Contributions of the cognitive approach to political psychology

Political Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 805-832

  McGraw, Kathleen M ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Information processing; Memory; Political cognition; Social cognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034346465     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0162-895X.00217     Document Type: Article

References (177)

1. Abelson, R. P., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., & Fiske, S. T. (1982). Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 619-630.
2. Aldrich, J. H., Sullivan, J. L., & Borgida, E. (1989). Foreign affairs and issue voting: Do presidential candidates "waltz before a blind audience"? American Political Science Review, 83, 123-142.
3. Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Axelrod, R. (1973). Schema theory: An information processing model of perception and cognition. American Political Science Review, 67, 1248-1273.
6. Axelrod, R. (Ed.) (1976). Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Berent, M. K., & Krosnick, J. A. (1995). The relation between attitude importance and knowledge structure. In M. Lodge & K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process (pp. 91-110). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
8. Bianco, W. T. (1998). Different paths to the same result: Rational choice, political psychology, and impression formation in campaigns. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 1061-1081.
9. Brady, H. E., & Sniderman, P. M. (1985). Attitude attribution: A group basis for political reasoning. American Political Science Review, 79, 1061-1078.
10. Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., vol. 2, pp. 554-594). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Brewer, M. B., & Harasty, A. S. (1996). Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook ofmotivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (vol. 3, pp. 347-370). New York: Guilford.
12. Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
13. Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
14. Conover, P. J. (1984). The influence of group identifications on political perception and evaluation. Journal of Politics, 46, 760-785.
15. Conover, P. J. (1988). The roles of social groups in political thinking. British Journal of Political Science, 18, 51-76.
16. Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1984). How people organize the political world: A schematic model. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 95-126.
17. Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1986). Emotional reactions to the economy: I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 50-78.
18. Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1989). Candidate perception in an ambiguous world: Campaign, cues, and inference processes. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 912-940.
19. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: Free Press.
20. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1993). Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 1179-1206.
21. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22. Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
23. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth. TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
24. Fazio, R. H. (1990). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 74-97). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. Feldman, S. (1989). Measuring issue preferences: The problem of response instability. Political Analysis, 1, 25-60.
26. Feldman, S. (1995). Answering survey questions: The measurement and meaning of public opinion. In M. Lodge & K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process (pp. 249-270). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
27. Fenno, R. E. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts. Boston: Little, Brown.
28. Fiorina, M. P. (1975). Formal models in political science. American Journal of Political Science, 19, 133-159.
29. Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York: Free Press.
30. Fiske, A. P., & Haslam, N. (1996). Social cognition is thinking about relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 143-148.
31. Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., vol. 2, pp. 915-981). New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Fiske, A. P., & Tetlock, P. (1997). Taboo tradeoffs: Reactions to transactions that transgress spheres of exchange. Political Psychology, 18, 255-298.
33. Fiske, S. T. (1986). Schema-based versus piecemeal politics: A patchwork quilt, but not a blanket, of evidence. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition: The 19th annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 41-54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Fiske, S. T. (1992). Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from daguerreotype to laserphoto. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 877-889.
35. Fiske, S. T., & Godwin, S. A. (1994). Social cognition research and small group research: A West Side Story, or . . . ? Small Group Research, 25, 147-171.
36. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1-74.
37. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
39. Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In M. Friedman (Ed.), Essays in positive economics (pp. 3-43). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Funk, C. L. (1996). Understanding trait inferences in candidate images. In M. X. Delli Carpini, L. Huddy, & R. Y. Shapiro (Eds.), Research in micropolitics (vol. 5, pp. 97-123). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
41. Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Gerber, A., & Green, D. R. (1998). Rational learning and partisan attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 794-818.
43. Gerber, A., & Green, D. R. (1999). Misperceptions about perceptual bias. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 189-210.
44. Gibson, J. L., & Gouws, A. (2000). Social identities and political intolerance: Linkages within the South African mass public. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 278-292.
45. Graber, D. A. (1984). Processing the news: Taming the information tide. New York: Longman.
46. Graber, D. A. (1994). Why voters fail information tests: Can the hurdles be overcome? Political Communication, 11, 33-46.
47. Graber, D. A. (1996, April). Wrong questions, wrong answers: Measuring political knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
48. Green, D. R., Salovey, P., & Truax, K. M. (1999). Static, dynamic, causative bipolarity of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 856-867.
49. Green, D. R., & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50. Greenstein, F. I. (1973). Political psychology: A pluralistic universe. In J. N. Knutson (Ed.), Handbook of political psychology (pp. 438-469). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51. Hamill, R., Lodge, M., & Blake, F. (1985). The breadth, depth, and utility of class, partisan, and ideological schemata. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 850-870.
52. Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336-355.
53. Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Maddox, K. B. (1999). Dualities and continua: Implications for understanding perceptions of persons and groups. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 606-626). New York: Guilford.
54. Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268.
55. Herrmann, R. (1985). Perceptions and behavior in Soviet foreign policy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
56. Herrmann, R. (1994). Policy-relevant theory and the challenge of diagnosis: The end of the Cold War as a case study. Political Psychology, 15, 111-142.
57. Herstein, J. A. (1981). Keeping the voter's limits in mind: A cognitive process analysis of decision-making in voting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 843-861.
58. Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (1998). The media's role in public negativity toward Congress: Distinguishing emotional reactions and cognitive evaluations. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 475-498.
59. Higgins, E. T., Herman, C. P., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.) (1981). Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Holbrook, A.L., Krosnick, J.A., Gardner, W. & Cacioppo, J.T. (2000). The formation of attitudes toward presidential candidates and political parties: An asymmetric nonlinear process. Unpublished manuscript.
61. Huckfeldt, R., Levine, J., Morgan, W., & Sprague, J. (1999). Accessibility and the political utility of partisan and ideological orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 43, 888-911.
62. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1993). Citizens, contexts, and politics. In A. W. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline (pp. 281-304). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
63. Huddy, L. (1994). The political significance of voters' gender stereotypes. In M. X. Delli Carpini, J. Huddy, & R. Y. Shapiro (Eds.), Research in micropolitics (vol. 4, pp. 169-198). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
64. Huddy, L. (1998, September). The social nature of political identity: Feminist image and feminist identity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
65. Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 119-147.
66. Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1997). Public perceptions of race and crime: The role of racial stereotypes. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 375-401.
67. Iyengar, S. (1990). Shortcuts to political knowledge: The role of selective attention and accessibility. In J. A. Ferejohn & J. H. Kuklinski (Eds.), Information and democratic processes (pp. 160-185). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
68. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American public opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
70. Jacobs, J. R., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1994). Issues, candidate image, and priming: The use of private polls in Kennedy's 1960 presidential campaign. American Political Science Review, 88, 527-540.
71. Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
72. Jervis, R. (1989). Political psychology: Some challenges and opportunities. Political Psychology, 10, 481-493.
73. Judd, C.,& Krosnick, J. A. (1989). The structural bases of consistency among political attitudes: Effects of political expertise and attitude importance. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 99-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
74. Judd, C., & Kulik, J. (1980). Schematic effects of social attitudes on information processing and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 569-578.
75. Kahn, K. F. (1994). Does gender make a difference? An experimental examination of sex stereotypes and press patterns in statewide campaigns. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 162-195.
76. Kinder, D. R. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition: The 19th annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 233-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
77. Kinder, D. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., vol. 2, pp. 778-867). New York: McGraw-Hill.
78. Kinder, D. R., & Palfrey, T. R. (Eds.) (1993). Experimental foundations of political science. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
79. Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
80. Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 213-236.
81. Krosnick, J. A. (1999). Survey methodology. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 537-567.
82. Krosnick, J. A. (in press). Is political psychology sufficiently psychological? Distinguishing political psychology from psychological political science. In J. Kuklinski (Ed.), Thinking about political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
83. Krosnick, J. A., & Brannon, L. A. (1993). The impact of war on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Multidimensional effects of political involvement. American Political Science Review, 87, 963-975.
84. Krosnick, J. A., & Fabrigar, L. R. (in press). Designing questionnaires to measure attitudes: Insights from cognitive and social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
85. Krosnick, J. A., & McGraw, K. M. (in press). Psychological political science vs. political psychology "true to its name." In K.R. Monroe (Ed.), Political Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
86. Kuklinski, J. H., Luskin, R. C., & Bolland, J. (1991). Where is the schema? Going beyond the "S" word in political psychology. American Political Science Review, 85, 1341-1357.
87. Kuklinski, J. H., Riggle, E., Ottati, V., Schwarz, N., & Wyer, R. S. (1991). The cognitive and affective bases of political tolerance judgments. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 1-27.
88. Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
89. Lane, R. E. (1986). What are people trying to do with their schemata? The question of purpose. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition: The 19th annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 303-318). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
90. Larson, D. W. (1985). Origins of containment: A psychological explanation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
91. Larson, D. W. (1994). The role of belief systems and schemas in foreign policy decision making. Political Psychology, 15, 17-34.
92. Lau, R. R. (1989a). Construct accessibility and electoral choice. Political Behavior, 11, 5-32.
93. Lau, R. R. (1989b). Individual and contextual influences on group identification Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 220-231.
94. Lau, R. R. (1990). Political motivation and political cognition. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (vol. 2, pp. 297-332). New York: Guilford.
95. Lau, R. R. (1995). Information search during an election campaign: Introducing a process-tracing methodology for political scientists. In M. Lodge & K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process (pp. 179-206). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
96. Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (1997). Voting correctly. American Political Science Review 91, 585-598.
