Head-up displays: Effects of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 377-403

  Ververs, Patricia May ^a,b   Wickens, Christopher D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE MEDICINE; AIRCRAFT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AVIATION; BIOENGINEERING; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

AEROSPACE MEDICINE; AIRCRAFT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; AVIATION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA DISPLAY; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 0032216862     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0804_4     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Andersen, G. J., & Kramer, A. F. (1993). Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 658-667.
2. Atchley, P., Kramer, A. F., & Theeuwes, J. (1997). Attentional control in 3-D space. In Proceedings of the 41st annual meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1328-1332). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
3. Downing, C. J., & Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 171-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
5. Fadden, S., & Wickens, C. D. (1997). Maximizing traffic awareness with a head-up flightpath highway display (Tech. Rep. No. ARL-97-1/FAA-97-1 ). Savoy: University of Illinois Institute of Aviation, Aviation Research Laboratory.
6. Fischer, E. (1979). The role of cognitive switching in head-up displays (NASA Contractor Rep. No. 3137). Moffett Field, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center.
7. Fischer, E., Haines, R. F., & Price, T. A. (1980). Cognitive issues in head-up display (NASA Tech. Paper No. 1711). Moffett Field, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center.
8. Larish, I., & Wickens, C. D. (1991). Divided attention with superimposed and separated imagery: Implications for head-up displays (Tech. Rep. No. 91-4/NASA HUD 91-1). Savoy: University of Illinois, Aviation Research Laboratory.
9. Lauber, J. K., Bray, R. S., Harrison, R. L., Hemingway, J. C., & Scott, B. C. (1982). An operational evaluation of head-up displays for civil transport operation: NASA/FAA phase III final report (NASA Tech. Paper No. 1815). Moffett Field, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center.
10. Loftus, G. R. (1996). Psychology will be a much better science when we change the way we analyze data. In Current directions in psychological science (pp. 161-171). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Martens, M., & Wickens, C. D. (1995). Lowlighting solutions to display clutter (Rep. No. ARL-95-10/NASA-95-4). Savoy: University of Illinois, Aviation Research Laboratory.
12. Martin-Emerson, R., & Wickens, C. D. (1993). Conformal symbology and the head-up display (Rep. No. ARL-93-6/NASA-HUD-93-1). Savoy: University of Illinois, Aviation Research Laboratory.
13. Martin-Emerson, R., & Wickens, C. D. (1997). Superimposition, symbology, visual attention, and the head-up display. Human Factors, 39, 581-601.
14. May, P., & Wickens, C. D. (1995). The role of visual attention in head-up displays: Design implications for varying symbology intensity (Rep. No. ARL-95-3/NASA-HUD-95-1). Savoy: University of Illinois, Aviation Research Laboratory.
15. McCann, R. S., & Foyle, D. C. (1996). Scene-linked symbology to improve situation awareness. In AGARD Conference Proceedings 575: Situation awareness: Limitations and enhancement in the aviation environment (pp. 16.1-16.11). Brussels, Belgium: North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
16. McCann, R. S., Foyle, D. C., & Johnston, J. C. (1993). Attentional limitations with head-up displays. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 70-75). Columbus: The Ohio State University.
17. Proctor, P. (1997, December). Economic, safety gains ignite HUD sales. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 147(22), 54-57.
18. Roscoe, S. N. (1987). The trouble with HUDs and HMDs. Human Factors Bulletin, 30(7), 1-2.
19. 3I-93-1). Savoy: University of Illinois, Aviation Research Laboratory.
20. Synder, H. L., & Dye, C. J. (1991). Effects of display failures, polarity, and clutter on visual search with cartographic images. Society for Information Display International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, XXII, 91-94.
21. Teichner, W. H., & Mocharnuk, J. B. (1979). Visual search for complex targets. Human Factors, 21, 259-276.
22. Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., & Kramer, A. F. (in press). Attentional control in three-dimensional space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
23. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
24. Ververs, P. M., & Wickens, C. D. (1996). The effect of clutter and lowlighting symbology on pilot performance with head-up displays. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 62-66). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
25. Ward, N. J., Parkes, A., & Lindsay, P. (1995). The effect of automotive head-up displays on attention to critical events in traffic. In International Conference on Experimental Analysis and Measurement of Situation Awareness (pp. 375-382). Daytona, FL: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Press.
26. Weintraub, D. J., & Ensing, M. (1992). Human factors issues in head-up display design: The book of HUD (State-of-the-Art Report 92-2). Dayton, OH: Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Crew System Ergonomics Information Analysis Center.
27. Weintraub, D. J., Haines, R. F., & Randle, R. J. (1984). The utility of head-up displays: Eye-focus vs. decision times. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 28th annual meeting (pp. 529-533). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
28. Weintraub, D. J., Haines, R. F., & Randle, R. J. (1985). Head-up display (HUD) utility, II: Runway to HUD transitions monitoring eye focus and decision times. In Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the Human Factors Society (pp. 615-616). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
29. Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
30. Wickens, C. D., & Long, J. (1995). Object vs. space-based models of visual attention: Implication for the design of head-up displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 179-194.