Bone attachment to glass-fibre-reinforced composite implant with porous surface

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1639-1646

  Mattila, R H ^a   Laurila, P ^b   Rekola, J ^a   Gunn, J ^a   Lassila, L V J ^a   Mantyla T ^b   Aho, A J ^a,c   Vallittu, P K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^c TURKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Animal experiment; Composite; FEA; Fibre reinforced; Orthopedics

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; BONE; COLLAGEN; FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATES; REINFORCEMENT; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR STRESS;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS; FIBRE-REINFORCED; FIBRE-REINFORCED COMPOSITE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSE; GLASS-FIBRE REINFORCED COMPOSITES; LOAD-BEARING; POROUS FIBERS; POROUS SURFACE; SHEAR FORCE; TITANIUM IMPLANTS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

BIOMATERIAL; FIBRE REINFORCED COMPOSITE; GLASS FIBER; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); TITANIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE GROWTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HISTOLOGY; IMPLANT; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; SHEAR STRESS; TIBIA; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ANIMALIA; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 67349278223     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.020     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Otani T., Whiteside L.A., and White S.E. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads. J Biomed Mater Res 27 (1993) 575-585
2. Huiskes R., Weinans H., and Van Rietberger B. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resoption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible material. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274 (1992) 124-134
3. Evans S.L., and Gregson P.J. Composite technology in load-bearing orthopaedic implants. Biomaterials 19 (1998) 1329-1342
4. Gasser B. About composite materials and their use in bone surgery. Injury 4 (2000) 48-53
5. DeSantis R., Ambrosio L., and Nicolais L. Polymer-based composite hip prostheses. J Inorg Biochem 79 (2000) 97-102
6. Brooks R.A., Jones E., Storer A., and Rushton N. Biological evaluation of carbon-fibre-reinforced polybutyleneterephthalate (CFRPBT) employed in a novel acetabular cup. Biomaterials 25 (2004) 3429-3438
7. Al-Shawi A.K., Smith S.P., and Anderson G.H. The use of a carbon fiber plate for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 320-324
8. Baker D., Kadambande S.S., and Alderman P.M. Carbon fibre plates in the treatment of femoral periprosthetic fractures. Injury 35 (2004) 596-598
9. Allcock S., and Ali M.A. Early failure of a carbon-fiber composite femoral component. J Arthroplasty 12 (1997) 356-358
10. Adam F., Hammer D.S., Pfautsch S., and Westermann K. Early failure of a press-fit carbon fiber hip prosthesis with a smooth surface. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 217-223
11. Minovic A., Milowsev I., Pisot V., Cor A., and Antolic V. Isolation of polyacetal wear particles from periprosthetic tissue of isoelastic femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83 (2001) 1182-1190
12. Vallittu P.K., and Ekstrand K. In vitro cytotoxicity of fiber-polymethyl methacrylate composite used in dentures. J Oral Rehabil 26 (1999) 666-671
13. Vallittu P.K. Comparison of two different silane compounds used for improving adhesion between fibres and acrylic denture base material. J Oral Rehabil 20 (1993) 533-539
14. Charnley J. Anchorage of the femoral head prosthesis to the shaft of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 42-B (1960) 28-30
15. Mattila R.H., Puska M.A., Lassila L.V.J., and Vallittu P.K. Fibre-reinforced composite implant: in vitro mechanical interlocking with bone model material and residual monomer analysis. J Mater Sci 41 (2006) 4321-4326
16. Aho A.J., Hautamäki M., Mattila R., Alander P., Strandberg N., Rekola J., et al. Surface porous fibre-reinforced composite bulk bone substitute. In vitro studies and in vivo evaluation in segment defect. Cell Tissue Bank 5 (2004) 213-221
17. Diego R.B., Estelles J.M., Sanz J.A., Garcia-Aznar J.M., and Sanchez M.S. Polymer scaffolds with interconnected spherical pores and controlled architecture for tissue engineering: fabrication, mechanical properties, and finite element modeling. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 81B (2007) 448-455
18. Thompson J.I., Gregson P.J., and Revell P.A. Analysis of push-out test data based on interfacial fracture energy. J Mater Sci Mater Med 10 (1999) 863-868
19. Spector M., Michno M.J., Smarook W.H., and Kwiatkowski G.T. A high-modulus polymer for porous orthopedic implants: biomechanical compatibility of porous implants. J Biomed Mater Res 12 (1978) 665-677
20. Lewandowska-Szumiel M., Komender J., Górecki A., and Kowalski M. Fixation of carbon fibre-reinforced carbon composite implanted into bone. J Mater Sci Mater Med 8 (1997) 485-488
21. Huiskes R. Failed innovation in total hip replacement. Diagnosis and proposals for a cure. Acta Orthop Scand 64 (1993) 699-716
22. Taylor M., Tanner K.E., Freeman M.A.R., and Yettram A.L. Finite element modelling - predictor of implant survival?. J Mater Sci Mater Med 6 (1995) 808-812
23. Simon U., Augat P., Ignatius A., and Claes L. Influence of the stiffness of bone defect implants on the mechanical conditions at the interface - a finite element analysis with contact. J Biomech 36 (2003) 1079-1086
24. Ruimerman R., Van Rietbergen B., Hilbers P., and Huiskes R. The effects of trabecular-bone loading variables on the surface signaling potential for bone remodeling and adaptation. Ann Biomed Eng 33 (2005) 71-78
25. Nowak B., and Najar J. Numerical simulation of influence of chosen parameters on tensile stresses in bone cement layer in total hip arthroplasty. Adv Mater Sci 6 (2006) 9-17
26. Gong S., and Bandyopadhyay S. Mechanical properties and fracture surface morphologies in unnotched specimens of rubber-PMMA composites. J Mater Eng Perf 16 (2007) 601-606
27. Christensen R.M. Mechanics of composite materials. vol. 348 (1979), John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York p. 133-35
28. Claes L.E., and Heigele C.A. Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the cource and type of fracture healing. J Biomech 32 (1999) 255-266
29. Vallittu P.K. Flexural properties of acrylic polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent 81 (1999) 318-326
30. Yildiz H., Chang F.-K., and Goodman S. Composite hip prosthesis design. II. Simulation. J Biomed Mater Res 39 (1998) 102-119
31. Qin Y.X., McLeod K.J., Guilak F., Chiang F.P., and Rubin C.T. Correlation of bony ingrowth to the distribution of stress and strain parameters surrounding a porous-coated implant. J Orthop Res 14 (1996) 862-870
32. Huiskes R. Review: if bone is the answer, then what is the question?. J Anat 197 (2000) 145-156
33. Huiskes R., Ruimerman R., Van Lenthe G.H., and Janssen J.D. Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature 405 (2000) 704-706
34. Marcolongo M., Ducheyne P., Garino J., and Schepers E. Bioactive glass fiber/polymeric composites bond to bone tissue. J Biomed Mater Res 39 (1998) 161-170