(ii) Biomechanics of implant fixation

Orthopaedics and Trauma

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 76-84

  Pal, Bidyut ^a   Puthumanapully, Pramod Kumar ^a   Amis, Andrew A ^a,b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b CHARING CROSS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cemented; Cementless; Fixation; Joint replacement prosthesis; Stability

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; IMPLANT; IMPLANT FIXATION; NECROSIS; ORTHOPEDIC FIXATION DEVICE; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING;

EID: 84878188145     PISSN: 18771327     EISSN: 18771335     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mporth.2013.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Schlegel U., Knifka J., Röllinghoff M., Koebke J., Eysel P., Morlock M. Effects of impaction on cement mantle and trabecular bone in hip resurfacing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011, 131:459-464.
2. Scheerlinck T., Casteleyn P.-P. The design features of cemented femoral hip implants. J Bone Jt Surg Br 2006, 88-B:1409-1418.
3. Lee A. The time-dependent properties of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement: the interaction of shape of femoral stems, surface finish and bone cement. Interfaces in total hip arthroplasty 2000, 11-19. Springer-Verlag Ltd. I.D. L. (Ed.).
4. Gandhi R., Tsvetkov D., Davey J.R., Mahomed N.N. Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Br 2009, 91-B:889-895.
5. Bobyn J.D., Pilliar R.M., Cameron H.U., Weatherly G.C. The optimum pore-size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop 1980, 150:263-270.
6. Macdonald S.J., Rosenzweig S., Guerin J.S., et al. Proximally versus fully porous-coated femoral stems: a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Orthop 2010, 468:424-432.
7. Emerson R.H., Sanders S.B., Head W.C., Higgins L. Effect of circumferential plasma-spray porous coating on the rate of femoral osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 1999, 81A:1291-1298.
8. Goosen J.H., Kums A.J., Kollen B.J., Verheyen C.C. Porous-coated femoral components with or without hydroxyapatite in primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009, 129:1165-1169.
9. Lazarinis S., Karrholm J., Hailer N.P. Increased risk of revision of acetabular cups coated with hydroxyapatite. Acta Orthop 2010, 81:53-59.
10. Jasty M., Bragdon C., Burke D., O'connor D., Lowenstein J., Harris W.H. In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Jt Surg Am 1997, 79:707-714.
11. Nelson C.L., Lonner J.H., Rand J.A., Lotke P.A. Strategies of stem fixation and the role of supplemental bone graft in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 2003, 85-A:S52-S57.
12. Ries M.D., Lynch F., Rauscher L.A., Richman J., Mick C., Gomez M. Pulmonary-function during and after total hip-replacement - findings in patients who have insertion of a femoral component with and without cement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 1993, 75A:581-587.
13. Verdonschot N., Huiskes R. The effects of cement-stem debonding in Tha on the long-term failure probability of cement. J Biomech 1997, 30:795-802.
14. Hoffman O. The brittle strength of orthotropic material. J Compos Mater 1967, 1:7.
15. Huiskes R. Failed innovation in total hip replacement: diagnosis and proposals for a cure. Acta Orthop Scand 1993, 64:699-716.
16. Murphy B.P., Prendergast P.J. The relationship between stress, porosity, and nonlinear damage accumulation in acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 2002, 59:646-654.
17. Jasty M., Floyd W.E., Schiller A.L., Goldring S.R., Harris W.H. Localized osteolysis in stable, non-septic total hip replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 1986, 68:912-919.
18. Engh C.A., Young A.M., Engh C.A., Hopper R.H. Clinical consequences of stress shielding after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2003, 417:157-163.
19. No author listed. Biomechanics of artificial joints. BME/ME 456 Biomechanics [cited 15 Jan 2013]; ]. http://www.engin.umich.edu/class/bme456/artjoint/artjoint.htm.
20. Charnley J. The reaction of bone to self-curing acrylic cement. A long-term histological study in man. J Bone Jt Surg Br 1970, 52:340-353.
21. Yue S., Pilliar R.M., Weatherly G.C. The fatigue strength of porous-coated Ti-6%Al-4%V implant alloy. J Biomed Mater Res 1984, 18:1043-1058.
22. Sumner D.R., Kienapfel H., Jacobs J.J., Urban R.M., Turner T.M., Galante J.O. Bone ingrowth and wear debris in well-fixed cementless porous-coated tibial components removed from patients. J Arthroplasty 1995, 10:157-167.
23. Kedgley A.E., Takaki S.E., Lang P., Dunning C.E. The effect of cross-sectional stem shape on the torsional stability of cemented implant components. J Biomech Eng 2007, 129:5.
24. Mann K.A., Bartel D.L., Ayers D.C. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond. J Orthop Res 1997, 15:700-706.
25. Rodop O., Kiral A., Arpacioglu O., et al. Effects of stem design and pre-cooling prostheses on the heat generated by bone cement in an in vitro model. J Int Med Res 2002, 30:265-270.
26. Bertin K.C. Tibial component fixation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of pegged and stemmed designs. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:670-678.
27. Andreykiv A., Prendergast P.J., Van Keulen F., Swieszkowski W., Rozing P.M. Bone ingrowth simulation for a concept glenoid component design. J Biomech 2005, 38:1023-1033.
28. Williams G.R., Abboud J.A. Total shoulder arthroplasty: glenoid component design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005, 14:S122-S128.
29. Callaghan J.J., Fulghum C.S., Glisson R.R., Stranne S.K. The effect of femoral stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented porous-coated total hip prostheses. Comparison of straight-stem and curved-stem designs. J Bone Jt Surg Am 1992, 74:839-848.
30. Mann K.A., Ayers D.C., Damron T.A. Effects of stem length on mechanics of the femoral hip component after cemented revision. J Orthop Res 1997, 15:62-68.