Deciphering genetic diversity and inheritance of tomato fruit weight and composition through a systems biology approach

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 64, Issue 18, 2013, Pages 5737-5752

  Pascual, Laura ^a   Xu, Jiaxin ^a,b   Biais, Benoît ^c,d   Maucourt, Mickaël ^d,e   Ballias, Patricia ^c,d,e   Bernillon, Stéphane ^c,e   Deborde, Catherine ^c   Jacob, Daniel ^c,e   Desgroux, Aurore ^a   Faurobert, Mireille ^a   Bouchet, Jean Paul ^a   Gibon, Yves ^c,e   Moing, Annick ^c   Causse, Mathilde ^a  

^a Researches Center of Avignon   (France)

^b NORTHWEST A F UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Univ Bordeaux   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^e Bordeaux Functional Genomic Center   (France)

Author keywords

Fruit; metabolome; proteome; systems biology; tomato

Indexed keywords

ENZYME; PROTEOME; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; FRUIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; METABOLISM; METABOLOME; METHODOLOGY; ORGAN SIZE; PHYSIOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TOMATO; TOMATO.;

FRUIT; METABOLOME; PROTEOME; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TOMATO.;

ENZYMES; FRUIT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; ORGAN SIZE; PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEOME; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84891498979     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ert349     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Blanca J, Canizares J, Cordero L, Pascual L, Diez MJ, Nuez F. 2012. Variation revealed by SNP genotyping and morphology provides insight into the origin of the tomato. PLoS One 7, e48198
2. Carrari F, Baxter C, Usadel B, et al. 2006. Integrated analysis of metabolite and transcript levels reveals the metabolic shifts that underlie tomato fruit development and highlight regulatory aspects of metabolic network behavior. Plant Physiology 142, 1380-1396
3. Conesa A, Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Talon M, Robles M. 2005. Blast2GO: A universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21, 3674-3676
4. Deborde C, Maucourt M, Baldet P, et al. 2009. Proton NMR quantitative profiling for quality assessment of greenhouse-grown tomato fruit. Metabolomics 52, 183-198
5. Dai N, German MA, Matsevitz T, Hanael R, Swartzberg D, Yeselson Y, Petreikov M, Schaffer AA, Granot D. 2002. LeFRK2, the gene encoding the major fructokinase in tomato fruits, is not required for starch biosynthesis in developing fruits. Plant Science 162, 423-430
6. Faurobert M, Mihr C, Bertin N, Pawlowski T, Negroni L, Sommerer N, Causse M. 2007. Major proteome variations associated with cherry tomato pericarp development and ripening. Plant Physiology 143, 1327-1346
7. Faurobert M, Iijima Y, Aoki K. 2013. Proteomics and metabolomics. In: Liedl B, Labate JA, Stommel JR, Slade A, Kole C, eds. Genetics, genomics and breeding of tomato. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Taylor& Francis Group, 403-421
8. Ferry-Dumazet H, Gil L, Deborde C, Moing A, Bernillon S, Rolin D, Nikolski M, de Daruvar A, Jacob D. 2011. MeRy-B: A web knowledge base for the storage, visualization, analysis and annotation of plant NMR metabolomic profiles. BMC Plant Biology 11, 104
9. Filzmoser P, Gschwandtner M, Todorov V. 2012. Review of sparse methods in regression and classification with application to chemometrics. Journal of Chemometrics 263, 42-51
10. Garcia V, Stevens R, Gil L, et al. 2009. An integrative genomics approach for deciphering the complex interactions between ascorbate metabolism and fruit growth and composition in tomato. Comptes Rendus Biologies 332, 1007-1021
11. Gibon Y, Blaesing OE, Hannemann J, Carillo P, Hohne M, Hendriks JHM, Palacios N, Cross J, Selbig J, Stitt M. 2004. A robot-based platform to measure multiple enzyme activities in Arabidopsis using a set of cycling assays: Comparison of changes of enzyme activities and transcript levels during diurnal cycles and in prolonged darkness. The Plant Cell 16, 3304-3325
12. Gibon Y, Usadel B, Blaesing OE, Kamlage B, Hoehne M, Trethewey R, Stitt M. 2006. Integration of metabolite with transcript and enzyme activity profiling during diurnal cycles in Arabidopsis rosettes. Genome Biology 7, R76
13. Gillaspy G, Bendavid H, Gruissem W. 1993. Fruits-A developmental perspective. The Plant Cell 5, 1439-1451
14. Giovannoni JJ. 2004. Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. The Plant Cell 16, S170-S180
15. Gomez-Romero M, Segura-Carretero A, Fernandez-Gutierrez A. 2010. Metabolite profiling and quantification of phenolic compounds in methanol extracts of tomato fruit. Phytochemistry 71, 1848-1864
16. Gutierez RA, Stokes TL, Thum K, et al. 2008. Systems approach identifies an organic nitrogen-responsive gene network that is regulated by the master clock control gene CCA1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105, 4939-4944
17. Hirai MY, Klein M, Fujikawa Y, Yano M, Goodenowe DB, Yamazaki Y, Kanaya S, Nakamura Y, Kitayama M, Suzuki H. 2005. Elucidation of gene-To-gene and metabolite-To-gene networks in Arabidopsis by integration of metabolomics and transcriptomics. Journal of Biological Chemistry 280, 25590-25595
18. Ideker T, Galitski T, Hood L. 2001. A new approach to decoding life: Systems biology. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 2, 343-372
19. Keurentjes, JJB, Sulpice R, Gibon Y, Steinhauser MC, Fu J, Koornneef M, Stitt M, Vreugdenhil D. 2008. Integrative analyses of genetic variation in enzyme activities of primary carbohydrate metabolism reveal distinct modes of regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Biology 9, R129
20. Keurentjes JJB. 2009. Genetical metabolomics: Closing in on phenotypes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 12, 223-230
21. Kliebenstein DJ. 2009a. Advancing genetic theory and application by metabolic quantitative trait loci analysis. The Plant Cell 21, 1637-1646
22. Kliebenstein DJ. 2009b. Quantification of variation in expression networks. Methods in Molecular Biology 553, 227-245
23. Kliebenstein DJ. 2010. Systems biology uncovers the foundation of natural genetic diversity. Plant Physiology 152, 480-486
24. Le Cao KA, Gonzalez I, Dejean S. 2009. integrOmics: An R package to unravel relationships between two omics datasets. Bioinformatics 25, 2855-2856
25. Li L, Lu K, Chen Z, Mu T, Hu Z, Li X. 2008. Dominance, overdominance and epistasis condition the heterosis in two heterotic rice hybrids. Genetics 180, 1725-1742
26. Lippman ZB, Zamir D. 2007. Heterosis: Revisiting the magic. Trends in Genetics 23, 60-66
27. Meyer RS, DuVal AE, Jensen HR. 2012. Patterns and processes in crop domestication: An historical review and quantitative analysis of 203 global food crops. New Phytologist 196, 29-48
28. Miller JC, Tanksley SD. 1990. RFLP analysis of phylogeneticrelationships and genetic-variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80, 437-448
29. Morcuende R, Bari R, Gibon Y, et al. 2007. Genome-wide reprogramming of metabolism and regulatory networks of Arabidopsis in response to phosphorus. Plant, Cell and Environment 30, 85-112
30. Mounet F, Moing A, Garcia V, et al. 2009. Gene and metabolite regulatory network analysis of early developing fruit tissues highlights new candidate genes for the control of tomato fruit composition and development. Plant Physiology 149, 1505-1528
31. Nesbitt, TC, Tanksley SD. 2002. Comparative sequencing in the genus Lycopersicon: Implications for the evolution of fruit size in the domestication of cultivated tomatoes. Genetics 162, 365-379
32. Osorio S, Alba R, Damasceno CMB, et al. 2011. Systems biology of tomato fruit development: Combined transcript, protein, and metabolite analysis of tomato transcription factor nor, rin and ethylene receptor nr mutants reveals novel regulatory interactions. Plant Physiology 157, 405-425
33. Osuna D, Usadel B, Morcuende R, et al., 2007. Temporal responses of transcripts, enzyme activities and metabolites after adding sucrose to carbon-deprived Arabidopsis seedlings. The Plant Journal 49, 463-491
