The Prediction of Physicochemical Properties

Computational Toxicology: Risk Assessment for Pharmaceutical and Environmental Chemicals

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 240-275

  Tetko, Igor V ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Applicability domain of models; Aqueous solubility; Physicochemical property prediction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889630713     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470145890.ch9     Document Type: Chapter

References (147)

1. Karickhoff SW, Carreira LA, Melton C, McDaniel VK, Vellino AN, Nute DE. Computer prediction of chemical reactivity-The ultimate SAR. In: US Environmental Protection Agency CfERI, editor, Environmental research brief EPA/600/ M-89/017. Cincinnati, OH, 1989.
2. Ertl P. Cheminformatics analysis of organic substituents: Identification of the most common substituents, calculation of substituent properties, and automatic identification of drug-like bioisosteric groups. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003;43:374-80.
3. Richardson BJ. Lectures on experimental and practical medicine. Med Times Gaz 1868;2:703.
4. DiMasi JA, Hansen RW, Grabowski HG. The price of innovation: New estimates of drug development costs. J Health Econ 2003;22:151-85.
5. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001;46:3-26.
6. Clarke ED, Delaney JS. Physical and molecular properties of agrochemicals: An analysis of screen inputs, hits, leads, and products. Chimia 2003;57:731-4.
7. Hasselbalch KA. Die Berechnung der Wasserstoffzahl des Blutes aus der freien und gebunden Kohlensäure desselben, und die Sauerstoffbindung des Blutes als Funktion der Wasserstoffzahl. Die Biochem Z 1916;78.
8. Avdeef A. Absorption and drug development: Solubility, permeability and charge state. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience, 2003.
9. Bergstrom CA, Luthman K, Artursson P. Accuracy of calculated pH-dependent aqueous drug solubility. Eur J Pharm Sci 2004;22:387-98.
10. Agharkar S, Lindenbaum S, Higuchi T. Enhancement of solubility of drug salts by hydrophilic counterions: Properties of organic salts of an antimalarial drug. J Pharm Sci 1976;65:747-9.
11. Crowley PJ, Martini LG. Physicochemical approaches to enhancing oral absorption. