Surface modification of fiber reinforced polymer composites and their attachment to bone simulating material

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1145-1152

  Hautamaki M P ^a,b   Puska, M ^a,c   Aho, A J ^a   Kopperud, H M ^c   Vallittu, P K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINUOUS FIBERS; DISSOLUTION PROCESS; DISSOLUTION SPEED; FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER COMPOSITES; FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITE (FRC); MECHANICAL LOCKING; SIMULATING MATERIALS; SURFACE FABRICATION;

BONE; DISSOLUTION; FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS; FIBERS; GLASS FIBERS; ORGANIC SOLVENTS; REINFORCEMENT; SOLVENTS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; SURFACES;

FIBER BONDING;

BONE CEMENT; GLASS FIBER; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); SOLVENT; TETRAHYDROFURAN; BIOMATERIAL; BONE PROSTHESIS; GLASS; POLYMER; RESIN;

ARTICLE; BONE IMPLANT; BONE MATRIX; BONE REMODELING; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROL GROUP; DISSOLUTION; FIBER; FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITE; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REINFORCEMENT; SURFACE PROPERTY; VELOCITY; BONE PROSTHESIS; CHEMISTRY; DEVICES; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SYNTHESIS; TENSILE STRENGTH; EQUIPMENT; METHODOLOGY;

