The response of processing tomato to deficit irrigation at various phenological stages in a sub-humid environment

Agricultural Water Management

Volumn 133, Issue , 2014, Pages 92-103

  Kuşçu, Hayrettin ^a   Turhan, Ahmet ^a   Demir, Ali Osman ^a  

^a ULUDAG UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Net income; Soluble solids; Tomato; Water deficit; Water productivity

Indexed keywords

NET INCOMES; SOLUBLE SOLIDS; TOMATO; WATER DEFICITS; WATER PRODUCTIVITY;

CULTIVATION; FRUITS; INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; PLANTS (BOTANY); WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY;

IRRIGATION;

CROP PRODUCTION; DRIP IRRIGATION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENTISOL; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FLOWERING; FRUIT; GROWING SEASON; HUMID ENVIRONMENT; PHENOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; RIPENING; SOLUBILIZATION; WATER USE EFFICIENCY; WEIGHT;

BURSA [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 84890290500     PISSN: 03783774     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2013.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Blaney H.F., Criddle W.D. Determining Consumptive Use and Irrigation Water Requirements 1962, 59. US Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin 1275.
2. Branthome X., Plé Y. Irrigation for mechanized harvest of processing tomatoes. Acta Horticulturae 1987, 200:165-172.
3. Cahn M.D., Herrero E.V., Hanson B.R., Snyder R.L., Hartz T.K., Miyao E.M. Effects of irrigation cutoff on processing tomato fruit quality. Acta Horticulturae 2003, 613:75-80.
4. Cassel D.K., Nielsen D.R. Field capacity and available water capacity. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1-Physical and Mineralogical Methods 1986, 901-926. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin. A. Klute (Ed.).
5. Cemeroglu B., Karadeniz F., Ozkan M. Meyve sebze isleme teknolojisi. Gida Teknolojisi Yayinlari 2003, 28:469-472. (in Turkish).
6. Cho I.H., Lee E.H., Kim T.Y., Woo Y.H., Kwon Y.S. Effects of high humidity on occurrence of tomato blossom-end-rot. Journal of Korean Society for Horticultural Science 1998, 39:247-249.
7. Costa J.M., Ortuňo M.F., Chaves M.M. Deficit irrigation as a strategy to save water: physiology and potential application to horticulture. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2007, 49(10):1421-1434.
8. Çetin Ö., Yildirim O., Uygan D., Boyaci H. Irrigation scheduling of drip-irrigated tomatoes using class a pan evaporation. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 2002, 26:171-178.
9. Çetin Ö., Uygan D. The effect of drip line spacing, irrigation regimes and planting geometries of tomato on yield, irrigation water use efficiency and net return. Agricultural Water Management 2008, 95:949-958.
10. Dalvi V.B., Tiwari K.N., Pawade M.N., Phirke P.S. Response surface analysis of tomato production under microirrigation. Agricultural Water Management 1999, 41:11-19.
11. DePascale S., Maggio A., Fogliano V., Ambrosino P., Retieni A. Irrigation with saline water improves carotenoids content and antioxidant activity of tomato. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 2001, 76:447-453.
12. Doorenbos J., Kassam A.H. Yield Response to Water 1979, United Nations FAO Publication no. 33, Rome.
13. El-Hendawy S.E., Schmidhalter U. Optimal coupling combinations between irrigation frequency and rate for drip-irrigated corn grown on sandy soil. Agricultural Water Management 2010, 97:439-448.
14. English M., Raja S.N. Perspectives on deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 1996, 32(1):1-14.
15. Esengun K., Erdal G., Gündüz O., Erdal H. An economic analysis and energy use in stake-tomato production in Tokat province of Turkey. Renewable Energy 2007, 32(11):1873-1881.
16. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2012, (accessed 15.02.12). http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx%3FPageID=567%23ancor.
17. Favati F., Lovelli S., Galgano F., Miccolis V., Di Tomasso T., Candido V. Processing tomato quality as affected by irrigation scheduling. Scientia Horticulturae 2009, 122:562-571.
