Misunderstanding in intercultural university encounters

Misunderstanding in Social Life: Discourse Approaches to Problematic Talk

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 22-56

  House, Juliane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85069288934     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Agar, M. (1992). Review of W erner Holly 1990. Politikersprache. In Language in Society, 21, 158-160
2. Barron, A. (2002). Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. Amsterdam: Benjamins
3. Besnier, N. (1990). Language and affect. In Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 419-451
4. Bloch, C. (1996). Emotions and discourse. In Text, 16, 323-341
5. Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? In Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 145-160
6. Blum-Kulka, S. and Weizman, E. (1988). The inevitability of misunderstanding: Discourse ambiguities. In Text, 8, 219-241
7. Blum-Kulka, S. and Weizman, E. (this volume). Misunderstandings in political interviews
8. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (eds) (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
9. Britton, B. K. and Graesser, A. C. (eds) (1995). Models of text understanding. Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum
10. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
11. Burgoon, J. K., Stern, L. A. and Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
12. Byrnes, H. (1986). Interactional style in Germ an and English conversations. In Text, 6, 89-206
13. Caffi, C. and Janney, R. (1994). Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication. In Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 325-373
14. Clyne, M. (1987). Cultural differences in the organization of academic texts. English and German. In Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 211-247
15. Coupland, N., Wiemann, J. M. and Giles, H. (eds) (1991). 'Miscommunication' and problematic talk. London: Sage
16. Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: H arcourt Brace
17. Dascal, M. (1985). The relevance of misunderstanding. In M. Dascal (ed.), Dialogue: An interdisciplinary approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 441-459
18. Dascal, M. (1999). Introduction: Some questions about misunderstanding. In Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 753-762
19. Dechert, W. and Raupach, M. (eds) (1989). Transfer in language productions. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
20. Edmondson, W. J. (1981). Spoken discourse. A model for analysis. London: Longman
21. Edmondson, W. J. (1987). 'Acquisition' and 'learning': The discourse system integration hypothesis. In W. Lorscher and R. Schulze (eds), Perspectives on language in perfojynance. Tubingen: Narr, 1070-1089
22. Edmondson, W. J. (1989). Discourse production, routines, and language learning. In B. Kettemann, R Bierbaumer, A. Fill and A. Karpf (eds), Englisch als Zweitsprache. Tubingen: Narr, 287-302
23. Ehrman, M. (1993). Ego boundaries revisited: Toward a model of personality and learning. In J. Alatis (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on languages mid linguistics. Strategic interaction and language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 330-362
24. Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. In Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 219-236
25. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row
26. Goffman, E. (1981). Fonns of talk. Oxford: Blackwell
27. Gumperz, J. (1982a). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
28. Gumperz, J. (1982b). Language and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
29. Gumperz, J. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In A. D uranti and C. Goodwin (eds), Rethinking context. Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 229-252
30. Halliday, M. A. K. (1990). New ways of meaning: A challenge to applied linguistics. In Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6, 7-36
31. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edn). London: Arnold
32. Heckhausen, H. and Beckmann, J. (1990). Intentional action and action slips. In Psychological Review, 97, 36-48
33. Hinnenkamp, V (this volume). Misunderstanding: Interactional structure and strategic resources
34. Holmes, J. (1988). Paying compliments: A sex-preferential positive politeness strategy. In Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 445-465
35. House, J. (1979). Interaktionsnormen in deutschen und englischen Alltagsdialogen. In Linguistische Berichte, 59, 76-90
36. House, J. (1986). Cross-cultural pragmatics and foreign language teaching. In Seminar fur Sprachlehrforschung (ed.), Prohleme und Perspektiven der Sprachlehiforschung. Frankfurt: Scriptor, 281-295
37. House, J. (1993). Toward a model for the analysis of inappropriate responses in native/non-native interactions. In S. Blum-Kulka and G. Kasper (eds), lnterlanguage pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press, 163-184
