Software architecture knowledge management: Theory and practice

Software Architecture Knowledge Management: Theory and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-279

  Babar, Muhammad Ali ^a   Dingsøyr, Torgeir ^b   Lago, Patricia ^c   Van Vliet, Hans ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889956825     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02374-3     Document Type: Book

References (348)

1. Ackerman, M.S., Halverson, C.A.: Reexamining organizational memory. Comm. ACM 43(1), 59-64 (2000).
2. Akerman, A., Tyree, J.: Using ontology to support development of software architecture. IBM Syst. J. 45(4), 813-825 (2006).
3. Al-Naeem, T., Gorton, I., Babar, M.A., Rabhi, F.A., Benatallah, B.: A quality-driven systematic approach for architecting distributed software applications. In: Proceedings 27th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 244-253. St. Louis, MO (2005).
4. Aldrich, J.: Using types to enforce architectural structure. In: Seventh Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2008), pp. 211-220. IEEE (2008).
5. Aleksovski, Z.: Using background knowledge in ontology matching. Ph.D. thesis, VU University Amsterdam (2008).
6. Aleman-Meza, B., Halaschek, C., Budak Arpinar, I.: Collective knowledge composition in a peer-to-peer network: A survey for peer-to-peer applications. In: Rivero, L.C., Doorn, J.H., Ferraggine, V.E. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Database Technologies and Applications, pp. 74-77. Idea Group (2005).
7. Ali-Babar, M., de Boer, R.C., Dingsøyr, T., Farenhorst, R.: Architectural knowledge management strategies: Approaches in research and industry. In: 2nd Workshop on Sharing and Reusing Architectural Knowledge - Architecture, Rationale, and Design Intent (SHARK/ADI '07). ACM, Minneapolis, MN, USA (2007).
8. Ali-Babar, M., Gorton, I.: A tool for managing software architecture knowledge. In: 2nd Workshop on Sharing and Reusing architectural Knowledge - Architecture, Rationale, and Design Intent (SHARK/ADI). ACM, Minneapolis, MN, USA (2007).
9. Ali-Babar, M., Gorton, I., Jeffery, R.: Capturing and using software architecture knowledge for architecture-based software development. In: 5th International Conference on Quality Software. IEEE Computer Press, Melbourne, Australia (2005).
10. Ali-Babar, M., Gorton, I., Kitchenham, B.: A framework for supporting architecture knowledge and rationale management. In: Dutoit, A., McCall, R., Mistr̀ik, I., Paech, B. (eds.) Rationale Management in Software Engineering, pp. 237-254. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).
11. Ali-Babar, M., Kitchenham, B., Maheshwari, P., Jeffery, R.: Mining patterns for improving architecting activities - A research program and preliminary assessment. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering. Keele, UK (2005).
12. Ali-Babar, M., Northway, A., Gorton, I., Heuer, P., Nguyen, T.: Introducing tool support for managing architectural knowledge: An experience report. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems (ECBS), pp. 105-113. IEEE Computer Society (2008).
13. Ali-Babar, M., Zhu, L., Jeffery, R.: A Framework for classifying and comparing software architecture evaluation methods. In: Proceedings of the 15th Australian Software Engineering Conference, pp. 309-319. Melbourne, Australia, IEEE Computer Society (2004).
14. Allmann, C., Winkler, L., Kölzow, T.: The requirements engineering gap in the OEMsupplier relationship. J. Univers. Knowl. Manag. 1(2), 103-111 (2006).
15. America, P., Rommes, E., Obbink, H.: Multi-View Variation Modeling for Scenario Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (2003).
16. Androutsellis-Theotokis, S., Spinellis, D.: A survey of peer-to-peer content distribution technologies. ACM Comput. Surv. 36(4), 335-371 (2004).
17. Ankolekar, A., Krötzsch, M., Tran, T., Vrandecic, D.: The two cultures: Mashing up web 2.0 and the semantic web. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 6(1), 70-75 (2008).
18. Antoniou, G., van Harmelen, F.: A Semantic Web Primer. MIT, Cambridge (2004).
19. Argyris, C., Schön, D.A.: Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practise. Organization Development Series. Addison Wesley, Boston MA (1996).
20. Arsanjani, A.: Service-Oriented Modeling and Architecture. IBM developerWorks (2004).
21. Arumugam, M., Sheth, A., Arpinar, I.B.: Towards peer-to-peer semantic web: A distributed environment for sharing semantic knowledge on the web. In: International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (2002).
22. Aurum, A., Jeffery, R., Wohlin, C., Handzic, M.: Managing Software Engineering Knowledge. Springer, Berlin (2003).
23. Avgeriou, P., Kruchten, P., Lago, P., Grisham, P., Perry, D.: Architectural knowledge and rationale - Issues, trends, challenges. ACMSIGSOFT Software Eng. Notes 32, 41-46 (2007).
24. Babu, T.L., Seetha Ramaiah, M., Prabhakar, T.V., Rambabu, D.A.: ArchVoc - Towards an ontology for software architecture. In: Second Workshop on SHAring and Reusing Architectural Knowledge - Architecture, Rationale, and Design Intent (SHARK/ADI). ACM (2007).
25. Baccarini, D.: The logical framework method for defining project success. Proj. Manag. J. 30, 25-32 (1999).
26. Bachmann, F., Merson, P.: Experience using the web-based tool wiki for architecture documentation. Tech. Rep. SEI-2005-TN-041, Carnegie Mellon University (2005).
27. Bacon, S.F.: Religious Meditations (1597).
28. Bales, D., Greenwald, R., Stackowiak, R.: Oracle Application Server 10g Essentials. O'Reilly, California (2004).
29. Barbacci, M.R., Ellison, R., Lattanze, A.J., Stafford, J.A., Weinstock, C.B., Wood, W.G.: Quality Attribute Workshops (QAWs). Tech. Rep. CMU/SEI-2003-TR-016, SEI, Carnegie Mellon University, USA. (2003).
30. Bartsch-Spörl, B.: Transfer of experience - issues beyond tool building. In: Workshop on Learning Software Organizations, pp. 3-8. Fraunhofer Publica, Kaiserslautern, Germany (1999).
31. Basili, V., Rombach, H.: The TAME project: Towards improvement-oriented software environments. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 14(6), 758-773 (1988).
32. Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G.: Improving software quality reusing knowledge and experience. Sloan Manag. Rev. 37(1), 55-64 (1995).
33. Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H.D.: The experience factory. In: Marciniak, J.J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 469-476. Wiley, New York (1994).
34. Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley, MA (2003).
35. Bass, L., Kazman, R.: Architecture-Based Development. Tech. Rep. CMU/SEI-99-TR-007, Software Engineering Institute (SEI), Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA (1999).
36. Batini, C., Ceri, S., Navathe, S.B., Navathe, S.: Conceptual Database Design: An Entity- Relationship Approach. Addison-Wesley, MA (1991).
37. Bechhofer, S., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D., Patel-Schneider, P., Stein, L.: Web ontology language (OWL) reference. W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/(2004.
38. Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2000).
39. Bengtsson, P., Lassing, N., Bosch, J., van Vliet, H.: Architecture-level modifiability analysis (ALMA). J. Syst. Software 69(1-2), 129-147 (2004).
40. Bittner, K., Spence, I.: Use Case Modeling. Addison-Wesley, Boston MA (2002).
41. Bjørnsson, F.O., Dingsøyr, T.: Knowledge management in software engineering: A systematic review of studied concepts and research methods used. Inform. Software Tech. 50(11), 1055-1168 (2008).
42. Boehm, B.: Software Engineering Economics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ (1981).
43. de Boer, R.C., Farenhorst, R.: In search of architectural knowledge. In: 3rd Workshop on Sharing and Reusing architectural Knowledge (SHARK). Leipzig, Germany (2008).
44. de Boer, R.C., Farenhorst, R., Lago, P., van Vliet, H., Clerc, V., Jansen, A.: Architectural knowledge: Getting to the core. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Quality of Software-Architectures (QoSA), pp. 197-214. Springer, Heidelberg, LNCS 4880 (2007).
45. de Boer, R.C., van Vliet, H.: Architecture knowledge discovery with latent semantic analysis: Constructing a reading guide for software product audits. J. Syst. Software 81(9), 1456-1469 (2008).
46. de Boer, R.C., van Vliet, H.: On the similarity between architecture and requirements. J. Syst. Software 82(3), 544-550 (2009).
47. Booch, G.: Handbook of Software Architecture. URL http://www.booch.com/ architecture/index.jsp.
48. Bosch, J.: Software architecture: The next step. In: Oquendo, F., Warboys, B., Morrison, R. (eds.) Software Architecture, First European Workshop (EWSA), pp. 194-199. Springer, Heidelberg, LNCS 3047 (2004).
49. Boussaidi, G.E., Mili, H.: A model-driven framework for representing and applying design patterns. In: 31st Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, pp. 97-100. IEEE (2007).
50. Bradbury, J.S., Cordy, J.R., Dingel, J., Wermelinger, M.: A survey of self-management in dynamic software architecture specifications. In: 1st ACM SIGSOFT Workshop on Self- Managed Systems, pp. 28-33. Newport Beach, California (2004).
51. Bratthall, L., Johansson, E., Regnell, B.: Is a design rationale vital when predicting change impact? - A controlled experiment on software architecture evolution. In: 2nd International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement, pp. 126-139. Springer Verlag. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1840 (2000).
52. van den Brink, P.: Social, Organization, and technological conditions that enable knowledge sharing. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft (2003).
53. Broekstra, J., Kampman, A., van Harmelen, F.: Sesame: A generic architecture for storing and querying RDF and RDF schema. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), pp. 54-68 (2002).
54. Brooks, F.P.: The Mythical Man-Month. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1975).
55. Brown, J.S., Duguid, P.: Organizational learning and communities-of- practise: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organizat. Sci. 2(1), 40-57 (1991).
56. de Bruin, H., van Vliet, H.: Quality-driven software architecture composition. J. Syst. Software 66(3), 269-284 (2003).
57. de Bruin, H., van Vliet, H., Baida, Z.: Documenting and analyzing a context-sensitive design space. In: Bosch, J., Gentleman, M., Hofmeister, C., Kuusela, J. (eds.) Software Architecture: System Design, Development and Maintenance, Proceedings 3rd Working IFIP/IEEE Conference on Software Architecture, pp. 127-141. Kluwer, Dordecht (2002).
58. Buckingham Shum, S., Hammond, N.: Argumentation-based design rationale: What use at what cost? Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 40(4), 603-652 (1994).
59. Burge, J.: Software engineering using design rationale. Ph.D. thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute. URL http://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/ETD/Available/etd- 050205-085625/(2005.
60. Burge, J., Brown, D.: An integrated approach for software design checking using rationale. In: Gero, J. (ed.) Design Computing and Cognition, pp. 557-576. Kluwer, Dordecht (2004).
61. Burge, J., Brown, D.: Rationale-based support for software maintenance. In: Dutoit, A., McCall, R., Mistr̀ik, I., Paech, B. (eds.) Rationale Management in Software Engineering, pp. 273-296. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).
62. Burge, J., Brown, D.: SEURAT: Integrated rationale management. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 835-838. ACM (2008).
63. Burge, J., Brown, D.: Software engineering using rationale. J. Syst. Software 81(3), 395-413 (2008).
64. Buschmann, F., Meunier, R., Rohnert, H., Sommerlad, P.: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: A System of Patterns. Wiley, New York (1996).
65. Buxton, J.N., Randell, B.: Software engineering techniques: Report of a Conference sponsored by the NATO Science Committee, Rome, Italy, 27-31 October 1969. NATO, Scientific Affairs Division, Brussels (1970).
66. Capilla, R., Nava, F., Dueñas, J.C.: Modeling and documenting the evolution of architectural design decisions. In: 2nd Workshop on Sharing and Reusing architectural Knowledge - Architecture, rationale, and Design Intent (SHARK/ADI), p. 9. ACM (2007).
67. Capilla, R., Nava, F., Pérez, S., Dueñas, J.C.: A web-based tool for managing architectural design decisions. In: 1st ACM Workshop on Sharing Architectural Knowledge (SHARK). Torino, Italy, ACM (2006).
68. Capiluppi, A., Lago, P., Morisio, M.: Characterizing the oss process. In: 2nd Workshop on Open Source Software engineering (2002).
69. Chowdhury, F.: Practice of team based management. http://www. bdresearchers.org/Article/PracticeofTeamBasedManagement(2008.
70. Clarke, R.: Web 2.0 as syndication. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commerce Res. 3(2), 30-43 (2008).
71. Clements, P., Bachmann, F., Bass, L., Garlan, D., Ivers, J., Little, R., Nord, R., Stafford, J.: Documenting Software Architectures : Views and Beyond, 1st edn. Addison Wesley, Boston MA (2002).
72. Clements, P., Kazman, R., Klein, M.: Evaluating Software Architectures: Methods and Case Studies. Addison-Wesley, MA (2001).
73. Clements, P., Kazman, R., Klein, M., Devesh, D., Reddy, S., Verma, P.: The duties, skills, and knowledge of software architects. In: 6th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA), p. 20. IEEE Computer Society, Mumbai, India (2007).
74. Clements, P., Northrop, L.: Software Product Lines: Practice and Patterns. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002).
75. Clerc, V.: Towards architectural knowledge management practices for global software development. In: 3rd Workshop on Sharing and Reusing Architectural Knowledge (SHARK), ICSE 2008. ACM (2008).
76. Clerc, V., Lago, P., van Vliet, H.: Assessing a multi-site development organization for architectural compliance. In: Proceedings of the 6th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture. IEEE Computer Society (2007).
77. Clerc, V., Lago, P., van Vliet, H.: Global software development: Are architectural rules the answer? In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE 2007), pp. 225-234. IEEE Computer Society (2007).
78. Clerc, V., Lago, P., van Vliet, H.: The architect's mindset. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Quality of Software-Architectures (QoSA). Springer, Heidelberg, LNCS 4880 (2007).
79. Conklin, E., Burgess-Yakemovic, K.C.: A process-oriented approach to design rationale. In: Moran, T., Carroll, J. (eds.) Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques and Use, chap. 14, pp. 393-427. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1996).
