Erratum: Time course and magnitude of illusory translation perception during off-vertical axis rotation (Journal of Neurophysiology (March 2006) 95, (1571-1587) DOI: 10.1152/jn.00613.2005);Time course and magnitude of illusory translation perception during off-vertical axis rotation

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 1571-1587

  Vingerhoets, R A A ^a,b   Medendorp, W P ^b,c   Van Gisbergen, J A M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; OTOLITH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; ROTATION; SELF MONITORING; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TILTING; TIME; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION; ADAPTATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; ILLUSION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEMICIRCULAR CANAL; STIMULATION; VESTIBULE; VESTIBULOOCULAR REFLEX;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REFLEX, VESTIBULO-OCULAR; ROTATION; SEMICIRCULAR CANALS; VESTIBULE;

EID: 33645983199     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00517.2006     Document Type: Erratum

References (54)

1. Angelaki DE and Hess BJ. Three-dimensional organization of otolith-ocular reflexes in rhesus monkeys. I. Linear acceleration responses during offvertical axis rotation. J Neurophysiol 75: 2405-2424, 1996a.
2. Angelaki DE and Hess BJ. Three-dimensional organization of otolith-ocular reflexes in rhesus monkeys. II. Inertial detection of angular velocity. J Neurophysiol 75: 2425-2440, 1996b.
3. Angelaki DE, McHenry MQ, Dickman JD, Newlands SD, and Hess BJ. Computation of inertial motion: neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information. J Neurosci 19: 316-327, 1999.
4. Angelaki DE, Wei M, and Merfeld DM. Vestibular discrimination of gravity and translational acceleration. Ann NY Acad Sci 942: 114-127, 2001.
5. Bos JE and Bles W. Theoretical considerations on canal- otolith interaction and an observer model. Biol Cybern 86: 191-207, 2002.
6. Brown JH. Magnitude estimation of angular velocity during passive rotation. J Exp Psychol 72: 169-172, 1966.
7. Darlot C, Denise P, Droulez J, Cohen B, and Berthoz A. Eye movements induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) at small angles of tilt. Exp Brain Res 73: 91-105, 1988.
8. Denise P, Darlot C, Droulez J, Cohen B, and Berthoz A. Motion perceptions induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) at small angles of tilt. Exp Brain Res 73: 106-114, 1988.
9. Droulez J and Darlot C. The geometric and dynamic implications of the coherence constraints in three-dimensional sensorimotor interactions. In: Attention and Performance XIII, edited by Jeannerod M. New York: Erlbaum, 1989, p. 495-526.
10. Ehrenstein WH and Ehrenstein A. Psychophysical methods. In: Modern Techniques in Neuroscience Research, edited by Windhorst U and Johansson H. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1999, p. 1211-1241.
11. Fisher SK, Ciuffreda KJ, Tannen B, and Super P. Stability of tonic vergence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 29: 1577-1581, 1988.
12. Freeman TC. Transducer models of head-centred motion perception. Vision Res 41: 2741-2755, 2001.
13. Furman JM, Schor RH, and Schumann TL. Off-vertical axis rotation: a test of the otolith-ocular reflex. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 101: 643-650, 1992.
14. Glasauer S. Interaction of semicircular canals and otoliths in the processing structure of the subjective zenith. Ann NY Acad Sci 656: 847-849, 1992.
15. Glasauer S. Linear acceleration perception: frequency dependence of the hilltop illusion. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 520: 37-40, 1995.
16. Glasauer S and Merfeld DM. Modeling three dimensional vestibular responses during complex motion stimulation. In: Three-Dimensional Kinematics of Eye, Head and Limb Movement, edited by Fetter M, Misslich H, Tweed D, and Haslwanter T. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic, 1997, p. 387-398.
17. Green DM and Swets JA. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1966.
18. Guedry F. Psychophysics of vestibular sensation. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology VI/2, edited by Kornhuber H. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974, p. 1-154.
19. Haslwanter T, Jaeger R, Mayr S, and Fetter M. Three-dimensional eyemovement responses to off-vertical axis rotations in humans. Exp Brain Res 134: 96-106, 2000.
20. Hess BJ and Angelaki DE. Inertial processing of vestibulo-ocular signals. Ann NY Acad Sci 871: 148-161, 1999.
21. Israel I, Chapuis N, Glasauer S, Charade O, and Berthoz A. Estimation of passive horizontal linear whole-body displacement in humans. J Neurophysiol 70: 1270-1273, 1993.
22. Israel I, Grasso R, Georges-Francois P, Tsuzuku T, and Berthoz A. Spatial memory and path integration studied by self-driven passive linear displacement. I. Basic properties. J Neurophysiol 77: 3180-3192, 1997.
23. Klein SA. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary. Percept Psychophys 63: 1421-1455, 2001.
24. Kushiro K, Dai M, Kunin M, Yakushin SB, Cohen B, and Raphan T. Compensatory and orienting eye movements induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 88: 2445-2462, 2002.
