Impact of margin assessment method on positive margin rate and total volume excised

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 86-92

  Moo, Tracy Ann ^a   Choi, Lydia ^a   Culpepper, Candice ^a   Olcese, Cristina ^a   Heerdt, Alexandra ^a   Sclafani, Lisa ^a   King, Tari A ^a   Reiner, Anne S ^a   Patil, Sujata ^a   Brogi, Edi ^a   Morrow, Monica ^a   Van Zee, Kimberly J ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MARGIN ASSESSMENT METHOD; MIDDLE AGED; ONCOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; ONCOLOGICAL PROCEDURE; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; POSITIVE MARGIN RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; SURGEON; TUMOR VOLUME; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84891743964     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3257-2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Showalter SL, Grover S, Sharma S, et al. Factors influencing surgical and adjuvant therapy in stage I breast cancer: a SEER 18 database analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1287-94.
2. Gage I, Schnitt SJ, Nixon AJ, et al. Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Cancer. 1996;78:1921-8.
3. Holland PA, Gandhi A, Knox WF, et al. The importance of complete excision in the prevention of local recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ. Br J Cancer. 1998;77:110-4.
4. Punglia RS, Morrow M, Winer EP, et al. Local therapy and survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2399-405.
5. Kreike B, Hart AA, van de Velde T, et al. Continuing risk of ipsilateral breast relapse after breast-conserving therapy at long-term follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:1014-21.
6. Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, et al. Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:3219-32.
7. Molina MA, Snell S, Franceschi D, et al. Breast specimen orientation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:285-8.
8. Kuerer HM. Kuerer's breast surgical oncology. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2010.
9. Wright MJ, Park J, Fey JV, et al. Perpendicular inked versus tangential shaved margins in breast-conserving surgery: does the method matter? J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:541-9.
10. Guidi AJ, Connolly JL, Harris JR, et al. The relationship between shaved margin and inked margin status in breast excision specimens. Cancer. 1997;79:1568-73.
11. Mendez JE, Lamorte WW, de Las Morenas A, et al. Influence of breast cancer margin assessment method on the rates of positive margins and residual carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2006;192:538-40.
12. Cao D, Lin C, Woo SH, et al. Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1625-32.
13. Hewes JC, Imkampe A, Haji A, et al. Importance of routine cavity sampling in breast conservation surgery. Br J Surg. 2009;96:47-53.
14. Jacobson AF, Asad J, Boolbol SK, et al. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision? Am J Surg. 2008;196:556-8.
15. Povoski SP, Jimenez RE, Wang WP, et al. Standardized and reproducible methodology for the comprehensive and systematic assessment of surgical resection margins during breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:254.
16. Marudanayagam R, Singhal R, Tanchel B, et al. Effect of cavity shaving on reoperation rate following breast-conserving surgery. Breast J. 2008;14:570-3.
17. Rizzo M, Iyengar R, Gabram SG, et al. The effects of additional tumor cavity sampling at the time of breast-conserving surgery on final margin status, volume of resection, and pathologist workload. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:228-34.
18. Millar EK, Leong AS. Significance and assessment of margin status in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Adv Anat Pathol. 2001;8:338-44.