Verticality perception during off-vertical axis rotation

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 3256-3268

  Vingerhoets, R A A ^a,b   Van Gisbergen, J A M ^a   Medendorp, W P ^b,c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CANAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; OTOLITH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; VESTIBULOOCULAR REFLEX; VISION; AXIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; MIDDLE AGED; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STIMULATION; TIME; VESTIBULE;

ADULT; AXIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PERCEPTION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROTATION; TIME FACTORS; VESTIBULE;

EID: 34447336443     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01333.2006     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Angelaki DE, McHenry MQ, Dickman JD, Newlands SD, Hess BJ. Computation of inertial motion: neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information. J Neurosci 19: 316-327, 1999.
2. Angelaki DE, Wei M, Merfeld DM. Vestibular discrimination of gravity and translational acceleration. Ann NY Acad Sci 942: 114-127, 2001.
3. Clark B, Graybiel A. Factors contributing to the delay in the perception of the oculogravic illusion. Am J Psychol 79: 377-388, 1966.
4. Cullen KE, Rey CG, Guitton D, Galiana HL. The use of system identification techniques in the analysis of oculomotor burst neuron spike train dynamics. J Comput Neurosci 3: 347-368, 1996.
5. Curthoys IS. The delay of the oculogravic illusion. Brain Res Bull 40: 407-412, 1996.
6. Denise P, Darlot C, Droulez J, Cohen B, Berthoz A. Motion perceptions induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) at small angles of tilt. Exp Brain Res 73: 106-114, 1988.
7. Droulez J, Darlot C. The geometric and dynamic implications of the coherence constraints in three-dimensional sensorimotor interactions. In: Attention and Performance XIII, edited by Jeannerod M. New York: Erlbaum, 1989, p. 495-526.
8. Dyde RT, Jenkin MR, Harris LR. The subjective visual vertical and the perceptual upright. Exp Brain Res 173: 612-622, 2006.
9. Eggert T. Der Einfluss orientierter Texturen auf die subjektieve Vertikale und seine systemtheoretische Analyse (PhD thesis). Munich, Germany: Munich Technical Univ., 1998.
10. Ernst MO, Banks MS. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415: 429-433, 2002.
11. Glasauer S. Interaction of semicircular canals and otoliths in the processing structure of the subjective zenith. Ann NY Acad Sci 656: 847-849, 1992.
12. Glasauer S, Merfeld DM. Modeling three-dimensional vestibular responses during complex motion stimulation. In: Three-Dimensional Kinematics of Eye, Head and Limb Movement, edited by Fetter M, Misslich H, Tweed D, Haslwanter T. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic, 1997, p. 387-398.
13. Graybiel A, Brown R. The delay in visual reorientation following exposure to a change in direction of resultant force on a human centrifuge. J Gen Psychol 45: 143-150, 1951.
14. Green AM, Angelaki DE. Resolution of sensory ambiguities for gaze stabilization requires a second neural integrator. J Neurosci 23: 9265-9275, 2003.
15. Groen EL, Jenkin HL, Howard IP. Perception of self-tilt in a true and illusory vertical plane. Perception 31: 1477-1490, 2002.
16. Guedry F. Psychophysics of vestibular sensation. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology, edited by Kornhuber H. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974, vol. VI/2, p. 1-154.
17. Haslwanter T, Jaeger R, Mayr S, Fetter M. Three-dimensional eye-movement responses to off-vertical axis rotations in humans. Exp Brain Res 134: 96-106, 2000.
18. Jaggi-Schwarz K, Hess BJ. Influence of dynamic tilts on the perception of earth-vertical. Exp Brain Res 149: 340-350, 2003.
19. Kaptein RG, Van Gisbergen JAM. Interpretation of a discontinuity in the sense of verticality at large body tilt. J Neurophysiol 91: 2205-2214, 2004.
20. Kaptein RG, Van Gisbergen JAM. Nature of the transition between two modes of external space perception in tilted subjects. J Neurophysiol 93: 3356-3369, 2005.
21. Keusch S, Hess BJ, Jaggi-Schwarz K. Direction specific error patterns during continuous tracking of the subjective visual vertical. Exp Brain Res 155: 283-290, 2004.
