Interface shear strength and fracture behaviour of porous glass-fibre-reinforced composite implant and bone model material

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 4, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1797-1804

  Nganga, Sara ^a,b   Ylä Soininmäki, Anne ^a,b   Lassila, Lippo V J ^a,b   Vallittu, Pekka K ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b Biocity Turku   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bone substitute material; Porous fibre reinforced composite; Push out test

Indexed keywords

BIFUNCTIONAL; BIS-GMA; BONE IMPLANT; BONE INGROWTH; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CLINICAL SITUATIONS; COHESIVE FRACTURE; DIMETHACRYLATES; FRACTURE BEHAVIOUR; HEAD AND NECK; IMPLANT FIXATION; IN-VITRO; INTERFACE SHEAR STRENGTH; INTERFACIAL FRACTURE TOUGHNESS; LOAD-BEARING; MODEL MATERIALS; NATURAL BONE; NON-WOVEN; ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANTS; POLYMER RESINS; POROUS FIBRE-REINFORCED COMPOSITE; PUSH-OUT; PUSH-OUT TESTS; STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES; TOTAL POROSITY;

BONE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FIBER REINFORCED MATERIALS; FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS; FIBERS; FRACTURE MECHANICS; FRACTURE TOUGHNESS; GLASS; GYPSUM; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); POROSITY; SHEAR FLOW; TISSUE;

FRACTURE;

CALCIUM SULFATE; GLASS FIBER; POROUS GLASS FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE GROWTH; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FORCE; FRACTURE; IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRENGTH;

BONE SUBSTITUTES; CALCIUM SULFATE; GLASS; MATERIALS TESTING; POROSITY; SHEAR STRENGTH; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 81255171414     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.05.037     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andersson O.H., Liu G., Kangasniemi K., Juhanoja J. Evaluation of the acceptance of glass in bone. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 1992, 3:145-150.
2. Ballo, A.M., 2008. Fiber-reinforced composite as oral implant material-experimental studies of glass fiber and bioactive glass in vitro and in vivo. Dissertation, Annales Universitatis Turkuensis D 810, Turku, Finland, Painosalama Oy.
3. Ballo A.M., Lassila L.V., Vallittu P.K., Närhi T.O. Load bearing capacity of bone anchored fiber-reinforced composite device. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2007, 18:2025-2031.
4. Berzins A., Sumner D.R. Implant pushout and pullout test. Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant Interface 2000, 463-476. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida. Y.H. An, R.A. Draughn (Eds.).
5. Chandra N., Ghonem H. Interfacial mechanics of push-out tests: theory and experiments. Compos. Part A-Appl. S. 2001, 32:575-584.
6. Corvelli A.A., Roberts J.C., Biermann P.J., Cranmer J.H. Characterization of a peek composite segmental bone replacement implant. J. Mater. Sci. 1999, 34:2421-2431.
7. Darvall B.W. Materials Science for Dentistry 2002, Woodhead Pub. CRC Press, Oxford. seventh ed.
8. Dhert W.J.A., Verheyen C.C.P.M., Braak L.H., de Wijn J.R., Klein C.P.A.T., de Groot K., Rozing P.M. A finite element analysis of the push-out test: influence of test conditions. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1992, 26:119-130.
9. Dhert W.J.A., Jansen J.A. The Validity of a single pushout test. Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant Interface 2000, 477-488. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida. Y.H. An, R.A. Draughn (Eds.).
10. Gibson L.J., Ashbey M.F. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties 1988, Pergamon Press Ltd., NY. first ed.
11. Hersek N., Canay S., Akça K., Çiftçi Y. Tensile strength of type IV dental stones dried in a microwave oven. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2002, 87:499-502.
12. Jansen J.A., von Rectum A.F. Textured and porous materials. Biomaterials Science-An Introduction to Materials in Medicine 2006, Academic Press. second ed. B.D. Ratner, A.S. Hoffman, F.J. Schoen, J.E. Lemons (Eds.).
13. Kissa E. Wetting and wicking. Text. Res. J. 1996, 66:660-668.
14. Kotz J.C., Treichel P., Townsend J.R. Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity 2009, vol. 2. Thomson Brooks/Cole. seventh ed.
15. LaPorte R.J. Hydrophilic Polymer Coatings for Medical Devices-Structure/Properties, Development, Manufacture and Applications 1997, Technomic Publishing Company Inc., Lancaster, USA.
16. Mattila R.H., Laurila P., Rekola J., Gunn J., Lassila L.V.J., Mäntylä T., Aho A.J., Vallittu P.K. Bone attachment to glass-fibre-reinforced composite implant with porous surface. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5:1639-1646.
17. Mattila R.H., Puska M.A., Lassila L.V.J., Vallittu P.K. Fibre-reinforced composite implant: in vitro mechanical interlocking with bone model material and residual monomer analyses. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2006, 41:4321-4326.
18. Nien Y.-H., Kalidindi S.R., Siegler S. Fixation strength of swellable bone anchors in low-density polyurethane foam. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2001, 58:137-146.
19. Qiao P., Chen Y. Cohesive fracture simulation and failure modes of FRP-concrete bonded interfaces. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2008, 49:213-225.
20. Thompson J.I., Gregson P.J., Revell P.A. Analysis of push-out test data based on interfacial fracture energy. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 1999, 10:863-868.
21. Toman M., Toksavul S., Sarikanat M., Firidinoǧlu K., Akin A. The evaluation of displacement resistance of glass FRC posts to root dentine using a thin slice push-out test. Int. Endod. J. 2009, 42:802-810.
22. Tuusa S.M.-R., Peltola M.J., Tirri T., Lassila L.V.J., Vallittu P.K. Frontal bone defect repair with experimental glass-fiber-reinforced composite with bioactive glass granule coating. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B 2007, 82:149-155.
23. Tuusa S., Peltola M., Tirri T., Lassila L., Vallittu P.K. A review of two animal studies dealing with biological responses to glass-fibre-reinforced composite implants in critical size calvarial bone defects in rabbits. Key Eng. Mater. 2007, 20:471-474.
24. Tuusa S., Peltola M., Tirri T., Puska M., Röyttä M., Aho H., Sandholm J., Lassila L., Vallittu P. Reconstruction of critical size calvarial bone defects in rabbits with glass-fibre-reinforced composite with bioactive glass granule coating. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B 2008, 84:510-519.
25. Vallittu P.K. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven fibres. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1999, 81:318-326.
26. Varin R.A. On the fracture toughness of intermetallics estimated from work of fracture. Scr. Mater. 2001, 45:1357-1363.
27. Zhao D.S., Moritz N., Laurila P., Mattila R., Lassila L.V.J., Strandberg N., Mäntylä T., Vallittu P.K., Aro H.T. Development of a multi-component fibre-reinforced composite implant for load-sharing conditions. Med. Eng. Phys. 2009, 31:461-469.