Preparing Principals for a Changing World: Lessons from Effective School Leadership Programs

Preparing Principals for a Changing World: Lessons from Effective School Leadership Programs

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Darling Hammond, Linda ^a   Meyerson, Debra ^a   LaPointe, Michelle ^b   Terry Orr, Margaret ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Bank Street College of Education ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891585362     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118269329     Document Type: Book

References (92)

1. AACTE. See American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
2. Adams, J. P. (1999). Good principals, good schools. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 29(1), 8-11.
3. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (2001, March). PK-12 educational leadership and administration (white paper). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
4. Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L.
5. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
6. Barnett, B. G., Basom, M. R., Yerkes, D. M., & Norris, C. J. (2000). Cohorts in educational leadership programs: Benefits, difficulties, and the potential for developing school leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(2), 255-282.
7. Baugh, D. F. (2003). The school-based administrative internship: Requirements and student expectations. Connections, 4, 12-.
8. Bridges, E., & Hallinger, P. (1993). Problem-based learning in medical and managerial education. In P. Hallinger, K. Leithwood & J. Murphy (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on educational leadership (pp. 253-267). New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Muth, R. (2001, November). Issues related to the effects of cohorts on learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Cincinnati, OH.
10. Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Allen, L. W. (2006). Preparing principals for high-need rural schools: A central office perspective about collaborative efforts to transform school leadership. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 21(1), 1-16.
11. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
12. Carr, C. S. (2005). Evolution of a leadership preparation program in the 21st century. NCPEA Education Leadership Review, 6(1), 33-41.
13. Coffin, G. A. (1997). The impact of district conditions on principals' experientially acquired professional learnin. (Doctoral dissertation,University of Toronto, Canada, 1999.) Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(6), 1844.
14. Cohen, C. & Freiman, A. (2001). Catalog and guide to federal funding sources for professional development in education. Washington, DC: The Finance Project.
15. Copland, M. A. (1999). Problem-based learning, problem-framing ability and the principal selves of prospective school principal. (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1999.) Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(8), 2750.
16. Daresh, J. C. (2001). Leaders helping leaders: A practical guide to administrative mentoring. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
17. Darling-Hammond, L., Hightower, A., Husbands, J., LaFors, J., Young, V., & Christopher, C. (2005). Instructional systemic change: The story of San Diego's reform. Lanham, MD: ScarecrowEducation.
18. Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., Meyerson, D., Orr. M. T., & Cohen, C. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute. Available from http://seli.stanford.edu/research/documents/sls techreport.pdf.
19. Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., & Meyerson, D. (2005). Review of research. School leadership study. Developing successful principals. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
20. Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 735-744.
21. Elmore, R. F. (2000, Winter). Building a New Structure for School Leadership. Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.
22. Elmore, R., & Burney, D. (1999). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 263-191). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Fry, B., Bottoms, G., & O'Neill, K. (2005). The principal internship: How can we get it right? Atlanta: Southern Regional Education Board.
24. Goldring, E., & Sims, P. (2005). Modeling creative and courageous school leadership through district-community-university partnerships. Educational Policy, 19(1), 223-249.
25. Granott, N. (1998). We learn, therefore we develop: Learning versus development-or developing learning? In M. C. Smith & T. Pouchot (Eds.), Adult learning and development: Perspectives from educational psychology (pp. 15-34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Grogan, M., & Robertson, S. (2002). Developing a new generation of educational leaders by capitalizing on partnerships. The International Journal of Educational Management, 16(6/7), 314.
27. Hale, E., & Moorman, H. (2003). Preparing school leaders. Washington, DC, & Edwardsville, IL: Institute for Educational Leadership and the Illinois Education Research Council.
28. Hallinger, P. (1992). The evolving role of American principals: From managerial to instructional to transformational leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(3), 35-48.
29. Hallinger, P. (2005, April). Instructional leadership: How has the model evolved and what have we learned? Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
30. Hallinger, P., & Heck, X. (1998). The superintendent as instructional leader: Findings from effective school districts, Joseph Murphy, Philip Hallinger, Journal of Educational Administration, 24(2), 1986, 213-236.