97. Lau, R. R., & Sears, D. O. (Eds.) (1986). Political cognition: The 19th annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
98. Lerner, J., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-275.
99. Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585-612.
100. Linville, P. W. (1982). The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 193-211.
101. Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Macmillan.
102. Lodge, M. (1995). Towards a procedural theory of candidate evaluation. In M. Lodge & K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process (pp. 111-140). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
103. Lodge, M., & Hamill, R. (1986). A partisan schema for political information processing. American Political Science Review, 80, 505-519.
104. Lodge, M., & McGraw, K. M. (Eds.) (1995). Political judgment: Structure and process. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
105. Lodge, M., McGraw, K. M., Conover, P. J., Feldman, S., & Miller, A. H. (1991). Where is the schema? Critiques. American Political Science Review, 85, 1357-1382.
106. Lodge, M., McGraw, K. M., & Stroh, P. (1989). An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 83, 399-419.
107. Lodge, M., & Steenbergen, M., with Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89, 309-326.
108. Lodge, M., Stroh, P., & Wahlke, J. (1990). Black box models of candidate evaluation. Political Behavior, 12, 5-18.
109. Lodge, M., & Taber, C. (in press). Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In A. Lupia, M. McCubbins, & S. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
110. Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? New York: Cambridge University Press.
111. Lusk, C. M., & Judd, C. M. (1988). Political expertise and the structural mediators of candidate evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 105-126.
112. Marcus, G. E. (1988). The structure of emotional response: 1984 presidential candidates. American Political Science Review, 82, 737-761.
113. Marcus, G. E., & MacKuen, M. B. (1993). Anxiety, enthusiasm, and the vote: The emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns. American Political Science Review, 87, 672-685.
114. Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
115. Marcus, G. E., & Rahn, W. (1990). Emotions and democratic politics. In S. Long (Ed.), Research in micropolitics (vol. 3, pp. 20-57). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
116. Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. L., Theiss-Morse, E., & Wood, S. L. (1995). With malice toward some: How people make civil liberties judgments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
117. Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
118. McGraw, K. M. (1996). Political methodology: Research design and experimental methods. In R. E. Goodin & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), A new handbook of political science (pp. 769-786). New York: Oxford University Press.
119. McGraw, K. M., Fischle, M., & Stenner, K. (2000). What politicians "know" depends on how they are asked. Unpublished manuscript.
120. McGraw, K. M., Fischle, M., Stenner, K., & Lodge, M. (1996). What's in a word? Bias in trait attributions of political leaders. Political Behavior, 18, 263-281.
121. McGraw, K. M., & Hoekstra, V. (1994). Experimentation in political science: Historical trends and future directions. In M. X. Delli Carpini, L. Huddy, & R. Y. Shapiro (Eds.), Research in micropolitics (vol. 4, pp. 3-30). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
122. McGraw, K. M., & Ling, C. (2000). Media priming of presidential and group evaluations. Manuscript submitted for publication.
123. McGraw, K. M., & Lodge, M. (1995). Information processing approaches to the study of political judgment. In M. Lodge & K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process (pp. 1-14). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
124. McGraw, K. M., Lodge, M., & Stroh, P. (1990a). On-line processing in candidate evaluation: The effects of issue order, issue salience and sophistication. Political Behavior, 12, 41-58.
125. McGraw, K. M., Lodge, M., & Stroh, P. (1990b). Processes of candidate evaluation: On-line or memory-based? A review and synthesis of four experiments. Unpublished manuscript.
126. McGraw, K. M., & Pinney, N. (1990). The effects of general and domain-specific expertise on political memory and judgment processes. Social Cognition, 8, 9-30.
127. McGraw, K. M., Pinney, N., & Neumann, D. (1991). Memory for political actors: Contrasting the use of semantic and evaluative organizational strategies. Political Behavior, 13, 165-189.
128. McGraw, K. M., & Steenbergen, M. (1995). Pictures in the head: Memory representations of political actors. In M. Lodge & K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process (pp. 15-42). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
129. McGuire, W. J. (1993). The poly-psy relationship: Three phases of a long affair. In S. Iyengar & W. J. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 9-35). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
130. Meffert, M., Guge, M., & Lodge, M. (1997, October). Good, bad, indifferent, and ambivalent: The consequences of multidimensional political attitudes. Paper presented at the conference "No Opinion, Instability and Change in Public Opinion Research," Amsterdam.
131. Merelman, R.M. (1969). The development of political ideology: A framework for the analysis of political socialization. American Political Science Review, 63, 750-767.
132. Merelman, R. M. (1979). On the asking of relevant questions: Discussion notes towards understanding the training of political psychologists. Political Psychology, 1, 104-109.
133. Miller, A. H., Wattenberg, M. P., & Malanchuk, O. (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. American Political Science Review, 80, 521-540.
134. Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (1996). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: A program of research on the priming hypothesis. In D. Mutz, P. Sniderman, & R. Brody (Eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change (pp. 79-100). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
135. Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 301-315.
136. Mondak, J. J. (2000). Reconsidering the measurement of political knowledge. Political Analysis, 8, 57-82.
137. Mondak, J. J. (in press). Developing valid knowledge scales. American Journal of Political Science.
138. Monroe, K. R. (Ed.) (1991). The economic approach to politics: A critical reassessment of the theory of rational action. New York: HarperCollins.
139. Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
140. Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567-583.
141. Nisbett, R., & Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview.
142. Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
143. Ostrom, T. (1994). The sovereignty of social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), The handbook of social cognition (pp. 1-10). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
144. Ottati, V. C., Steenbergen, M. R., & Riggle, E. (1992). The cognitive and affective components of political attitudes: Measuring the determinants of candidate evaluations. Political Behavior, 14, 423-442.
145. Ottati, V. C., & Wyer, R. S. (1993). Affect and political judgment. In S. Iyengar & W. J. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 296-320). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
146. Peffley, M., Hurwitz, J., & Sniderman, P. M. (1997). Racial stereotypes and whites' political views of blacks in the context of welfare and crime. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 30-60.
147. Price, V. & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion. Progress in the Communication Sciences, 13, 173-211.
148. Rahn, W. M. (1993). The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 412-496.
149. Rahn, W. M. (1995). Candidate evaluation in complex information environments: Cognitive organization and comparison processes. In M. Lodge & K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process (pp. 43-64). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
150. Rahn, W. M. (in press). Affect as information: The role of public mood in political reasoning. In A. Lupia, M. McCubbins, & S. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
151. Rahn, W. M., Aldrich, J. H., & Borgida, E. (1994). Individual and contextual variations in political candidate appraisal. American Political Science Review, 88, 193-199.
152. Rahn, W. M., Aldrich, J. H., Borgida, E., & Sullivan, J. L. (1990). A social-cognitive model of candidate appraisal. In J. A. Ferejohn & J. H. Kuklinski (Eds.), Information and democratic processes (pp. 136-159). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
153. Rahn, W. M., Kroeger, B., & Kite, C. (1996). A framework for the study of public mood. Political Psychology. 17, 29-58.
154. Rahn, W. M., Krosnick, J. A., & Breuning, M. (1994). Rationalization and derivation processes in survey studies of political candidate evaluation. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 582-600.
155. Rahn, W. M., & Sullivan, J. L. (in press). Political psychology and political science. In J. H. Kuklinski (Ed.), Doing political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
156. Redlawsk, D. (in press). You must remember this: A test of the on-line model of voting. Journal of Politics.
157. Sears, D. O. (1989). The ecological niche of political psychology. Political Psychology, 10, 501-506.
158. Sherman, S. J., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1989). Social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 281-326.
159. Sniderman, P. M., Brody. R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
160. Sniderman, P. M., & Grob, D. B. (1996). Innovations in experimental design in attitude surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 377-399.
161. Steenbergen, M., & Brewer, P. (1997, October). The not-so-ambivalent public. Paper presented at the conference "No Opinion, Instability and Change in Public Opinion Research," Amsterdam.
162. Sudman, S., Bradburn, N. M., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
163. Sullivan, J. L., Piereson, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1982). Political tolerance and American democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
164. Sullivan, J. L., & Rahn, W. M. (in press). The contours of political psychology: Situating research on political information processing. In J. H. Kuklinski (Ed.), Citizens and information: Perspectives from political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
165. Sylvan, D. A., & Voss, J. F. (Eds.) (1998). Problem representation in foreign policy decision making. New York: Cambridge University Press.
166. Taber, C. S., & Steenbergen, M. S. (1995). Computational experiments in electoral behavior. In M. Lodge & K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process (pp. 141-178). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
167. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
168. Terkildsen, N. (1993). When white voters evaluate black candidates: The processing implications of candidate skin color, prejudice, and self-monitoring. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 1032-1053.
169. Tetlock, P. E. (1989). Structure and function in political belief systems. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 129-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
170. Tetlock, P. E. (1998). Social psychology and world politics. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., vol. 2, pp. 868-914). New York: McGraw-Hill.
171. Thompson, L., & Fine, G. A. (1999). Socially shared cognition, affect, and behavior: A review and integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 278-303.
172. Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 299-314.
173. Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1989). Self-categorization theory and social influence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (pp. 233-275). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
174. Wahlke, J. C., & Lodge, M. (1972). Psychophysiological measures of political attitudes and behavior. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 16, 505-537.
175. Zaller, J. R. (1990). Political awareness, elite opinion leadership, and the mass survey response Social Cognition, 8, 125-153.
176. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
177. Zaller, J. R., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 579-616.