Law, politics, and perception: How policy preferences influence legal reasoning

Law, Politics, and Perception: How Policy Preferences Influence Legal Reasoning

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Braman, Eileen ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891584460     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (151)

1. Arkes, Hal R., and Caroline Blumer. 2000. "The Psychology of Sunk Cost." In Judgment and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader, edited by Terry Connolly, Hal R. Arkes, and Kenneth R. Hammond, 97-113. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Baas, Larry, and Dan Thomas 1984. "The Supreme Court and Policy Legitimation: Experimental Tests." American Politics Quarterly 12:335-60.
3. Bartels, Brandon L. 2005. "Heterogeneity in Supreme Court Decision Making: How Case Level Factors Alter Preference Based Behavior." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
4. Baum, Lawrence. A. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
5. Baum, Lawrence. A. 2006. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Prince-ton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
6. Becker, Theodore L. 1964. Political Behavioralism and Modern Jurisprudence. Chicago: Rand McNally.
7. Becker, Theodore L. 1966. "Surveys and Judiciaries, or Who's Afraid of the Purple Curtain?" Law and Society Review 1:133-43.
8. Becker, Theodore L. 1969. "A Survey Study of Hawaiian Judges: The Effect of Decisions on Judicial Role Variations." American Political Science Review 60:677-80.
9. Bem, Daryl J. 1972. "Self Perception Theory." In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 6, edited by Leonard Berkowitz, 2-62. New York: Academic Press.
10. Bickel, Alexander. 1986. The Least Dangerous Branch. New Haven: Yale University Press.
11. Bonneau, Chris W., and Thomas H. Hammond. 2005. "Conceptualizing Sincere and Strategic Behavior on the U.S Supreme Court." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
12. Brace, Paul, Melinda Gann Hall, and Laura Langer. 1999. "Judicial Choice and the Politics ofAbortion: Institutions, Context and the Autonomy of Courts." Albany Law Review 62:1265-303.
13. Braman, Eileen. 2006. "Reasoning on the Threshold: Testing the Separability of Preferences in Legal Decision Making." Journal of Politics 68, no. 2:308-21.
14. Braman, Eileen. 2008. "Catching up to Move Ahead: Identifying and Filling Theoreti-cal Gaps on Precedental Constraint on the Supreme Court." Law and Courts 18:13-16.
15. Braman, Eileen, and Thomas E. Nelson. 2007. "Mechanism of Motivated Reasoning?: Analogical Perception in Discrimination Disputes." American Journal of Political Science 51, no. 4:940-56.
16. Cardozo, Benjamin N. 1921. The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven: Yale University Press
17. Cardozo, Benjamin N. 1924. The Growth of the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
18. Christensen, Larry. 1997. Experimental Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Press.
19. Collins, Paul. M. 2007. "Lobbyists before the U.S. Supreme Court Investigating the Influence of Amicus Briefs." Political Research Quarterly 60, no. 1:55-77.
20. Collins, Paul. 2008. Friends of the Supreme Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Collins, Paul M., and Wendy L. Martinek. 2007. "The Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges on the United States Courts of Appeals." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans.
22. Cooper, Joel, and Russell H. Fazio. 1984. "A New Look at Dissonance Theory." In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 17, edited by Leonard Berkowitz, 229-67. New York: Academic Press.
23. Cross, Frank B. 1997. "Political Science and the New Legal Realism: A Case of Unfortunate Interdisciplinary Ignorance." Northwestern University Law Review 92:251-326.
24. Eagly, Alice H., and Blair T. Johnson. 1990. "Gender Style in Bureaucracy: A Meta-Analysis." Psychological Bulletin 180:233-56.
25. Easterbrook, Frank H. 1982. "Ways of Criticizing the Court." Harvard Law Review 95:802-32.
26. Edwards, Harry T. 1998. "Collegiality and Decision Making on the D.C. Circuit Court." Virginia Law Review 84:1335-71.
27. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington D.C.: CQ Press.
28. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 2000. "Toward a Strategic Revolution in Judicial Politics: A Look Back, a Look Ahead." Political Research (uarterly 53:624-61.
29. Ferguson, Joshua, Linda Babcock, and Peter M. Shane. 2008. "Do a Law's Policy Implications Affect Beliefs about Its Constitutionality?" Law and Human Behavior 32:219-27.
30. Fischhoff, Baruch. 1977. "Perceived Informativeness of Facts." Journal of Experimen-tal Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3:349-58.
31. Frank, Jerome. 1931a. "Are Judges Human? Part One: The Effect on Legal Think-ing of the Assumption that Judges Behave Like Human Beings." University of Pennsylvania Law Review 80:17-53.
32. Frank, Jerome. 1931b. "Are Judges Human? Part Two: As Through a Class Darkly." Uni-versity of Pennsylvania Law Review 80:233-67.
33. Gentner, Dedre. 1998. "Analogy." In Companion to Cognitive Science, edited by William Bechtel and George Graham, 107-13. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
34. Gentner, Dedre, Brian Bowdle, Phillip Wolff, and Consuelo Boronot. 2001. "Metaphor Is Like Analogy." In The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, edited by Dedre Gentner, Keith J. Holyoak, and Boicho N. Nokinov, 199-253. Cambridge: MIT Press.
35. George, Tracey. E. 1998. "Developing a Positive Theory of Decision Making on the U.S Court of Appeals." Ohio State Law Journal 58:1635-96.
36. George, Tracey E., and Lee Epstein. 1992. "On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision-Making." American Political Science Review 86:323-37.
37. Gibson, James. 1978. "Judges' Role Orientations Attitudes and Decisions: An Interactive Model." American Political Science Review 72:911-24.
38. Gibson, James. 1991. "Decision Making in Appellate Courts." In The American Courts, edited by John Gates and Charles Johnson, 255-78. Washington: CQ Press.
39. Gillman, Howard. 2001. "What's Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behavioralists Test the 'Legal Model' of Judicial Decision-Making." Law and Social Inquiry 36:465-504.
40. Green, Donald P., and Alan S. Gerber. 2002. "Reclaiming the Experimental Tradition in Political Science." In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milnor, 3:805-32. New York: Norton.
41. Gruenfeld, Deborah. 1995. "Status, Ideology and Integrative Complexity on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the Politics of Political Decision Making." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68:5-20.
42. Gruenfeld, Deborah, and Andrea B. Hollingshead. 1993. "Sociocognition in Work Groups: The Evolution of Integrative Complexity and Its Relation to Task Performance." Small Groups Research 24:383-405.
43. Gruenfeld, Deborah, Peter Kim, and Jared Preston. 1998. "Interdependence of Competitive Groups: How Power, Legitimacy, and Precedent Affect Integrative Complexity of the Majority." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, San Diego.
44. Guthrie, Chris, Jeffery J. Rachlinski, and Andrew J. Wistrich. 2001. "Inside the Judicial Mind." Cornell Law Review 86:777-830.
45. Hall, Melinda Gann, and Paul Brace. 1989. "Order in the Courts: A Neo-Institutional Approach to Judicial Consensus." Western Political Quarterly 42:391-407.
46. Hammond, Thomas H., Chris W. Bonneau, and Reginald S. Sheehan. 2005. Strategic Behavior and Policy Choice on the U.S. Supreme Court. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
47. Heider, Fritz. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley Press.
48. Hinch, Melvin J., and Michael C. Munger. 1997. Analytical Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
49. Hoekstra, Valerie, and Jefffery S. Segal. 1996. "The Shepherding of Local Public Opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb's Chapel." Journal of Politics 58: 1079-102.
50. Holyoak, Keith J., and Paul Thagard. 1995. Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.
51. Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder. 1987. News That Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. James, Dorothy B. 1968. "Role Theory and the Supreme Court." Journal of Politics 30:160-86.
53. Janis, Irving L. 1982. Groupthink. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
54. Johnson, Charles A. 1987. "Law, Politics, and Judicial Decision-Making." Law and Society Review 21:325-40.
55. Johnson, Frank. 1976. "The Constitution and the Federal District Judge." Texas Law Review 54:903-16.
56. Jost, John T., Jack Glaser, Arie W. Kruglanski, and Frank J. Sulloway. 2003. "Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition." Psychological Bulletin 129:339-75.
57. Kaarbo, Juliet, and Margaret G. Hermann. 1998. "Leadership Styles of Prime Ministers: How Individual Differences Affect the Foreign Policymaking Process." Leadership (uarterly 9:243-63.
58. Kahn, Ronald. 1994. "The Supreme Court as a (Counter) Majoritarian Institution: Misperceptions of the Warren, Burger and Rehnquist Courts." Detroit College of Law Review 1994:1-60.
59. Keppel, Geoffery. 1982. Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook. 2nd ed. En-glewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
60. Khong, Yueng Foong. 1992. Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of1965. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
61. Kinder, Donald, and Thomas R. Palfrey. 1993. "On Behalf of an Experimental Political Science." In Experimental Foundations of Political Science, edited by Donald Kinder and Thomas R. Palfrey, 1-42. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
62. Knight, Jack, and Lee Epstein. 1996. "The Norm of Stare Decisis." American Journal of Political Science 40:1018-35.
63. Koestler, Arthur. 1964. The Act of Creation. New York: Penguin.
64. Kunda, Ziva. 1990. "The Case for Motivated Reasoning." Psychological Bulletin 108:480-98.
65. Kunda, Ziva. 1999. Social Cognition: Making Sense of People. Cambridge: MIT Press.
66. Lacy, Dean. 2001. "A Theory of Nonseparable Preferences in Survey Responses." American Journal of Political Science 45:239-58.
67. Lerner, Jennifer S., and Phillip E. Tetlock. 1999. "Accounting for the Effects of Accountability." Psychological Bulletin 125:255-75.
68. Llewellyn, Karl. N. 1962. Realism in Theory and Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69. Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. London: Sage.
70. Lord, Charles G., Mark R. Lepper, and Elizabeth Preston. 1984. "Considering the Opposite: A Corrective Strategy for Social Judgment." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47:2131-43.
71. Lord, Charles G., Lee Ross, and Mark R. Lepper. 1979. "Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37:1098-21.
72. MacCoun, Robert. 1998. "Biases in the Interpretation and Use of Research Results." Annual Review of Psychology 49:259-87.
73. McGraw, Kathleen. 2000. "Contributions of the Cognitive Approach to Political Psychology." Political Psychology 21:805-32.
74. McGuire, William J. 1985. "The Nature of Attitudes and Attitude Change." In The Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd ed., edited by Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson, 2:233-346. New York: Random House.
75. Mendelson, Wallace. 1963. "The Neo-Behavioral Approach to the Judicial Process: A Critique." American Political Science Review 57:593-603.
76. Mondak, Jeffery J. 1994. "Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court: The Sources and Context of Legitimation." Political Research Quarterly 47:675-92.
77. Morehead, Thomas. 1998. "Small Groups." In The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., edited by Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey, 415-69. New York: McGraw Hill.
78. Moscovici, Serge. 1980. "Toward a Theory of Conversion Behavior." In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by Leonard Berkowitz, 13:209-39. New York: Academic Press.
79. Moscovici, Serge, and M. Zallvaloni. 1969. "The Group as a Polarizer of Attitudes." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 12:125-35.
80. Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
81. Murphy, Walter F., and Joseph Tanenhaus. 1972. The Study of Public Law. New York: Random House.
82. Nelson, Thomas E., Rosalie Clawson, and Zoe Oxley. 1997. "Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance." American Political Science Review 91:567-83.
83. Nemeth, Charlan Jeanne. 1986. "Differential Contributions of Majority and Minority Influence." Psychological Review 92:23-32.
84. Peppers, Todd C. 2006. Courtiers of the Marble Palace: The Rise and Influence of the Supreme Court Law Clerk. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
85. Posner, Richard A. 1990. The Problems of Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
86. Posner, Richard A. 1995. Overcoming Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
87. Posner, Richard A. 2003. Economic Analysis of Law. 6th ed. New York: Aspen.
88. Posner, Richard A. 2008. How Judges Think. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
89. Pound, Roscoe. 1905. "The Decadence of Equity." Columbia Law Review 5: 20-35.
90. Pound, Roscoe. 1913. "Justice According to Law." Columbia Law Review 13:696-713.
91. Pound, Roscoe. 1931. "The Call for a Realist Jurisprudence." Harvard Law Review 44: 697-711.
92. Pritchett, C. Herman. 1941. "Division of Opinion among Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, 1939-1941." American Political Science Review 35:890-98.
