Does cooperation reduce service delivery costs? Evidence from residential solid waste services

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 85-107

  Bel, Germà ^a   Fageda, Xavier ^a   Mur, Melania ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890530268     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: 14779803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mus059     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Agranoff, Robert. 2010. Local governments and their intergovernmental networks in federalizing Spain. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
2. Allers, Maarten A., and Bieuwe J. Geertsema. 2012. Do municipal amalgamations affect local government spending and taxation? Evidence from the Netherlands. Paper presented at the 2012 Conference of the Public Choice Society. http://www.pubchoicesoc.org/papers-2012/Allers- Geertsema.pdf (accessed September 3, 2012).
3. Ballard, Michael J., and Mildred Warner. 2000. Taking the high road: Local government restructuring and the quest for quality. In Power tools for fighting privatization. ed, AFSCME, 6/1-6/53. Washington, DC: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.
4. Bel, Germà. 2006. Economía y política de la privatización local. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
5. -. Forthcoming. Local government size and efficiency in capital intensive services: What evidence is there of economies of scale, density and scope? In The challenge of local government size. Theoretical perspectives, international experience, and policy reform. eds, Santiago Lago- Peñas and Jorge Martinez-Vazquez. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
6. Bel, Germà, and Antonio Miralles. 2003. Factors influencing the privatisation of urban solid waste collection in Spain. Urban Studies 40:1323-34.
7. Bel, Germà, and Antón Costas. 2006. Do public sector reforms get rusty? Local privatization in Spain. Journal of Policy Reform 9:1-24.
8. Bel, Germà, and Xavier Fageda. 2007. Why do local governments privatise local services? A survey of empirical studies. Local Government Studies 33:517-34.
9. -. 2008. Reforming the local public sector: Economics and politics in privatization of water and solid waste. Journal of Economic Policy Reform 11:45-65.
10. -. 2009. Factors explaining local privatization: A meta-regression analysis. Public Choice 139:105-19.
11. -. 2010. Empirical analysis of solid management waste costs: Some evidence from Galicia, Spain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 54:187-93.
12. -. 2011. Big guys eat big cakes: Firm size and contracting in urban and rural areas. International Public Management Journal 14:4-26.
13. Bel, Germà, and Mildred Warner. 2008a. Does privatization of solid waste and water services reduce costs? A review of empirical studies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52:1337-348.
14. -. 2008b. Challenging issues in local privatization. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26:104-9.
15. Bel, Germà, and Melania Mur. 2009. Inter-municipal cooperation, privatization and waste management costs: Evidence from rural municipalities. Waste Management 29:2772-8.
16. Bel, Germà, Elbert Dijkgraaf, Xavier Fageda, and Raymond Gradus. 2010. Similar problems, different solutions: Comparing refuse collection in the Netherlands and Spain. Public Administration 88:479-95.
17. Bel, Germà, Xavier Fageda, and Mildred Warner. 2010. Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta-regression analysis of solid waste and water services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29:553-77.
18. Brown, Trevor L. 2008. The dynamics of government-to-government contracts. Public Performance Management Review 31:364-86.
19. Brown, Trevor L., and Matthew Potoski. 2003a. Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13:441-68.
20. -. 2003b. Managing contract performance: A transaction cost approach. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22:275-97.
21. -. 2005. Transaction costs and contracting: The practitioner perspective. Public Performance and Management Review 28:326-51.
22. Callan, Scott J., and Janet M. Thomas. 2001. Economies of scale and scope: A cost analysis of municipal solid waste services. Land Economics 77:548-60.
23. Carr, Jered B., Kelly LeRoux, and Manoj K. Shrestha. 2009. Institutional ties, transaction costs, and external service production. Urban Affairs Review 44:403-27.
24. Dijkgraaf, Elbert, and R. H. J. M. Gradus. 2003. Cost savings of contracting out refuse collection. Empirica 30:149-61.
25. Dixit, Avinash. 1973. The optimum factory town. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4:637-51.
26. Domberger, Simon, Shirley A. Meadowcroft, and David J. Thompson. 1986. Competitive tendering and efficiency: The case of refuse collection. Fiscal Studies 7:69-87.
27. Donahue, John. 1989. The privatization decision: Private means for public ends. New York: Basic Books.
28. Dubin, Jeffrey A., and Peter Navarro. 1988. How markets for impure public goods organize: The case of household refuse collection. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 4:217-41.
29. Emerson, Kirk, Tina Nabatchi, and Stephen Balogh. 2012. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22:1-29.
30. Feiock, Richard C. 2007. Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs 29:47-63.
31. Feiock, Richard C., and John T. Scholz, eds. 2010. Self-organizing federalism: Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Fluvià, Modest, Ricard Rigall-I-Torrent, and Anna Garriga. 2008. Déficit en la provisión local de servicios públicos y tipología municipal. Revista de Economía Aplicada 16:111-32.
33. Frederickson, George H., and Kevin B. Smith. 2003. The public administration theory primer. Boulder, CO: Westview.
34. Garrone, Paola, Luca Grilli, and Xavier Rousseau. Forthcoming. Management discretion and political interference in municipal enterprises. Evidence from Italian utilities. Local Government Studies.
