E-government in the Caribbean nations

Journal of Global Information Technology Management

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 52-70

  Joseph, Rhoda C ^a   Jeffers, Patrick I ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES   (Jamaica)

Author keywords

Caribbean; Caricom; Developing countries; E government; E government maturity

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649182808     PISSN: 1097198X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1097198X.2009.10856485     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aladwani, A. M. (2001) IT planning effectiveness in a developing country. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 4(3). 51-64.
2. Andersen, K. V., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 236-248.
3. Bagchi, K. (2005). Factors Contributing to Global Digital Divide: Some Empirical Results. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 8(3), 47-65.
4. Bakry, S. H. (2003). Toward the development of a standard e-readiness assessment policy. International Journal of Network Management, 13(2), 129-137.
5. Becker, S. A. (2005). E-government usability for older adults. Communications of the ACM, 48(2), 102-104.
6. Caricom (2007) www.caricom.org Retrieved June 15, 2007.
7. CIA Factbook (2007) www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/ Retrieved October 24, 2007.
8. Criado, J. I., & Ramilo, M. C. (2003). E-government in practice: An analysis of Web site orientation to the citizens in Spanish municipalities. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16(3), 191.
9. Esterling, K., Lazer, D. M. J., & Neblo, M. A. (2005) Home (Page) Style: Determinants of the Quality of the House Members’ Web Site. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1(2), 50-63.
10. Evans, D., & Yen, D. C. (2006). E-Government: Evolving relationship of citizens and government, domestic, and international development. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 207-235.
11. Hunter, D. R., & Jupp, V. (2001). E-government Leadership: Rhetoric v.v Reality Closing the Gap: Accenture.
12. infoDev. (2005). E-Ready for What? E-Readiness in Developing Countries: Current Status and Prospects toward the Millenium Development Goals. www.infodev.org/en/article.15.html Retrieved May 31, 2007.
13. Ke, W., & Wei, K. K. (2004). Successful e-government in Singapore. Communications of the ACM, 47(6), 95-99.
14. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content Analysis. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.
15. Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122-136.
16. Lee, S. M., Tan, X. & Trimi, S. (2005). Current Practices of Leading E-government Countries. Communications of the ACM, 45(10), 99-104.
17. Marche, S., & McNiven, J. D. (2003). E-government and E-governance: The Future Isn't What It Used to Be. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 20(1), 74-86.
18. Pons, A. (2004). E-Government for Arab Countries. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 7(1), 30-46.
19. Rahardjo, E., Mirchandani, D. and Joshi, K. (2007) E-Government Functionality and Website Features: A Case Study of Indonesia. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 10(1) 31-49.
20. Reddick, C. G. (2005). Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly, 22(1), 38-57.
21. Shackleton, P., Fisher, J., & Dawson, L. (2004). Evolution of Local Government E Services: The applicability of ebusiness Maturity models. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04) - Track 5, Hawaii.
22. Siau, K., & Long, Y. (2005). Synthesizing E-government Stage Models: A Meta synthesis based on Meta-ethnography Approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(3/4), 443-458.
23. StatSoft (2008). Cluster Analysis http://www.statsoft.eom/textbook/stduan.html#d Retrieved July 15, 2008.
24. Swartz, N. (2004). E-Government Around the World. Information Management Journal, 38(1), 12.
25. UNPAN. (2001). Global Survey of E-government.
26. UNPAN. (2004). The Caricom Connectivity Agenda: A community context for ICT. http://unpanl .un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan017133.pdf Retrieved June 15, 2007.
27. UNPAN. (2005). UN Global E-government Readiness Report 2005 From E-government to E-inclusion. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division of Public Administration and Development Management. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan021888.pdf Retrieved Jun6 15, 2007.
28. UNPAN. (2008) UN e-Government Survey 2008 From e-Government to Connected Governance United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division of Public Administration and Development Management. http://unpanl.un.org/intradoc/groups/pubIic/documents/UN/UNPAN028607.pdf Retrieved July 2, 2008.
29. Virginia de Vasconcellos, M., & das Gramas Rua, M. (2005). Impacts of Internet use on Public Administration: A Case Study of the Brazilian Tax Administration. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 3(1), 49-58.
30. Wei, X., & Zhao, J. (2005, August). E-government: Citizens' requirement analysis in Chinese e-government. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Electronic commerce ICEC '05.
31. West, D. M. (2004). E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15-27.