Ultrasound mediated enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and carboxymethyl cellulose

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1448-1457

  Sulaiman, Ahmad Ziad ^a   Ajit, Azilah ^a   Chisti, Yusuf ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA PAHANG   (Malaysia)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Carboxymethyl cellulose; Cellulase; Cellulose hydrolysis; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

CARBOXY-METHYL CELLULOSE; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE HYDROLYSIS; MAXIMUM REACTION RATE; MICHAELIS-MENTEN KINETIC; RATE OF HYDROLYSIS; SATURATION CONSTANT; TRICHODERMA REESEI;

CELLULOSE; OPTIMIZATION; PARTICLE SIZE; SACCHARIFICATION; SONICATION; ULTRASONICS;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS;

CARBOXYMETHYL CELLULOSE; ENZYMOLYSIS; HYDROLYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; PARTICLE SIZE; SACCHARIFICATION; ULTRASONIC FREQUENCIES;

HYPOCREA JECORINA;

CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE;

ARTICLE; CELLULOSE HYDROLYSIS; CHEMISTRY; ENZYMOLOGY; HYDROLYSIS; KINETICS; TRICHODERMA; ULTRASOUND;

CARBOXYMETHYL CELLULOSE; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE HYDROLYSIS; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; ULTRASOUND;

CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE SODIUM; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; HYDROLYSIS; KINETICS; SONICATION; TRICHODERMA;

EID: 84890220972     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.1786     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Fan L-T, Gharpuray MM, Lee YH, editors. Cellulose Hydrolysis. Berlin: Springer; 1987.
2. Chandel AK, Chandrasekhar G, Silva MB, da Silva SS. The realm of cellulases in biorefinery development. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2012;32:187-202.
3. Chandel AK, Chan ES, Rudravaram R, Narasu ML, Rao LV, Ravindra P. Economics and environmental impact of bioethanol production technologies: An appraisal. Biotechnol Mol Biol Rev. 2007;2:14-32.
4. Lee SB, Shin HS, Ryu DDY, Mandels M. Adsorption of cellulase on cellulose: Effect of physicochemical properties of cellulose on adsorption and rate of hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1982;24:2137-2153.
5. Lin L, Yan R, Liu Y, Jiang W. In-depth investigation of enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass wastes based on three major components: Cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:8217-8223.
6. van Wyk JPH. Cellulase adsorption-desorption and cellulose saccharification during enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose materials. Biotechnol Lett. 1997;19:775-778.
7. Várnai A, Viikari L, Marjamaa K, Siika-aho M. Adsorption of monocomponent enzymes in enzyme mixture analysed quantitatively during hydrolysis of lignocellulose substrates. Bioresour Technol. 2010;102:1220-1227.
8. Xiao Y, Wu Q, Cai Y, Lin X. Ultrasound-accelerated enzymatic synthesis of sugar esters in nonaqueous solvents. Carbohydr Res. 2005;340:2097-2103.
9. Xiao Y, Yang L, Mao P, Zhao Z, Lin X. Ultrasound-promoted enzymatic synthesis of troxerutin esters in nonaqueous solvents. Ultrason Sonochem. 2010;18:303-309.
10. Yeh AI, Huang YC, Chen SH. Effect of particle size on the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;79:192-199.
11. Chisti Y. Mass transfer. In: Flickinger MC, editor. Encyclopedia of Industrial Biotechnology, Bioprocess, Bioseparation, and Cell Technology, vol. 5. New York: Wiley; 2010:3241-3277.
12. Baldascini H, Ganzeveld KJ, Janssen DB, Beenackers AACM. Effect of mass transfer limitations on the enzymatic kinetic resolution of epoxides in a two-liquid-phase system. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001;73:45-54.
13. Bisset F, Sternberg D. Immobilization of Aspergillus β-glucosidase on chitosan. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978;35:750-755.
14. Mason TJ, Lorimer JP. Sonochemistry: Theory, Applications and Uses of Ultrasound in Chemistry. Chichester: Ellis Horwood; 1988.
15. Hagenson LC, Doraiswamy LK. Comparison of the effects of ultrasound and mechanical agitation on a reacting solid-liquid system. Chem Eng Sci. 1998;53:131-148.
16. Gumel AM, Annuar MSM, Chisti Y, Heidelberg T. Ultrasound assisted lipase catalyzed synthesis of poly-6-hydroxyhexanoate. Ultrason Sonochem. 2012;19:659-667.
17. Gumel AM, Annuar MSM, Chisti Y. Lipase catalyzed ultrasonic synthesis of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate-co-6-hydroxyhexanoate. Ultrason Sonochem. 2013;20:937-947.
18. Rolz C. Ultrasound effect on enzymatic saccharification. Biotechnol Lett. 1986;8:131-136.
19. Aliyu M, Hepher MJ. Effects of ultrasound energy on degradation of cellulose material. Ultrason Sonochem. 2000;7:265-268.
20. Yachmenev VG, Bertoniere NR, Blanchard EJ. Intensification of the bio-processing of cotton textiles by combined enzyme/ultrasound treatment. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2002;77:559-567.
21. Imai M, Ikari K, Suzuki I. High-performance hydrolysis of cellulose using mixed cellulase species and ultrasonication pretreatment. Biochem Eng J. 2004;17:79-83.
22. Li C, Yoshimoto M, Tsukuda N, Fukunaga K, Nakao K. A kinetic study on enzymatic hydrolysis of a variety of pulps for its enhancement with continuous irradiation. Biochem Eng J. 2004;19:155-164.
23. Yachmenev VG, Blanchard EJ, Lambert AH. Use of ultrasonic energy for intensification of the bio-preparation of greige cotton. Ultrasonics 2004;42:87-91.
24. Basedow AM, Ebert KH. Effects of mechanical stress on the reactivity of polymers: Activation of acid hydrolysis of dextran by ultrasound. Polym Bull. 1979;1:299-306.
25. Choi JH, Kim SB. Effect of ultrasound on sulfuric acid-catalysed hydrolysis of starch. Korean J Chem Eng. 1994;11:178-184.
26. Kristol DS, Khamis AA, Parker RC. Effect of ultrasound on the acid hydrolysis of dextran. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Develop. 1984;23:74-78.
27. Lii C, Chen CH, Yeh AI, Lai VMF. Preliminary study on the degradation kinetics of agarose and carrageenans by ultrasound. Food Hydrocolloids 1999;13:477-481.
28. Mecozzi M, Acquistucci R, Amici M, Cardarilli D. Improvement of an ultrasound assisted method for the analysis of total carbohydrate in environmental and food samples. Ultrason Sonochem. 2002;9:219-223.
29. Schuchardt U, Joekes I, Duarte HC. Hydrolysis of sugar cane bagasse with hydrochloric acid, promoted by ultrasound. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 1987;39:115-124.
