Academic achievement

Educating English Language Learners: A Synthesis of Research Evidence

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 176-222

  Lindholm Leary, Kathryn ^a   Borsato, Graciela ^b  

^a SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891030967     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511499913.006     Document Type: Chapter

References (101)

1. Abedi, J. 2001. Assessment and accommodations for English language learners: Issues and recommendations (Policy Brief 4). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
2. Abedi, J., Hofstetter, C., Baker, E., and Lord, C. 2001a. NAEP Math performance and test accommodations: Interactions with student language background (CSE Technical Report 536). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
3. Abedi, J., and Lord, C. 2001. The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education 14, (3), 219-34.
4. Abedi, J., Lord, C., Boscardin, C. K., Miyoshi, J. 2001b. The effects of accommodations on the assessment of limited English proficient (LEP) students in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) (CSE Technical Report 537). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
5. Abedi, J., Lord, C., and Hofstetter, C. 1998. Impact of selected background variables on students' NAEP math performance (CSE Technical Report 478). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
6. Abella, R. 1992. Achievement tests and elementary ESOL exit criteria: An evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14, (2), 169-74.
7. Adams, D., Astone, B., Nunez-Wormack, E. M., and Smodlaka, I. 1994. Predicting the academic achievement of Puerto Rican and Mexican-American ninth-grade students. Urban Review 26, (1), 1-14.
8. Alanis, I. 2000. A Texas two-way bilingual program: Its effects on linguistic and academic achievement. Bilingual Research Journal 24, (3), 225-48.
9. Alderman, D. L. 1982. Language proficiency as a moderator variable in testing academic aptitude. Journal of Educational Psychology 74, (4), 580-7.
10. Aspiazu, G. G., Bauer, S. C., and Spillett, M. 1998. Improving the academic performance of Hispanic youth: A community education model. Bilingual Research Journal 22, (2-4), 127-47.
11. August, D., and Hakuta, K. (eds.). 1997. Improving schooling for language minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12. Baker, K. A., and de Kanter, A. A. 1981. Effectiveness of bilingual education: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Budget and Evaluation.
13. Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Watson, M., and Schaps, E. 1997. Caring school communities. Educational Psychology 32, 137-51.
14. Berman, P., Minicucci, C., McLaughlin, B., Nelson, B., and Woodworth, K. 1995. School reform and student diversity: Case studies of exemplary practices for English language learner students. Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning, and B.W. Associates.
15. Burnham-Massey, L., and Piña, M. 1990. Effects of bilingual instruction on English academic achievement of LEP students. Reading Improvement 27, (2), 129-32.
16. Butler, F. A., and Stevens, R. 1997. Accommodation strategies for English language learners on large-scale assessments: Student characteristics and other considerations (CSE Technical Report 448). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
17. Butler, Y. G., Orr, J. E., Bousquet-Gutiérrez, M., and Hakuta, K. 2000. Inadequate conclusions from an inadequate assessment: What can SAT-9 scores tell us about the impact of Proposition 227 in California? Bilingual Research Journal 24, (1-2), 141-54.
18. Calderón, M., and Carreon, A. 1994. Educators and students use cooperative learning to become biliterate and bicultural. Cooperative Learning Magazine, 4, 6-9.
19. Calderón, M., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., and Slavin, R. 1998. Effects of bilingual cooperative integrated reading and composition on students making the transition from Spanish to English. The Elementary School Journal, 99, 153-65.
20. Calderón, M., Tinajero, J., and Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. 1992. Adapting cooperative integrated reading and composition to meet the needs of bilingual students. Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students 10, 79-106.
21. California State Department of Education. 1982. Basic Principles for the Education of Language Minority Students, An Overview. Sacramento: Office of Bilingual Bicultural Education.
22. Castellon-Wellington, M. 2000. The impact of preference for accommodations: The performance of English language learners on large-scale academic achievement tests (CSE Technical Report 534). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
23. Cazabon, M., Lambert, W., and Hall, G. 1993. Two-way bilingual education: A progress report on the Amigos Program (Research Report No. 7). Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
24. Cazabon, M., Nicoladis, E., and Lambert, W. E. 1998. Becoming bilingual in the Amigos two-way immersion program (Research Report No. 3). Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence.