34. Prudent M, Bertin N, Genard M, Munos S, Rolland S, Garcia V, Petit J, Baldet P, Rothan C, Causse M. 2010. Genotypedependent response to carbon availability in growing tomato fruit. Plant, Cell and Environment 33, 1186-1204
35. Ranc N, Munos S, Santoni S, Causse M. 2008. A clarified position for Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme in the evolutionary history of tomatoes (solanaceae). BMC Plant Biology 8, 130
36. Rockman MV, Kruglyak L. 2006. Genetics of global gene expression. Nature Reviews Genetics 711, 862-872
37. Rosenfeld N, Elowitz MB, Alon U. 2002. Negative autoregulation speeds the response times of transcription networks. Journal of Molecular Biology 323, 785-793
38. Saito K, Matsuda F. 2010 Metabolomics for functional genomics, systems biology, and biotechnology. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61, 463-489
39. Schauer N, Semel Y, Balbo I, Steinfath M, Repsilber D, Selbig J, Pleban T, Zamir D, Fernie AR. 2008. Mode of inheritance of primary metabolic traits in tomato. The Plant Cell 20, 509-523
40. Schauer N, Semel Y, Roessner U, et al. 2006. Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nature Biotechnology 24, 447-454
41. Sim SC, Durstewitz G, Plieske J, et al. 2012. Development of a large SNP genotyping array and generation of high-density genetic maps in tomato. PLoS One 7, e40563
42. Springer NM, Stupar RM. 2007. Allele-specific expression patterns reveal biases and embryo-specific parent-of-origin effects in hybrid maize. The Plant Cell 19, 2391-2402
43. Stacklies W, Redestig H, Scholz M, Walther D, Selbig J. 2007. pcaMethods-A bioconductor package providing PCA methods for incomplete data. Bioinformatics 23, 1164-1167
44. Steinhauser MC, Steinhauser D, Gibon Y, Bolger M, Arrivault S, Usadel B, Zamir D, Fernie AR, Stitt M. 2011. Identification of enzyme activity quantitative trait loci in a Solanum lycopersicum×Solanum pennellii introgression line population. Plant Physiology 157, 998-1014
45. Steinhauser MC, Steinhauser D, Koehl K, Carrari F, Gibon Y, Fernie AR, Stitt M. 2010. Enzyme activity profiles during fruit development in tomato cultivars and Solanum pennellii. Plant Physiology 153, 80-98
46. Stevens R, Buret M, Duffe P, Garchery C, Baldet P, Rothan C, Causse M. 2007. Candidate genes and quantitative trait loci affecting fruit ascorbic acid content in three tomato populations. Plant Physiology 143, 1943-1953
47. Stylianou IM, Affourtit JP, Shockley KR, Wilpan RY, Abdi FA, Bhardwaj S, Rollins J, Churchill GA, Paigen B. 2008. Applying gene expression, proteomics and single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis for complex trait gene identification. Genetics 178, 1795-1805
48. Stuber CW. 2010. Heterosis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding Reviews 12. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
49. Tomato Genome Consortium. 2012. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485, 635-641
50. Wang Z, Potter RH, Jones MG. 2003. Differential display analysis of gene expression in the cytoplasm of giant cells induced in tomato roots by Meloidogyne javanica. Molecular Plant Pathology 4, 361-371
51. Wang H, Schauer N, Usadel B, Frasse P, Zouine M, Hernould M, Latche A, Pech JC, Fernie AR, Bouzayen M. 2009. Regulatory features underlying pollination-dependent and-independent tomato fruit set revealed by transcript and primary metabolite profiling. The Plant Cell 21, 1428-1452
52. Xu J, Pascual L, Aurant R, Bouchet JP, Valot B, Zivy M, Causse M, Faurobert M. 2013a. An extensive proteome map of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit pericarp. Proteomics (in press
53. Xu J, Ranc N, Munos S, Rolland S, Bouchet JP, Desplat N, Le Paslier MC, Liang Y, Brunel D, Causse M. 2013b. Phenotypic diversity and association mapping for fruit quality traits in cultivated tomato and related species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 126, 567-581