User acceptance of SMS-based e-government services: Differences between adopters and non-adopters

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 486-497

  Susanto, Tony Dwi ^a,b   Goodwin, Robert ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Adopters; E Government; Non adopters; SMS; User acceptance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890143691     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Al-Adawi Z., Yousafzai S., Pallister J. Conceptual model of citizen adoption e-government. The second international conference on innovations in information technology 2005.
2. Alampay E.A. Text 2920/117: Reporting police wrongdoing via SMS in the Philippines. mGovernment case study 2003, eGovernment for Development. R. Heeks (Ed.).
3. Alhujran O. Determinants of e-government services adoption in developing countries: A field survey and a case study 2009, School of Information Systems and Technology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong.
4. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991, 50(2):179-211.
5. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior 1980, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, USA.
6. Almahamid S., McAdams A.C., Al Kalaldeh T., Al-Sa'eed M. The relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived information quality, and intention to use e-government. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 2010, 30-44.
7. Aripin N., Omar S.Z. Perception and attitude of short messaging services (SMS) among students of Universiti Utara Malaysia, in konferen antarabangsa. Media, culture and society: Competing discourses on consumption and production of consciousness 2007, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor.
8. Awadhi S.A., Morris A. The Use of the UTAUT model in the adoption of e-government services in Kuwait. Hawaii international conference on system sciences 2008, IEEE.
9. Bagozzi R.P., Yi Y., Phillips L.W. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly 1991, 36:421-458.
10. Bamba F., Barnes S.J. Evaluating consumer permission in SMS advertising. Paper presented to the 5th Mobility Roundtable, Helsinki, Finland 2006.
11. Barkhuus L. Why everyone loves to text message: Social management with SMS. Paper presented to the GROUP'05, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA 2005, ACM.
12. Consumer behavior as risk taking 1967, Harvard University Press, Boston. R.A. Bauer (Ed.).
13. Bauer H., Barnes S.J., Neumann M., Reichardt T. Driving consumer acceptance of mobile marketing: A theoretical framework and empirical study. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 2005, 6(3):181-192.
14. Berger, Ida A framework for understanding the relationship between environmental attitudes and consumer behaviours. Marketing Theory and Application 1993, 4:157-163.
15. Bouaziz F. Public Administration Presence on the Web: a Cultural Explanation. The Electronic Journal of e-Government 2008, 6(1):11-22.
16. Bremer A.A., Prado L.A.L. Municipal m-services using SMS. Euro mGov 2006.
17. Bryne B.M. Structural equation modelling with AMOS 2010, Taylor & Francis Group, New York. 2nd ed.
18. Carter L., Belanger F. The influence of perceived characteristics of innovation on e-government adoption. Electronic Journal of E-Government 2004, 2(1):11-20.
19. Carter L., Belanger F. The utilization of e-government services. Information Systems Journal 2005, 15:5-25.
20. Carter L., Weerakkody V. E-government adoption: A cultural comparison. Information Systems Front 2008, 10:472-482.
21. Choudrie J., Dwivedi Y. A survey of citizens' awareness and adoption of e-government initiatives, the 'government gateway': a United Kingdom perspective. Paper presented at the eGovernment Workshop Brunel University, West London, UK 2005.
22. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.W. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 1989, 35(8):982.
23. Dennis A.R., Venkatesh V., Ramesh V. Adoption of collaboration: Integrating technology acceptance and collaboration technology research. Sprouts 2003.
24. Dickinger A., Scharl A., Murphy J. Diffusion and success factors of mobile Marketing. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2005, 4(2):159-173.
25. Dimitrova D.V., Chen Y-C. Profiling the Adopters of E-Government Information and Services. Social Science Computer Review 2006, 24(2):172-188.
26. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS 2009, SAGE Publication Ltd., London. 3rd ed.
27. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research 1975, Addison-Wesley.
28. Garson G.D. Data imputation for missing values Retrieved 29/10/2010, from:. http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/missing.htm.
29. Garson G.D. Validity Retrieved 17/11/2010, from. http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/validity.htm.
