Projected costs and consequences of computed tomography-determined fractional flow reserve

Clinical Cardiology

Volumn 36, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 743-748

  Hlatky, Mark A ^a   Saxena, Akshay ^b   Koo, Bon Kwon ^c   Erglis, Andrejs ^d   Zarins, Christopher K ^b   Min, James K ^e  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b HEARTFLOW INC   (United States)

^c Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^d PAULS STRADINS CLINICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Latvia)

^e WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEART DEATH; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; FORECASTING; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84890125343     PISSN: 01609289     EISSN: 19328737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/clc.22205     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Tonino PAL, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55: 2816-2821.
2. Fearon WF, Bornschein B, Tonino PAL, et al. Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. Circulation. 2010; 122: 2545-2550.
3. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2010; 31: 2501-2555.
4. Kleiman NS,. Bringing it all together: integration of physiology with anatomy during cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58: 1219-1221.
5. Meijboom WB, Meijs MFL, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52: 2135-2144.
6. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 2324-2336.
7. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52: 1724-1732.
8. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghe CAG, van Pelt N, et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52: 636-643.
9. Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms: results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58: 1989-1997.
10. Shreibati JB, Baker LC, Hlatky MA,. Association of coronary CT angiography or stress testing with subsequent utilization and spending among Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2011; 306: 2128-2136.
11. Redberg RF, Walsh J,. Pay now, benefits may follow-the case of cardiac computed tomographic angiography. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 2309-2311.
12. Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK,. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61: 2233-2241.
13. Kugelmass AD, Cohen DJ, Brown PP, et al. Hospital resources consumed in treating complications associated with percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97: 322-327.
14. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al. CACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 33: 1756-1824.
15. Pijls NH, Sels JW,. Functional measurement of coronary stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59: 1045-1057.
16. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 2105-2111.
17. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ,. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 226-235.
18. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA. 2012; 308: 1237-1245.