BONE SUBSTITUTES; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; COMPOSITE RESINS; GLASS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POLYMERS; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 84891644368     PISSN: 09574530     EISSN: 15734838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-013-4890-9     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Kaufmann TJ, Jensen ME, Ford G, et al. Cardiovascular effects of polymethylmethacrylate use in percutaneous vertebroplasty. Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23(4):601-4.
2. Lieberman IH, Togawa D, Kayanja MM. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: filler materials. Spine J. 2005;5(6, Supplement):305-16.
3. Gomaa A, Lee RM, Liu CS. Polypseudophakia for cataract surgery: 10-year follow-up on safety and stability of two poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA) intraocular lenses within the capsular bag. Eye (Lond). 2011;25(8):1090-3.
4. Becker LC, Bergfeld WF, Belsito DV, et al. Final report of the cosmetic ingredient review expert panel safety assessment of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), methyl methacrylate crosspolymer, and methyl methacrylate/glycol dimethacrylate crosspolymer. Int J Toxicol. 2011;30(3 Suppl):54S-65S.
5. Vakiparta M, Yli-urpo A, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of glass fiber reinforced composite with multiphase biopolymer matrix. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004;15(1):7-11.
6. Mattila RH, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Production and structural characterisation of porous fibre-reinforced composite. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2004;35(6):631-6.
7. Dyer SR, Lassila LV, Jokinen M, et al. Effect of cross-sectional design on the modulus of elasticity and toughness of fiber-reinforced composite materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(3):219-26.
8. Zhao DS, Moritz N, Laurila P, et al. Development of a multicomponent fiber-reinforced composite implant for load-sharing conditions. Med Eng Phys. 2009;31(4):461-9.
9. Chan C-M, Ko T-M, Hiraoka H. Polymer surface modification by plasmas and photons. Surf Sci Rep. 1996;24(1-2):1-54.
10. Chen J, Zhuang H, Zhao J, et al. Solvent effects on polymer surface structure. Surf Interface Anal. 2001;31(8):713-20.
11. Goddard JM, Hotchkiss JH. Polymer surface modification for the attachment of bioactive compounds. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32(7): 698-725.
12. Chu PK, Chen JY, Wang LP, et al. Plasma-surface modification of biomaterials. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2002;36(5-6):143-206.
13. Mendonca G, Mendonca DBS, Aragao FJL, et al. Advancing dental implant surface technology-from micron-to nanotopography. Biomaterials. 2008;29(28):3822-35.
14. Mattila RH. Fibre-reinforced composite implant: in vitro mechanical interlocking with bone model material and residual monomer analysis. J Mater Sci. 2006;41(13):4321.
15. Puska MA, Narhi TO, Aho AJ, et al. Flexural properties of crosslinked and oligomer-modified glass-fibre reinforced acrylic bone cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004;15(9):1037-43.
16. Puska MA, Lassila LV, Narhi TO, et al. Improvement of mechanical properties of oligomer-modified acrylic bone cement with glass-fibers. Appl Compos Mater. 2004;11(1):17-31.
17. Hautamaki MP, Aho AJ, Alander P, et al. Repair of bone segment defects with surface porous fiber-reinforced polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) composite prosthesis: histomorphometric incorporation model and characterization by SEM. Acta Orthop. 2008;79(4):555-64.
18. Aho AJ, Hautamaki M, Mattila R, et al. Surface porous fibrereinforced composite bulk bone substitute. Cell Tissue Banking. 2004;5(4):213-21.
19. Mattila RH, Laurila P, Rekola J, et al. Bone attachment to glassfibre- reinforced composite implant with porous surface. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(5):1639-46.
20. Vallittu PK. Curing of a silane coupling agent and its effect on the transverse strength of autopolymerizing polymethylmethacrylateglass fibre composite. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24(2):124-30.
21. Nganga S, Yla-Soininmaki A, Lassila LVJ, et al. Interface shear strength and fracture behaviour of porous glass-fibre-reinforced composite implant and bone model material. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4(8):1797-804.
22. Ballo AM, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, et al. Load bearing capacity of bone anchored fiber-reinforced composite device. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18(10):2025-31.
23. Horowitz S, Doty S, Lane J, et al. Studies of the mechanism by which the mechanical failure of polymethylmethacrylate leads to bone resorption. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(6):802-13.
24. Vallittu PK. Peak temperatures of some prosthetic acrylates on polymerization. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23(11):776-81.
25. Revell PA, Braden M, Freeman MAR. Review of the biological response to a novel bone cement containing poly(ethyl methacrylate) and n-butyl methacrylate. Biomaterials. 1998;19(17):1579-86.
26. Lu JX, Huang ZW, Tropiano P, et al. Human biological reactions at the interface between bone tissue and polymethylmethacrylate cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2002;13(8):803-9.
27. Bruens ML, Pieterman H, de Wijn JR, et al. Porous polymethylmethacrylate as bone substitute in the craniofacial area. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14(1):63-8.
28. Vallittu PK, Miettinen V, Alakuijala P. Residual monomer content and its release into water from denture base materials. Dent Mater. 1995;11(6):338-42.
29. Vallittu PK, Ruyter IE, Buykuilmaz S. Effect of polymerization temperature and time on the residual monomer content of denture base polymers. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106(1):588-93.
30. Frazer RQ, Byron RT, Osborne PB, West KP. PMMA: An essential material in medicine and dentistry. J Long Term Eff Med Implant. 2005;15(6):629-39.
31. Narva KK, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The static strength and modulus of fiber reinforced denture base polymer. Dent Mater Off Publ Acad Dent Mater. 2005;21(5):421-8.
32. Vallittu PK. Impregnation of glass fibres with polymethylmethacrylate using a powder-coating method. Appl Compos Mater. 1995;2(1):51-8.
33. Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81(3):318-26.
34. Miller-Chou BA, Koenig JL. A review of polymer dissolution. Prog Polym Sci. 2003;28(8):1223-70.
35. Ueberreiter K, Asmussen F. Velocity of dissolution of polymers. Part I. J Polym Sci. 1962;57(165):187-98.
36. Hildebrand J, Scott RL. The solubility of nonelectrolytes. 3rd ed. New York: Reinhold; 1950.
37. Hansen CM. 50 Years with solubility parameters-past and future. Prog Org Coat. 2004;51(1):77-84.
38. Belmares M, Blanco M, Goddard WA, et al. Hildebrand and Hansen solubility parameters from molecular dynamics with applications to electronic nose polymer sensors. J Comput Chem. 2004;25(15):1814-26.
39. Ribar T, Bhargava R, Koenig JL. FT-IR imaging of polymer dissolution by solvent mixtures. 1. Solvents. Macromolecules. 2000;33(23):8842-9.
40. Stamatialis DF, Sanopoulou M, Raptis I. Swelling and dissolution behavior of poly(methyl methacrylate) films in methyl ethyl ketone/methyl alcohol mixtures studied by optical techniques. J Appl Polym Sci. 2002;83(13):2823-34.
41. Burnside SD, Giannelis EP. Synthesis and properties of new poly(dimethylsiloxane) nanocomposites. Chem Mater. 1995;7(9): 1597-600.
42. Thomason JL, Porteus G. Swelling of glass-fiber reinforced polyamide 66 during conditioning in water, ethylene glycol, and antifreeze mixture. Polym Compos. 2011;32(4):639-47.
43. Park S, Jin J. Effect of silane coupling agent on interphase and performance of glass fibers/unsaturated polyester composites. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2001;242(1):174-9.
44. Debnath S, Wunder SL, McCool JI, et al. Silane treatment effects on glass/resin interfacial shear strengths.DentMater. 2003;19(5):441-8.
45. Shim V, Boheme J, Josten C, et al. Use of Polyurethane Foam in Orthopaedic Biomechanical Experimentation and Simulation. In Zafar F, Sharmin E, eds.Polyurethane. 1st ed.: InTech 2012:171-200.
46. ASTM International. Standard Specification for Rigid Polyurethane Foam for Use as a Standard Material for Testing Orthopaedic Devices and Instruments. 2012:08(2012).