Introducing e-learning/teaching in a physiology course for medical students: Acceptance by students and subjective effect on learning

American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 337-342

  Felder, E ^a   Fauler, M ^a   Geiler, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

E learning; Hearing; Lab tutor; Physiology course

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; E-LEARNING; EDUCATION; HEARING; HUMAN; LAB TUTOR; LEARNING; MEDICAL STUDENT; PHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY COURSE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

E-LEARNING; HEARING; LAB TUTOR; PHYSIOLOGY COURSE;

HUMANS; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 84890880547     PISSN: 10434046     EISSN: 15221229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/advan.00158.2012     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Boeker M, Müller C, Klar R, Lutterbach J. Oncocase: interdisciplinary case based teaching in neurooncology based on the campus platform. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005: 898, 2005.
2. Cook DA, Dupras DM, Thompson WG, Pankratz VS. Web-based learning in residents' continuity clinics: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Med 80: 90-97, 2005.
3. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA 300: 1181-1196, 2008.
4. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Instructional design variations in internet based learning for health professions education. Acad Med 85: 909-922, 2010.
5. De Groote SL, Dorsch JL. Measuring use patterns of online journals and databases. J Med Libr Assoc 91: 231-241, 2003.
6. De Groote SL, Shultz M, Doranski M. Online journals' impact on the citation patterns of medical faculty. J Med Libr Assoc 93: 223-228, 2005.
7. Ellaway R. E-learning: is the revolution over? Med Teach 33: 297-302, 2011.
8. Folb BL, Wessel CB, Czechowski LJ. Clinical and academic use of electronic and print books: the Health Sciences Library System e-book study at the University of Pittsburgh. J Med Libr Assoc 99: 218-228, 2011.
9. Fordis M, King JE, Ballantyne CM. Comparison of the instructional efficacy of internet-based CME with live interactive CME workshops. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 294: 1043-1051, 2005.
10. Foust JE, Bergen P, Maxeiner GL, Pawlowski PN. Improving e-book access via a library-developed full-text search tool. J Med Libr Assoc 95: 40-45, 2007.
11. Frand J. The information age mindset: changes in students and implications for higher education. Educause Rev 35: 14-24, 2000.
12. Friedman R. Top ten reasons the World Wide Web may fail to change medical education. Acad Med 71: 979-981, 1996.
13. Gold JP, Begg WB, Fullerton D. Successful implementation of a novel internet hybrid surgery curriculum. The early phase outcome of thoracic surgery prerequisite curriculum e-learning project. Ann Surg 240: 499-509, 2004.
14. Jones S. The Internet Goes to College: How Students Are Living in the Future With Today's Technology (online). http://www.pewinternet.org/~/ media/Files/Reports/2002/PIP_College_Report.pdf.pdf [22 August 2013].
15. Lyon HC, Ueberla K, Batschkus M. Correlation between medical students use of computer-based instruction (CBI) and high exam scores: lessons learned from 10 years of CBI development and use. In: Computer Based Training in der Medizin. Technik-Evaluation-Implementation, edited by Adler M, Dietrich JW, Holzer MF, Fischer MR. Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag, 1998, p. 105-112.
16. MacCall SL. Online medical books: their availability and an assessment of how health sciences libraries provide access on their public websites. J Med Libr Assoc 94: 75-80, 2006.
17. Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, Bakia M, Jones K. United States Department of Education. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: a Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies (online). http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/ finalreport.pdf [22 August 2013].
18. Melamed RJ, Bodem M, Lanwert S. Effektivität multimedialer Lerneinheiten in der medizinischen Lehre am Beispiel der Urologie. In: Rechnergestützte Lehr- und Lernsysteme in der Medizin. Proceedings zum 7. Workshop der GMDS AG Computergestützte Lehr- und Lernsysteme in der Medizin, edited by Puppe F, Albert J, Bernauer J, Fischer M, Klar R, Leven J. Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag, 2004, p. 205-207.
19. Oblinger D. Boomers, Gen-Xers and Millennials: understanding the new students. Educause Rev 38: 37-47, 2003.
20. Seluakumaran K, Jusof FF, Ismail R, Husain R. Integrating an opensource course management system (Moodle) into the teaching of a firstyear medical physiology course: a case study. Adv Physiol Educ 35: 369-377, 2011.
21. Shaffer K, Small JE. Blended learning in medical education: use of an integrated approach with web-based small group modules and didactic instruction for teaching radiologic anatomy. Acad Radiol 11: 1059-1070, 2004.
22. Taradi SK, Taradi M, Radic K, Pokrajac N. Blending problem-based learning with Web technology positively impacts student learning outcomes in acid-base physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 29: 35-39, 2005.
23. Triola MM, Huwendiek S, Levinson AJ, Cook DA. New directions in e-learning research in health professions education: report of two symposia. Med Teach 34: e15-e2035-39, 2012.
24. Van der Velde W, Ernst O. The future of ebooks? Will print disappear? An end-user perspective. Libr Hi Tech 27: 570-83, 2009.
25. West JB. A Web-based course of lectures in respiratory physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 35: 249-251, 2011.