Genome-wide characterization of adaptation and speciation in tiger swallowtail butterflies using de novo transcriptome assemblies

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1233-1245

  Zhang, Wei ^a   Kunte, Krushnamegh ^b   Kronforst, Marcus R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Hybrid speciation; Introgression; Papilio; Transcriptome

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME;

ANIMAL; BUTTERFLY; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; INSECT GENOME; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; HYBRID SPECIATION; INTROGRESSION; PAPILIO;

ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOME, INSECT; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; SELECTION, GENETIC; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ADAPTATION; HYBRID SPECIATION; INTROGRESSION; PAPILIO; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84891530915     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evt090     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abbott RJ, Rieseberg LH. 2012. Hybrid speciation. Encyclopaedia of Life Sciences (eLS). Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons.
2. Andolfatto P. 2008. Controlling type-I error of the McDonald-Kreitman test in genomewide scans for selection on noncoding DNA. Genetics 180:1767-1771.
3. Anisimova M, Bielawski JP, Yang Z. 2001. Accuracy and power of the likelihood ratio test in detecting adaptive molecular evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 18:1585-1592.
4. Brower J V Z. 1958. Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies: Part II. Battus philenor and Papilio troilus, P. polyxenes and P. glaucus. Evolution 12:123-136.
5. Buerkle CA, Rieseberg LH. 2007. The rate of genome stabilization in homoploid hybrid species. Evolution 62:266-275.
6. Charif D, Lobry JR. 2007. SeqinR 1.0-2: a contributed package to the R project for statistical computing devoted to biological sequences retrieval and analysis. In: Bastolla U, Porto M, Roman HE, Vendruscolo M, editors. Structural approaches to sequence evolution: molecules, networks, populations. New York: Springer Verlag. p. 207-232.
7. Conesa A, et al. 2005. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21:3674-3676.
8. Durand EY, Patterson N, Reich D, Slatkin M. 2011. Testing for ancient admixture between closely related populations. Mol Biol Evol. 28:2239-2252.
9. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792-1797.
10. Felsenstein J. 1989. PHYLIP-phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164-166.
11. Futahashi R, et al. 2008. Genome-wide identification of cuticular protein genes in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 38:1138-1146.
12. Grabherr MG, et al. 2011. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 29:644-652.
13. Grant PR. 1999. Ecology and evolution of Darwin's finches. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
14. Green RE, et al. 2010. A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome. Science 328:710-722.
15. Guindon S, et al. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 59:307-321.
16. Hagen RH, Lederhouse RC, Bossart JL, Scriber JM. 1991. Papilio canadensis and P. glaucus (Papilionidae) are distinct species. J Lep Soc. 45:245-258.
17. Hagen RH, Scriber J. 1991. Systematics of the Papilio glaucus and P.troilus species groups (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae): inferences from allozymes. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 84:380-395.
18. Hagen RH, Scriber JM. 1989. Sex-linked diapause, color, and allozyme loci in Papilio glaucus: linkage analysis and significance in a hybrid zone. J Heredity. 80:179-185.
19. Hagen RH, Scriber JM. 1995. Sex chromosomes and speciation in tiger swallowtails. In: Scriber JM, Tsubaki Y, Lederhouse RC, editors. Swallowtail butterflies: their ecology and evolutionary biology. Gainesville (FL): Scientific Publishers, Inc. p. 211-227.
20. Heliconius Genome Consortium. 2012. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487:94-98.
21. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. 2008. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:1-13.
22. Hulsen T, Huynen MA, de Vlieg J, Groenen PM. 2006. Benchmarking ortholog identification methods using functional genomics data. Genome Biol. 7:R31.
23. Jombart T, Ahmed I. 2011. adegenet 1.3-1:new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 27:3070-3071.
24. Kent WJ. 2002. BLAT-the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 12:656-664.
25. Kryazhimskiy S, Plotkin JB. 2008. The population genetics of dN/dS. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000304.
26. Kunte K, et al. 2011. Sex chromosome mosaicism and hybrid speciation among tiger swallowtail butterflies. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002274.