93. Pritchett, C. Herman. 1948. The Roosevelt Court: A Study in Judicial Politics and Values. New York: Macmillan.
94. Provine, Marie D. 1980. Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
95. Randazzo, Kirk A., Richard W. Waterman, and Jeffrey A. Fine. 2006. "Checking the Federal Courts: the Impact of Congressional Statutes on Judicial Behavior." Journal of Politics 68:1006-17.
96. Richards, Mark J., and Herbert M. Kritzer. 2002. "Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making." American Political Science Review 96:305-20.
97. Rohde, David, and Harold J. Spaeth. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
98. Ross, Lee. 1977. "The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process." In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10, edited by Leonard Berkowitz, 173-200. New York: Academic Press.
99. Ross, Michael R., Cathy McFarland, and Garth J. Fletcher. 1985. "Attribution and Social Perception." In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson, 2:73-122. New York: Random House.
100. Rowland, C. K., and Robert A. Carp. 1980. "A Longitudinal Study of Party Effects on Federal District Court Policy Propensities." American Journal of Political Science 24:291-305.
101. Rowland, C. K. 1996. Politics and Judgment in Federal District Courts. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
102. Ruger, Theodore W., Pauline T. Kim, Andrew D. Martin, and Kevin M. Kim. 2004. "The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decision Making." Columbia Law Review 104:1150-208.
103. Schauer, Fredrick. 1991. Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision Making in Law and Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
104. Schlag, Pierre 1985. "Rules and Standards." University of California Law Review 33:379-430.
105. Schubert, Glendon. 1962. "The 1960 Term of the Supreme Court." American Political Science Review 56:90-107.
106. Schwartz, Edward P. 1992. "Policy, Precedent and Power: A Positive Theory of Supreme Court Decision Making." Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 8:219-53.
107. Schwartz, Thomas. 1977. "Collective Choices, Separation of Issues and Vote Trading." American Political Science Review 71:999-1010.
108. Segal, Jeffrey A. 1984. "Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases." American Political Science Review 78:891-900.
109. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Albert D. Cover. 1989. "Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices." American Political Science Review 83:557-65.
110. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
111. Segal, Jeffrey A. 1996a. "The Influence of Stare Decisis on the Votes of United States Su-preme Court Justices." American Journal of Political Science 40:971-1003.
112. Segal, Jeffrey A. 1996b. "Norms, Dragons, and Stare Decisis: A Response." American Jour-nal of Political Science 40:1064-82.
113. Segal, Jeffrey A. 2002. The Supreme Court and The Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
114. Shapiro, Martin M. 1993. "Public Law and Judicial Politics." In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by Ada W. Finifter 365-81. Washington D.C.: American Political Science Association.
115. Sheehan, Reginald S., William Mishler, and Donald R. Songer. 1992. "Ideology, Status and the Differential Success of Direct Parties before the Supreme Court." American Political Science Review 86:464-71.
116. Sheppard, Stephen M. 1998. The History of U.S. Legal Education. Hackensack, N.J.: Salem Press.
117. Sherwin, Emily. 1999. "A Defense of Analogical Reasoning in Law." University of Chicago Law Review 66:1179-97.
118. Slotnick, Elliot. 1991. "Judicial Politics." In Political Science: Looking to the Future, edited by William Crotty, 4:67-97. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
119. Sniderman, Paul. 2000. "Taking Sides: A Fixed-Choice Theory of Political Reasoning." In Elements of Reason: Cognition Choice and the Bounds of Rationality, edited by Arthur Lupia, Matthew McCubbins, and Samuel Popkin, 67-84. New York: Cambridge University Press.
120. Spaeth, Harold J. 1961. "An Approach to the Study of Attitudinal Differences as an Aspect of Judicial Behavior." American Journal of Political Science 5:165-80.
121. Spaeth, Harold J. 1963. "An Analysis of Judicial Attitudes in Labor Relations Decisions of the Warren Court." Journal of Politics 25:290-311.
122. Spaeth, Harold J., and Jeffrey A. Segal. 1999. Majority Rule or Minority Will: Adherence to Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press.
123. Spiller, Pablo T., and Rafael Gely. 1992. "Congressional Control or Judicial Independence: The Determinants of U.S. Supreme Court Labor Relations Decisions." Rand Journal of Economics 23:463-92.
124. Spriggs, James F., II, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 1997. "Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court." Political Research Quarterly 50:365-86.
