Assessment of effective radiation dose ofan extremity cbct, msctand conventional x ray for knee area using mosfet dosemeters

Radiation Protection Dosimetry

Volumn 157, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 515-524

  Koivisto, Juha ^a   Kiljunen, Timo ^b   Wolff, Jan ^c,d   Kortesniemi, Mika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b International Comprehensive Cancer Center Docrates   (Finland)

^c TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^d TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; BONE; BONE MARROW; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; KNEE; METHODOLOGY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; THERMOLUMINESCENCE DOSIMETRY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; X RAY;

ABSORPTION; ANTHROPOMETRY; BONE AND BONES; BONE MARROW; CALIBRATION; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY; THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; X-RAYS;

EID: 84890107245     PISSN: 01448420     EISSN: 17423406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nct162     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bachmann, L. M., Haberzeth, S., Steurer, J. and ter Riet, G. The accuracy of the Ottawa knee rule to rule out knee fractures: a systematic review. Ann. Intern. Med. 140, 121-124, (2004).
2. Dirschl, D. R. and Dawson, P. A. Injury severity assessment in tibial plateau fractures. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 423, 85-92 (2004).
3. Calhoun, P. S., Kuszyk, B. S., Heath, D. G., Carley, J. C. and Fishman, E. K. Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. Radiographics 19, 745-764.1 (1999).
4. Koskinen, S. K., Haapamäki, V. V., Salo, J., Lindfors, N. C., Kortesniemi, M., Seppälä, L. and Mattila, K. T. CT arthrography of the wrist using a novel, mobile, dedicated extremity cone-beam CT (CBCT). Skeletal Radiol. 42(5), 649-657 (2013).
5. Miracle, A. C. and Mukherji, S. K. Conebeam CTof the head and neck, Part 2: clinical applications. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 30, 1285-1292 (2009).
6. Ganguly, R. Accuracy of linear measurement in Galileos cone beam CT under simulated clinical condition. Thesis. University of Iowa (2009).
7. Salo, J., Kokkonen, H., Kröger, H., Jurvelin, J. S. and Töyräs, J. High resolution diagnosis of cartilage and meniscus damage with novel extremity-CBCT. Eposter at ICRS (2012). http://www.cartilage.org/.
8. Mattila, K. T., Kankare, J., Kortesniemi, M. et al. Cone beam CT for extremity imaging. EPOS atECR (2011). Europ. Soc. Radiol. DOI: 10.1594/ecr2011/C-0297.
9. Loubele, M., Bogaerts, R., VanDijck, E., Pauwels, R., Vanheusdena, S., Suetens, P., Marchal, G., Sanderink, G. and Jacobs, R. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCTand MSCTscanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur. J. Radiol. 71(3), 461-468 (2009).
10. Ludlow, J. B. and Ivanovic, M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 106, 106-114 (2008).
11. Koivisto, J., Kiljunen, T., Tapiovaara, M., Wolff, J. and Kortesniemi, M. Assessment of radiation exposure in dental cone-beam computerized tomography with the use of metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters and Monte Carlo simulations. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 114(3), 393-400 (2012).
12. Nagel, H. D. CT Parameters that influence the radiation dose. In: Radiation Dose from Adult and Pediatric Multidetector Computed Tomography. Tack, D. and Genevois, P. A., Eds. Springer-Verlag. pp. 1-8 (2007).
13. Koivisto, J., Kiljunen, T., Wolff, J. and Kortesniemi, M. Characterization of MOSFET dosimeter angular dependence in three rotational axes measured free-in-air and in soft-tissue equivalent material. J. Radiat. Res. 00, 1-7 (2013). doi:10.1093/jrr/rrt015.
14. Pauwels, R. et al., The SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur. J. Radiol. 81, 267-271 (2012).
15. Fuller, N. J., Hardingham, C. R., Graves, M., Screaton, N., Dixon, A. K., Ward, L. C. and Elia, M. Predicting composition of leg sections with anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis, using magnetic resonance imaging as reference. Clin. Sci. 96, 647-657 (1999).
16. ICRP. Basic anatomical &physiological data for use in radiological protection-the skeleton. ICRP Publication 70. Ann. ICRP 25(2) (1995).
17. ICRP. Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values. ICRP Publication 89. Ann. ICRP 32(3-4) (2002).
18. Du Bois, D. and Du Bois, E. F. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch. Intern. Med. 17, 863-871 (1916).
19. International commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Recommendations of the ICRP. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 37(2-4) (2008).
20. Hill, R. L. and Rathbone, B. A. Hanford technical basis for multiple dosimetry effective dose methodology. PNNL-19675. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
