The paradox of communication: Socio-cognitive approach to pragmatics

Pragmatics and Society

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 50-73

  Kecskes, Istvan ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054864064     PISSN: 18789714     EISSN: 18789722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Arnseth, Hans Christian and Ivar Solheim. 2002. Making sense of shared knowledge. In: Proceedings of CSCL 2002, Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, G. Stahl (ed), 102-110.
2. Arundale, Robert B. 1999. An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory. Pragmatics 9, 119-154.
3. Arundale, Robert B. 2008. Against (Gricean) intentions at the heart of human interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics 5, 2, 231-256.
4. Bach, Kent. 1994. Conversational implicature. Mind and Language 9, 124-162.
5. Bach, Kent 2001. You don't say? Synthese 128, 15-44.
6. Barr, Dale J. and Boaz Keysar. 2005. Making sense of how we make sense: the paradox of egocentrism in language use. In: Figurative Language Comprehension, Herbert L. Colston and Albert N. Katz (eds), 21-43. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1993. Challenging assumption about concepts [commentary]. Cognitive Development 8, 169-180.
8. Barsalou, Lawrence, 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 577- 609.
9. Burton-Roberts, Noel. 2005. Robyn Carston on semantics, pragmatics and 'encoding'. Journal of Linguistics 41, 389-407.
10. Capone, Alessandro. 2008. Are explicatures cancellable? Towards a theory of the speaker's intentionality. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6, 1, 55-83
11. Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.
12. Carston, Robyn. 2004a.Truth-conditional content and conversational implicature. In: The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction, C. Bianchi (ed), 65-100. Stanford: CSLI.
13. Carston, Robyn. 2004b. Explicature and semantics. In: Semantics: A reader, Steven Davis and Brendan S. Gillon (eds), 817-845. Oxford: Oxford University Press
14. Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Clark, Herbert and Susan E. Brennan. 1991. Grounding in Communication. In: Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, L. Resnick, J. Levine and S. Teasley (eds), 127-149. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16. Evans, Vyv. 2006. Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models and Meaning-construction. Cognitive Linguistics 17, 4, 491-534.
17. Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner. 2002. Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
18. Frege, Gottlob. 1980 [1884]. The Foundations of Arithmetic, transl. J. L. Austin. Second, revised edition. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
19. Gee, James Paul. 1999. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
20. Gibbs, Raymond W. 1996. What's cognitive about cognitive linguistics. In: Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods, Eugene H. Casad (ed), 27-55. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
21. Giora, Rachel. 1997. Understanding figurative and literal language. The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics 7, 183-206.
22. Giora, Rachel. 2003. On Our Mind: Salience, Context and Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Grice, H. Paul. 1957. Meaning. The Philosophical Review 66, 377-388.
24. Grice, H. Paul. 1969. Utterer's meaning and intention. The Philosophical Review 78, 147-177.
25. Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In: Speech Acts, P. Cole and J. Morgan, eds. 41- 58. New York: Academic Press.
26. Grosz, Barbara J., Aravind K. Joshi and Scott Weinstein. 1995. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21, 2, 203-225.
27. Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Gundel, Jeannette K., Nancy Hedberg and Ron Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse. Language 69, 2, 274-307.
29. Heritage, John. 1990/91. Intention, Meaning and Strategy: observations on constraints from conversation analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction 24, 311-332.
30. Horn, Lawrence R. 2006. The Border Wars: a neo-Gricean perspective. In: Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics: The Michigan papers, K. von Heusinger and K. Turner (eds), 21-48. Oxford: Elsevier.
31. Horn, Lawrence R. 2007. Neo-Gricean Pragmatics: a Manichaean manifesto. In: Pragmatics, Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), 158-183. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
32. Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M. 2005. Default Semantics. Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Joas, Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
35. Kecskés, István. 2000. A Cognitive-pragmatic Approach to Situation-bound Utterances. Journal of Pragmatics 32, 6, 605-625.
36. Kecskés, István. 2001. The "Graded Salience Hypothesis" in Second Language Acquisition. In: Applied Cognitive Linguistics I: theory and language acquisistion, Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier and René Dirven (eds), 249-270. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
37. Kecskés, István. 2002. Situation-Bound Utterances in L1 and L2. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
38. Kecskés, István. 2004a. Lexical Merging, Conceptual Blending and Cultural Crossing. Intercultural Pragmatics 1, 1, 1-21.
39. Kecskés, István. 2004b. The Role of Salience in Processing Pragmatic Units. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 51, 3-4, 309-324.
40. Kecskés, István. 2006. On My Mind: thoughts about salience, context, and figurative language from a second language perspective. Second Language Research 22, 2, 219-237.
41. Kecskés, István. 2008. Dueling Context: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 40, 3, 385-406.
42. Kecskés, István and Jacob L. Mey (eds). 2008. Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
43. Kecskés, István and Fenghui Zhang. 2009. Activating, Seeking and Creating Common Ground: A socio-cognitive approach. Pragmatics & Cognition. 17, 2, 331-355.
44. Keysar, Boaz. 2007. Communication and Miscommunication: the role of egocentric processes. Intercultural Pragmatics 4, 1, 71-84.
45. Keysar, Boaz and Anne Henly. 2002. Speakers' Overestimation of their Effectiveness. Psychological Science 13, 207-212.
46. Koschmann, Timothy and Curtis D. LeBaron. 2003. Reconsidering Common Ground: Examining Clark's contribution theory in the OR. In: Proceedings of the Eight European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Kari Kuutti, Eija Helena Karsten, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Paul Dourish and Kjeld Schmidt (eds), 81-98. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
47. Leibniz, G.W. 1976 [1679]. Philosophical papers and letters. Selection, translated and edited with an introduction by Leroy E. Loemker, 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Reidel.
48. Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
49. Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Language and Mind: let's get the issues straight! In: Language in Mind: Advances in the study of language and cognition, Dedre Gentner and Susan Goldin- Meadow (eds), 25-46.Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.
50. Levinson, Stephen C. 2006. On the Human 'Interaction Engine'. In: Roots of Human Sociality. Culture, cognition and interaction, Nick Enfield and Stephen Levinson (eds), 39-69. Oxford:. Berg
51. Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
52. Millikan, Ruth G. 1998. A Common Structure for Concepts of Individuals, Stuffs, and Real Kinds: More mama, more milk, and more mouse. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, 1, 55-100.
53. Moeschler, Jacques. 2004. Intercultural Pragmatics: a cognitive approach. Intercultural Pragmatics, 1, 1, 49-70.
54. Rampton, Ben. 1995. Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman.
55. Rapaport, William J. 2003. What Did You Mean by that? Misunderstanding, negotiation, and syntactic semantics. Minds and Machines 13, 3, 397-427.
56. Recanati, Francois. 2001. What is Said. Synthese 128, 75-91.
57. Saul, Jennifer. 2002. What is Said and Psychological Reality: Grice's project and relevance theorists' criticisms. Linguistics and Philosophy 25, 347-72.
58. Searle, John. 1983. Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Searle, John. 2007. What is Language? Some preliminary remarks. In: Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive and intercultural aspects, István Kecskés and Laurence Horn (eds.), 7-37. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
60. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: communication and cognition, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
61. Stalnaker, Robert C. 1978. Assertion. Syntax and Semantics 9, 315-332.
62. Stalnaker, Robert C. 2002. Common Ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25, 701-721.
63. Strayer, David L. and William A. Johnston. 2001. Driven to Distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone. Psychological Science 12, 462-466.
64. Violi, Patrizia. 2000. Prototypicality, Typicality and Context. In: Meaning and Cognition, L. Albertazzi (ed), 103-123. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
65. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1921/1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, transl. C. K. Ogden. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.