38. House, J. (1996). Contrastive discourse analysis and misunderstanding: The case of German and English. In M. Hellinger and U. Ammon (eds), Contrastive sociolinguistics. Berlin: Alouton, 345-361
39. House, J. (1997). Translation quality assessment. A model revisited, Tubingen: Narr
40. House, J. (1998). Politeness and translation. In L. Hickey (ed.), The pragmatics of translation. Clevedon: Multilingual M atters, 54-71
41. House, J. (2000). Understanding misunderstanding: A pragmatic-discourse approach to analysing mismanaged rapport in talk across cultures. In H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London: Continuum. 145-164
42. House, J. (in press). Politeness in Germany. In L. Hickey and M. Stewart (eds), Politeness in Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
43. House, J. and Kasper, G. (1981). Politeness markers in English and German. In E Coulmas (ed.), Conversational routine. The Hague: M outon, 157-185
44. Hymes, D. (1996). Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality. Toward an understanding of voice. London: Taylor & Francis
45. Janney, R. W. and Arndt, H. (1992). Intracultural tact versus intercultural tact. In R. Watts, S. Ide and K. Ehlich (eds), Politeness in language. Berlin: M outon de Gruyter, 21-41
46. Jaszczolt, K. (1996). Relevance and infinity: Implications for discourse interpretation. In Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 703-722
47. Kasper, G. (1990). Linguistic politeness: C urrent research issues. In Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 193-228
48. Kasper, G. and Blum-Kulka, S. (eds) (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press
49. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a constructionintegration model. In Psychological Review, 95, 163-182
50. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
51. Kotthoff, H. (1989). Pro und Kontra in der Fi'emdsprache. Frankfurt: Lang
52. Kotthoff, H. (1993). Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. In Language in Society, 22, 193-216
53. Kotthoff, H. (1994). Zur Rolle der Konversationsanalyse in der interkulturellen Kommunikation. In Zeitschrift fur Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft, 93, 75-96
54. Lakoff, R. (1990). Talking power. New York: Basic Books
55. Langer, E. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
56. Ledoux, J. (1996). The emotional brain. New York: Simon & Schuster
57. Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman
58. Legrand, P. (1996). European legal systems are not converging. In International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 45, 52-81
59. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, A1A: M IT Press
60. Levinas, E. (1961). Totalite et infni. The Hague: Nijhoff
61. Luchtenberg, S. (1994). A friendly voice to help you vs working through your manual: Pragmatic differences between American and German software manuals. In Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 315-319
62. Markova, I., Graumann, C. and Foppa, K. (eds) (1995). Mutualities in dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
63. Miall, D. (1995). Anticipation and feeling in literary response: A neuropsychological view. In Poetics, 23, 275-298
64. Miles, P. (1994). Compliments and gender. University of H awaii Occasional Papers, 26, 85-137
65. Mohl, S. (1996). Alltagssituationen im interkulturellen Vergleich: Realisierung von Kritik und Ablehnung im Deutschen und Englischen. MA thesis, University of Hamburg
66. Niemeier, S. and Dirven, R. (eds) (1997). The language of emotion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
67. Ochs, E. (ed.) (1989). The pragmatics of affect. Special issue of Text, 9 (1)
68. Rama than, V. and Atkinson, D. (1999). Ethnographic approaches and methods in L2 writing research: A critical guide and review. In Applied Linguistics, 20, 44-70
69. Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
70. Shea, D. (1994). Perspective and production: Structuring conversational participation across cultural boundaries. In Pragmatics, 4, 357-389
71. Slobin, D. (2000). Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier and R. Dirven (eds), Evidence for linguistic relativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 107-138
72. Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture. Oxford: Blackwell
73. Tannen, D. (1979). What's in a frame. In R. Freedle (ed.), New directions in discourse processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 137-181
74. Tannen, D. (1993). Framing in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press
75. Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. In Applied Linguistics, 4, 91-112
76. Thonus, T. (1999). How to communicate politely and be a tutor, too: NS-NNS interaction and writing center practice. In Text, 19, 253-280
77. Tyler, A. (1995). The coconstruction of cross-cultural miscommunication. In Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 129-152
78. van Dijk, T. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage
79. Watts, R. J. (1989). Relevance and relational work: Linguistic politeness as politic behavior. In Multilingua, 8, 131-166