21. 10 CFR Ch. III (1-1-11 Edition) 835.101. http://www .gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2011-title10-vol4/pdf/CFR- 2011-title10-vol4sec835-2.pdf.
22. Yoshizumi, T. T., Goodman, P. C., Frush, D. P., Nguyen, G., Toncheva, G., Sarder, M. and Barnes, L. Validation of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for organ dose assessment during CT: comparison with thermoluminescent dosimetry. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 188(5), 1332-1336 (2007).
23. Ehringfeld, C., Schmid, S., Poljanc, K., Kirisits, C., Aiginger, H. and Georg, D. Application of commercial MOSFET detectors for in vivo dosimetry in the therapeutic x-ray range from 80 kV to 250 kV. Phys. Med. Biol. 50(2), 289-303 (2005).
24. Bongartz, G. et al. European guidelines for multislice computed tomography. Funded by the European Commission. Contract number FIGM-CT2000-20078- CT-TIP March (2004). http://www.msct.eu/.
25. McCollough, C. H., Leng, S., Yu, L., Cody, D. D., Boone, J.M. and McNitt-Gray, M. F. CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology. 259, 311-316 (2011).
26. Kim, S., Song, H., Samei, E., Yin, F. and Yoshizumi, T. T. Computed tomography dose index and dose length product for cone-beam CT: Monte Carlo simulations of a commercial system. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 12(2) 84-95 (2011).
27. Yu, L., Vrieze, T. J., Bruesewitz, M. R., Kofler, J. M., DeLone, D. R., Pallanch, J. F., Lindell, E. P. and McCollough, C. H. Dose and image quality evaluation of a dedicated cone-beam CT system for high-contrast neurologic applications. AJR, 194 (2010).
28. Roxby, P., Foroudi, F. and Haworth, A. Simple methods to reduce patient dose in a Varian cone beam CT system for delivery verification in pelvic. Br. J. Radiol. 82, 855-859 (2009). doi:10.1259/bjr/37579222.
29. Pauwels, R., Theodorakou, C., Walker, A., Bosmans, H., Jacobs, R., Horner, K. and Bogaerts, R. and The SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium. Dose distribution for dental cone beam CT and its implication for defining a dose index. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 41, 583-593 (2012).
30. Lofthag-Hansen, S., Thilander-Klang, A., Ekestubbe, A., Helmrot, E. and Gröndahl, K. Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and Accuitomo FPD. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 37, 72-79 (2008).
31. Thilander-Klang, A. and Helmrot, E. Methods of determining the effective dose in dental radiology. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 139(1-3), 306-309 (2010).
32. Holroyd, J. R. and Walker, A. Recommendations for the design of X-ray facilities and the quality assurance of dental cone beam CT (computed tomography) systems. A Report of the HPAWorking Party on dental cone beam CT. HPA-RPD-065. Health Protection Agency (2010).
33. 1Kiljunen, T. Patient doses in CT, dental cone beam CT and projection radiography in Finland, with emphasis on paediatric patients. STUK-A232, 62 pp.papps.66 pp (2008).
34. Lian, C. P. L., Othman, M. A. R., Cutajar, D., Butson, M., Guatelli, S. and Rosenfeld, A. B. Monte Carlo study of the energy response and depth dose water equivalence of the MOSkin radiation dosimeter at clinical kilovoltage photon energies. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 34(2), 273-279 (2011).
35. Lian, C., Wong, J., Young, A., Cutajar, D., Petasecca, M., Lrech, M. and Rosenfeld, A. Measurement of multislice computed tomography dose profile with the dose magnifying glass and the MOSkin radiation dosimeter. Radiat. Meas. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas .2012.12.016.
36. Zbijewski, W. et al. Design and optimization of a dedicated cone-beam CT system for musculoskeletal extremities imaging. Medical imaging 2011: physics of medical imaging. Proceedings of the SPIE, Vol. 7961, pp. 796104-796104-8 (2011).
37. Tapiovaara, M. and Tapiovaara, T. The validation and user's manual of the Spektripaja (2.0) program. Report STUK-TR 3. Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (2008) (in Finnish).
38. Biswas, D., Bible, J. E., Bohan, M., Simpson, A. K., Whang, P. G. and Grauer, J. N. Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 91, 1882-1889 (2009).
39. Huda, W. and Gkanatsios, N. A. Radiation dosimetry for extremity radiographs. Health Phys. 75, 492-499 (1998).
40. Sanfridsson, J., Holje, G., Svahn, G., Ryd, L. and Jonsson, K. Radiation dose and image information in computed radiography: A phantom study of angle measurements in the weight-bearing knee. Acta Radiol. 41, 310-316 (2000).
41. Cristy, M. and Eckerman, K. F. Specific absorbed fractions of energy at various ages from internal photon sources. I. Methods. Reportornl/TM-8381/V1. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1987).