Interculturality and intercultural pragmatics

The Routledge Handbook of Language and Intercultural Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 67-84

  Kecskes, Istvan ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890374876     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203805640     Document Type: Chapter

References (70)

1. Austin, J.L. (1976) How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Hartford, B. (eds) (2005) Interlanguage Pragmatics: Exploring Institutional Talk, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Barr, DJ. and Keysar, B. (2005) ‘Making sense of how we make sense: the paradox of egocentrism in language use’, in H.L. Colston and A.N. Kayz (eds) Figurative Language Comprehension, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 21—43.
4. Blum-Kulka, S., Blondheim, M., House, J., Kasper, G. and Wagner, J. (2008) ‘Intercultural pragmatics, language and society’, in P. van Sterkenburg (ed.) Unity and Diversity of Languages, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins, pp. 155—73.
5. Boxer, D. (2002) ‘Discourse issues in cross-cultural pragmatics’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22: 150-67.
6. Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bublitz, W. and Lenk, U. (1999) ‘Disturbed coherence: “fill me in”’, in W. Bublitz, U. Lenk and E. Ventola (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins, pp. 153-75.
8. Chaiklin, S. and Lave, J. (eds) (1993) Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Coates, J. (1995) ‘The negotiation of coherence in face-to-face interaction: some examples from the extreme bounds’, in M.-A. Gernsbacher and T. Givon (eds) Coherence in Spontaneous Text, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 41-58.
10. Colston, H.L. (2005) ‘On sociocultural and nonliteral: a synopsis and a prophesy’, in H.L. Colston and A.N. Katz (eds) Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1-20.
11. Escandell-Vidal, V. (1996) ‘Towards a cognitive approach to politeness’, Language Science, 18: 629-50.
12. Evans, V. (2009) How Words Mean: Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models, and Meaning Construction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Felix-Brasdefer, J.C. (2008) ‘Sociopragmatic variation: six preferred responses in Mexican and Dominican Spanish’, Journal of Politeness Research, 4(1): 81-110.
14. Gee, J.P. (1999). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis, London: Routledge.
15. Gibbs, R.W., (1999) Intentions in the Experience of Meaning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Giora, R. (1997) ‘Understanding figurative and literal language: the graded salience hypothesis’, Cognitive Linguistics, 8(3): 183-206.
17. Giora, R. (2003) On our Mind: Salience, Context and Figurative Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Goddard, C. and Wierzbicka, A. (1997) ‘Discourse and culture’, in T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction, London: Sage, pp. 231 -57.
19. Grice, H.P. (1961) ‘The causal theory of perception’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 35: 121-52.
20. Grosz, BJ. and Sidner, C.L. (1986) ‘Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse’, Computational Linguistics, 12(3): 175-204.
21. Grosz, BJ., Joshi, A.K. and Weinstein, S. (1995) ‘Centering: a framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse’, Computational Linguistics, 21(2): 203-25.
22. Gudykunst, W.B. and Mody, B. (2002) Handbook of International and Intercultural Communication, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 259-75.
23. Habermas, J. (1979) Communication and the Evolution of Society, Toronto: Beacon Press.
24. Hall, J.K., Cheng, A. and Carlson, M. (2006) ‘Reconceptualizing multicompetence as a theory of language knowledge’, Applied Linguistics, 27(2): 220-40.
25. Higgins, C. (ed.) (2007) ‘A closer look at cultural differences, “interculturality” in talk-in interaction’, Pragmatics, Special issue 17(1).
26. Hinnenkamp, V. (1995) ‘Intercultural communication’, inJ. Verschueren, J.-O. Ostman andJ. Blommaert (eds) Handbook of Pragmatics, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
27. House, J. (2000) ‘Understanding misunderstanding: a pragmatic-discourse approach to analysing mismanaged rapport in talk across cultures’, in H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.) Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures, London: Continuum, pp. 146-64.
28. House, J. (2003) ‘Misunderstanding in intercultural university encounters’, in J. House, G. Kasper and S. Ross (eds) Misunderstanding in Social Life: Discourse Approaches to Problematic Talk, London: Longman, pp. 22-56.
29. Hu, J. and Pan, H. (2001) ‘Processing local coherence of discourse in centering theory’, proceedings of the 15th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
30. Jary, M. (1998) ‘Relevance theory and the communication of politeness’, Journal of Pragmatics, 30: 1-19.
31. Kasper, G. (1996) ‘The development of pragmatic competence’, in E. Kellerman, B. Weltens and T. Bongaerts (eds) EUROSLA 6: A Selection of Papers, 55(2): 103-20.
32. Kasper, G. (1998) ‘Interlanguage pragmatics’, in H. Byrnes (ed.) Learning Foreign and Second Languages: Perspectives in Research and Scholarship, New York: The Modern Language Association of America, pp. 183—208.
