Clinical comparison of THA with a standard-length or short femoral component

Orthopedics

Volumn 36, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Christensen, Christian P ^a   Jacobs, Cale A ^a  

^a LEXINGTON CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BADULT; BCLINICAL ARTICLE; BFEMALE; BHUMAN; BMALE; BMIDDLE AGE; BONE GROWTH; BONE LENGTH; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMORAL LENGTHENING DEVICE; FEMUR; GEOMETRY; HARRIS HIP SCORE; LEG LENGTHENING; ORTHOPEDIC ENDOPROSTHESIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREVALENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHORT LENGTH FEMORAL COMPONENT; STANDARD LENGTH FEMORAL COMPONENT; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84890841774     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20131120-19     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Lerch M, Kurtz A, Stukenborg-Colsman C, et al. Bone remodeling after total hip arthroplasty with a short stemmed metaphyseal loading implant: finite element analysis validated by a prospective DEXA investigation. J Orthop Res. 2012; 30:1822-1829.
2. Chen H-H, Morrey BF, An K-N, Lou Z-P. Bone remodeling characteristics of a short-stemmed total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(6):945-950.
3. Albanese CV, Santori FS, Pavan L, Learmonth ID, Passariello R. Periprosthetic DXA after total hip arthroplasty with short vs. ultra-short custom-made femoral stems: 37 patients followed for 3 years. Acta Orthop. 2009; 80(3):291-297.
4. Niinimaki T, Junila J, Jalovaara P. A proximal fixed anatomic femoral stem reduces stress shielding. Int Orthop. 2001; 25:85-88.
5. Rohrl SM, Li MG, Pedersen E, Ullmark G, Nivbrandt B. Migration pattern of a short femoral neck preserving stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 448:73-78.
6. Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Valstar ER, Neilissen RG. 5-year clinical and radiostereometric analysis (RSA) follow-up of 39 CUT femoral neck total hip prostheses in young osteoarthritis patients. Acta Orthop. 2012; 83(4):334-341.
7. Jacobs CA, Christensen CP. Progressive subsidence of a tapered, proximally coated femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2009; 33(4):917-922.
8. Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; 235:148-165.
9. Noble PC, Box GG, Kamaric E, Fink MJ, Alexander JW, Tullos HS. The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; 316:31-44.
10. Casper DS, Kim GK, Parvizi J, Freeman TA. Morphology of the proximal femur differs widely with age and sex: relevance to design and selection of femoral prostheses. J Orthop Res. 2012; 30:1162-1166.
11. Boe BG, Rohrl SM, Heier T, Snorrason F, Nordsletten L. A prospective randomized study comparing electro-chemically deposited hydroxyapatite and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite on titanium stems: 55 hips followed for 2 years with RSA and DXA. Acta Orthop. 2011; 82(1):13-19.
12. McCalden RW, Naudie D, Thompson AE, Somerville L. RSA analysis of early migration of a short metaphyseal vs. standard length metaphyseal cementless stem: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons; November 2-4, 2012; Dallas, TX.
13. Schmidutz F, Graf T, Mazoochian F, Fottner A, Bauer-Melnyk A, Jansson V. Migration analysis of a metaphyseal anchored short-stem hip prosthesis: EBRA-FCA evaluation of 80 implants with a minimum follow-up time of 2 years. Acta Orthop. 2012; 83(4):360-365.
14. Rao RR, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Eng K, Rothman RH. Immediate weight bearing after uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; 349:156-162.
15. Mayr E, Nogler M, Benedetti MG, et al. A prospective randomized assessment of earlier functional recovery in THA patients treated by minimally invasive direct anterior approach: a gait analysis study. Clin Biomech. 2009; 24(10):812-818.
16. Maffiuletti NA, Impellizzeri FM, Widler K, et al. Spatiotemporal parameters of gait after total hip replacement: anterior versus posterior approach. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009; 40:407-415.
17. Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur: principles of prevention and management. Instr Course Lect. 1998; 47:237-242.
18. Brady OH, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classificaton of femoral fractures after hip replacement. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15(1):59-62.