Dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of breast lesions: A morphological and quantitative analysis

Journal of the Hong Kong College of Radiologists

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 43-52

  Sivarajan, U ^a   Jayapragasam, K J ^a   Aziz, Y F Abdul ^a   Rahmat, K ^a   Bux, S I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MALAYA MEDICAL CENTRE   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Breast tumors; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pathology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST LESION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MORPHOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TISSUE PERFUSION;

EID: 76349108250     PISSN: 10295097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lee CH. Problem solving MR imaging of the breast. Radiol Clin North Am. 2004;42:919-34.
2. Schneider BP, Miller KD. Angiogenesis of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1782-90.
3. Kuhl CK, Bieling H, Gieseke J, et al. Breast neoplasms: T2* susceptibility-contrast, first-pass perfusion MR imaging. Radiology. 1997;202:87-95.
4. Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Gieseke J, et al. Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology. 1997;203:137-44.
5. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.
6. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881-8.
7. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology. 2001;219:484-94.
8. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Haustein J, Pohl C, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: comparison of two different doses of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology. 1994;191:639-46.
9. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233:830-49.
10. Ikeda DM. Progress report from the American College of Radiology Breast MR Imaging Lexicon Committee. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2001;9:295-302.
11. Malich A, Fischer DR, Wurdinger S, et al. Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:964-70.
12. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, et al. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:889-95.
13. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology. 2001;219:484-94.
14. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology. 2006; 238:42-53.
15. Kuhl CK, Mielcarek P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 1999;211:101-10.
16. Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA. 2004;292:2735-42.
17. Schnall MD, Rosen S, Englander S, Orel SG, Nunes LW. A combined architectural and kinetic interpretation model for breast MR images. Acad Radiol. 2001;8:591-7.
18. Kawashima M, Tamaki Y, Nonaka T, et al. MR imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:179-83.
19. Kuhl CK, Klaschik S, Mielcarek P, Gieseke J, Wardelmann E, Schild HH. Do T2-weighted pulse sequences help with the differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;9:187-96.
20. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:35-0.
21. Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK, Bone B. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast. Analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:379-86.
22. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:519-25.
23. Taylor JS, Tofts PS, Port R, et al. MR imaging of tumor microcirculation: promise for the new millennium. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:903-7.
24. Tofts PS, Berkowitz B, Schnall MD. Quantitative analysis of dynamic Gd-DTPA enhancement in breast tumors using a permeability model. Magn Reson Med. 1995;33:564-8.
25. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 2nd ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 1995.
26. Fischer U. Lehratlas der MR-Mammographie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2000. p 24-31.
27. Kuhl CK, Schild HH, Morakkabati N. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology. 2005;236:789-800.
28. Kuhl CH. The current status of Breast MR imaging. Part 1. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy and transfer of clinical practice. Radiology. 2007;244:356-78.
29. Teifke A, Hlawatsch A, Beier T, et al. Undetected malignancies of the breast: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 1.0 T. Radiology. 2002;224:881-8.
30. Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein KL, et al. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Radiology. 1995;197:387-95.
31. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM, et al. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology. 1995;196:115-22.
32. Siegmann KC, Müller-Schimpfle MM, Schick F, et al. MR imaging-detected breast lesions: histopathological correlation of lesion characteristics and signal intensity data. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:1403-9.
33. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA - preliminary observations. Radiology. 1989;170:681-6.
34. Gribbestad IS, Nilsen G, Fjøsne H, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Acta Oncol. 1992;31:833-42.