Online journals' impact on the citation patterns of medical faculty

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 223-228

  De Groote, Sandra L ^a   Shultz, Mary ^a   Doranski, Marceline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICINE; ONLINE SYSTEM; URBAN POPULATION; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERNET; LIBRARY; LIBRARY SCIENCE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TIME; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FACULTY, MEDICAL; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNET; JOURNALISM, MEDICAL; LIBRARIES, MEDICAL; LIBRARY SURVEYS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PERIODICALS; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 23844545418     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. BANE AF. Business periodicals Ondisc: how full-text availability effect the library. Comput Libr 1995 May;15(5):54-6.
2. PESSAH R, VENTURELLA K. Document delivery: St. John's University's experience with full-text services. Libr Software Rev 1995 Winter;14(4):212-4.
3. ROGERS SA. Electronic journal usage at Ohio State University. Coll Res Libr 2001 Jan;62(1):25-34.
4. MORSE DJ, CLINTWORTH WA. Comparing patterns of print and electronic journal use in an academic health science library. Issues Sci Technol Librarianship 2000 Fall;(28). (Available from: 〈http://www.library.ucsb. edu/istl/00-fall/refereed.html〉. [cited Mar 2001].)
5. MONTGOMERY CH, SPARKS JL. The transition to an electronic journal collection: managing the organizational changes (at Drexel University). Ser Rev 2000 Oct;26(3):4-18.
6. DE GROOTE SL, DORSCH JL. Online journals: impact on print journal usage. Bull Med Libr Assoc 2001 Oct;89(4):372-8.
7. CURTIS KL, WELLER AC, HURD JM. Information-seeking behavior of health sciences faculty: the impact of new information technologies. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1997 Oct;85(4): 402-10.
8. BRENNAN MJ, HURD JM, BLECIC DD, WELLER AC. A snapshot of early adopters of e-journals: challenges to the library. Coll Res Libr 2002 Nov;63(6):515-26.
9. DE GROOTE SL, DORSCH JL. Measuring use patterns of online journals and databases. J Med Libr Assoc 2003 Apr; 91(2):231-40.
10. SMITH ET. Changes in faculty reading behaviors: the impact of electronic journals on the University of Georgia. J Acad Lib 2003 May;29(3):162-8.
11. SATHE NA, GRADY JL, GIUSE NB. Print versus electronic journals: a preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes. J Med Libr Assoc 2002 Apr; 90(2):235-43.
12. ISI journal citation reports, databases of the Institute for Scientific Information. [Web document]. [cited 18 Mar 2004]. 〈http://jcr0. isiknowledge.com/www/help/hjcrgls2.htm# Impact_Factor_def〉.
13. CURTI M, PISTOTTI V, GABUTTI G, KLERSY C. Impact factor and electronic versions of biomedical scientific journals. Haematologica 2001 Oct;86(10):1015-20.
14. WELLER AC. Editorial peer review: its strengths and weaknesses. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2001:126-7.
15. MAXFIELD MW, DICARLO R, DICARLO MA. Decreasing use of monthly serials after publication date. Ser Libr 199527(4):71-7.
16. BLECIC DD, ROBINSON AE. Use of print journals in an intracampus exchange program: implications for service and electronic journal subscriptions. Bull Med Libr Assoc 2000 Jan;88(1):75-7.
17. BLECIC DD. Measurements of journal use: an analysis of the correlations between three methods. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1999 Jan;87(1):20-5.