80. Cook, D., Cripps, P., Spaas, P.: An Introduction to the IBM Views and Viewpoints Framework for IT Systems. IBM developerWorks (2008).
81. Coplien, J.O., Harrison, N.B.: Organizational Patterns of Agile Software Development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (2004).
82. Coplien, J.O., Schmidt, D.C.: Pattern Languages of Program Design. Addison Wesley, Boston MA (1995).
83. Coulouris, G., Dollimore, J., Kindberg, T.: Distributed Systems: Concepts and Design, 4th edn. Addison Wesley, Boston MA (2005).
84. Cronbach, L.J.: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3), 297-334 (1951).
85. Cui, X., Sun, Y., Mei, H.: Towards automated solution synthesis and rationale capture in decision-centric architecture design. In: 7th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA '08), pp. 221-230 (2008).
86. Damian, D.: Stakeholders in global requirements engineering: Lessons learned from practice. IEEE Software 24(2), 21-27 (2007).
87. Damian, D., Izquierdo, L., Singer, J., Kwan, I.: Awareness in the wild: Why communication breakdowns occur. In: 2nd International Conference on Global Software Engineering, pp. 81-90. IEEE Comput. Soc. (2007).
88. Davenport, T., Probst, G.: Knowledge Management Case Book - Best Practises. Publicis MCD, Germany (2000).
89. Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L.: Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA (1998).
90. Davies, J., Fensel, D., Van Harmelen, F., NetLibrary, I.: Towards the Semantic Web: Ontology-driven Knowledge Management. Wiley, New York (2003).
91. Decker, B., Ras, E., Rech, J., Jaubert, P., Rieth, M.: Wiki-based stakeholder participation in requirements engineering. IEEE Software 24(2), 28-35 (2007).
92. Desouza, K., Awazu, Y., Baloh, P.: Managing Knowledge in Global Software Development Efforts: Issues and Practices. IEEE Software 23(5), 30-37 (2006).
93. Desouza, K.C.: Barriers to effective use of knowledge management systems in software engineering. Comm. ACM 46(1), 99-101 (2003).
94. Desouza, K.C., Evaristo, J.R.: Managing knowledge in distributed projects. Comm. ACM 47(4), 87-91 (2004).
95. Dierkes, M., Berthoin Antal, A., Child, J., Nonaka, I.: Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford University Press, New York (2001).
96. Dingsøyr, T., Conradi, R.: A survey of case studies of the use of knowledge management in software engineering. Int. J. Software Eng. Knowl. Eng. 12(4), 391-414 (2002).
97. Dingsøyr, T., Lago, P., van Vliet, H.: Assumptions promote Learning about Architectural Knowledge. In: von Wangenheim, C.G., Rocha, A.R. (eds.) 8th International Workshop on Learning Software Organizations, pp. 59-67. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2006).
98. Dingsøyr, T., Moe, N.B.: The impact of employee participation on the use of an electronic process guide: A longitudinal case study. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 34(2), 212-225 (2008).
99. Dingsøyr, T., Røyrvik, E.: An empirical study of an informal knowledge repository in a medium-sized software consulting company. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE25), pp. 84-92. IEEE Computer Society, Portland, Oregon, USA (2003).
100. Dingsøyr, T., Røyrvik, E., Djarraya, H.K.: Practical knowledge management tool use in a software consulting company. Comm. ACM 48(12), 96-100 (2005).
101. Dobrica, L., Niemela, E.: A survey on software architecture analysis methods. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 28(7), 638-653 (2002).
102. Drucker, P.: Post-Capitalist Society. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford (1993).
103. Dueñas, J.C., Capilla, R.: The decision view of software architecture. In: Morison, R., Oquendo, F. (eds.) 2nd European Workshop on Software Architecture. Pisa, Italy (2005).
104. Dutoit, A.H., Paech, B.: Rationale management in software engineering. In: Chang, S.K. (ed.) Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, vol. 1. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore (2001).
105. Dyba, T.: Enabling software process improvement: An investigation on the importance of organizational issues. PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (2001).
106. Dyba, T., Dingsøyr, T.: Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Inform. Software Tech. 50(9), 833-859 (2008).
107. Earl, M.: Knowledge management strategies: Towards a taxonomy. J. Manag. Inform. Syst. 18(1) (2001).
108. Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M.A.: The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK (2003).
109. Ebert, C., Man, J.D.: Effectively utilizing project, product and process knowledge. Inform. Software Tech. 50(6), 579-594 (2008).
110. Ehrig, M., Tempich, C., Broekstra, J., van Harmelen, F., Sabou, M., Siebes, R., Staab, S., Stuckenschmidt, H.: SWAP: Ontology-based knowledge management with peer-to-peer technology. In: Workshop on Ontology-based Knowledge Management. Co-located with the German Conference on Knowledge Management, Lecture Notes in Informatics (2003).
111. Emam, K.E., Koru, A.G.: A replicated survey of IT software project failures. IEEE Software 25(5), 84-89 (2008).
112. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, New York (2007).
113. Farenhorst, R., Izaks, R., Lago, P., van Vliet, H.: A just-in-time architectural knowledge sharing portal. In: Proceedings of the 7th Working IFIP/IEEE Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA7), pp. 125-134. IEEE Computer Society (2008).
114. Farenhorst, R., Lago, P., van Vliet, H.: EAGLE: Effective tool support for sharing architectural knowledge. Int. J. Cooper. Inform. Syst. 16(3/4), 413-437 (2007).
115. Farenhorst, R., Lago, P., van Vliet, H.: Prerequisites for successful architectural knowledge sharing. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC 2007), pp. 27-36. IEEE Computer Society (2007).
116. Farenhorst, R., van Vliet, H.: Experiences with a wiki to support architectural knowledge sharing. In: Third Workshop on Wikis for Software Engineering (Wiki4SE) (2008).
117. Feigenbaum, L., Herman, I., Hongsermeier, T., Neumann, E., Stephens, S.: The semantic web in action. Scientific American (2007).
118. Feldmann, R.L., Althoff, K.D.: On the status of learning software organisations in the year 2001. In: Althoff, K.D., Feldmann, R.L., Mller, W. (eds.) Learning Software Organizations Workshop, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2176, pp. 2-6. Springer, Kaiserslautern, Germany (2001).
119. Feller, J., Fitzgerald, B.: Understanding Open Source Software Development. Addison Wesley, Boston MA (2001).
120. Fensel, D.: Ontology-based knowledge management. IEEE Comput. 35(11), 56-59 (2002).
121. Fischer, G., Ostwald, J.: Knowledge management: problems, promises, realities, and challenges. IEEE Intell. Syst. 16(1), 60-70 (2001).
122. Fitzgerald, B.: The transformation of open source software. MIS Q. 30(3), 587-598 (2006).
123. Folmer, E., van Gurp, J., Bosch, J.: A framework for capturing the relationship between usability and software architecture. Software Process Improv. Pract. 8(2), 67-87 (2003).
124. Foster, I.: What is the grid?. URL www-fp.mcs.anl.gov/∼foster/ Articles/WhatIsTheGrid.pdf(2002.
125. Fowler, M.: Analysis Patterns: Reusable ObjectModels. Addison-Wesley, BostonMA (1997).
126. Fowler, M.: Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture. Addison-Wesley, Boston MA (2003).
127. Fowler, M.:Who needs an architect. IEEE Software 20(5), 11-13 (2003).
128. Fowler, M., Rice, D., Foemmel, M., Hieatt, E., Mee, R.: Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture. Pearson, Boston MA (2002).
