Effects of modern primary flight display clutter: Evidence from performance and eye tracking data

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 11-15

  Moacdieh, Nadine M ^a   Prinet, Julie C ^a   Sarter, Nadine B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMOUNT OF INFORMATION; MONITORING STRATEGY; NUMBER OF FIXATIONS; PRIMARY FLIGHT DISPLAY; PRIMARY FLIGHT DISPLAYS; REDUCTION TECHNIQUES; SIMULATED FLIGHT; SPATIAL DENSITIES;

EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMAN ENGINEERING;

CLUTTER (INFORMATION THEORY);

EID: 84889823253     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/1541931213571005     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Aviram, G., & Rotman, S. R. (2000). Evaluation of human detection performance of targets embedded in natural and enhanced infrared images using image metrics. Optical Engineering, 39(4), 885-896.
2. Campbell, C. B. (2002). Advanced integrated general aviation primary flight display user interface design, development and assessment. In Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2002. Proceedings. (Vol. 2, pp. 105-1). IEEE.
3. Ewing, G., Woodruff, C., & Vickers, D. (2006). Effects of local clutter on human target detection. Spatial Vision, 19(1), 37-60.
4. Goldberg, J. H., & Kotval, X. P. (1999). Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24(6), 631-645.
5. Jacob, R. J. K., & Karn, K. S. (2003). Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: ready to deliver the promises. In Hyönä, J., Radach, R. & Deubel, H. (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 573-605). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO). (2010). Concept of Operations for the Next Generation Air Transportation System. Version 3.1, 10 April 2010. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
7. Kaber, D., Kim, S., Kaufmann, K., Veil, T., Alexander, A., Stelzer, E., Hsiang, S., & Bailey, N. (2008). Modeling the effects of HUD visual properties, pilot experience and flight scenario on a multi-dimensional measure of clutter. Hampton, VA: Langley Research Center.
8. Kaufmann, K. A., & Kaber, D. B. (2010). The influence of individual differences in perceptual performance on pilot perceptions of head-up display clutter. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. San Francisco, CA: HFES.
9. Kim, S., & Kaber, D. B. (2009). Assessing the effects of conformal terrain features in advanced head-up displays on pilot performance. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 36-40). San Antonio, TX: HFES.
10. Kim, S., Prinzel, L. J., Kaber, D. B., Alexander, A. L., Stelzer, E. M., & Kaufmann, K.. (2011). Multidimensional measure of display clutter and pilot performance for advanced head-up display. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 82(11), 1013-1022.
11. Next Gen Integration and Implementation Office. (2010). Next Gen Implementation Plan. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
12. Poole, A., & Ball, L. J. (2006). Eye tracking in HCI and usability research. Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, C. Ghaoui (ed.) (2006).
13. Rosenholtz, R., Li, Y., Mansfield, J., & Jin, Z. (2005). Feature congestion, a measure of display clutter. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 761-770). Portland, Oregon: ACM Press.
14. Rosenholtz, R., Li, Y., & Nakano, L. (2007). Measuring visual clutter. Journal of Vision, 7(2), 1-22.
15. Sarter, N. B., Mumaw, R. J., & Wickens, C. D. (2007). Pilots' monitoring strategies and performance on automated flight decks: An empirical study combining behavioral and eye-tracking data. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 49(3), 347-357.
16. Schons, V. W., & Wickens, C.D. (1993). Visual separation and information access in aircraft display layout (Report No. ARL-93-7/NASA-AI-93- 1), Savoy, IL: University of Illinois, Aviation Research Laboratory.
17. Snow, M. P., & French, G. A. (2002). Effects of primary flight symbology on workload and situation awareness in a head-up synthetic vision display. In Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2002. Proceedings. (Vol. 2, pp. 115-1). IEEE.
18. Ververs, P. M., & Wickens, C. D. (1998). Head-up displays: Effect of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8(4), 377-403.
19. Yeh, M., & Wickens, C. D. (2000). Attentional filtering in the design of electronic map displays: A comparison of color-coding, intensity coding, and decluttering techniques. Human Factors, 43(4), 543-562.
20. Zelinsky, G. J., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1997). Eye movements during parallelserial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 244-262.