Sharing, caring, and surveilling: An actor-partner interdependence model examination of facebook relational maintenance strategies

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 16, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 863-869

  McEwan, Bree ^a  

^a WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; EMPATHY; FEMALE; FRIEND; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SATISFACTION; SOCIAL NETWORK;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EMPATHY; FEMALE; FRIENDS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; SOCIAL NETWORKING;

EID: 84890737222     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0717     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2012) Trend data (adults). www.pewinternet.org/Trend-Data-(Adults)/Online-Activities-Daily.aspx (accessed Apr. 17, 2012).
2. Symantec Corporation. (2009) Norton online living report. www.symantec.com/about/news/release/article.jsp?prid = 20090317-02 (accessed Mar. 22, 2012).
3. Rabby MK, Walther JB. (2003) Computer-mediated communication effects on relationship formation and maintenance. In Canary DJ, Dainton M, eds. Maintaining relationships through communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 141-162.
4. Wright KB. On-line relational maintenance strategies and perceptions of partners within exclusively Internet-based and primarily Internet-based relationships. Communication Studies 2004; 55:239-253.
5. Canary DJ, Stafford L. (1994) Maintaining relationships through strategic and routine interaction. In Canary DJ, Stafford L. eds. Communication and relational maintenance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 3-22.
6. Canary DJ, Stafford L, Hause KS, et al. An inductive analysis of relational maintenance strategies: comparisons among lovers, relatives, friends, and others. Communication Research Reports 1993; 10:5-14.
7. Oswald DJ, Clark EM, Kelly CM. Friendship maintenance: an analysis of individual and dyad behaviors. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology 2004; 23:413-441.
8. Stafford L. Measuring relationship maintenance behaviors: critique and development of the revised relationship maintenance behavior scale. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships 2011; 28:278-303.
9. Ogolsky BG, Bowers JR. A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships. 2013; 30:343-367.
10. McEwan B, Guerrero LK. Maintenance behavior and relationship quality as predictors of perceived availability of resources in newly formed college friendship networks. Communication Studies. 2012; 63:421-440.
11. Hays RB. The development and maintenance of friendship. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships 1984; 1:75-98.
12. Dainton M, Zelley E, Langan E. (2003) Maintaining friendships throughout the life span. In Canary DJ, Dainton M, eds. Maintaining relationships through communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 79-124.
13. boyd, d, Ellison, NB. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007; 13:210-230.
14. Walther JB, Ramirez A. (2010) New technologies and new directions in online relating. In Smith SW, Wilson SW, eds. New directions in interpersonal communication research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 264-284.
15. Rice RE. Media appropriateness: using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research 1993; 19:451-484.
16. Radovanovic D, Regnedda M. (2012) Small talk in the digital age: making sense of phatic posts. Proceedings of the #MSM2012 Workshop. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-838/paper-18.pdf (accessed Nov. 1, 2012).
17. Malinowski B. (1936) The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In Ogden CK, Richards AI, eds. The meaning of meaning. New York: Harcourt Brace, pp. 296-336.
18. Facebook. (2012) Key facts. http://newsroom.fb.com/content/default.aspx? NewsAreaId = 22 (accessed Jun. 1, 2012).
19. Madrigal A. (2012) The case for Facebook. www.theatlantic .com (accessed Jun. 1, 2012).
20. Bryant EM, Marmo J. Relational maintenance strategies on Facebook. Kentucky Journal of Communication 2010. http://kycommunication.com/jenniferpdf/ Bryant.pdf (accessed Jun. 7, 2010).
21. Bryant EM, Marmo J. (2010) Using Facebook to maintain friendships: examining differences between acquaintances, casual friends, and close friends. Paper presented at a meeting of the National Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
22. Stafford L, Canary DJ. Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender, and relational characteristics. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships 1991; 8:217-242.
23. Tong ST, Walther JB. (2011) Relational maintenance and CMC. In Wright KB, Webb LM, eds. Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 98-118.
24. Oswald DJ, Clark EM. How do friendship maintenance behaviors and problem-solving styles function at the individual and dyadic levels. Personal Relationships 2006; 3:333-348.
25. Ledbetter AM, Mazer JP, DeGroot JM, et al. Attitudes toward online social connection and self-disclosure as predictors of Facebook communication and relational closeness. Communication Research 2011; 38:27-53.
26. Ledbetter AM. Family communication patterns and relational maintenance behavior: direct and mediated associations with friendship closeness. Human Communication Research 2009; 35:130-147.
27. Bryant EM, Marmo J. The rules of Facebook friendship. A two-stage examination of interaction rules in close, casual, and acquaintance friendships. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships 2012; 29:1013-1035.
28. Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C. The benefits of Facebook "friends": social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 2007. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html (accessed Mar. 2, 2010).
29. Joinson AN. (2008) "Looking at," "looking up," or "keeping up with" people? Motives and uses of Facebook. Paper presented at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, Italy. New York: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., pp. 1027-1036.
30. Lampe C, Ellison N, Steinfield C. A face(book) in the crowd: social searching as social browsing. Proceedings of CSCW 2006. New York: ACM Press, pp. 167-170.