27. Lederhouse RC, Ayres MP, Scriber JM, Tsubaki Y. 1995. Physiological and behavioral adaptations to variable thermal environments in North American swallowtail butterflies. In: Scriber JM, Tsubaki Y, Lederhouse RC, editors. Swallowtail butterflies: their ecology and evolutionary biology. Gainesville (FL): Scientific Publishers, Inc. p. 71-81.
28. Li WH. 1993. Unbiased estimation of the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution. J Mol Evol. 36:96-99.
29. Luebke HJ, Scriber JM, Yandell BS. 1988. Use of multivariate discriminant analysis of male wing morphometrics to delineate a hybrid zone for Papilio glaucus glaucus and P. g. canadensis in Wisconsin. Am Midl Nat. 119:366-379.
30. Mallet J. 2007. Hybrid speciation. Nature 446:279-283.
31. Mallet J. 2009. Rapid speciation, hybridization and adaptive radiation in the Heliconius melpomene group. In: Butlin R, Bridle J, Schluter D, editors. Speciation and patterns of diversity. Sheffield (UK): Cambridge University Press. p. 177-194.
32. Mavárez J, Linares M. 2008. Homoploid hybrid speciation in animals. Mol Ecol. 17:4181-4185.
33. McDonald JH, Kreitman M. 1991. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351:652-654.
34. O'Neil ST, et al. 2010. Population-level transcriptome sequencing of nonmodel organisms Erynnis propertius and Papilio zelicaon. BMC Genomics 11:310.
35. Pan M, et al. 2008. Characterization of mitochondrial genome of Chinese wild mulberry silkworm, Bombyx mandarina (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae). Sci China C Life Sci. 51:693-701.
36. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289-290.
37. Pavulaan H, Wright DM. 2002. Pterourus appalachiensis (Papilionidae: Papilioninae), a new swallowtail butterfly from the Appalachian region of the United States. Taxon Rep Internal Lepidoptera Survey. 3:1-20.
38. Pavulaan H, Wright DM. 2004. Discovery of a black female form of Pterourus appalachiensis (Papilionidae: Papilioninae) and additional observations of the species in West Virginia. Taxon Rep Internal Lepidoptera Survey. 6:1-10.
39. Pepke S, Wold B, Mortazavi A. 2009. Computation for ChIP-seq and RNA-seq studies. Nat Methods. 6:S22-S32.
40. Rieseberg LH. 1997. Hybrid origins of plant species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 28:359-389.
41. Rieseberg LH, Van Fossen C, Desrochers AM. 1995. Hybrid speciation accompanied by genomic reorganization in wild sunflowers. Nature 375:313-316.
42. Ritland DB, Scriber JM. 1985. Larval developmental rates of three putative subspecies of tiger swallowtail butterflies, Papilio glaucus, and their hybrids in relation to temperature. Oecologia 65:185-193.
43. Scriber JM. 1996. A new 'Cold Pocket' hypothesis to explain local host preference shifts in Papilio canadensis. Entomol Exp Appl. 80:315-319.
44. Scriber JM, Hagen RH, Lederhouse RC. 1996. Genetics of mimicry in the tiger swallowtail butterflies, Papilio glaucus and P. canadensis (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Evolution 50:222-236.
45. Scriber JM, Hainze J. 1987. Geographic variation in host utilization and the development of insect outbreaks. In: Barbosa P, Schultz JC, editors. Insect outbreaks: ecological and evolutionary processes. New York: Academic Press. p. 433-468.
46. Scriber JM, Lederhouse RC, Dowell RV. 1995. Hybridization studies with North American swallowtails. In: Scriber JM, Tsubaki Y, Lederhouse RC, editors. Swallowtail butterflies: their ecology and evolutionary biology. Gainesville (FL): Scientific Publishers, Inc. p. 269-281.
47. Scriber JM, Ording GJ. 2005. Ecological speciation without host plant specialization; possible origins of a recently described cryptic Papilio species. Ent Exp Appl. 115:247-263.
48. Seehausen O. 2006. African cichlid fish: a model system in adaptive radiation research. Proc Biol Sci. 273:1987-1998.
49. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. 2001. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17:1246-1247.
50. Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2009. The role of hybridization in plant speciation. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 60:561-588.
51. Sperling F A H. 1993. Mitochondrial DNA variation and Haldane's rule in the Papilio glaucus and P. troilus species group. Heredity 71:227-227.
52. Thornton K. 2003. Libsequence: a C++ class library for evolutionary genetic analysis. Bioinformatics 19:2325-2327.
53. Tibshirani R, Leisch F. 2012. Bootstrap: functions for the book "An introduction to the bootstrap" by B. Efron and R. Tibshirani, 1993. New York: Chapman & Hall.
54. Winter CB, Porter AH. 2010. AFLP linkage map of hybridizing swallowtail butterflies, Papilio glaucus and Papilio canadensis. J Hered. 101:83-90.
55. Xia Q, et al. 2004. A draft sequence for the genome of the domesticated silkworm (Bombyx mori). Science 306:1937-1940.
56. Zakharov EV, Caterino MS, Sperling F A H. 2004. Molecular phylogeny, historical biogeography, and divergence time estimates for swallowtail butterflies of the genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Syst Biol. 53:193-215.