35. Hefetz, Amir, and Mildred E. Warner. 2004. Privatization and its reverse: Explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process. Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory 14:171-90.
36. -. 2012. Contracting or public delivery? The importance of service, market and management characteristics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22:289-317.
37. Hefetz, Amir, Mildred Warner, and Eran Vigoda-Gadot. 2012. Privatization and inter-municipal contracting: The US local government experience 1992-2007. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30:675-92.
38. Hirsch, Werner Z. 1965. Cost functions of an urban government service: Refuse collection. Review of Economics and Statistics 47:87-92.
39. Holzer, Marc, and John Fry. 2011. Shared services and municipal consolidation. A critical analysis. Alexandria, VA: Public Technology Institute.
40. Hulst, Rudie, and André van Montfort, eds. 2007. Inter-municipal cooperation in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer.
41. Kelly, Josephine. 2007. The curious absence of inter-municipal cooperation in England. Public Policy and Administration 22:319-34.
42. Kemper, Peter, and John Quigley. 1976. The economics of refuse collection. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
43. Kitchen, Harry M. 1976. A statistical estimation of an operating cost function for municipal refuse collection. Public Finance Quarterly 4:56-76.
44. Lago-Peñas, Santiago, and Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, eds. Forthcoming. The challenge of local government size. Theoretical perspectives, international experience, and policy reform. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
45. Lamothe, Scott, Meeyoung Lamothe, and Richard C. Feiock. 2008. Examining local government service delivery arrangements over time. Urban Affairs Review 44:27-56.
46. Lamothe, Meeyoung, and Scott Lamothe. Forthcoming. To trust or not to trust? What matters in local government-vendor relationships? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
47. LeRoux, Kelly, and Jered B. Carr. 2007. Explaining local government cooperation on public works: Evidence from Michigan. Public Works Management and Policy 12:344-58.
48. LeRoux, Kelly, Paul W. Brandenburger, and Sanjay K. Pandey. 2010. Interlocal service cooperation in US cities: A social network explanation. Public Administration Review 70:268-78.
49. Levin Jonathan, and Steven Tadelis. 2010. Contracting for government services: Theory and evidence from U.S. cities. Journal of Industrial Economics LVIII:507-41.
50. Lowery, David. 2000. A transactions costs model of metropolitan governance: Allocation versus redistribution in urban America. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10:49-78.
51. Milward, H. B., and Keith G. Provan. 2000. Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10:359-79.
52. Mirrless, James A. 1972. The optimum town. Swedish Journal of Economics 74:114-35.
53. Oates, Wallace. 1972. Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
54. Ostrom, Vincent, Charles M. Tiebout, and Robert Warren. 1961. The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review 55:831-42.
55. Pier, William J., Robert B. Vernon, and John H. Wicks. 1974. An empirical comparison of government and private production efficiency. National Tax Journal 27:653-56.
56. Reeves, Eoin, and Michael Barrow. 2000. The impact of contracting-out on the costs of refuse collection services. The case of Ireland. Economic and Social Review 31:129-50.
57. Shrestha, Manoj K., and Richard C. Feiock. 2011. Transaction cost, exchange embeddedness, and interlocal cooperation in local public goods. Political Research Quarterly 64:573-87.
58. Sørensen, Rune J. 2007. Does dispersed public ownership impair efficiency? The case of refuse collection in Norway. Public Administration 85:1045-58.
59. Steiner, Reto. 2003. The causes, spread and effects of inter-municipal cooperation and municipal mergers in Switzerland. Public Management Review 5:551-71.
60. Stevens, Barbara J. 1978. Scale, market structure, and the cost of refuse collection. Review of Economics and Statistics 60:438-48.
61. Swianiewicz, Pawel, ed. 2011. Working together. Inter-municipal cooperation in five central European countries. Budapest: Open Society Institute.
62. Szymanski, Stefan, and Sean Wilkins. 1993. Cheap rubbish? Competitive tendering on refuse collection services. Fiscal Studies 14:109-30.
63. Warner, Mildred E. 2006. Market-based governance and the challenge for rural governments: US trends. Social Policy and Administration 40:612-31.
64. Warner, Mildred E., and Robert Hebdon. 2001. Local government restructuring: Privatization and its alternatives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20:315-36.
65. Warner, Mildred E., and Amir Hefetz. 2002. Applying market solutions to public services: An assessment of efficiency, equity and voice. Urban Affairs Review 38:70-89.
66. -. 2003. Rural-urban differences in privatization: Limits to the competitive state. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 21:703-18.
67. Warner, Mildred E., and Germà Bel. 2008. Competition or monopoly? Comparing privatization of local public services in the U.S. and Spain. Public Administration 86:723-35.
68. Williamson, Oliver E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly 36:269-96.
69. Zafra-Gómez, Luis J., Diego Prior, Ana Maria, Plata Díaz, and Antonio M. López-Hernández. Forthcoming. Reducing costs in times of crisis: Delivery forms in small and medium sized local governments' waste management services. Public Administration.