An extensive proteome map of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit pericarp

Proteomics

Volumn 13, Issue 20, 2013, Pages 3059-3063

  Xu, Jiaxin ^a,b   Pascual, Laura ^a   Aurand, Rémy ^a,c   Bouchet, Jean Paul ^a   Valot, Benoît ^d   Zivy, Michel ^d   Causse, Mathilde ^a   Faurobert, Mireille ^a  

^a Researches Center of Avignon   (France)

^b NORTHWEST A F UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Domaine Saint Paul   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

Fruit pericarp proteome; Genome sequence; Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry; Plant proteomics; Tomato; Two dimensional gel electrophoresis

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN VARIANT; PROTEOME; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; FRUIT; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOTYPE; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NONHUMAN; PEPTIDE MAPPING; PERICARP; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT GENE; PLANT GENOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; TOMATO; TWO DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS;

FRUIT PERICARP PROTEOME; GENOME SEQUENCE; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY; PLANT PROTEOMICS; TOMATO; TWO-DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS;

FRUIT; GENE ONTOLOGY; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PLANT PROTEINS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 84885406397     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201200438     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Weckwerth, W., Integration of metabolomics and proteomics in molecular plant physiology - coping with the complexity by data-dimensionality reduction. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 132, 176-189.
2. Goff, S. A., A unifying theory for general multigenic heterosis: energy efficiency, protein metabolism, and implications for molecular breeding. New Phytol. 2011, 189, 923-937.
3. Palma, J. M., Corpas, F. J., del Rio, L. A., Proteomics as an approach to the understanding of the molecular physiology of fruit development and ripening. J. Proteomics 2011, 74, 1230-1243.
4. Giovannoni, J. J., Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell 2004, 16(Suppl), S170-S180.
5. Faurobert, M., Iijima, Y., Aoki, K., Proteomics and metabolomics, in: Liedl, B. E., Labate, J. A., Stommel, J. R., Slade, A., Kole, C. (Eds.), Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Tomato, CRC Press, Florida, USA, 2012, pp. 403-427.
6. Iwahashi, Y., Hosoda, H., Effect of heat stress on tomato fruit protein expression. Electrophoresis 2000, 21, 1766-1771.
7. Page, D., Gouble, B., Valot, B., Bouchet, J. P. etal., Protective proteins are differentially expressed in tomato genotypes differing for their tolerance to low-temperature storage. Planta 2010, 232, 483-500.
8. Manaa, A., Ben Ahmed, H., Valot, B., Bouchet, J. P. etal., Salt and genotype impact on plant physiology and root proteome variations in tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 2797-2813.
9. Marjanovic, M., Stikic, R., Vucelic-Radovic, B., Savic, S. etal., Growth and proteomic analysis of tomato fruit under partial root-zone drying. OMICS 2012, 16, 343-356.
10. Sheoran, I. S., Olson, D. J., Ross, A. R., Sawhney, V. K., Proteome analysis of embryo and endosperm from germinating tomato seeds. Proteomics 2005, 5, 3752-3764.
11. Rocco, M., D'Ambrosio, C., Arena, S., Faurobert, M. etal., Proteomic analysis of tomato fruits from two ecotypes during ripening. Proteomics 2006, 6, 3781-3791.
12. Faurobert, M., Mihr, C., Bertin, N., Pawlowski, T. etal., Major proteome variations associated with cherry tomato pericarp development and ripening. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1327-1346.
13. Sato, S., Tabata, S., Hirakawa, H., Asamizu, E. etal., The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 2012, 485, 635-641.
14. Ranc, N., Munos, S., Santoni, S., Causse, M., A clarified position for solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme in the evolutionary history of tomatoes (solanaceae). BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8, 130.
15. Chaib, J., Devaux, M. F., Grotte, M. G., Robini, K. etal., Physiological relationships among physical, sensory, and morphological attributes of texture in tomato fruits. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 1915-1925.
16. Faurobert, M., Pelpoir, E., Chaib, J., Phenol extraction of proteins for proteomic studies of recalcitrant plant tissues. Methods Mol. Biol. 2007, 355, 9-14.
17. Conesa, A., Gotz, S., Garcia-Gomez, J. M., Terol, J. etal., Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 3674-3676.
18. Sung, D., Vierling, E., Guy, C., Comprehensive expression profile analysis of the Arabidopsis hsp70 gene family. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 789-800.
19. Rappsilber, J., Ryder, U., Lamond, A. I., Mann, M., Large-scale proteomic analysis of the human spliceosome. Genome Res. 2002, 12, 1231-1245.
20. Wang, W. X., Vinocur, B., Shoseyov, O., Altman, A., Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 244-252.
21. Neta-Sharir, I., Isaacson, T., Lurie, S., Weiss, D., Dual role for tomato heat shock protein 21: protecting photosystem II from oxidative stress and promoting color changes during fruit maturation. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1829-1838.
22. Vizcaíno, J. A., Côté, R. G., Csordas, A., Dianes, J. A. et al., The PRoteomics IDEntifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: Status in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D1063-D1069.