31. Bryant E, Marmo J, Ramirez A. (2011) A functional approach to social networking sites. In Wright KB, Webb LM, eds. Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 3-20.
32. Trottier, D. Interpersonal surveillance on social media. Canadian Journal of Communication 2012; 37:319-332.
33. Bliezner R, Adams RG. (1992). Adult friendship. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Chow CM, Roelse H, Buhrmester D, et al. (2012) Transformations in friend relationships across the transition into adulthood. In Laursen B, Collins WA, eds. Relationship pathways. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 91-111.
35. Duggan M, Brenner J. (2013) The demographics of social media users-2012. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Social-media-users.aspx (accessed Feb. 20, 2013).
36. Hayton JC, Allen DG, Scarpello V. Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: a tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods 2004; 7:191-205.
37. Patil VH, Singh SN, Mishra S, et al. Parallel analysis engine to aid determining number of factors to retain 2007. http://ires.ku.edu/smishra/ parallelengine.htm (accessed Dec. 10, 2012).
38. Costello AB, Osborne JW. (2005) Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation 2005; 10.
39. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. (2001) Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
40. Norton R. Measuring marital quality: a critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage & Family 1983; 45:141-151.
41. Goodboy AK, Myers SA. Relational maintenance behaviors of friends with benefits: investigating equity and relational characteristics. Human Communication 2008; 11:71-86.
42. McEwan B, Zanolla D. When online meets offline: A field investigation of modality switching. Computers in Human Behavior 2013; 29:1565-1571.
43. Peters AS, Rowatt WC, Johnson MK. Associations between dispositional humility and social relationship quality. Psychology 2011; 2:155-161.
44. Yum YO. The relationships among loneliness, self/partner constructive maintenance behavior, and relational satisfaction in two cultures. Communication Studies 2003; 54:451-467.
45. Rubin Z. (1973) Liking and loving. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
46. Hess JA. Measuring distance in personal relationships: the relational distance index. Personal Relationships 2003; 10:197-215.
47. Kaplan DL, Keys CB. Sex and relationship variables as predictors of sexual attraction in cross-sex platonic friendships between young heterosexual adults. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships 1997; 14:191-206.
48. Pontari BA. Appearing socially competent: the effects of a friend's presences on the socially anxious. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 2009; 25:283-294.
49. Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 1992; 63:596-612.
50. Kenny DA. Models on nonindependence in dyadic research. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships 1996; 13:279-294.
51. Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. (2006) Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford.
52. Aiken LA, West SG. (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
53. Hayes AF. A primer on multilevel modeling. Human Communication Research 2006; 32:385-410.
54. Christofides E, Muise A, Desmarais S. Information disclosure and control on Facebook: are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? CyberPsychology & Behavior 2009; 12:341-345.
55. Kolek EA, Saunders D. Online disclosure: an empirical examination of undergraduate Facebook profiles. Journal of Student Affairs Research & Practice 2008; 45:1-25.
56. John NA. Sharing and Web 2.0: the emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society Online First 2012.
57. Nosko A, Wood E, Molema S. All about me: disclosure in online social networking profiles: the case of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 2010; 26:406-418.
58. Altman I, Taylor DA. (1973) Social penetration: the development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
59. Hendrick SS. Self-disclosure and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 1981; 40:1150-1159.
60. Meeks BS, Hendrick SS, Hendrick C. Communication, love, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships 1998; 15:775-773.
61. Weidler DJ, Clark EM. A distinct association: inclusion of other in the self and self-disclosure. The New School Psychology Bulletin 2011; 9:34-44.
62. O'Sullivan, PB. (2005) Masspersonal communication: rethinking the mass-interpersonal divide. Paper presented at a meeting of the International Communication Association, New York.
63. Petronio S. (2002) Boundaries of privacy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
64. Carpenter CJ. Narcissism on Facebook: self-promotional and anti-social behavior. Personality & Individual Differences 2012; 52:482-486.
65. Ramirez A, Walther JB, Burgoon JK, et al. Informationseeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: toward a conceptual model. Human Communication Research 2002; 28:213-228.
66. Berger CR, Bradac JA. (1982) Language and social knowledge. London: Edward Arnold.
67. Sunnafrank M. Predicted outcome value during initial interactions: a reformulation of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research 1986; 13:3-33.
68. Burgoon JK, Bonito JA, Ramirez A, et al. Testing the interactivity principle: effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication 2002; 52:657-677.
69. Haythornthwaite C. Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication, & Society 2005; 8:125-147.
70. Hampton KN, Goulet LS, Marlow C, et al. (2012) Why most Facebook users get more than they give: the effect of Facebook power users on everybody else. http://pewinterent.org/reports/2012/Facebook-users.aspx (accessed Apr. 17, 2012).
71. Marche S. (2012) Is Facebook making us lonely? www .theatlantic.com (accessed Jun. 1, 2012).
72. Turkle S. (2011) Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
73. Rainie L, Wellman B. (2012) Networked: the new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. Tufekci Z. (2012) Social media's small, positive role in human relationships. www.theatlantic.com (accessed Jun. 1, 2012).