Building up and reasoning about architectural knowledge

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4214 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 43-58

  Kruchten, Philippe ^a   Lago, Patricia ^b   Van Vliet, Hans ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL KNOWLEDGE; ARCHITECTURAL KNOWLEDGE BASE; ARCHITECTURE DESIGNS; COMMERCIAL TOOLS; DESIGN DECISIONS; EXPLICIT REPRESENTATION; ONTOLOGY-BASED; PARTICULAR SOLUTION; QUALITY SYSTEMS; TOOL SUPPORT; USE CASE MODEL;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; ONTOLOGY;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 77049104931     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11921998_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Bass, L., et al.: Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (2003).
2. Bosch, J.: Software Architecture: the Next Step. In First European Workshop on Software Architecture (EWSA 2004), (2004), Springer-Verlag, 194-199.
3. Buckingham Shum, S. Analyzing the usability of a Design Rational Notation. In Moran, T.P. and Carroll, J.M. eds. Design Rationale Concepts, Techniques, and Use, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (1996) 185-215.
4. Burge, J.E. and Brown, D.C. Reasoning with design rationale. In Gero, J.S. ed. Artificial Intelligence in Design '00, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands (2000) 611-629.
5. Clements, P., Bachmann, F., Bass, L., et al.: Documenting Software Architectures: Views and Beyond. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002).
6. Conklin, J. and Begeman, M.L.: gIBIS: A tool for all reasons. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40 (1989).
7. Fekete, J.-D.: The InfoVis Toolkit. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2004 (INFOVIS'04), (2004), 167-174.
8. Fluit, C., Sabou, M. and van Harmelen, F. Ontology-based information visualisation. In Geroimenko, V. and Chen, C. eds. Visualising the Semantic Web, Springer-Verlag (2005).
9. Fowler, M.: Who Needs an Architect. IEEE Software, 20 (5) (2003) 11-13.
10. Granitzer, M., Kienreich, W., Sabol, V., et al.: Evaluating a System for Interactive Exploration of Large, Hierarchically Structured Document Repositories. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2004 (INFOVIS'04), (2004), IEEE CS, 127-133.
11. Hayes, J.H., Dekhtyar, A. and Sundaram, S.K.: Improving After-the-Fact Tracing and Mapping: Supporting Software Quality Predictions. IEEE Software, 22 (2005) 30-37.
12. IEEE standard 1471:2000 - Recommended practice for architectural description of software intensive systems. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA (2000).
13. Klein, M. DRCS: An Integrated System for Capture of Designs and Their Rationale. In Gero, J.S. ed. Artificial Intelligence in Design '92, Kluwer AP (1993) 393-412.
14. Kruchten, P.: The 4+1 View Model of Architecture. IEEE Software, 12 (6) (1995) 45-50.
15. Kruchten, P.: An Ontology of Architectural Design Decisions. In 2nd Groningen Workshop on Software Variability Management, (2004), Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
16. Lago, P. and van Vliet, H.: Explicit Assumptions Enrich Architectural Models. In proceeding of ICSE 2005, (2005), ACM Press, 206-214.
17. Lee, J.: Design Rationale: Understanding the Issues. IEEE Expert 12 (1997) 78-85.
18. Lee, J.: SIBYL: a tool for managing group design rationale. In ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW90), (1990), 79 - 92.
19. Myers, K.L., Zumel, N.B. and Garcia, P.: Acquiring Design Rationale Automatically. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 14 (2000).
20. Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press (1995).
21. Rus, I. and Lindvall, M.: Knowledge Management in Software Engineering. IEEE Software, 19 (2002) 26-38.
22. Tang, A., Babar, M.A., Gorton, I., et al.: A Survey of Architecture Design Rationale. In WICSA 5, (2005), IEEE CS.
23. Tang, A., Nicholson, A., Jin, Y., et al.: Using Bayesian Belief Networks for Change Impact Analysis in Architecture Design. In WICSA 5, (2005), IEEE CS.
24. Tufte, E.R.: Visual explanations: images and quantities, evidence and narrative. Graphics Press LLC, Cheshire, CO (1997).
25. Tyree, J. and Akerman, A.: Architecture Decisions: Demystifying Architecture. IEEE Software, 22 (2005) 19-27.
26. van der Ven, J.S., et al. Using Architectural decisions. In Hofmeister, C., Crnkovic, I., Reussner, R. and Becker, S. eds. Perspectives in Software Architecture Quality, Universitaet Karlsruhe, Fakultaet fuer Informatik (2006).
27. van Ham, F.: Using Multilevel Call Matrices in Large Software Projects. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2003 (INFOVIS'03), (2003), IEEE CS, 227-232.