25. Collier, V. P. 1987. Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly 21, (4), 617-41.
26. Collier, V. P. 1992. A synthesis of studies examining long-term language minority student data on academic achievement. Bilingual Research Journal 16, (1-2), 187-212.
27. Coltrane, B. 2002. English-language learners and high-stakes tests: An overview of the issues. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EDO-FL-02-07).
28. Corallo, C., and McDonald, D. H. 2002. What works with low-performing schools: A review of research. Charleston, WV: AEL, Regional Educational Laboratory, Region IV Comprehensive Center.
29. Curiel, H., Rosenthal, J. A., and Richek, H. G. 1986. Impacts of bilingual education on secondary school grades, attendance, retentions and drop-out. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 8, (4), 357-67.
30. Davidson, F. 1994. Norms appropriacy of achievement tests: Spanish-speaking children and English children's norms. Language Testing 11, (1), 83-95.
31. de Jong, E. J. 2002. Effective bilingual education: From theory to academic achievement in a two-way bilingual program. Bilingual Research Journal 26, (1), 65-84.
32. de la Garza, J. V., and Medina, M. 1985. Academic achievement as influenced by bilingual instruction for Spanish-dominant Mexican American children. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 7, (3), 247-59.
33. Dixon, J. K. 1995. Limited English proficiency and spatial visualization in middle school students' construction of the concepts of reflection and rotation. Bilingual Research Journal 19, (2), 221-47.
34. Doherty, R.W., Hilberg, R. S., Pinal, A., and Tharp, R. G. 2003. Five standards and student achievement. NABE Journal of Research and Practice 1(1), 1-24.
35. Dulay, H., and Burt, M. 1980. The relative proficiency of limited English proficient students. In J. E. Alatis (ed.), Current Issues in Bilingual Education (pp. 181-200). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
36. Duran, B. J., and Weffer, R. E. 1992. Immigrants' aspirations, high school process, and academic outcomes. American Educational Research Journal 29, (1), 163-81.
37. Duran, R. P., O'Connor, C., and Smith, M. 1988. Methods for assessing reading comprehension skills of language minority students (Project 2.2 Technical Report). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Language Education and Research.
38. Duran, R. P., Revlin, R., and Havill, D. 1995. Verbal comprehension and reasoning skills of Latino high school students (Research Report No. 13). Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
39. Echevarria, J., Short, D., and Powers, K. 2003. School reform and standards-based education: How do teachers help English language learners? Technical report. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence.
40. Fernandez, R., and Nielsen, F. 1986. Bilingualism and Hispanic scholastic achievement: Some baseline results. Social Science Research 15, 43-70.
41. Fulton-Scott, M. J., and Calvin, A. D. 1983. Bilingual multicultural education vs. integrated and non-integrated ESL instruction. NABE: The Journal for the National Association for Bilingual Education 7, (3), 1-12.
42. Gándara, P. 1995. Over the ivy walls: The educational mobility of low-income Chicanos. New York: State University of New York Press.
43. Gándara, P., and Merino, B. 1993. Measuring the outcomes of LEP programs: Test scores, exit rates, and other mythological data. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15, (3), 320-38.
44. García-Vázquez, E., Vázquez, L. A., López, I. C., and Ward, W. 1997. Language proficiency and academic success: Relationships between proficiency in two languages and achievement among Mexican-American students. Bilingual Research Journal 21, (4), 395-408.
45. García-Vázquez, E., Vázquez, L. A., López, I. C., & Ward, W. 1999. Language proficiency and academic success: Relationships between proficiency in two languages and achievement among Mexican-American students. Bilingual Research Journal 21(4), 395-408.
46. Gersten, R., and Woodward, J. 1995.Alongitudinal study of transitional and immersion bilingual education programs in one district. Elementary School Journal 95, (3), 223-39.
47. Goldenberg, C. N., and Gallimore, R. 1991. Local knowledge, research knowledge, and educational change: A case study of early Spanish reading improvement. Educational Researcher 20, 2-14.
48. Goldenberg, C. N., and Sullivan, J. 1994. Making change happen in a languageminority school: A search for coherence, (Educational Practice Report #13). Santa Cruz: University of California at Santa Cruz, National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Acquisition.