31. Hallinger, P., & McCary, C. E. (1992, March). Developing the strategic thinking of instructional leaders (Occasional Paper No. 13). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Graduate School of Education, The National Center for Educational Leadership.
32. Herszenhorn, D. M. (2005, May 20). How a district in the Bronx got results: From pushing. New York Times. Retrieved on June 20, 2009, from www.nytimes.com/2005/05/20/nyregion/20school.html.
33. Hess, F. M. (1999). Spinning wheels: The politics of urban school reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
34. Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium [ISLLC] (2008). Available from http://www.ccsso.org/projects/education leadership initiatives/ ISLLCStandards/.
35. Jackson, B. L., & Kelley, C. (2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 192-212.
36. Kaagan, S. (1998). Leadership development: The heart of the matter. International Journal of Educational Management, 12(2), 74-81.
37. Knapp, M. S., Copland, M. A., & Talbert, J. E. (2003, February). Leading for learning: Reflective tools for school and district leaders. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
38. Kolb, D. A., & Boyatzis, R. E. (1999). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive learning and thinking styles (pp. 000-000). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Lave, J. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Leithwood, K., & Duke, D. (1999). A century's quest to understand school leadership. In J. Murphy & K. Seashore-Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 45-72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). Transformational school leadership effects: A replication. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4), 451-479.
42. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformation leadership on student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112-129.
43. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005, April). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996-2005. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
44. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., Coffin, G., & Wilson, P. (1996). Preparing school leaders: What works? Journal of School Leadership, 6(3), 316-342.
45. Leithwood, K., Seashore-Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning (Learning from Leadership Project Executive Summary). New York: The Wallace Foundation.
46. Little, J. W., Gerritz, W. H., Stern, D. H., Guthrie, J. W., Kirst, M. W., & Marsh, D. D. (1987). Staff development in California: Public and personal investments, program patterns, and policy choices (Policy Paper PC87-12-15-CPEC). San Francisco & Berkeley, CA: Far West Laboratory for Education Research and Development & Policy Analysis for California Education.
47. Lumsden, L. S. (1992). Prospects in principal preparation. ERIC Digest, 77. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
48. Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397.
49. Marsick, V. J. and Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization's learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132-151.
50. McCarthy, M. (1999). The evolution of educational leadership preparation programs. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration: A project of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 119-239). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51. McLaughlin, X., & Talbert, X. (2002). Bay Area School Reform Collaborative: Phase one (1996-2001) evaluation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for Research on the Context of Teaching.
52. Miles, K. H. (2003). Rethinking professional development spending to support school improvement: Lessons from comparative spending analysis. In M. L. Plecki & D. H. Monk (Eds.), School finance and teacher quality: Exploring the connections (pp. 87-110). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
53. Monk, D., Plecki, M., & Killeen, K. (2003). Examining investments in teacher professional development: A look at current practice and a proposal for improving the research base. In M. L. Plecki & D. H. Monk (Eds.), School finance and teacher quality: Exploring the connections (pp. 137-156). New York: Eye on Education.
54. Murphy, J. (1990). Preparing school administrators for the twenty-first century: The reform agenda (NCEL Occasional Paper 2). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Graduate School of Education, National Center for Educational Leadership.
55. Murphy, J., & Vriesenga, M. (2004). Research on preparation programs in educational administration: An analysis (monograph). Columbia, MO: University of Missouri-Columbia, University Council for Educational Administration.
56. National Center for Education Information. (2003). Certification of principals and superintendents in the U.S. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
57. National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Schools and Staffing Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
58. National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2001). Recognizing and encouraging exemplary leadership in America's schools: A proposal to establish a system of advanced certification for administrators. Washington, DC: National Policy Board for Educational Administration NCEI. See National Center for Education Information.
59. NCES. See National Center for Education Statistics.
60. Neuman, J. M. (1999). Preparation of the urban principa. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1999.) Dissertation Abstracts, 60(3), 609.
61. Newmann, F. M., King, M. B., & Youngs, P. (2001). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108(4), 259-299.
62. Norton, J. (2002). Preparing school leaders: It's time to face the facts. Atlanta: Southern Regional Education Board.
