An economic analysis and energy use in stake-tomato production in Tokat province of Turkey

Renewable Energy

Volumn 32, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1873-1881

  Esengun, Kemal ^a   Erdal, Gülistan ^a   Gündüz, Orhan ^a   Erdal, Hilmi ^a  

^a GAZIOSMANPASA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Economic analysis; Energy equivalent; Energy use; Input output; Stake tomato

Indexed keywords

DIESEL FUELS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; GLOBAL WARMING; RANDOM PROCESSES;

ENERGY EQUIVALENT; ENERGY USE;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS;

DIESEL FUELS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; GLOBAL WARMING; RANDOM PROCESSES;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CROP YIELD; DIESEL; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FERTILIZER; FRUIT PRODUCTION; GLOBAL WARMING; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; MACHINERY; NONRENEWABLE RESOURCE; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

EURASIA; TOKAT; TURKEY;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 33847607025     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2006.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. General Directorate of Population and Citizenship of Turkey. 2005 〈http://www.nvi.gov.tr/11,sayilarla_turkiye.html〉.
2. The Prime Ministry State Planning Organization (DPT). 2005 〈http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/ekonomi/gosterge/tr〉.
3. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2005 〈http://apps.fao.org/faostat/servlet〉.
4. Keskin G, Gül U. Tomato. Agricultural Economics Research Institute of Turkiye (AERI), ISSN, 1303-8346, 2004;5(13):2-4 [in Turkish].
5. The Governor's Office of Tokat-Turkey. 2005 〈http://www.tokat.gov.tr/tarim.html〉.
6. Uhlin H. Why energy productivity is increasing: an I-O analysis of Swedish agriculture. Agric Syst 56 4 (1998) 443-465
7. Ozkan B., Kurklu A., and Akcaoz H. An input-output energy analysis in greenhouse vegetable production: a case study for Antalya region of Turkey. Biomass Bioenergy 26 (2004) 189-195
8. Ram RA, Raghuvanski NK, Arya SV. Study on energy cost requirements for wheat cultivation, ISAE XVII annual convention. Paper No. 80-105, New Delhi, February 6-8, 1980.
9. Gezer I., Acaroglu M., and Haci{dotless}seferogullari{dotless} H. Use of energy and labour in apricot in Turkey. Biomass Bioenergy 24 3 (2003) 215-219
10. Yi{dotless}lmaz I., Akcaoz H., and Ozkan B. An analysis of energy use and input-output costs for cotton production in Turkey. Renew Energy 30 (2005) 145-155
11. CAEEDAC (The Canadian Agricultural Energy End-Use Data and Analysis Centre). A descriptive analysis of energy consumption in agriculture and food sector in Canada, Final Report, February 2000 〈http://www.usask.ca/agriculture/caedac/main/tpage.html〉.
12. Kennedy S. Energy use in American agriculture. Sustainable Energy Term Paper 2000. 5/1/2000 〈http://web.met.edu/10.391j/www/proceeding.html〉.
13. Dutt B.K. Comparative efficiency of energy use in rice production. Energy 6 (1982) 25
14. Pathak B.S., and Binning A.S. Energy use pattern and potential for energy saving in rice-wheat cultivation. Agric Energy 4 (1985) 271-278
15. Singh S., and Singh G. Energy input vs. crop yield relationship for four major crops of Northern India. Agric Mech Asia Africa Latin America 23 2 (1992) 57-61
16. Singh S., Verma S.R., and Mittal J.P. Energy requirements for production of major crops in India. Agric Mech Asia Africa Latin America 28 4 (1997) 13-17
17. Thakur C.L., and Mishra B.L. Energy requirements and energy gaps for production of major crops in Madhya Pradesh. Agric Situation India 48 (1993) 665-689
18. Hatirli S.A., Ozkan B., and Fert C. Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in greenhouse tomato production. Renew Energy 31 (2006) 427-438
19. Baruah D.C., and Bhattacharya P.C. Utilization pattern of human and fuel energy in tea plantation. J Agric Soil Sci 8 2 (1995) 189-192
20. Yadav R.N., Singh R.K.P., and Prasad S. An economic analysis of energy requirements in the production of potato crop in Bihar Sharif Block of Nalanda District (Bihar). Econ Affairs 36 (1991) 112-119
21. Chandra H, De D, Singh RS. Spatial variation in energy use pattern for paddy cultivation in India. Proceeding of national workshop on energy and environment management for sustainable development of agriculture and agro industrial sector, July 8-9, 2001. p. 48-51.
22. Yamane T. Elementary sampling theory (1967), Prentice Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA
23. Singh H, Mishra D, Nahar NM. Energy use pattern in production agriculture of a typical village in Arid Zone India--Part I. Energy Convers Manage 2002.
24. Yaldiz O, Ozturk HH, Zeren Y, Bascetincelik A. Energy usage in production of field crops in Turkey. In: 5th international congress on agricultural machinery and energy, Kusadasi{dotless}, Turkey, October 11-14, 1993 (in Turkish).
25. Onal I, Tozan M. Energy budget and work requirements of the alternative production systems in the processing tomato productions. In: 10th national agricultural mechanization congress, Adana, Turkey, May 5-7, 1986. p. 216-28 (in Turkish).
26. Singh JM. On farm energy use pattern in different cropping systems in Haryana, India. Master of Science, Sustainable Energy Systems and Management, International Institute of Management, University of Flensburg, Germany, 2002.
27. Shrestha DS. Energy use efficiency indicator for agriculture, 1998 〈http://www.usaskca/agriculture/caedac/PDF/mcrae.PDF〉, 10/10/2002.
28. Ozkan B., Akcaoz H., and Karadeniz F. Energy requirement and economic analysis of citrus production in Turkey. Energy Convers Manage 45 (2004) 1821-1830
29. Singh M.K., Pal S.K., Thakur R., and Verma U.N. Energy input-output relationship of cropping systems. Indian J Agric Sci 67 6 (1997) 262-266
30. Maddal K.G., Saha K.P., Ghosh P.K., Hati K.M., and Bandyopadhyay K.K. Bioenergy and economic analysis of soybean-based crop production systems in central India. Biomass Bioenergy 23 (2002) 337-345
31. Canakci M., Topakci M., Akinci I., and Ozmerzi A. Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: case study for Antalya region, Turkey. Energy Convers Manage 46 (2005) 655-666