129. Galster, M., Eberlein, A., Moussavi, M.: Transition from requirements to architecture: A review and future perspective. In: 7th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD), pp. 9-16 (2006).
130. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Boston MA (1994).
131. Gant, J., Gant, D.: Web portal functionality and state government e-service. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 1627- 1636. IEEE Computer Society (2002).
132. Georgas, J.C., Taylor, R.N.: Towards a Knowledge-Based Approach to Architectural Adaptation Management. In: 1st ACM SIGSOFT Workshop on Self-managed systems, pp. 59-63. Newport Beach, California (2004).
133. Ghosh, T.: Creating Incentives for Knowledge Sharing. Tech. rep., MIT Open Courseware, Sloan school of management, Cambridge, MA, USA (2004).
134. Girvan, M., Newman, M.: Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99(12), 7821-7826 (2002).
135. Gongla, P., Rizzuto, C.R.: Evolving communities of practice: IBM global services experience. IBM Syst. J. 40(4), 842-862 (2001).
136. Gorton, I.: Essential Software Architecture. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).
137. Gorton, I., Haack, J.: Architecting in the Face of Uncertainty: An Experience Report. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2004). Edinburgh, Scotland (2004).
138. Gorton, I., Zhu, L.: Tool support for just-in-time architecture reconstruction and evaluation: An experience report. In: 27th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'05), pp. 514-523. ACM (2005).
139. Gruber, T.R., Russell, D.M.: Design knowledge and design rationale: A framework for representing, capture, and use. Tech. Rep. KSL 90-45, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Standford University, California, USA (1991).
140. Haase, P., Siebes, R., van Harmelen, F.: Peer selection in peer-to-peer networks with semantic topologies. In: ICSNW, pp. 108-125 (2004).
141. Hall, H.: Input-friendliness: Motivating knowledge sharing across intranets. J. Inform. Sci. 27(3), 139-146 (2001).
142. Hall, J., Jackson, M., Laney, R., Nuseibeh, B., Rapanotti, L.: Relating software requirements and architectures using problem frames. In: IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 137-144 (2002).
143. Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N., Tierney, T.:What is your strategy for managing knowledge? Harv. Bus. Rev. 77(2), 106-116 (1999).
144. Harrison, N.B., Avgeriou, P., Zdun, U.: Using patterns to capture architectural decisions. IEEE Software 24(4), 38-45 (2007).
145. Hislop, D.: Mission impossible? communicating and sharing knowledge via information technology. J. Inform. Tech. 17, 165-177 (2002).
146. Hofmeister, C., Kruchten, P., Nord, R., Obbink, H., Ran, A., America, P.: A general model of software architecture design derived from five industrial approaches. J. Syst. Software 80(1), 106-126 (2007).
147. Hofmeister, C., Nord, R., Soni, D.: Applied Software Architecture. Addison Wesley, Boston MA (2000).
148. Hohpe, G., Woolf, B.: Enterprise Integration Patterns. Addison-Wesley, MA (2004).
149. Houdek, F., Schneider, K.: Software experience center. The evolution of the experience factory concept. In: International NASA-SEL Workshop (1999).
150. Huysman, M., deWit, D.: Practices of managing knowledge sharing: Towards a second wave of knowledge management. Knowl. Process Manag. 11(2), 81-92 (2004).
151. Huysman, M., Wulf, V.: IT to support knowledge sharing in communities, towards a social capital analysis. J. Inform. Tech. 21, 40-51 (2006).
152. IBM: Rational Unified Process. IBM Rational Software (2007). http://www.ibm.com/software/awdtools/rup/.
153. IBM Global Technology Services: Services Overview. http://www.ibm.com/ services/us/index.wss.
154. IBM Software Group: Product Overview. http://www.ibm.com/software.
155. IEEE1471: IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software- Intensive Systems. Tech. rep., IEEE (2000).
156. International Standards Organization (ISO): ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001, Software Quality Attributes, Software engineering - Product quality, Part 1: Quality model (2001).
157. ISO/IEC 9126-1: Software Engineering - Product Quality - Part 1: Quality Model. ISO (2001).
158. ISO/IEC 42010 WD3: Architectural description, working draft 3. ISO, Geneva (2008).
159. Jansen, A.: Architectural design decisions. PhD thesis, University of Groningen (2008).
160. Jansen, A., Avgeriou, P., van der Ven, J.S.: Enriching software architecture documentation. J. Syst. Software, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.052 (2009).
161. Jansen, A., Bosch, J.: Software architecture as a set of architectural design decisions. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE/IFIP Working Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA), pp. 109-119. IEEE Computer Society (2005).
162. Jansen, A., Bosch, J., Avgeriou, P.: Documenting after the fact: Recovering architectural design decisions. J. Syst. Software 81(4), 536-557 (2008).
163. Jansen, A., van der Ven, J.S., Avgeriou, P., Hammer, D.K.: Tool support for architectural decisions. In: 6th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture. Mumbai, India. pp. 44-53. IEEE Computer Society (2007).
164. Jansen, A., de Vries, T., Avgeriou, P., van Veelen, M.: Sharing the architectural knowledge of quantitative analysis. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Quality of Software-Architectures (QoSA), pp. 220-234. Springer, Heidelberg, LNCS 5281 (2008).
165. Jarczyk, A.P., Loffler, P., Shipmann, F.M. III.: Design rationale for software engineering: A survey. In: Proceedings of the 25th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 577-586 (1992).
166. Jeffery, R., Basili, V.: Validating the tame resource data model. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 1988). Singapore (1988).
167. Johannson, C., Hall, P., Coquard, M.: Talk to Paula and Peter - They are experienced. In: F.B.G. Ruhe (ed.) International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE'99), Workshop on Learning Software Organizations. LNCS, vol. 1756, Springer, Heidelberg (1999).
168. Jones, C.: Software Assessments, Benchmarks, and Best Practices. Addison-Wesley, Boston MA (2000).
169. Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, M.: Ontology mapping: The state of the art. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 18(01), 1-31 (2003).
170. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C.Y., Wei, K.K.: Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Q. 29(1), 113-143 (2005).
171. Karsenty, L.: An empirical evaluation of design rationale documents. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common Ground, pp. 150-156 (1996).
172. Kazman, R., Abowd, G., Bass, L., Clements, P.: Scenario-based analysis of software architecture. IEEE Software 13, 47-55 (1996).
173. Kazman, R., Bass, L., Klein, M.: The essential components of software architecture design and analysis. J. Syst. Software 79, 1207-1216 (2006).
174. Kazman, R., Bass, L., Klein, M., Lattanze, T., Northrop, L.: A basis for analyzing software architecture analysis methods. Software Qual. J. 13, 329-355 (2005).
175. Kazman, R., Bass, L., Webb, M., Abowd, G.: SAAM: A method for analyzing the properties of software architectures. In: 16th International Conference On Software Engineering (ICSE-16), pp. 81-90. IEEE Computer Society Press, Sorrento, Italy (1994).
176. Kazman, R., Klein, M.H., Barbacci, M., Longstaff, T.A., Lipson, H.F., Carrière, S.J.: The architecture tradeoff analysis method. In: ICECCS, pp. 68-78 (1998).
177. Kazman, R., Kruchten, P., Nord, R., Tomayko, J.: Integrating Software Architecture-Centric Methods into the Rational Unified Process. Tech. rep., Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-2004-TR-011 (2004).
178. Kew, N.: Apache Modules Book: Application Development with Apache. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (2007).
179. King, R.: How cloud computing is changing the world. BusinessWeek Online (August 2008).
180. Kircher, M., Jain, P.: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: Patterns for Resource Management, Volume 3. Wiley, New York (2004).
181. Kiryakov, A., Ognyanov, D., Manov, D.: OWLIM - A pragmatic semantic repository for OWL. In: Proceedings of the 6th Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE), pp. 182-192. Springer, Berlin (2005).
182. Kitchenham, B., Hughes, R., Linkman, S.: Modeling software measurement data. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 27(9), 788-804 (2001).
183. Klems, M., Nimis, J., Tai, S.: Do clouds compute? a framework for estimating the value of cloud computing. In: Seventh Workshop on E-Business (WeB2008), Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (LNBIP). Springer, Berlin (in press).
184. Klyne, G., Carroll, J., McBride, B.: Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax. W3C Recommendation (2004). URL http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/.
185. Kneuper, R.: Supporting Software Processes Using Knowledge Management. In: S.K. Chang (ed.) Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, pp. 579-606. World Scientific, Singapore (2001).
186. Kolb, D.: Experiential Learning experience as a source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1984).
187. Krafzig D., Banke K., Slama D.: Enterprise SOA. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (2005).
188. Kruchten, P.: The 4+1 View Model of Architecture. IEEE Software 12(6), 42-50 (1995).
189. Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process, An Introduction, third edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (2003).
190. Kruchten, P.: An Ontology of Architectural Design Deciions in Software-Intensive Systems. In: 2nd Groningen Workshop on Software Variability Management. Groningen, The Netherlands (2004).
191. Kruchten, P., Capilla, R., Dueñas, J.C.: The Decision's View Role in Software Architecture Practice. IEEE Software 26(2), 36-42 (2009).
192. Kruchten, P., Lago, P., van Vliet, H.: Building up and Reasoning about Architectural Knowledge. In: C. Hofmeister, I. Crnkovic, R. Reussner (eds.) Quality of Software Architectures, Proceedings 2nd International Conference, LNCS, vol. 4214, pp. 43-58. Springer, Berlin (2006).
193. Kruchten, P., Lago, P., van Vliet, H., Wolf, T.: Building up and exploiting architectural knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE/IFIP Working Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA), pp. 291-292. IEEE Computer Society, USA (2005).
194. Kwan, I., Damian, D., Storey, M.A.: Visualizing a Requirements-centred Social Network to Maintain Awareness Within Development Teams. In: Workshop on Requirements Engineering Visualization (REV). Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN, USA (2006).
195. Lago, P., Avgeriou, P.: First Workshop on Sharing and Reusing Architectural Knowledge. ACM SIGSOFT Software Eng. Notes 31(5), 32-36 (2006).
196. Lago, P., Farenhorst, R., Avgeriou, P., de Boer, R.C., Clerc, V., Jansen, A., van Vliet, H.: The GRIFFIN collaborative virtual community for architectural knowledge management. In: A. Finkelstein, A. van der Hoek, J. Grundy, I. Mistr̀ik, J. Whitehead (eds.) Collaborative Software
197. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980).
198. Lampson, B.W.: Hints for computer system design. Oper. Syst. Rev. 15(5), 33-48 (1983).
199. van Lamsweerde, A.: From system goals to software architecture. In: M. Bernardo, P. Inverardi (eds.) Formal Methods for Software Architectures, LNCS, vol. 2804, pp. 25-43. Springer, Berlin (2003).
200. Lee, J.: Design rationale systems: understanding the issues. IEEE Expert 12(3), 78-85 (1997).
201. Lee, L., Kruchten, P.: Capturing software architectural design decisions. In: 20th Annual Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE'07). IEEE, Vancouver (2007).
202. Lee, L., Kruchten, P.: Customizing the capture of software architectural design decisions. In: 21st Annual Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE'08). IEEE, Niagara Falls, ON (2008).
203. Lee, L., Kruchten, P.: A tool to visualize architectural design decisions. In: S. Becker, F. Plasil, R. Reussner (eds.) 4th International Conference on the Quality of Software Architecture (QoSA). LNCS, vol. 5281, pp. 43-54. Springer, Berlin (2008).
204. Lee, L., Kruchten, P.: Visualizing software architectural design decisions. In: R. Morrison, D. Balasubramaniam, K. Falkner (eds.) European Conference on Software Architecture (ECSA 2008). LNCS vol. 5292, pp. 359-362. Springer, Berlin (2008).
205. Letsche, T., Berry, M.: Large-Scale Information Retrieval with Latent Semantic Indexing. Inform Sci 100(1-4), 105-137 (1997).
206. Liang, P., Jansen, A., Avgeriou, P.: Selecting a high-quality central model for sharing architectural knowledge. In: Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC 2008), pp. 357-365. IEEE Computer Society Press, USA (2008).
207. Liang, P., Jansen, A., Avgeriou, P.: Sharing architecture knowledge through models: quality and cost. The Knowl. Eng. Rev. 24(3) (2009).
208. Liang, P., Jansen, A., Avgeriou, P.: Collaborative Software Architecting through Knowledge Sharing. In: A. Finkelstein, A. van der Hoek, J. Grundy, I. Mistr̀ik, J. Whitehead (eds.) Collaborative Software Engineering. Springer, Berlin (to appear).
209. Lin, K.J.: Building web 2.0. Computer 40(5), 101-102 (2007).
210. Linberg, K.: Software developer perceptions about software project failure: A case study. J. Syst. Software 49(2-3), 177-92 (1999).
211. Lindvall, M., Rus, I., Jammalamadaka, R., Thakker, R.: Software tools for knowledge management. Tech. rep., DoD Data Analysis Center for Software (2001).
212. Lohmann, S., Heim, P., Auer, S., Dietzold, S., Riechert, T.: Semantifying requirements engineering - The softWiki approach. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Semantic Technologies (I-SEMANTICS), pp. 182-185 (2008).
213. Lopez, D.: Sams Teach Yourself Apache 2 in 24 Hours. Sams (2002).
214. Lua, E.K., Crowcroft, J., Pias, M., Sharma, R., Lim, S.: A survey and comparison of peer-to-peer overlay network schemes. Commun. Surveys Tutor., IEEE 7(2), 72-93 (2005).
215. Lübke, D.: An Integrated Approach for Generation in Service-Oriented Architecture Projects. Phd thesis, Leibniz Universiẗat Hannover (2007).
216. Lübke, D., Lüecke, T., Schneider, K., Gomez, J.M.: Model-driven development of business applications using event-driven process chains. In: 2006 GITMA International Conference, pp. 95-98. Global Information Technology Management Association, Orlando, USA (2006).