22. Knill DC, Pouget A. The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci 27: 712-719, 2004.
23. Körding KP, Wolpert DM. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427: 244-247, 2004.
24. Laurens J, Droulez J. Bayesian processing of vestibular information. Biol Cybern December 05, 2006. doi:10.1007/s00422-006-0133- 1.
25. Mast F, Jarchow T. Perceived body position and the visual horizontal. Brain Res Bull 40: 393-398, 1996.
26. Mayne R. A systems concept of the vestibular organs. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology, edited by Kornhuber H. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974, vol. VI/2, p. 493-580.
27. Merfeld DM, Park S, Gianna-Poulin C, Black FO, Wood S. Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. I. Frequency response of VOR and perceptual responses during translation and tilt. J Neurophysiol 94: 186-198, 2005a.
28. Merfeld DM, Park S, Gianna-Poulin C, Black FO, Wood S. Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. II. VOR and perceptual responses during combined tilt and translation. J Neurophysiol 94: 199-205, 2005b.
29. Merfeld DM, Young LR, Oman CM, Shelhamer MJ. A multidimensional model of the effect of gravity on the spatial orientation of the monkey. J Vestib Res 3: 141-161, 1993.
30. Merfeld DM, Zupan LH. Neural processing of gravitoinertial cues in humans. III. Modeling tilt and translation responses. J Neurophysiol 87: 819-833, 2002.
31. Merfeld DM, Zupan LH, Gifford CA. Neural processing of gravitoinertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation. J Neurophysiol 85: 1648-1660, 2001.
32. Mittelstaedt H. A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical. Naturwissenschaften 70: 272-281, 1983.
33. Mittelstaedt H. The role of the pitched-up orientation of the otoliths in two recent models of the subjective vertical. Biol Cybern 61: 405-416, 1989.
34. Mittelstaedt H, Glasauer S, Gralla G, Mittelstaedt ML. How to explain a constant subjective vertical at constant high speed rotation about an earthhorizontal axis. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 468: 295-299, 1989.
35. Niemeier M, Crawford JD, Tweed DB. Optimal transsaccadic integration explains distorted spatial perception. Nature 422: 76-80, 2003.
36. Paige GD, Seidman SH. Characteristics of the VOR in response to linear acceleration. Ann NY Acad Sci 871: 123-135, 1999.
37. Paige GD, Tomko DL. Eye movement responses to linear head motion in the squirrel monkey. I. Basic characteristics. J Neurophysiol 65: 1170-1182, 1991.
38. Pavlou M, Wijnberg N, Faldon ME, Bronstein AM. Effect of semicircular canal stimulation on the perception of the visual vertical. J Neurophysiol 90: 622-630, 2003.
39. Schöne H. On the role of gravity in human spatial orientation. Aerosp Med 35: 764-772, 1964.
40. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Statist 6: 461-464, 1978.
41. Seidman SH, Telford L, Paige GD. Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration. Exp Brain Res 119: 307-314, 1998.
42. Stocker AA, Simoncelli EP. Noise characteristics and prior expectations in human visual speed perception. Nat Neurosci 9: 578-585, 2006.
43. Telford L, Seidman SH, Paige GD. Dynamics of squirrel monkey linear vestibuloocular reflex and interactions with fixation distance. J Neurophysiol 78: 1775-1790, 1997.
44. Udo de Haes H. Stability of apparent vertical and ocular countertorsion as a function of lateral tilt. Percept Psychophys 8: 137-142, 1970.
45. Van Beuzekom AD, Van Gisbergen JAM. Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates. J Neurophysiol 84: 11-27, 2000.
46. Vingerhoets RAA, Medendorp WP, Van Gisbergen JAM. Time course and magnitude of illusory translation perception during off-vertical axis rotation. J Neurophysiol 95: 1571-1587, 2006.
47. Weiss Y, Simoncelli EP, Adelson EH. Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nat Neurosci 5: 598-604, 2002.
48. Wood SJ. Human otolith-ocular reflexes during off-vertical axis rotation: effect of frequency on tilt-translation ambiguity and motion sickness. Neurosci Lett 323: 41-44, 2002.
49. Zupan LH, Merfeld DM. An internal model of head kinematics predicts the influence of head orientation on reflexive eye movements. J Neural Eng 2: S180-S197, 2005.
50. Zupan LH, Merfeld DM, Darlot C. Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements. Biol Cybern 86: 209-230, 2002.