18. Fereres E., Soriano M.A. Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. Special issue on 'integrated approaches to sustain and improve plant production under drought stress'. Journal of Experimental Botany 2007, 58:147-159.
19. Feddema J.J. A revised thornthwaite-type global climate classification. Physical Geography 2005, 26(6):442-466.
20. Garcia E., Barrett D.M. Evaluation of processing tomatoes from two consecutive growing seasons: quality attributes, peelability and yield. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 2006, 30:20-36.
21. Garrity P.D., Watts D.G., Sullivan C.Y., Gilley J.R. Moisture deficits and grain sorghum performance, evapotranspiration yield relationships. Agronomy Journal 1982, 74:815-820.
22. Gatta G., Giuliani M.M., Monteleone M., Nardella E., De Caro A. Deficit irrigation scheduling inprocessing tomato. Water Saving in Mediterranean Agriculture and Future Research Needs 2007, vol. 1:277-289. CIHEAM, Bari.
23. Gerhard J., Nielsen H.M., Wolfgang P. Measuring image analysis attributes and modeling fuzzy consumer aspects for tomato quality. Computers and Electronic in Agriculture 2001, 31:17-29.
24. Hanson B.R., May D.M. Effect of subsurface drip irrigation on processing tomato yield, water table depth, soil salinity, and profitability. Agricultural Water Management 2004, 68:1-17.
25. Hanson B.R., Hutmacher R.B., May D.M. Drip irrigation of tomato and cotton under shallow saline ground water conditions. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 2006, 20:155-175.
26. Hanson B.R., May D.M. Crop evapotranspiration of processing tomato in the San Joaquin Valley of California, USA. Irrigation Science 2006, 24:211-221.
27. Harmanto Salokhe V.M., Babel M.S., Tantau H.J. Water requirement of drip irrigated tomatoes grown in greenhouse in tropical environment. Agricultural Water Management 2005, 71:225-242.
28. Hartz T.K. Drip-irrigation scheduling for fresh-market tomato production. HortScience 1993, 28(1):35-37.
29. Helyes L., Lugasi A., Pék Z. Effect of irrigation on processing tomato yield and antioxidant components. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 2012, 36:702-709.
30. Igbadun H.E., Salim B.A., Tarimo A.K.P.R., Mahoo H.F. Effects of deficit irrigation scheduling on yields and soil water balance of irrigated maize. Irrigation Science 2008, 27:11-23.
31. Imtiyaz M., Mgadla N.P., Manase S.K., Chendo K., Mothobi E.O. Yield and economic return of vegetable crops under variable irrigation. Irrigation Science 2000, 19:87-93.
32. Ismail S.M., Ozawa K., Khondaker N.A. Influence of single and multiple water application timings on yield and water use efficiency in tomato (var. First power). Agricultural Water Management 2008, 95:116-122.
33. Johnstone P.R., Hartz T.K., LeStrange M., Nunez J.J., Miyao E.M. Managing fruit soluble solids with late-season deficit irrigation in drip-irrigated processing tomato production. HortScience 2005, 40(6):1857-1861.
34. Jensen C.R., Battilani A., Plauborg F., Psarras G., Chartzoulakis K., Janowiak F., Stikic R., Jovanovic Z., Li G., Liu F., Jacobsen S.E., Andersen M.N. Deficit irrigation based on drought tolerance and root signaling in potatoes and tomatoes. Agricultural Water Management 2010, 98:403-413.
35. Kaboosi K., Kaveh F. Sensitivity analysis of FAO 33 crop water production function. Irrigation Science 2012, 30:89-100.
36. Kirda C. Deficit irrigation scheduling based on plant growth stages showing water stress tolerance. FAO, Deficit Irrigation Practices. FAO Water Report No. 22 2002, 3-10. FAO, Rome, Italy.
37. Kirda C., Cetin M., Dasgan H.Y., Topcu S., Kaman H., Ekici B., Derici M.R., Ozguven A.I. Yield response of greenhouse grown tomato to partial root drying and conventional deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 2004, 69:191-201.
38. Kirda C., Topcu S., Cetin M., Dasgan H.Y., Kaman H., Topaloglu F., Derici M.R., Ekici B. Prospects of partial root zone irrigation for increasing irrigation water use efficiency of major crops in the Mediterranean region. Annals of Applied Biology 2007, 150:281-291.
39. Kirkham M.B. Principles of Soil and Plant Water Relations 2005, 520. Elsevier, USA.