25. Lackner JR and Graybiel A. Postural illusions experienced during Z-axis recumbent rotation and their dependence upon somatosensory stimulation of the body surface. Aviat Space Environ Med 49: 484-488, 1978a.
26. Lackner JR and Graybiel A. Some influences of touch and pressure cues on human spatial orientation. Aviat Space Environ Med 49: 798-804, 1978b.
27. Mayne R. A systems concept of the vestibular organs. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology VI/2, edited by Kornhuber H. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974, p. 493-580.
28. Medendorp WP, Tweed DB, and Crawford JD. Motion parallax is computed in the updating of human spatial memory. J Neurosci 23: 8135-8142, 2003.
29. Medendorp WP, Van Gisbergen JA, and Gielen CC. Human gaze stabilization during active head translations. J Neurophysiol 87: 295-304, 2002.
30. Medendorp WP, Van Gisbergen JA, Van Pelt S, and Gielen CC. Context compensation in the vestibuloocular reflex during active head rotations. J Neurophysiol 84: 2904-2917, 2000.
31. Merfeld DM. Modeling human vestibular responses during eccentric rotation and off vertical axis rotation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 520: 354-359, 1995a.
32. Merfeld DM. Modeling the vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt. Exp Brain Res 106: 123-134, 1995b.
33. Merfeld DM, Park S, Gianna-Poulin C, Black FO, and Wood S. Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. I. Frequency response of VOR and perceptual responses during translation and tilt. J Neurophysiol 94: 186-198, 2005a.
34. Merfeld DM, Park S, Gianna-Poulin C, Black FO, and Wood S. Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. II. VOR and perceptual responses during combined tilt and translation. J Neurophysiol 94: 199-205, 2005b.
35. Merfeld DM, Young LR, Oman CM, and Shelhamer MJ. A multidimensional model of the effect of gravity on the spatial orientation of the monkey. J Vestib Res 3: 141-161, 1993.
36. Merfeld DM and Zupan LH. Neural processing of gravitoinertial cues in humans. III. Modeling tilt and translation responses. J Neurophysiol 87: 819-833, 2002.
37. Merfeld DM, Zupan LH, and Gifford CA. Neural processing of gravitoinertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation. J Neurophysiol 85: 1648-1660, 2001.
38. Merfeld DM, Zupan LH, and Peterka RJ. Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration. Nature 398: 615-618, 1999.
39. Mittelstaedt H, Glasauer S, Gralla G, and Mittelstaedt ML. How to explain a constant subjective vertical at constant high speed rotation about an earth-horizontal axis. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 468: 295-299, 1989.
40. Okada T, Grunfeld E, Shallo-Hoffmann J, and Bronstein AM. Vestibular perception of angular velocity in normal subjects and in patients with congenital nystagmus. Brain 122: 1293-1303, 1999.
41. Paige GD and Seidman SH. Characteristics of the VOR in response to linear acceleration. Ann NY Acad Sci 871: 123-135, 1999.
42. Paige GD and Tomko DL. Eye movement responses to linear head motion in the squirrel monkey. I. Basic characteristics. J Neurophysiol 65: 1170-1182, 1991.
43. Raphan T and Cohen B. Velocity storage and the ocular response to multidimensional vestibular stimuli. In: Reviews of Oculomotor Research. I. Adaptive Mechanisms in Gaze Control: Facts and Theories, edited by Berthoz A and Melvill-Jones G. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1985, p. 123-143.
44. Raphan T, Matsuo V, and Cohen B. Velocity storage in the vestibulo-ocular reflex arc (VOR). Exp Brain Res 35: 229-248, 1979.
45. Seidman SH, Telford L, and Paige GD. Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration. Exp Brain Res 119: 307-314, 1998.
46. Telford L, Seidman SH, and Paige GD. Dynamics of squirrel monkey linear vestibuloocular reflex and interactions with fixation distance. J Neurophysiol 78: 1775-1790, 1997.
47. Telford L, Seidman SH, and Paige GD. Canal- otolith interactions in the squirrel monkey vestibulo-ocular reflex and the influence of fixation distance. Exp Brain Res 118: 115-125, 1998.
48. Turano KA and Massof RW. Nonlinear contribution of eye velocity to motion perception. Vision Res 41: 385-395, 2001.
49. Wertheim AH. Motion perception during self-motion: the direct versus inferential controversy revisited. Behav Brain Sci 17: 293-355, 1994.
50. Wichmann FA and Hill NJ. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept Psychophys 63: 1293-1313, 2001.
51. Wood SJ. Human otolith-ocular reflexes during off-vertical axis rotation: effect of frequency on tilt-translation ambiguity and motion sickness. Neurosci Lett 323: 41-44, 2002.
52. Young LR. Perception of the body in space: mechanisms. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System. Sensory Processes. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1984, sect. 1, vol. III, pt. 2, p. 1023-1066.
53. Zupan LH, Merfeld DM, and Darlot C. Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements. Biol Cybern 86: 209-230, 2002.
54. Zupan LH, Peterka RJ, and Merfeld DM. Neural processing of gravitoinertial cues in humans. I. Influence of the semicircular canals following post-rotatory tilt. J Neurophysiol 84: 2001-2015, 2000.