33. Kasper, G. (2004) ‘Speech acts in (inter)action: repeated question’, Intercultural Pragmatics, 1(1): 125—35.
34. Kasper, G. and Blum-Kulka, S. (1993) ‘Interlanguage pragmatics: an introduction’, in G. Kasper and S. Blum-Kulka (eds) Interlanguage Pragmatics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3—17.
35. Katz, A. (2005) ‘Discourse and social—cultural factors in understanding nonliteral language’, in H. Colston and A. Katz (eds) Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum and Associates, pp. 183—207.
36. Kecskes, I. (2004) ‘Lexical merging, conceptual blending, cultural crossing’, Intercultural Pragmatics, 1(1): 1—26.
37. Kecskes, I. (2005) ‘Pragmatics aspects of multilingualism’, in K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, Oxford: Elsevier Science.
38. Kecskes, I. (2007) ‘Formulaic language in English lingua franca’, in I. Kecskes and L. Horn (eds) Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects, Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 191-219.
39. Kecskes, I. (2008) ‘Dueling context: a dynamic model of meaning’, Journal of Pragmatics, 40(3): 385-406.
40. Kecskes, I. (2010a) ‘The paradox of communication: a socio-cognitive approach’, Pragmatics and Society, 1(1):50-73.
41. Kecskes, I. (2010b) ‘Dual and multilanguage systems’, International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(2): 1-19.
42. Kecskes, I. (2011) ‘Intercultural pragmatics’, in D. Archer and P. Grundy (eds) Pragmatics Reader, London: Routledge, pp. 371-87.
43. Kecskes, I. and Zhang, F. (2009) ‘Activating, seeking and creating common ground: a socio-cognitive approach’, Pragmatics and Cognition, 17(2): 331-55.
44. Keysar, B., and Barr, DJ. (2002) ‘Self anchoring in conversation: why language users do not do what they “should”’, in T. Gilovich, D.W. Griffin and D. Kahneman (eds) Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 150-66.
45. Keysar, B. and Bly, B. (1995) ‘Intuitions of the transparency of idioms: can one keep a secret by spilling the beans?’, Journal of Memory and Language, 34: 89-109.
46. Koole, T. and Thije, J.D. ten (1994) The Construction of Intercultural Discourse: Team Discussions of Educational Advisers, Amsterdam/Atlanta: RODOPI.
47. Leibniz, G.W. (1679; 2nd edn 1976) Philosophical Papers and Letters, Selection translated and edited with an introduction by L.E. Loemker, 2nd edn, Dordrecht, Holland/Boston, MA: D. Reidel.
48. Markee, N. (2000) Conversation Analysis, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. Markee, N. and Kasper, G. (2004) ‘Classroom talks: an introduction’, Modern Language Journal, 88(4): 491-500.
50. Meier, AJ. (1997) ‘Teaching the universals of politeness’, ELTJournal, 51(1): 21-28.
51. Mori, J. (2003) ‘The construction of interculturality: a study of initial encounters between American and Japanese students’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(2): 143-84.
52. Nishizaka, A. (1995) ‘The interactive constitution of interculturality: how to be a Japanese with word?’, Human Studies, 18: 301-26.
53. Paradis, M. (1995) Aspects of Bilingual Aphasia, London: Pergamon.
54. Philip, G. (2005) ‘Figurative language and the advanced learner’, Research News: The Newsletter of the IATEFL Research SIG, 16: 16-20.
55. Prodromou, L. (2008) English as a Lingua Franca: A Corpus-Based Analysis, London: Continuum.
56. Samovar, L.A. and Porter, R.E. (2001) Intercultural Communication Reader, New York: Thomas Learning Publications.
57. Selinker, L. (1972) ‘Interlanguage’, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10: 209-31.
58. Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000) ‘Rapport management: a framework for analysis’, in H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.) Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk across Cultures, London: Continuum, pp. 11-46.
59. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986; 2nd edn 1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Oxford: Blackwell.
60. Thomas, J. (1983) ‘Cross-cultural pragmatic failure’, Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91-112.
61. Ting-Toomey, S. (1999) Communicating Across Cultures, New York/London: The Guilford Press.
62. van Dijk, T.A. (2008) Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Violi, P. (2000) ‘Prototypicality, typicality and context’, in L. Albertazzi (ed.) Meaning and Cognition, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 103-23.
64. Walker, M.A. (1998) ‘Centering, anaphora resolution, and discourse structure’, in M.A. Walker, A.K. Joshi and E.F. Prince (eds) Centering in Discourse, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 401—35.
65. Wenger, E. (2000) Communities of Practice, New York: Cambridge University Press.
66. Wierzbicka, A. (1985) ‘Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts’, Journal of Pragmatics, 9: 145-78.
67. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2004) ‘Relevance theory’, in L.R. Horn and G. Ward (eds) The Handbook of Pragmatics, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 607-32.
68. Winch, P. (1997) ‘Can we understand ourselves?’, Philosophical Investigations, 20(3): 193-204.
69. Wittgenstein, L. (2001) Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edn, Oxford/Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
70. Wray, A. (2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.