63. NPBEA. See National Policy Board for Educational Administration.
64. Orr, M. T. (2003, April). Evaluating educational leadership preparation: A review of empirical, conceptual and methodological literature. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
65. Orr, M. T. (2006). Mapping innovation in leadership preparation in our nation's schools of education. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(7), 492-499.
66. Orr, M. T., & Barber, M. E. (2007). Collaborative leadership preparation: A comparative study of innovative programs and practices. Journal of School Leadership, 16(6), 000-000.
67. Orr, M. T., & Orphanos, S. (2007, April). Learning leadership matters: Teachers' experiences of innovatively and conventionally prepared principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
68. Orr, M. T., Silverberg, R., & LeTendre, B. (2006). Comparing leadership development from pipeline to preparation to advancement: A study of multiple institutions' leadership preparation programs. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
69. Peterson, K. D. (2002). The professional development of principals: Innovations and opportunities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 213-232.
70. Peterson, K. D., & Kelley, C. J. (2002). Principal in-service programs: A portrait of diversity and promise. In M. S. Tucker & J. B. Codding (Eds.), The principal challenge (pp. 313-346). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
71. Pounder, Ogawa, & Adams, (1995). Leadership as an organization-wide phenomena: Its impact on school performance. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(4), 564-588.
72. Resnick, L. B., & Hall, M. W. (2001). The principles of learning: Study tools for educators (CD-ROM, version 2.0). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center, Institute for Learning. Available at www.instituteforlearning.org.
73. Rice, J. K., & Cohen, C. (2005, April). Understanding the costs of professional development initiatives: A framework and applications. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Finance Association, Denver, CO. Available at http://seli.stanford.edu/research/documents/pd costs.pdf.
74. Richardson, 1999
75. Robinson, C. (2003). Catalog and guide to federal funding sources for professional development in education (2003-Update). Washington DC: The Finance Project.
76. Rouse, C., & Markham, L. (2004). Leadership evaluation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
77. Sanders, N. M., & Simpson, J. (2005). State policy framework to develop highly qualified administrators. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
78. Sandlin, R., & Feigen, S. (1995). Collaboration between the university and school district: Can it work? Teacher Education Quarterly, 22(4), 75-82.
79. Silins, H. C., Mulford, W. R., & Zarins, S. (2002). Organizational learning and school change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 613-642.
80. Snyder, J., & Ebmeier, H. (1992). Empirical linkages among principal behaviors and intermediate outcomes: Implications for principal evaluation. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 5-107.
81. Southern Regional Education Board. (2006). Schools can't wait: Accelerating the redesign of university principal preparation programs. Atlanta: Southern Regional Education Board.
82. SREB. See Southern Regional Education Board.
83. Thomas B. Fordham Institute. (2003, May). Better leaders for America's schools: A manifesto. Washington, DC: Fordham Institute.
84. Trapani, V. M. (1994). Field experiences in administrative preparation programs for elementary school principals: Perceived effectivenes. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts, 55(12), 3710.
85. Usdan, M., McCloud, B., & Podmostko, M. (2000). Leadership for student learning: Reinventing the principalship. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
86. U.S. Department of Education. (2005). Innovative pathways to school leadership. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
87. Waters, J. T., Marzano, R. J., & McNulty, B. A. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
88. West, L., Staub, F. C., Mack-Kirschner, A. (2003). Content-focused coaching: Transforming mathematics lessons. New York: Heinemann.
89. Whitaker, K. (2001). Where are the principal candidates? Perceptions of superintendents. NASSP Bulletin, 85(625), 82-92.
90. Williams, T., Kirst, M., Haertel, E., et al. (2005). Similar students, different results: Why do some schools do better? A large-scale survey of California elementary schools serving low-income students. Mountain View, CA: EdSource. Retrieved November 8, 2005, from http://www.edsource.org/pdf/SimStu05.pdf.
91. Winter, P. A., Rinehart, J. S., & Munoz, M. A. (2001, November). Principal certified personnel: Do they want the job? Paper presented at the annualmeeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Cincinnati, OH. (ERIC Document Reproduction).
92. Winter, P. A., Rinehart, J. S., and Munoz, M. A. (2002, June). Principal recruitment: An empirical evaluation of a school district's internal pool of principal certified personnel. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16(2), 000-000.