Evaluation of processing tomatoes from two consecutive growing seasons: Quality attributes, peelability and yield

Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 20-36

  Garcia, Elisabeth ^a   Barrett, Diane M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 33645116126     PISSN: 01458892     EISSN: 17454549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4549.2005.00044.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. BARRINGER, S.A., BENNETT, M.A. and BASH, W.D. 1999. Effect of fruit maturity and nitrogen fertilizer levels on tomato peeling efficiency. J. Veg. Crop Prod. 5, 3-11.
2. BEL-HAJ, H.M. 1981. Effect of cultivars, break temperature, pulping and extraction methods on the viscosity of tomato juice. Diss. Abstr. Int. B42(2), 550.
3. BRITTON, G. 1998. Overview of carotenoid biosynthesis. In Carotenoids Vol. 3 (G. Britton, S. Liaaen-jensen and H. Pfander, eds) pp. 33-147, Birkhäuser-Verlag, Basel.
4. DAVIES, J. and HOBSON, G.E. 1981. The constituents of tomato fruit - The influence of environment, nutrition, and genotype. CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 75(3), 205-280.
5. GOULD, W.A. 1992. Tomato Production, Processing and Technology, 3rd Ed., CTI Publishers, Baltimore, MD.
6. HOBSON, G. and GRIERSON, D. 1993. Tomato. In Biochemistry of Fruit Ripening (G.B. Seymour, J.E. Taylor and G.A. Tucker, eds) pp. 405-442, Chapman & Hall, London, U.K.
7. HUEHN, M. 1990. Nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. 1. Theory. Euphytica 47, 189-194.
8. LEONARD, S., BUHLERT, J., MARSH, G., WOLCOTT, T. and HEIL, J.R. 1980. Procedures for Evaluating Utilization Potential and Quality in Processing Tomatoes and Tomato Products. Department of Food Science and Technology, UCDavis, Davis, CA.
9. LUH, B.S., UKAI, N. and CHUNG, J.I. 1973. Effects of nitrogen nutrition and day temperature on composition, color and nitrate in tomato fruit. J. Food Sci. 38, 29-33.
10. MOHR, W.P. 1990. The influence of fruit anatomy on ease of peeling of tomatoes for canning. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 25, 449-457.
11. MONTI, L.M. 1980. The breeding of tomatoes for peeling. Acta Hortic. 100, 341-349.
12. PETRO-TURZA, M. 1986-1987. Flavors of tomato and tomato products. Food Rev. Int. 2, 309-351.
13. POYSA, V. 1993. Use of Lycopersicon cheesmanii and L. chmielewskii to increase dry matter content of tomato fruit. Can. J. Plant Sci. 73, 273-279.
14. SAS. 2000. SAS System for Windows v. 8.01, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
15. SHARMA, S.K., LEMAGUER, M., LIPTAY, A. and POYSA, V. 1996. Effect of composition on the Theological properties of tomato thin pulp. Food Res. Int. 29(2), 175-179.
16. SHEWFELT, R.L. and PRUSSIA, S.E. 1993. Postharvest Handling: a Systems Approach. Academic, San Diego, CA.
17. STEVENS, M.A. 1972a. Relationship between components contributing to quality variation among tomato lines. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 97, 70-73.
18. STEVENS, M.A. 1972b. Citrate and malate concentrations in tomato fruits: Genetic control and maturational effects. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 97, 655-658.
19. THAKUR, B.R., SINGH, R.K. and NELSON, P. 1996. Quality attributes of processed tomato products: A review. Food Res. Int. 12, 375-401.
20. TRIANO, S.R. and ST CLAIR, D.A. 1995. Processing tomato germplasm with improved fruit soluble solids content. Hortscience 30, 1477-1478.
21. United States Department of Agriculture. 1994. United States standards for grades of tomato sauce. Federal Register. 59 FR52624. URL http:// www.ams.usda.gov/standards/cntatos.pdf