Feature congestion: A of display clutter

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 761-770

  Rosenholtz, Ruth ^a   Li, Yuanzhen ^a   Mansfield, Jonathan ^a   Jin, Zhenlan ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clutter; Display design; Feature congestion; Information density; Recommender systems; Visual interfaces; Visualization

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONGESTION CONTROL (COMMUNICATION); FEATURE EXTRACTION; VISUALIZATION;

CLUTTER; DISPLAY DESIGN; FEATURE CONGESTION; INFORMATION DENSITY; RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; VISUAL INTERFACES;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 80051471827     PISSN: 02749696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Ahlberg, C. & Shneiderman, B. Visual Information Seeking: Tight Coupling of Dynamic Query Filters with Starfield Displays. Proc. CHI 1994, ACM Press (1994), 313-317.
2. Beyond the Click: Insights from Marketing Effectiveness Research (January 2001). http://www.dynamiclogic.com/na/research/btc/beyond_the_click_0102.html.
3. Burt, P., & Adelson, E.H. The Laplacian Pyramid as a Compact Image Code. IEEE Trans. on Communication, COM-31:532-540, 1983.
4. Buttenfield, B.P. & McMaster, R.B. (eds.). Map Generalization: Making Rules for Knowledge Representation. Longman, London, 1991.
5. Callaghan, T.C. Interference and domination in texture segregation: Hue, geometric form, and line orientation. Perception & Psychophysics 46, 4 (1989), 299-311.
6. C.I.E. Recommendations on uniform color spaces, color difference equations, psychometric color terms. Supplement No.2 to CIE publication No.15 (E.-1.3.1) 1971/(TC-1.3.) (1978).
7. Duncan, J. & Humphreys, G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychol. Rev., 96, (1989), 433-458.
8. Eckstein, M.P., Thomas, J.P., Palmer, J, & Shimozaki, S.S. A signal detection model predicts the effects of setsize in visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction and disjunction displays, Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 3 (2000), 425-451.
9. Fishkin, K. & Stone, M.C. Enhanced Dynamic Queries via Movable Filters. Proc. CHI 1995, ACM Press (1995), 415-420.
10. Frank, A.U. & Timpf, S. Multiple Representations for Cartographic Objects in a Multi-scale Tree - An Intelligent Graphical Zoom. Comput. & Graphics, 18, 6 (1994), 823-829.
11. Fumas, G.W. Generalized Fisheye Views. Proc. CHI 1986, ACM Press (1986), 16-23.
12. Itti, L., Koch, C., & Niebur, E. A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20, 11, (1998), 1254-1259.
13. Miller, G.A. The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two (http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Miller/). Psychological Review, 63, (1956), pp. 81-97.
14. Nickerson, J.V. Visual Programming. Ph.D. dissertation, New York University, New York, 1994. http://www.stevens-tech.edu/jnickerson/.
15. Nygren, E. & Allard, A. "Between the Clicks": Skilled Users Scanning of Pages. In Designing for the Web: Empirical Studies, Human Factors and the Web: Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (March 1996).
16. Oliva, A., Mack, M.L., Shrestha, M., & Peeper, A. Identifying the Perceptual Dimensions of Visual Complexity of Scenes. Proc. 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, (2004).
17. Palmer, J. Set-size Effects in Visual Search: the Effect of Attention is Independent of the Stimulus for Simple Tasks. Vision Research, 34, (1994), 1703-1721.
18. Perlin, K. & Fox, D. Pad: An Alternative Approach to the Computer Interface. Proc. SIGGRAPH 1993, ACM Press (1993), 57-64.
19. Perona, P. & Malik, J. Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. JOSA(A) 7, 5, (1990), 923-932.
20. Phillips, R.J. & Noyes, L. An Investigation of Visual Clutter in the Topographic Base of a Geological Map. The Cartographic Journal, 19, 2 (1982), 122-132.
21. Rosenholtz, R. Significantly different textures: A computational model of pre-attentive texture segmentation. Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer Verlag (2000), 197-211.
22. Rosenholtz, R. Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries? Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 3, (2001), 476-489.
23. Rosenholtz, R. Visual search for orientation among heterogeneous distractors: Experimental results and implications for signal detection theory models of search. J. Experimental Psychology, 27, 4, (2001), 985-999.
24. Sellen, A. J. & Harper, R.H.R. The Myth of the Paperless Office. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003.
25. nd Int'l Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction, Elsevier Science Pub. (1987), 375-382.
26. Treisman, A.M., & Gelade, G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cog. Psych., 12, (1980), 97-136.
27. Tullis, T.S. A Computer-Based Tool for Evaluating Alphanumeric Displays. INTERACT '84, B. Shackel (ed.), Elsevier Science (1985), 719-723.
28. Tufte, E.R. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT, 1983.
29. Watson, A.B. Visual detection of spatial contrast patterns: Evaluation of five simple models. Opt. Express, 6, (2000), 12-33, http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPEX-6-1-12.
30. Wolfe, J.M. Guided Search 2.0: A Revised Model of Visual Search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 2, (1994), 202-238.
31. Wolfe, J.M. Visual search. In H. Pashler, ed., Attention. University College London Press, London, U.K., 1998.
32. Woodruff, A., Landay, J., & Stonebraker, M. Constant Information Density in Zoomable Interfaces. Proc. AVI 1998, 57-65.