Biology 1983, 305-329. Real LA. ed, pp, Academic Press, New York, NY
39. Rathcke B. Interactions for pollination among co-flowering shrubs. Ecology 1988, 69:446-457.
40. Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 2000, 287:1770-1774.
41. Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Tscharntke T. Pollination, seed set and seed predation on a landscape scale. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 2001, 268:685-1690.
42. Steffan-Dewenter I, Potts SG, Packer L. Pollinator diversity and crop pollination services are at risk. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2005, 20:651-652.
43. Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T. Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia 1999, 121:432-440.
44. Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Bürger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T. Scale-dependent effects of landscape structure on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 2002, 83:1421-1432.
45. Totland O, Nielsen A, Bjerknes AL, Ohlson M. Effects of an exotic plant and habitat disturbance on pollinator visitation and reproduction in a boreal forest herb. American Journal of Botany 2006, 93:868-873.
46. Traveset A, Richardson DM. Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2006, 21:208-216.
47. Valentine DH. Ecological criteria in plant taxonomy. Essays in Plant Taxonomy 1978, 1-18. Street HE. ed, p, Academic Press, London
48. Vane-Wright RI, Humphries CJ, Williams PH. What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 1991, 55:235-254.
49. Wade PM, de Waal LC, Child EL, Darby EJ. Control of invasive riparian and aquatic weeds. 1994, NRA Report, International Centre of Landscape Ecology Loughborough, R and D Project Record 294/7W
50. Westphal C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T. Mass-flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale. Ecology Letters 2003, 6:961-965.
51. Westphal C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T. Bumblebees experience landscapes at different spatial scales: possible implications for coexistence. Oecologia 2006, 149:289-300.
52. Westphal C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T. Mass flowering oilseed rape improves early colony growth but not sexual reproduction of bumblebees. Journal of Applied Ecology 2009, 46:187-193.
53. Westrich P. Habitat requirements of central European bees and the problems of partial habitats. The Conservation of Bees 1996, 1-16. Matheson ABuchmann SLO'Toole CWestrich PWilliams H. eds, pp, Linnaean Society of London and the International Bee Research Association by Academic Press, London, UK
54. Winfree R, Kremen C. Are ecosystem services stabilized by differences among species? A test using crop pollination. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 2009, 276:229-237.