217. Lübke, D., Schneider, K.: Leveraging feedback on processes in SOA Projects. In: I. Richardson, P. Runeson, R. Messnarz (eds.) EuroSPI. LNCS, vol. 4257, pp. 195-206. Springer, Berlin (2006).
218. Lyytinen, K., Robey, D.: Learning failure in information systems development. Inform. Syst. J. 9, 85-101 (1999).
219. Markus, M.L.: Power, politics, and M.I.S. implementation. Commun. ACM 26(6), 430-444 (1983).
220. Matinlassi, M., Niemela, E., Dobrica, L.: Quality-driven architecture design and quality analysis method: A revolutionary initiation approach to a product line architecture. Tech. Rep. 456, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo (2002).
221. McConnell, S.: Rapid Development. Microsoft Press (1996).
222. McDermott, R.: Learning Across Teams - How to build communities of practice in team organizations. Knowledge Manage. Rev. 2(8) (1999).
223. McDermott, R.: Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management. Calif. Manage. Rev. 41(4), 103-117 (1999).
224. Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.: A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 26(1), 70-93 (2000).
225. Meier, J., Homer, A., Hill, D., Taylor, J., Bansode, P., Wall, L., Boucher Jr, R., Bogawat, A.: Application Architecture Guide 2.0-Designing applications on the .NET platform. Microsoft, Redmond, WA (2008).
226. Mendling, J., Nüttgens, M.: EPC Markup Language (EPML) - An XML-based interchange format for Event-Driven Process Chains (EPC). Inform. Syst. e-Bus. Manage. (ISeB) 4(3), 245-263 (2005).
227. Mills, J.A.: A pragmatic view of the system architect. Commun. ACM 28(7), 708-717 (1985).
228. Moran, T., Carroll, J.: Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, USA (1996).
229. Schuster N., Zimmermann, O.: Architectural Decision Knowledge Wiki. http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/adkwik.
230. Naiburg, E.J., Maksimchuk, R.A.: UML for Database Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA (2001).
231. Napster: (2009). URL free.napster.com.
232. Networked European Software and Services Initiative (NESSI) - Grid: Grid vision and strategic research agenda (2008). URLwww.soi-nwg.org.
233. Newman, M., Girvan, M.: Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 69(2) (2004).
234. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company : How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press (1995).
235. Nuseibeh, B.: Weaving Together Requirements and Architectures. IEEE Comput. 34(3), 115-117 (2001).
236. Obbink, H., Kruchten, P., Kozaczynski, W., Hilliard, R., Ran, A., Postema, H., Lutz, D., Kazman, R., Tracz, W., Kahane, E.: Report on Software Architecture Review and Assessment (SARA), Version 1.0. At http://philippe. kruchten.com/architecture/SARAv1.pdf. Tech. rep. (2002).
237. Obbink, H., Mller, J.K., America, P., van Ommering, R., Muller, G., van der Sterren, W., Wijnstra, J.G.: Copa: A component-oriented platform architecting method for families of software-intensive electronic products (tutorial). In: SPLC1, the First Software Product Line Conference. Denver, Colorado (2000).
238. Object Management Group: Reusable Asset Specification, Version 2.2 (2005).
239. Object Management Group: Software & Systems Process Engineering, Metamodel Specification (SPEM) (2008).
240. O'Leary, D.E.:Wikis: From each according to his knowledge. Computer 41(2), 34-41 (2008).
241. Open Group: The Open Group Architecture Framework, Version 8.1.1. http://www.opengroup.org/togaf.
242. O'Reilly, T.: What is Web 2.0 - design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/ news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.
243. Oxford Dictionary and Thesaurus. Oxford (1995).
244. Parnas, D.L.: On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Commun. ACM 15(12), 1053-1058 (1972).
245. Parnas, D.L.: On a 'buzzword': hierarchical sructure. In: J.L. Rosenfeld (ed.) IFIP Congress 74, pp. 336-339. North-Holland, Stockholm, Sweden (1974).
246. Parnas, D.L.: On the design and development of program families. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2(1), 1-9 (1976).
247. Parnas, D.L., Clements, P., Weiss, D.M.: The modular structure of complex systems. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 11(3), 259-266 (1985).
248. Passant, A., Mulvany, I., Mika, P., Maisonneauve, N., Lser, A., Cattuto, C., Bizer, C., Bauckhage, C., Alani, H.: Mining for Social Serendipity. In: H. Alani, S. Staab, G. Stumme (eds.) Social Web Communities, no. 08391 in Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, pp. 21-26. Schloss Dagstuhl, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Germany (2008).
249. Paternó, F., Santoro, C.: One Model, Many Interfaces. In: C. Kolski, J. Vanderdonckt (eds.) Fourth International Conference on Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces, pp. 143-154. Kluwer, Dordrecth (2002).
250. Perry, D., Wolf, A.: Foundations for the Study of Software Architecture. ACM Software Eng. Notes 17(4), 40-52 (1992).
251. Pinto, J., Slevin, D.: Project success: Definitions and measurement techniques. Project Manage. J. 19, 67-72 (1988).
252. Plachy, E.C., Hausler, P.A.: Enterprise solutions structure. IBM Syst. J. 38(1), 4-11 (1999).
253. Pohl, K., Sikora, E.: COSMOD-RE: Supporting the Co-Design of Requirements and Architectural Artifacts. In: E. Sikora (ed.) 15th International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 258-261. IEEE Computer Society, USA (2007).
254. Pohl, K., Sikora, E.: Structuring the Co-design of Requirements and Architecture. In: P. Sawyer, B. Paech, P. Heymans (eds.) 13th Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ), LNCS, vol. 4542, pp. 48-62. Springer, Trondheim, Norway (2007).
255. Polanyi, M.: The Tacit Dimension, Anchor Books, vol. 540. Doubleday, Garden City, New York (1967).
256. Probst, G.J.B.: Practical Knowledge Management: A Model That Works. Prism, Arthur D. Little (1998). URL http://know.unige.ch/publications/ Prismartikel.PDF.
257. Procaccino, J.D., Verner, J., Shelfer, K., Gefen, D.: What do software practitioners really think about project success: An exploratory study. J. Syst. Software 78(2), 194-203 (2005).
258. Prudhommeaux, E., Seaborne, A.: SPARQL Query Language for RDF. W3C Working Draft (2006). URL http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/.
259. Ramesh, B., Jarke, M.: Towards Reference Models for Requirements Traceability. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 27(1), 58-93 (2001).
260. Ramil, J.F., Lehman, M.M., Kahen, G.: The FEAST Approach to Quantitative Process Modelling of Software Evolution Processes. In: F. Bomarius, M. Oivo (eds.) Profes, LNCS, vol. 1840, pp. 311-325. Springer, Oulu, Finland (2000).
261. Ran, A., Kuusela, J.: Design Decision Trees. In: 8th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design, pp. 172-175 (1996).
262. Rapanotti, L., Hall, J.G., Jackson, M., Nuseibeh, B.: Architecture-driven Problem Decomposition. In: 12th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 80-89 (2004).
263. Rechtin, E.: Systems Architecting: creating and building complex systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1991).
264. Regli, W., Hu, X., Atwood, M., Sun, W.: A Survey of Design Rationale Systems: Approaches, Representation, Capture and Retrieval. Eng. Comput. 16(3-4), 209-235 (2000).