30. Garson G.D. Factor analysis Retrieved 16/11/2010 from. http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/factor.htm.
31. Gefen D., Warkentin M., Pavlou P., Rose G. Egovernment adoption. The Americas Conference on Information Systems, Tampa, FL 2002.
32. Gilbert D., Balestrini P., Littleboy D. Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. The International Journal of Public Sector Management 2004, 14(4):286-301.
33. Grant I., Donohoe S. Why young consumers are not open to mobile marketing communication. International Journal of Advertising 2007, 26(2):223-246.
34. Grinter R.E., Eldridge M.A. y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg?. The Computer Support Cooperative Work, Netherland 1975.
35. Gong M., Yan X. Applying technology acceptance model, theory of planned behavior and social cognitive theory to mobile data communications service acceptance. Pacific Asia Conference on, Information Systems (PACIS) 2004.
36. Hair J.F., Black B., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L. Multivariate data analysis 1998, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey. 5th ed.
37. Hart P.D., M.Teeter R. The new e-government equation: Ease, engangement, privacy and protection. Retrieved from 2003, http://www.cio.gov/documents/egovpoll2003.pdf.
38. Hooper D., Coughlan J., Mullen M.R. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 2008, 6(1):53-60.
39. Horst M., Kuttschreuter M., Gutteling J.M. Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior 2007, 23(4):1838-1852.
40. Hu L.T., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999, 6:1-55.
41. Hung S.Y., Chang C.M., Yu T.J. Determinants of user acceptance of the e-government services: The case of online tax filling and payment system. Government Information Quarterly 2006, 23:97-122.
42. Jackson J.L., Dezee K., Dauglas K., Shimeall W. Introduction to structural equation modeling (path analysis) 2005.
43. Joreskog K.G., Sorbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modelling with SIMPLIS command language 1993, Scientific Software International, Chicago.
44. Kaasinen E. User acceptance of mobile services- Value, ease of use, trust and ease of adoption 2005, VTT Information Technology, Tampere University of Technology, Finland.
45. Kim G.S., Park S.-B., Oh J. An examination of factors influencing consumer adoption of short message service (SMS). Psychology and Marketing 2008, 25(8):769-786.
46. Kovacic Z.J. The impact of national culture on worldwide eGovernment readiness. Informing Science Journal 2005, 8:143-158.
47. Krishnamurthy S. A comprehensive analysis of permission marketing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2001, 6(2).
48. Lallana E.C. SMS, business and government in the Philippines. ICT4D.ph 2004.
49. Lee Y., Kozar K.A., Larsen K.R.T. The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2003, 12.
50. Lee J.K., Braynov S., Rao H.R. Effects of a Public Emergency on Citizens' Usage Intention toward E-Government: A Study in the Context of War in Iraq. The the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems Omaha, NE, USA 2005.
51. Leung L. Unwillingness-to-communicate and college students' motives in SMS mobile messaging. Telematics and Informatics 2007, 24(2):115-129.
52. Linh P.T.T. The effect of perceived risk on attitudes, intention and consumption of fish in Hanoi 2009, University of Tromso, Norway.
53. Malhotra Y., Galleta D.F. Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. The thirty-second annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences 1999, IEEE Computer Society, Hawaii.
54. Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behaviour. Information Systems Research 1991, 2:173-191.
55. Mallat N. Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments - A qualitative study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2007, 16:413-432.
56. Mitchell V.- W. Consumer perceived risk: conceptualizations and models. European Journal of marketing 1998.
57. Mofleh S., Wanous M. Understanding Factors Influencing Citizens Adoption of e-Government Services in the Developing World: Jordan as a Case Study INFOCOMP - Journal of Computer Science 2008, 7(2):1-11.
58. Nunnally J. Psychometric theory 1978, McGraw Hill, New York.
59. Nysveen H., Pedersen P.E., Thorbjornsen H. Intentions to Use mobile services: Antecedents and cross-service comparisons. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2005, 33(3):330-346.