49. Guerrero, M., and Sloan, K. 2001. A descriptive analysis of four exemplary K-Spanish reading programs in Texas: Are they really exemplary? Bilingual Research Journal 25, 253-80.
50. Hampton, S., Ekboir, J. M., Rochin, R. I. 1995. The performance of Latinos in rural public schools: A comparative analysis of test scores in grades 3, 6, and 12. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 17, (4), 480-98.
51. Kao, G., and Tienda, M. 1995. Optimism and achievement: The educational performance of immigrant youth. Social Science Quarterly 76, 1-19.
52. Kirk-Senesac, B.V. 2002. Two-waybilingual immersion:Aportrait of quality schooling. Bilingual Research Journal 26, (1), 85-101.
53. Klingner, J., and Vaughn, S. 2000. The helping behaviors of fifth graders while using collaborative strategic reading during ESL content classes. TESOL Quarterly 34, (1), 69-98.
54. Knapp, M. S., and Woolverton, S. 2003. Social class and schooling. In J. Banks and C. A. McGee Banks (eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education, 2nd Edition (pp. 548-69). New York: Jossey Bass.
55. Lambert, W. E., and Cazabon, M.1994. Students' view of the Amigos program (Research Report No. 11). Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
56. Lee, O., and Fradd, S. H. 1996. Literacy skills in science learning among linguistically diverse students. Science Education 80, (6), 651-71.
57. Lee, O., Fradd, S. H., and Sutman, F. X. 1995. Science knowledge and cognitive strategy use among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32, (8), 797-816.
58. Levine, D. U., and Lezotte, L. W. 1995. Effective schools research. In J. A. Banks and C. A. Mcgee Banks (eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 525-47). New York: Macmillan.
59. Lindholm, K. J. 1988. The Edison elementary school bilingual immersion program: Student progress after one year of implementation. Technical Report No. 9 of the Center for Language Education and Research, UCLA.
60. Lindholm, K. J. 1991. Theoretical assumptions and empirical evidence for academic achievement in two languages. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 13, (1), 3-17.
61. Lindholm, K. J., and Aclan, Z. 1991. Bilingual proficiency as a bridge to academic achievement: Results frombilingual/immersion programs. Journal of Education 173, (2), 99-113.
62. Lindholm, K., and Fairchild, H. 1989. Evaluation of an "exemplary" bilingual immersion program (Technical Report TR13). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Center for Language Education and Research (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 307 820).
63. Lindholm-Leary, K. J. 2001. Dual language education. Avon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
64. Lindholm-Leary, K. J., and Borsato, G. 2001. Impact of two-way bilingual elementary programs on students' attitudes toward school and college. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence.
65. Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., and Betebenner, D.W. 2002. Accountability systems: Implications of requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Educational Researcher 31, (2), 3-16.
66. Lucas, T., Henze, R., and Donato, R. 1990. Promoting the success of Latino languageminority students: An exploratory study of six high schools. Harvard Educational Review 60, (3), 315-40.
67. Marzano, R. J. 2003. What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
68. Medrano, M. F. 1986. Evaluating the long-term effects of a bilingual education program: A study of Mexican-American students. Journal of Educational Equity and Leadership 6, (2), 129-38.
69. Medrano, M. F. 1988. The effects of bilingual education on reading and mathematics achievement: A longitudinal case study. Equity and Excellence 23, (4), 17-19.
70. Mehan, H., Datnow, A., Bratton, E., Tellez, C., Friedlaender, D., and Ngo, T. 1991. Untracking and college enrollment (Research Report No. 4). Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence.
71. Mehan, H., Hubbard, L., Lintz, A., and Villanueva, I. 1994. Tracking untracking: The consequences of placing low track students in high track classes (Research Report No. 10). Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
72. Minicucci, C. 1996. Learning science and English: How school reform advances scientific learning for limited English proficient middle school students (Educational Practice Report No. 17). Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
73. Montecel, M. R., and Cortez, J. D. 2002. Successful bilingual education programs: Developmentandthe dissemination of criteria to identify promisingandexemplary practices in bilingual education at the national level. Bilingual Research Journal 26, 1-22.