265. Risson, J., Moors, T.: Survey of research towards robust peer-to-peer networks: search methods. Comput. Networks 50(17), 3485-3521 (2006).
266. Rittel, H., Webber, M.: Planning Problems are Wicked Problems. In: N. Cross (ed.) Developments in Design Methodology, pp. 135-144. Wiley, New York (1984).
267. Robbins, J.E., Hilbert, D.M., Redmiles, D.F.: Using critics to analyze evolving architectures. In: Joint proceedings of the second international software architecture workshop (ISAW-2) and international workshop on multiple perspectives in software development (Viewpoints '96) on SIGSOFT '96 workshops. ACM, San Francisco, CA, USA (1996).
268. Robillard, P.N.: The role of knowledge in software development. Commun. ACM 42(1), 87-92 (1999).
269. Royce, W.E., Royce, W.: Software architecture: Integrating process and technology. TRW Quest 14(1), 2-15 (1991).
270. Rozanski, N., Woods, E.: Software Systems Architecture: Working With Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2005).
271. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G.: The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual, The (2nd Edition). Pearson Higher Education (2004).
272. Rus, I., Lindvall, M.: Knowledge management in software engineering. IEEE Software 19(3), 26-38 (2002).
273. Samoladas, I., Gousios, G., Spinellis, D., Stamelos, I.: The sqo-oss quality model: Measurement based open source software evaluation. In: IFIP 4th International Conference on Open Source Systems (OSS 2008), pp. 237-248. Springer, Berlin (2008).
274. Schaffert, S., Bry, F., Baumeister, J., Kiesel, M.: Semantic wikis. IEEE Software 25(4), 8-11 (2008).
275. Schmidt, D.C., Buschmann, F.: Patterns, frameworks, and middleware: Their synergistic relationships. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, Portland, Oregon (2003).
276. Schmidt, D.C., Fayad, M., Johnson, R.E.: Software patterns. Commun. ACM 39(10), 37-39 (1996).
277. Schmidt, D.C., Stal, M., Rohnert, H., Buschmann, F.: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: Patterns for Concurrent and Networked Objects, vol. 2. Wiley, New York (2000).
278. Schneider, K.: Realistic and Unrealistic Expectations about Experience Exploitation. In: Conquest 2001, pp. 171-182. ASQF Erlangen (2001).
279. Schneider, K.: Experience Based Process Improvement. In: J. Kontio, R. Conradi (eds.) Proceedings European Conference on Software Quality (ECSQ 2002), LNCS, vol. 2349, pp. 114-123. Springer, Berlin (2002).
280. Schneider, K.:What to Expect from Software Experience Exploitation. J. Universal Comput. Sci., www.jucs.org, 8(6), 44-54 (2002).
281. Schneider, K.: Generating Fast Feedback in Requirements Elicitation. In: P. Sawyer, B. Paech, P. Heymans (eds.) Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2007), LNCS, vol. 4542, pp. 160-74. Springer, Berlin (2007).
282. Schneider, K.: Experience and Knowledge Management in Software Engineering. Springer, Berlin (2009).
283. Schneider, K., Basili, V.R., von Hunnius, J.: Experience in Implementing a Learning Software Organization. IEEE Software 19(3), 46-49 (2002).
284. Schneider, K., Hunnius, J.v.: Effective experience repositories for software engineering. In: Proceedings International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 534-539. IEEE Computer Society, Portland, Oregon (2003).
285. Schneider, K., Lübke, D.: Systematic tailoring of quality techniques. In: B. Hindel (ed.) World Congress of Software Quality 2005, vol. III - Online Complement, pp. 121-130. iSQI, Munich, Germany (2005).
286. Schneider, K., Schwinn, T.:Maturing experience base concepts at daimlerChrysler. Software Process Improve. Pract. 6, 85-96 (2001).
287. Schneider, K., Stapel, K.: Informationsflussanalyse für angemessene Dokumentation und verbesserte Kommunikation. In: H. Züllighoven (ed.) Software Engineering 2007, pp. 263-264. Köllen, Hamburg, Germany (2007).
288. Schneider, K., Stapel, K., Knauss, E.: Beyond Documents: Visualizing Informal Communication. In: B. Berenbach, O. Gottel (eds.) Third International Workshop on Requirements Engineering Visualization (REV 08), pp. 31-40. IEEE Computer Society, Barcelona, Spain (2008).
289. Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York (1983).
290. Schultze, U., Leidner, D.E.: Studying knowledge management in information systems research: Discourses and theoretical assumptions. MIS Quart. 26(3), 213-242 (2002).
291. Schuster, N., Zimmermann, O., Pautasso, C.: ADkwik: Web 2.0 collaboration system for architectural decision engineering. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), pp. 255-260 (2007).
292. Schwaber, K., Beedle, M.: Agile Software Development with Scrum. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (2002).
293. Schwartz, D.G.: Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management. Idea Group Reference, Hershey, USA (2006).
294. Senge, P.M.: The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practise of The Learning Organisation. Century Business (1990).
295. Shaw, M., Clements, P.: The Golden Age of Software Architecture. IEEE Software 23(2), 31-39 (2006).
296. Shaw, M., DeLine, R., Klein, D., Ross, T., Young, D., Zelesnik, G.: Abstractions for software architecture and tools to support them. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 21(4), 314-335 (1995).
297. Shaw, M., Garlan, D.: Software Architecture: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (1996).
298. Shipman III, F., McCall, R.: Integrating different perspectives on design rationale: Supporting the emergence of design rationale from design communication. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des., Anal. Manuf. 11(2), 141-154 (1997).
299. Siebes, R.M.: Semantic routing in peer-to-peer systems. Ph.D. thesis, VU University Amsterdam (2006).
300. Soni, D., Nord, R., Hofmeister, C.: Software architecture in industrial applications. In: 17th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE-17), pp. 196-207. ACM (1995).
301. Sowe, S., Stamelos, I., Angelis, L.: Identifying knowledge brokers that yield software engineering knowledge in OSS projects. Inform. Software Technol. 48(11), 1025-1033 (2006).
302. Sowe, S.K., Karoulis, A., Stamelos, I.: A constructivist view on knowledge management in open source virtual communities. In: A.D.D. Figueiredo, A.P. Afonso (eds.) Managing Learning in Virtual Settings: The Role of Context, pp. 290-308. IGI Global (2005).
303. Sowe, S.K., Stamelos, I., Angelis, L.: Understanding knowledge sharing activities in free/open source software projects: An empirical study. J. Syst. Software 81(3), 431-446 (2008).
304. Stachoviak, H.: Allgemeine Modelltheorie. Springer, Wien, New York (1973).
305. Standish Group: Chaos Report (1994).
306. Stapel, K., Knauss, E., Allmann, C.: Lightweight process documentation: just enough structure in automotive pre-development. In: R. O'Connor, N. Baddoo, K. Smolander, R. Messnarz (eds.) EuroSPI, Communictions in Computer and Information Science 16, pp. 142-151. Springer, Dublin, Ireland (2008).
307. Stapel, K., Schneider, K., Lübke, D., Flohr, T.: Improving an industrial reference process by information flow analysis: A Case Study. In: J. M̈unch, P. Abrhamsson (eds.) PROFES 2007, LNCS vol. 4589, pp. 147-159. Springer, (2007).