60. Pallant J. SPSS survival manual 2002, Allen & Unwin, Sydney. 2nd ed.
61. Peters O., Almekinders J., Van Buren R., Roy S., Wessels J. Motives for SMS use. The annual meeting of the International Communication Association. Retrieved from 2003, http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p112026_index.html.
62. Phang C.W., Kankanhalli A. A Research Framework for Citizen Participation via E-Consultation. The the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems 2005, Omaha, NE, USA.
63. Philip F.M. Making a case for modifying the technology acceptance model to account for limited accessibility in developing countries. Information Technology for Development 2006, 12(3):213-224.
64. Ramayah T., Yulihasri, Ibrahim A., Jamaludin N. Predicting short message service (SMS) usage among university students using the technology acceptance model (TAM). Paper presented to IAMOT 2006, Malaysia 2006.
65. Rannu R., Semevsky M. Mobile services in Tartu 2005, Mobi Solutions Ltd., Tartu, Estonia.
66. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of innovations 2003, Free Press, New York. 5th ed.
67. Scharl A., Dickinger A., Murphy J. Diffusion and success factors of mobile marketing. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2005, 4:159-173.
68. Schmitt N., Stults D.N. Methodology review: Analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Applied Psychological Measurement 1986, 10:1-22.
69. Smsegov.info (cited in August 2011). http://smsegov.info.
70. Susanto T.D., Goodwin R., Calder P. A Six-level model of SMS-based eGovernment. International conference on e-government 2008 2008, ICEG, Melbourne.
71. Susanto T.D., Goodwin R. Factors influencing citizen adoption of SMS-based eGovernment services. Electronic Journal of E-Government 2010, 8(1).
72. Susanto T.D., Goodwin R. Adoption success factors of SMS-based eGovernment: A case study of SMS-OBM and SMS-MIIAS. The 3rd International Conference on Chief Information Officer (ICCIO), Bandung, Indonesia 2010.
73. Susanto T.D., Goodwin R. User acceptance of SMS-based eGovernment services. IFIP EGOV 2011, Netherland, August 28-September 2 2011.
74. Suki N.M., Ramayah T. Modelling Customer's attitude towards eGovernment services. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences 2011, 6(1):17-23.
75. Taylor S., Todd P.A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research 1995, 6(2):144-176.
76. Taylor S., Todd P.A. Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly 1995, 19(4):561.
77. Titah R., Barki H. E-Government Adoption and Acceptance: A Literature Review. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR) 2006, 2(3):23-57.
78. Treiblmaier H., Pinterits A., Floh A. Antecedents of the adoption of e-payment services in the public sector. The Twenty-Fifth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) 2004 2004.
79. Turel O., Serenko A., Bontis N. User acceptance of wireless short messaging services: Deconstructing perceived value. Information and Management 2007, 44:63-73.
80. Van Ryn M., Vinokur A.D. The role of experimentally manipulated self-efficacy in determining job-search behavior among the unemployed 1990, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Michigan.
81. Venkatesh V., Michael G.M., Gordon B.D., Fred D.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 2003, 27(3):425-478.
82. Venkatesh V., Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 2000, 46(2):186-204.
83. Wang Y.S., Lin H.H., Luarn P. Predicting consumer intention to use mobile service. Info Systems 2006, 16:157-179.
84. Wangpipatwong S., Chutimaskul W., Papasratorn B. Understanding Citizen's Continuance Intention to Use e-Government Website: a Composite View of Technology Acceptance Model and Computer Self-Efficacy. The Electronic Journal of e-Government 2008, 6(1):55-64.
85. Wei R., Xiaoming H., Pan J. Examining User Behavioral Response to SMS Ads: Implications for the Evolution of the Mobile Phone as a Bona-fide medium. Telematics and Informatics 2009, 27:32-41.
86. Westlund O. Towards an understanding of the adoption and use of mobile internet news 2008, Roskilde Universitetscenter.
87. Wu J., Wang S. What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information and Management 2005, 42(5):719-729.
88. Yulong K., Wenli L. A study of the factors affecting the adoption of mobile instant messaging in China. Paper presented to the Eighth International Conference on Mobile Business. Dalian, Liaoning, China 2009.