40. Kuşçu H., Çetin B., Turhan A. Yield and economic return of drip-irrigated vegetable production in Turkey. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 2009, 37:51-59.
41. Li X., Liu F., Li G., Lin Q., Jensen C.R. Soil microbial response, water and nitrogen use by tomato under different irrigation regimes. Agricultural Water Management 2010, 98:414-418.
42. Luquet D., Vidal A., Smith M., Dauzat J. 'More crop per drop': how to make it acceptable for farmers?. Agricultural Water Management 2005, 76:108-119.
43. Machado R.M.A., Oliveira M.R.G. Tomato root distribution, yield and fruit quality under different subsurface drip irrigation regimes and depths. Irrigation Science 2005, 24:15-24.
44. Madrid R., Barba E.M., Sánchez A., Garcia A.L. Effects of organic fertilisers and irrigation level on physical and chemical quality of industrial tomato fruit (cv. Nautilus). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2009, 89:2608-2615.
45. Mahajan G., Singh K.G. Response of greenhouse tomato to irrigation and fertigation. Agricultural Water Management 2006, 84:202-206.
46. Malash N.M., Flowers T.J., Ragab R. Effect of irrigation methods, management and salinity of irrigation water on tomato yield, soil moisture and salinity distribution. Irrigation Science 2008, 26:313-323.
47. Marouelli W.A., Silva W.L.C., Moretti C.L. Production, quality, and water use efficiency of processing tomato as affected by the final irrigation timing. Horticultura Brasileira 2004, 22(2):226-231.
48. Mofoke A.L.E., Adewumi J.K., Babatunde F.E., Mudiare O.J., Ramalan A.A. Yield of tomato grown under continuous-flow drip irrigation in Bauchi state of Nigeria. Agricultural Water Management 2006, 84:166-172.
49. Mukherjee A., Kundu M., Sarkar S. Role of irrigation and mulch on yield, evapotranspiration rate and water use pattern of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Agricultural Water Management 2010, 98:182-189.
50. Ngouajio M., Wang G., Goldy R. Withholding of drip irrigation between transplanting and flowering increases the yield of field-grown tomato under plastic mulch. Agricultural Water Management 2007, 87:285-291.
51. Nonami H., Fukuyama T., Yamamoto M., Yang L., Hashimoto Y. Blossom-end rot of tomato plants may not be directly caused by calcium deficiency. Acta Horticulturae 1995, 396:107-114.
52. Nuruddin M.M., Madramootoo C.A., Dodds G.T. Effects of water stress at different growth stages on greenhouse tomato yield and quality. HortScience 2003, 38(7):1389-1393.
53. Oliveira M.R.G., Calado A.M., Portas C.A.M. Tomato root distribution under drip irrigation. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1996, 121(4):644-648.
54. Ozbahce A., Tari A.F. Effects of different emitter space and water stress on yield and quality of processing tomato under semi-arid climate conditions. Agricultural Water Management 2010, 97:1405-1410.
55. Patanè C., Cosentino S.L. Effects of soil water deficit on yield and quality of processing tomato under a Mediterranean climate. Agricultural Water Management 2010, 97:131-138.
56. Patanè C., Tringali S., Sortino O. Effects of deficit irrigation on biomass, yield, water productivity and fruit quality of processing tomato under semi-arid Mediterranean climate conditions. Scientia Horticulturae 2011, 129(4):590-596.
57. Pulupol L.U., Behboudian M.H., Fisher K.J. Growth, yield and postharvest attributes of glasshouse tomatoes produced under deficit irrigation. HortScience 1996, 31:926-929.
58. Ramalan A.A., Nwokeocha C.U. Effects of furrow irrigation methods, mulching and soil water suction on the growth, yield and water use efficiency of tomato in the Nigerian Savanna. Agricultural Water Management 2000, 45:317-330.
59. Richards L.A. Physical condition of water in soil. Method of Soil Analysis. Part 1: Agronomy 1965, vol. 9:128-151. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
60. Saure M.C. Blossom-end rot of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)-a calcium or a stress-related disorder?. Scientia Horticulturae 2001, 90:193-208.
61. Singandhupe R.P., Rao G.G.S.N., Patil N.G., Brahmanand P.S. Fertigation studies and irrigation scheduling in drip irrigation system in tomato crop (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). European Journal of Agronomy 2003, 19:327-340.