308. Stolze, M.: Visual critiquing in domain oriented design environments: Showing the right thing at the right place. In: J.S. Gero, F. Sudweeks (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Design'94, pp. 467-482. Kluwer, Dordretch (1994).
309. Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., Preston, J.: Knowledge management - The next fad to forget people? In: J. Pries-Heje, C. Ciborra, K. Kautz, J. Valor, E. Christiaanse, D. Avison, C. Heje (eds.) 7th European Conference on Information Systems, vol. 2, pp. 668-678. Copenhagen, Denmark (1999).
310. Tai, S.: Software Service Engineering. Presentation at Schloss Dagstuhl seminar. http://www.dagstuhl.de/de/programm/kalender/semhp/?semnr=09021(2009.
311. Taibi, T. (ed.): Design Pattern Formalization Techniques. IGI Publishing (2007).
312. Tanenbaum, A.S., van Steen, M.: Distributed systems: principles and paradigms, second edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA (2007).
313. Tang, A., Avgeriou, P., Jansen, A., Capilla, R., Ali-Babar, M.: A comparative study of architecture knowledge management tools. J. Syst. Software (in press).
314. Tang, A., Babar, A.M., Gorton, I., Han, J.: A Survey of the Use and Documentation of Architecture Design Rationale. In: Proceedings 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA5), pp. 89-98. IEEE Computer Society (2005).
315. Tang, A., Han, J.: Architecture Rationalization: A Methodology for Architecture Verifiability, Traceability and Completeness. In: Proceedings 12th Annual IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS '05), pp. 135-144. IEEE, USA (2005).
316. Tang, A., Jin, Y., Han, J.: A Rationale-Based Architecture Model for Design Traceability and Reasoning. J. Syst. Software 80(6), 918-934 (2007).
317. Tang, A., Nicholson, A., Jin, Y., Han, J.: Using Bayesian belief networks for change impact analysis in architecture design. J. Syst. Software 80(1), 127-148 (2007).
318. Tang, A., Tran, M.H., Han, J., van Vliet, H.: Design reasoning improves software design quality. In: S. Becker, F. Plasil, R. Reussner (eds.) 4th International Conference on the Quality of Software-Architectures (QoSA), LNCS, vol. 5281, pp. 28-42. Springer, Berlin (2008).
319. Telang, R., Mukhopadhyay, T.: Drivers of Web portal use. Electron. Commerce Res. Applic. 4, 49-65 (2005).
320. Terveen, L.G., Selfridge, P.G., Long, M.D.: Living design memory: framework, implementation, lessons learned. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 10(1), 1-37 (1995).
321. Thomas, D.M., Bostrom, R.P., Gouge, M.: Making knowledge work in virtual teams. Commun. ACM 50(11), 85-90 (2007).
322. Tiwana, A.: The Knowledge Management Toolkit: Orchestrating IT, Strategy, and Knowledge Platforms. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (2002).
323. Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument, 2 edn. Cambridge University Press (2003).
324. Traetteberg, H., Molina, P.J., Nunes, N.J.: Making model-based UI design practical: usable and open methods and tools. In: N. Nunes, C. Rich (eds.) 9th International Conference on Intelligent User Interface, pp. 376-377. ACM, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal (2004).
325. Tyree, J., Akerman, A.: Architecture Decisions: Demystifying Architecture. IEEE Software 22(2), 19-27 (2005).
326. van der Ven, J., Jansen, A., Avgeriou, P., Hammer, D.: Using architectural decisions. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Quality of Software-Architectures (QoSA), LNCS, vol. 4214, pp. 1-10. Springer, Berlin (2006).
327. Vincenti, W.:What Engineers Know and How They Know It. John Hopkins University Press (1990).
328. van Vliet, H.: Software architecture knowledge management. In: Proceedings 19th Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASEC 2008), pp. 24-31. IEEE Computer Society (2008).
329. W3C: Semantic Web (2009). URL www.w3.org/2001/sw330.
330. W3C: Web Ontology Language (OWL) (2009). URL www.w3.org/2004/OWL.
331. Wahler, M.: Using Patterns to develop consistent design constraints. PhD thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (2008).
332. Waldo, J., Wyant, G., Wollrath, A., Kendall, S.: A note on distributed computing. Tech. Rep. SMLI TR-94-29, Sun Microsystems (1994).
333. Wang, X., Zhang, D., Gu, T., Pung, H.: Ontology based context modeling and reasoning using OWL. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom), pp. 18-22. IEEE Computer Society (2004).
334. Weaver, B.N., Bishop, W.L.: The Corporate Memory : A profitable and practical approach to information management and retention systems. John Wiley, New York (1974).
335. Wenger, E.: Communities of practice : learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1998).
336. Wenger, E.C., McDermott, R., Snyder, W.M.: Cultivating Communities of Practice. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2002).
337. White, S.A.: Business Process Modeling Notation Specification. Tech. rep., Object Management Group Standard (2006).
338. Williams, L.G., Smith, C.U.: PASA: An architectural approach to fixing software performance problems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of the Computer Measurement Group. Reno, USA (2002).
339. Winkler, S.: Information flow between requirement artifacts. In: P. Sawyer, B. Paech, P. Heymans (eds.) International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2007), LNCS, vol. 4542, pp. 232-246. Springer, Trondheim, Norway (2007).
340. Yakovlev, I.V.: Web 2.0: Is it evolutionary or revolutionary? IT Profession. 9(6), 43-45 (2007).
341. Ye, Y., Fischer, G.: Context-Aware Browsing of Large Component Repositories. In: 16th International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 99-106. Coronado Island, CA, USA (2001).
342. Youngs, R., Redmond-Pyle, D., Spaas, P., Kahan, E.: A standard for architecture description. IBM Syst. J. 38(1), 32-50 (1999).
343. Zhuge, H.: The Knowledge Grid. World Scientific, Singapore (2004).
344. Zimmermann, O.: An Architectural Decision Modeling Framework for Service-Oriented Architecture Design. PhD Dissertation, Universiẗat Stuttgart, Germany. Dissertation.de - Verlag im Internet (2009).
345. Zimmermann, O., Doubrovski, V., Grundler, J., Hogg, K.: Service-Oriented Architecture and Business Process Choreography in an Order Management Scenario. In: OOPSLA Conference Companion. San Diego, CA, USA (2005).
346. Zimmermann, O., Gschwind, T., Kuester, J., Leymann, F., Schuster, N.: Reusable Architectural Decision Models for Enterprise Application Development. In: S. Overhage, C. Szyperski (eds.) Proceedings 3rd International Conference on the Quality of Software-Architectures (QoSA), LNCS, vol. 4880 pp. 15-32. Springer, Berlin (2007).
347. Zimmermann O., Koehler J., Leymann F., Polley R., Schuster N.: Managing Architectural Decision Models with Dependency Relations, Integrity Constraints, and Production Rules. J. Syst. Software (2009), doi:10.1016/j.jss.2009.01.039.
348. Zimmermann, O., Milinski, M., Craes, M., Oellermann, F.: Second Generation Web services-oriented architecture in production in the finance industry. In: OOPSLA Conference Companion (2004).