5-year clinical and radiostereometric analysis (RSA) follow-up of 39 CUT femoral neck total hip prostheses in young osteoarthritis patients

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 83, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 334-341

  Nieuwenhuijse, Marc J ^a   Valstar, Edward R ^a,b   Nelissen, Rob G H H ^a,b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; FEMALE; FEMORAL NECK PROSTHESIS; FEMUR NECK; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; LONG TERM SURVIVAL; MALE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RADIOSTEREOMETRIC ANALYSIS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOSTEREOMETRIC ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865320439     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2012.702392     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Corner J A, Rawoot A, Parmar H V. The thrust plate prosthesis in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clinical and radiological outcome with minimum 5-year follow-up. Hip Int 2008; 18 (2): 88-94. (Pubitemid 351982897)
2. Decking R, Puhl W, Simon U, Claes L E. Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006; 21 (5): 495-501. (Pubitemid 44389484)
3. Decking R, Rokahr C, Zurstegge M, Simon U, Decking J. Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 31 (9): 17.
4. Duijsens A W, Keizer S, Vliet-Vlieland T, Nelissen R G. Resurfacing hip prostheses revisited: failure analysis during a 16-year follow-up. Int Orthop 2005; 29 (4): 224-8. (Pubitemid 41125320)
5. Ender S A, Machner A, Pap G, Hubbe J, Grashoff H, Neumann H W. Cement-less CUT femoral neck prosthesis: increased rate of aseptic loosening after 5 years. Acta Orthop 2007; 78 (5): 616-21. (Pubitemid 350034937)
6. Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I, Pulkkinen P, Nevalainen J, Paavolainen P. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4, 661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years. Acta Orthop 2005; 76 (1): 28-41.
7. Hauptfeisch J, Glyn-Jones S, Beard D J, Gill H S, Murray D W. The premature failure of the Charnley Elite-Plus stem: a confrmation of RSA predictions. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006; 88 (2): 179-83. (Pubitemid 43279927)
8. Havelin L I, Fenstad A M, Salomonsson R, Mehnert F, Furnes O, Overgaard S, et al. The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association: a unique collaboration between 3 national hip arthroplasty registries with 280, 201 THRs. Acta Orthop 2009; 80 (4): 393-401.
9. Huo M H, Parvizi J, Bal B S, Mont M A, Council of Musculoskeletal Specialty Societies (COMSS) of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. What's new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2008; 90 (9): 2043-55.
10. Ishaque B A, Donle E, Gils J, Wienbeck S, Basad E, Stürz H. Eight-year results of the femoral neck prosthesis ESKA-CUT. Z Orthop Unfall 2009; 147 (2): 158-65.
11. Johanson P E, Fenstad A M, Furnes O, Garellick G, Havelin L I, Overgaard S, et al. Inferior outcome after hip resurfacing arthroplasty than after conventional arthroplasty. Evidence from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database, 1995 to 2007. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (5): 535-41.
12. Kaptein B L, Valstar E R, Stoel B C, Rozing P M, Reiber J H. A new modelbased RSA method validated using CAD models and models from reversed engineering. J Biomech 2003; 36 (6): 873-82. (Pubitemid 36555384)
13. Kärrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G, Snorrason F. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter: 4-7 year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1994; 76: 912-7. (Pubitemid 24368446)
14. Koebke J, Xepulias P, Thomas W. Cut type femur neck prosthesis-a functional morphologic analysis. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2000; 45 (5): 135-40. (Pubitemid 30351471)
15. Morrey B F. Short-stemmed uncemented femoral component for primary hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1989; (249): 169-75. (Pubitemid 20199766)
16. National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE): Guidance on the selection of prostheses for primary total hip replacement. Online at: http://guidance. nice.org.uk/TA2/Guidance/pdf/English. Accessed online at December 6, 2011.
17. Nelissen R G, Pijls B C, Karrholm J, Malchau H, Nieuwenhuiijse M J, Val-star E R. RSA and registries: The quest for phased introduction of new implants. J. Bone Joint Surg (Am) (Suppl 3 E) 2011; 93: 62-5.
18. Ranstam J, Ryd L, Onsten I. Accurate accuracy assessment: review of basic principles. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71 (1): 106-8.
19. Rudert M, Leichtle U, Leichtle C, Thomas W. Implantation technique for the CUT-type femoral neck endoprosthesis. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2007; 19 (5-6): 458-72. (Pubitemid 350302384)
20. Röhrl S M, Li M G, Pedersen E, Ullmark G, Nivbrant B. Migration pattern of a short femoral neck preserving stem. Clin Orthop 2006; (448): 73-8. (Pubitemid 44324852)
21. Ryd L, Albrektsson B E, Carlsson L, Dansgård F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, et al. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1995; 77: 377-83.
22. Simpson J M, Villar R N. Resurfacing registers concern. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2010; 92 (11): 1493-7.
23. Specht J, Schneider T, Mecklenbeck W, Arnold W. The femoral neck prosthesis Cut 2000-frst clinical, radiological and scintigraphic results. Orthop Prax 2003; 5: 307-11.
24. Springer B D, Connelly S E, Odum S M, Fehring T K, Griffn W L, Mason J B, Masonis J L. Cementless femoral components in young patients: review and meta-analysis of total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty (6 Suppl) 2009; 24: 2-8.
25. Steens W, Skripitz R, Schneeberger A G, Petzing I, Simon U, Goetze C. Cementless femoral neck prosthesis CUT-clinical and radiological results after 5 years. Z Orthop Unfall 2010; 148 (4): 413-9.
26. Stukenborg-Colsman C. Femoral neck prostheses. Orthopade 2007; 36 (4): 347-52. (Pubitemid 46623250)
27. Thomas W, Grundei H. The ESKA femoral neck prosthesis for internal fxa-tion cut. Orthop Prax 1999; 35: 646-52.
28. Thomas W, Lucente L, Mantegna N, Grundei H. ESKA (CUT) endoprosthesis. Orthopade 2004; 33 (11): 1243-8. (Pubitemid 40029296)
29. Valstar E R, Gill R, Ryd L, Flivik G, Börlin N, Kärrholm J. Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop 2005; 76 (4): 563-72. (Pubitemid 41232789)
30. Walker P S, Blunn G W, de Prada D, Casas C. Design rationale and dimensional considerations for a femoral neck prosthesis. Clin Orthop 2005; (441): 313-9. (Pubitemid 44384238)
31. Zelle B A, Gerich T G, Bastian L, Shuler F D, Pape H C, Krettek C. Total hip arthroplasty in young patients using the thrust plate prosthesis: clinical and radiological results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124 (5): 310-6. (Pubitemid 38931242)