125. Stevens, Robert. 1983. Law School: Legal Education from the 1850s to the 1980s. Cha-pel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
126. Stone-Sweet, Alec. 2002. "Path Dependence, Precedent and Judicial Power." In On Law Politics and Judicialization, edited by Martin M. Shapiro and Stone-Sweet, 112-35. New York: Oxford University Press.
127. Suedfeld, Peter, and Phillip E. Tetlock. 1977a. "War, Peace, and Integrative Com-plexity." Journal of Conflict Resolution 221:427-42.
128. Suedfeld, Peter, and Phillip E. 1977b. "Integrative Complexity of Communications in International Cri-ses." Journal of Conflict Resolution 21:169-84.
129. Sunstein, Cass. 1993. "On Analogy in Legal Reasoning." Harvard Law Review 106:741-49.
130. Taber, Charles. 1998. "The Interpretation of Foreign Policy Events: A Cognitive Process Theory." In Problem Representation in Foreign Policy Decision Making, edited by Donald A. Sylvan and James F. Voss, 29-52. New York: Cambridge University Press.
131. Taber, Charles, and Milton Lodge. 2006. "Motivated Skepticism in Political Information Processing." American Journal of Political Science 50:755-69.
132. Taber, Charles, Milton Lodge, and Jill Glathar. 2001. "The Motivated Construction of Political Judgments." In Citizens and Politics: Perspectives from Political Psychology, edited by James Kuklinski, 198-226. New York: Cambridge University Press.
133. Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1966. "The Cumulative Scaling of Judicial Decisions." Harvard Law Review 79:1583-94.
134. Tesser, Abraham, and John Campbell. 1983. "Self Definition and Self-Evaluation Maintenance." In Psychological Perspectives on the Self, edited by Jerry Suls and Anthony Greenwald, 1-31. New York: Guilford Press.
135. Tetlock, Philip E. 1981. "Personality and Isolationism: Content Analysis of Senatorial Speeches." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41:737-43.
136. Tetlock, Philip E. 1983. "Accountability and the Complexity of Thought." Journal of Person-ality and Social Psychology 45:74-83.
137. Tetlock, Philip E. 1984. "Cognitive Style and Political Belief Systems in the British House of Commons." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46:365-75.
138. Tetlock, Philip E., Jane Bernzweig, and Jack L. Gallant. 1985. "Supreme Court Decision-Making: Cognitive Style as a Predictor of Ideological Consistency of Voting." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48:1227-39.
139. Tetlock, Phillip E., L. Skitka, and R. Boettger. 1989. "Social and Cognitive Strategies for Coping with Accountability Conformity, Complexity and Bolstering." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57:632-40.
140. Turow, Scott. 1977. One L. New York: Putnam.
141. Tversky, Amos. 1977. "Features of Similarity." Psychological Review 84:327-52.
142. Ulmer, S. Sidney. 1960. "Supreme Court Behavior and Civil Rights." Western Political Quarterly 13:288-311.
143. Ulmer, S. Sidney. 1965. "Toward a Theory of Subgroup Formation in the U.S. Supreme Court." Journal of Politics 27:133-52.
144. Ulmer, S. Sidney. 1973. Social Backgrounds as an Indicator to the Votes of Supreme Court Justices in Criminal Cases: 1947-1956 Terms. American Journal of Political Science 17:622-30.
145. Velleman, Daniel. 1994. How to Prove It: A Structural Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
146. Walker, Thomas G., and Deborah J. Barrow. 1985. "The Diversification of the Federal Bench: Policy and Process Ramifications." Journal of Politics 47:596-617.
147. Ward, Artemus, and David L. Weiden. 2006. Sorcerers' Apprentices: 100 Years of Law Clerks at the United States Supreme Court. New York: New York University Press.
148. Watson, James D. 1969. The Double Helix. New York: Signet.
149. Welch, Susan, Michael Combs, and John Gruhl. 1988. "Do Black Judges Make a Difference?" American Journal of Political Science 32:126-36.
150. Winter, David. 1987. "Leader Appeal, Leader Performance and the Motive Profiles of Leaders and Followers: A Study of American Presidents and Elections." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52:196-202.
151. Wistrich, Andrew, Chris Guthrie, and Jeffrey Rachlinski. 2005. "Can Judges Ignore Inadmissible Information?" University of Pennsylvania Law Review 153: 1251-345.