Erratum: The genomic signal of partial sweeps in Mimulus guttatus (Genome Biology and Evolution 5:8 (1457-1469) DOI:10.1093/gbe/evt100);The genomic signal of partial sweeps in Mimulus guttatus

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1457-1469

  Kelly, John K ^a   Koseva, Boryana ^a   Mojica, Julius P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability   (United States)

Author keywords

Illumina; Mimulus; Partial sweeps; Soft sweeps

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETICS; ILLUMINA; MIMULUS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PARTIAL SWEEPS; PLANT GENOME; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SOFT SWEEPS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ILLUMINA; MIMULUS; PARTIAL SWEEPS; SOFT SWEEPS;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE FREQUENCY; GENOME, PLANT; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MIMULUS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 84891643084     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evt130     Document Type: Erratum

References (53)

1. Beaumont MA, Nichols RA. 1996. Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 263: 1619-1626.
2. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 57:289-300.
3. Borchsenius F. 2002. Staggered flowering in four sympatric varieties of Geonoma cuneata (Palmae). Biotropica 34:603-606.
4. Bowley AL. 1920. Elements of statistics. New York (NY): Scribner.
5. Burke MK, et al. 2010. Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila. Nature 467:587-590.
6. Chevin L-M, Hospital F. 2008. Selective sweep at a quantitative trait locus in the presence of background genetic variation. Genetics 180: 1645-1660.
7. Cohan FM. 1984. Genetic divergence under uniform selection. I. Similarity among populations of Drosophila melanogaster in their responses to artificial selection for modifiers of ciD. Evolution 38:55-71.
8. Cutler DJ, Jensen JD. 2010. To pool, or not to pool? Genetics 186:41-43.
9. Dobzhansky TH, Levene H. 1948. Genetics of natural populations. XVII. Proof of operation of natural selection in wild populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 33:537-547.
10. Emerson KJ, et al. 2010. Resolving postglacial phylogeography using high-throughput sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107: 16196-16200.
11. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Essex (UK): Prentice Hall.
12. Feder AF, Petrov DA, Bergland AO. 2012. LDx: estimation of linkage disequilibrium from high-throughput pooled resequencing data. PLoS One 7:e48588.
13. Fisher RA, Ford EB. 1947. The spread of a gene in natural conditions in a colony of the moth Panaxia dominula. Heredity 1:143-174.
14. Ford EB. 1971. Ecological genetics. London: Chapman and Hall.
15. Futschik A, Schlötterer C. 2010. The next generation ofmolecular markers from massively parallel sequencing of pooled dna samples. Genetics 186:207-218.
16. Goldringer I, Bataillon T. 2004. On the distribution of temporal variations in allele frequency: consequences for the estimation of effective population size and the detection of loci undergoing selection. Genetics 168: 563-568.
17. Hartl DL, Clark AG. 1989. Principles of population genetics. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
18. Hayes BJ, et al. 2009. A genome map of divergent artificial selection between Bos taurus dairy cattle and Bos taurus beef cattle. Anim Genet. 40:176-184.
19. Hermisson J, Pennings PS. 2005. Soft sweeps: molecular population genetics of adaptation from stand ing genetic variation. Genetics 169: 2335-2352.
20. Hohenlohe P, et al. 2010a. Population genomic analysis of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags. PLoS Genet. 6:e1000862.
21. Hohenlohe PA, Phillips PC, Cresko WA. 2010b. Using population genomics to detect selection in natural populations: key concepts and methodological considerations. Int J Plant Sci. 171:1059-1071.
22. Husband BC, Schemske DW. 2000. Ecological mechanisms of reproductive isolation between diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium. J Ecol. 88:689-701.
23. Imhof JP. 1961. Computing the distribution of quadratic forms in normal variables. Biometrika 48:419-426.
24. Innan H, Kim Y. 2004. Pattern of polymorphism after strong artificial selection in a domestication event. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101: 10667-10672.