30. Basedow AM, Ebert KH. Ultrasonic degradation of polymers in solution. Adv Polym Sci. 1977;22:83-148.
31. Chisti Y. Sonobioreactors: Using ultrasound for enhanced microbial productivity. Trends Biotechnol. 2003;21:89-93.
32. Czechowska-Biskup R, Rokita B, Lotfy S, Ulanski P, Rosiak JM. Degradation of chitosan and starch by 360-kHz ultrasound. Carbohydr Polym. 2005;60:175-184.
33. Rehman MSU, Kim I, Chisti Y, Han J-I. Use of ultrasound in the production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. Energy Educ Sci Tech. 2013;30:1391-1410.
34. Howell JA, Stuck JD. Kinetics of Solka Floc cellulose hydrolysis by Trichoderma viride cellulase. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1975;17:873-893.
35. Huang XL, Penner MH. Apparent substrate-inhibition of the Trichoderma reesei cellulase system. J Agric Food Chem. 1991;39:2096-2100.
36. Ortega N, Busto D. Kinetics of cellulose saccharification by Trichoderma reesei cellulases. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2001;47:7-14.
37. Bansal P, Hall M, Realff MJ, Lee JH, Bommarius AS. Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:833-848.
38. Wang L, Templer R, Murphy RJ. High-solids loading enzymatic hydrolysis of waste papers for biofuel production. Appl Energy 2012;99:23-31.
39. Chisti Y, Moo-Young M. Disruption of microbial cells for intracellular products. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1986;8:194-204.
40. Sulaiman AZ, Ajit A, Yunus RM, Chisti Y. Ultrasound-assisted fermentation enhances bioethanol productivity. Biochem Eng J. 2011;54:141-150.
41. Rokhina EV, Lens P, Virkutyte J. Low-frequency ultrasound in biotechnology: State of the art. Trends Biotechnol. 2009;27:298-306.
42. Kwiatkowska B, Bennet J, Akunna J, Walker GM, Bremner DH. Stimulation of bioprocesses by ultrasound. Biotechnol Adv. 2011;29:768-780.
43. Sreenath HK. 1993. Hydrolysis of carboxymethyl celluloses by cellulases. Lebensm-Wiss Technol. 1993;26:224-228.
44. Mandels M, Hontz L, Nystrom J. Enzymatic hydrolysis of waste cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1974;16:1471-1493.
45. Reese ET, Ryu DY. Shear inactivation of cellulase of Trichoderma reesei. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1980;2:239-240.
46. Schulein M. Cellulases of Trichoderma reesei. Methods Enzymol. 1988;160:234-242.
47. Henrissat B, Driguez H, Viet C, Schulein M. Synergism of cellulases from Trichoderma reesei in the degradation of cellulose. Biotechnol. 1985;3:722-726.
48. Holtzapple M, Cognata M, Shu Y, Hendrickson C. Inhibition of Trichoderma reesei cellulase by sugars and solvents. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1990;36:275-287.
49. Al-Zuhair S. The effect of crystallinity of cellulose on the rate of reducing sugars production by heterogeneous enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99:4078-4085.
50. Melo EHM, Kennedy JF. Cellulose derivatives: An enzymatic approach to their modification. Carbohydr Polym. 1993;22:233-237.
51. Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem. 1959;31:426-428.
52. Jian S, Wenyi T, Wuyong C. Ultrasound-accelerated enzymatic hydrolysis of solid leather waste. J Cleaner Prod. 2008;16:591-597.
53. Reese ET, Siu RGH, Levinson HS. The biological degradation of cellulose derivatives and its relationship to the mechanism of cellulose hydrolysis. J Bacteriol. 1950;59:485-497.
54. He D, Bao L, Long Y, Wei W, Yao S. A new study of the enzymatic hydrolysis of carboxymethyl cellulose with a bulk acoustic wave sensor. Talanta 2000;50:1267-1273.
55. Bezerra RM, Dias AA. Discrimination among eight modified Michaelis-Menten kinetics models of cellulose hydrolysis with a large range of substrate/enzyme ratios: Inhibition by cellobiose. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2004;112:173-184.
56. Lineweaver H, Burk D. The determination of enzyme dissociation constants. J Am Chem Soc. 1934;56:658-666.
57. Mason TJ, Lorimer JP. Applied Sonochemistry: The Uses of Power Ultrasound in Chemistry and Processing. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2002.
58. Li C, Yoshimoto M, Ogata H, Tsukuda N, Fukunaga K, Nakao K. Effects of ultrasonic intensity and reactor scale on kinetics of enzymatic saccharification of various waste papers in continuously irradiated stirred tanks. Ultrason Sonochem. 2005;12:373-384.
59. Basto C, Silva CJ, Gübitz G, Cavaco-Paulo A. Stability and decolourization ability of Trametes villosa laccase in liquid ultrasonic fields. Ultrason Sonochem. 2007;14:355-362.
60. Kardos N, Luche J-L. Sonochemistry of carbohydrate compounds. Carbohydr Res. 2001;332:115-131.
61. Sinisterra JV. Application of ultrasound to biotechnology: an overview. Ultrasonics 1992;30:180-185.
62. Chisti Y. Shear Sensitivity. In: Flickinger MC, editor. Encyclopedia of Industrial Biotechnology, Bioprocess, Bioseparation, and Cell Technology, vol. 7. New York: Wiley; 2010:4360-4398.