74. Nielsen, F., and Lerner, S. 1986. Language skills and school achievement of bilingual Hispanics. Social Science Research 15, 209-40.
75. Pilkington, C. L., Piersel, W. C., and Ponterotto, J. G. 1988. Home language as a predictor of first-grade achievement for Anglo-and Mexican-American children. Contemporary Educational Psychology 13, 1-14.
76. Ramirez, J. D. 1992. Longitudinal study of structured English immersion strategy, early-exit and late-exit transitional bilingual education program for languageminority children (Executive Summary). Bilingual Research Journal 16, (1-2), 1-62.
77. Ramirez, J. D., Yuen, S. D., Ramey, D. R. 1991. Longitudinal study of structured English immersion strategy, early-exit and late-exit transitional bilingual education programs for language-minority children (Final report to the U.S. Department of Education). San Mateo, CA: Aguirre International.
78. Reyes, P., Scribner, J. D., and Paredes Scribner, A. (eds.). 1999. Lessons from highperforming Hispanic schools: Creating learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.
79. Rosnow, R. L., Rosenthal, R., and Rubin, D. B. 2000. Computing contrasts, effect sizes, and counternulls on other people's published data: General procedures for research consumers. Psychological Methods 1, 331-40.
80. Royer, J. M., and Carlo, M. S. 1991. Assessing the language acquisition progress of limited English proficient students: Problems and a new alternative. Applied Measurement in Education 4, (2), 85-113.
81. Rumbaut, R., and Portes, A. 2001. Ethnicities: Children of immigrants in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
82. Rumberger, R. W., and Larson, K. A. 1998. Toward explaining differences in educational achievement among Mexican-American language-minority students. Sociology of Education 71, (1), 68-92.
83. Saldate, M., Shitala, S. P., and Medina, M. 1985. Bilingual instruction and academic achievement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Instructional Psychology 12, (1), 24-30.
84. Shepard, L., Taylor, G., and Betebenner, D. 1998. Inclusion of limited-English-proficient students in Rhode Island's grade 4 mathematics performance assessment (CSE Technical Report 486). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
85. Short, D. J. 1994. The challenge of social studies for limited-English-proficient students. Social Education 58, (1), 36-8.
86. Slavin, R. E., and Calderón, M. 2001. Effective programs for Latino students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
87. Solano-Flores, G., and Trumbull, E. 2003. Examining language in context: The need for new research and practice paradigms in the testing of English-language learners. Educational Researcher 32, (2), 3-13.
88. Stevens, R. A., Butler, F. A., Castellon-Wellington, M. 2000. Academic language and content assessment: Measuring the progress of English language learners (ELLs) (CSE Technical Report 552). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
89. Stoops Verplaetse, L. 1998. How content teachers interact with English language learners. TESOL Journal 7, (5), 24-8.
90. Teddle, C., and Reynolds, D. 2000. The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.
91. Tellez, K. 1998. Class placement of elementary school emerging bilingual students. Bilingual Research Journal 22, (2-4), 279-95.
92. Thomas, W. P., and Collier, V. P. 2002. A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students' long-term academic achievement. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence.
93. Tikunoff, W. 1985. Applying significant bilingual instructional features in the classroom. Rosslyn, VA: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 338 106).
94. Troike, R. C. 1978. Research evidence for the effectiveness of bilingual education. NABE Journal (3), 13-24.
95. U.S. Department of Education. 1994. Improving America's Schools Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
96. U.S. Department of Education. 1998. Turning around low-performing schools:Aguide for state and local leaders. Washington, DC: Author.
97. U.S. Department of Education. 2001. No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
98. Valdez-Pierce, L., O'Malley, J. M. 1992. Performance and portfolio assessment for language minority students. NCBEProgram Information Guide Series.Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
99. Velez, W., and Fernandez, R. R. 1991. The ASPIRA Association school retention study. Equity and Excellence 25, (1), 55-61.
100. Wenglinsky, H. 2000.Howteaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
101. Willig, A. C. 1985. A meta-analysis of selected studies on the effectiveness of bilingual education. Review of Educational Research 55, (3), 269-318.