25. Johansson AM, PetterssonME, Siegel PB, CarlborgÖ. 2010. Genome-wide effects of long-term divergent selection. PLoS Genet. 6:e1001188.
26. Kelly JK. 2008. Testing the rare alleles model of quantitative variation by artificial selection. Genetica 132:187-198.
27. Kelly JK, Holeski LM, Arathi HS. 2008. The genetic correlation between flower size and water use efficiency in monkeyflowers. Evol Ecol Res. 10:147-152.
28. Kolaczkowski B, Kern AD, Holloway AK, Begun DJ. 2011. Genomic differentiation between temperate and tropical australian populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 187:245-260.
29. Kotz S, Johnson NL, Boyd DW. 1967. Series representations of distributions of quadratic forms in normal variables. I. Central case. Ann Math Statist. 38:823-837.
30. Lee YW. 2009. Genetic analysis of stand ing variation for floralmorphology and fitness components in a natural population of Mimulus guttatus (common monkeyflower). Durham (NC): Duke University.
31. Lewontin RC. 1974. The genetic basis of evolutionary change. New York (NY): Columbia University Press.
32. Lewontin RC, Krakauer J. 1973. Distribution of gene frequency as a test of the theory of the selective neutrality of polymorphisms. Genetics 74: 175-195.
33. Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler Transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754-1760.
34. Li H, et al.; G. P. D. P. Subgroup. 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078-2079.
35. Liu H, Tang Y, Zhang HH. 2009. A new chi-square approximation to the distribution of non-negative definite quadratic forms in non-central normal variables. Comput Stat Data Anal. 53:853-856.
36. Magwene PM, Willis JH, Kelly JK. 2011. The statistics of bulk segregant analysis using next generation sequencing. PLoS Comput Biol. 7: e1002255.
37. Marriage TN, et al. 2009. Direct estimation of the mutation rate at dinucleotide microsatellite loci in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). Heredity 103:310-317.
38. Martin NH, Willis JH. 2007. Ecological divergence associated with mating system causes nearly complete reproductive isolation between sympatric Mimulus species. Evolution 61:68-82.
39. Maynard Smith J, Haigh J. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 23:23-35.
40. Mojica JP, Kelly JK. 2010. Viability selection prior to trait expression is an essential component of natural selection. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 277: 2945-2950.
41. Mojica JP, Lee YW, Willis JH, Kelly JK. 2012. Spatially and temporally varying selection on intrapopulation quantitative trait loci for a life history trade-off in Mimulus guttatus. Mol Ecol. 21: 3718-3728.
42. Nei M, LiWH. 1979. Mathe matical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 76: 5269-5273.
43. Oleksyk TK, Smith MW, O'Brien SJ. 2010. Genome-wide scans for footprints of natural selection. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 365: 185-205.
44. Pavlidis P, Hutter S, StephanW. 2008. A population genomic approach to map recent positive selection in model species. Mol Ecol. 17: 3585-3598.
45. Pearson ES. 1959. Note on an approximation to the distribution of noncentral x2. Biometrika 46:364.
46. Pennings PS, Hermisson J. 2006. Soft sweeps III: the signature of positive selection from recurrent mutation. PLoS Genet. 2:e186.
47. Petit C, Lesbros P, Ge X, Thompson JD. 1997. Variation in flowering phenology and selfing rate across a contact zone between diploid and tetraploid Arrhenathe rum elatius (Poaceae). Heredity 79: 31-40.
48. Pritchard JK, Di Rienzo A. 2010. Adaptation-not by sweeps alone. Nat Rev Genet. 11:665-667.
49. Remolina SC, Chang PL, Leips J, Nuzhdin SV, Hughes KA. 2012. Genomic basis of aging and life-history evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 66:3390-3403.
50. Scoville A, Lee YW, Willis JH, Kelly JK. 2009. Contribution of chromosomal polymorphisms to the G-matrix of Mimulus guttatus. New Phytol. 183: 803-815.
51. Scoville AG, Lee YW,Willis JH, Kelly JK. 2011. Explaining the heritability of an ecologically significant trait in terms of individual QTLs. Biol Lett. 7: 896-898.
52. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 2000. Biometry.NewYork (NY): Freeman and Company.
53. Turner TL, Stewart AD, Fields AT, RiceWR, Tarone AM. 2011. Populationbased resequencing of experimentally evolved populations reveals the genetic basis of body size variation in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 7:e1001336.