62. Smith J.S., Hui Y.H. Food Processing: Principles and Applications 2004, Blackwell, Iowa.
63. Stewart J.I., Cuenca R.H., Pruit W.O., Hagan R.M., Tosso J. Determination and utilization of water production functions for principal California crops. W-67 California Contribution Project Report 1977, University of California, Davis, USA.
64. Stikic R., Popovic S., Srdic M., Savic M., Jovanovic Z., Prokic L., Zdravkovic J. Partial root drying (PRD): a new technique for growing plants that saves water and improves the quality of fruit. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology 2003, (Special issue):164-171.
65. Tanksley S.D., Grandillo S., Fulton T., Zamir D., Eshed Y., Petiard V., Lopez J., Beck-Bunn T. Advanced backcross QTL analysis in a cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinellifolium. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1996, 92:213-224.
66. Tahi H., Wahbi R., Wakrim R., Aganchich B., Serraj R., Centritto M. Water relations, photosynthesis, growth and water-use efficiency in tomato plants subjected to partial rootzone drying and regulated deficit irrigation. Plant Biosystems 2007, 141(2):265-274.
67. Topak R., Süheri S., Acar B. Effect of different drip irrigation regimes on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield, quality and water use efficiency in Middle Anatolian, Turkey. Irrigation Science 2011, 29:79-89.
68. Topcu S., Kirda C., Dasgan Y., Kaman H., Cetin M., Yazici A., Bacon M.A. Yield response and N-fertiliser recovery of tomato grown under deficit irrigation. European Journal of Agronomy 2007, 26:64-70.
69. TUIK (Turkish Statistical Institute) Crop Production Statistics 2012, (accessed 15.02.12). http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/Start.do.
70. Turhan A., Ozmen N., Serbeci M.S., Seniz V. Effects of grafting on different rootstocks on tomato fruit yield and quality. Horticultural Science (Prague) 2011, 38(4):142-149.
71. Walker W.R. Guidelines for designing and evaluating surface irrigation systems. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 45 1989, FAO, Rome.
72. White A.G., Alspach P.A., Weskett R.H., Brewer L.R. Heritability of fruit shape in pear. Euphtica 2000, 112:1-7.
73. Wang D., Kang Y., Wan S. Effect of soil matric potential on tomato yield and water use under drip irrigation condition. Agricultural Water Management 2007, 87:180-186.
74. Wang F., Kang S., Du T., Li F., Qiu R. Determination of comprehensive quality index for tomato and its response to different irrigation treatments. Agricultural Water Management 2011, 98:1228-1238.
75. Yavuz M.Y., Yildirim M., Camoglu G., Erken O. Effect of different irrigation levels on yield, water use efficiency and some quality parameters on tomato. The Philippine Agricultural Scientist 2007, 90(4):283-288.
76. Yohannes F., Tadesse T. Effect of drip and furrow irrigation and plant spacing on yield of tomato at Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. Agricultural Water Management 1998, 35:201-207.
77. Yuan B.Z., Kang Y., Nishiyama S. Drip irrigation scheduling for tomatoes in unheated greenhouses. Irrigation Science 2001, 20:149-154.
78. Zegbe J.A., Behboudian M.H., Clothier B.E. Partial rootzone drying is a feasible option for irrigating processing tomatoes. Agricultural Water Management 2004, 68:195-206.
79. Zegbe J.A., Behboudian M.H., Clothier B.E. Responses of 'petopride' processing tomato to partial rootzone drying at different phonological stages. Irrigation Science 2006, 24:203-210.
80. Zegbe-Dominguez J.A., Behboudian M.H., Lang A., Clothier B.E. Deficit irrigation and partial root-zone drying maintain fruit dry mass and enhance fruit quality in 'petopride' processing tomato (Lycopersicom esculentum Mill.). Scientia Horticulturae 2003, 98:505-510.
81. Zotarelli L., Scholberg J.M., Dukes M.D., Muňoz-Carpena R., Icerman J. Tomato yield, biomass accumulation, root distribution and irrigation water use efficiency on a sandy soil, as affected by nitrogen rate and irrigation scheduling. Agricultural Water Management 2009, 96:23-34.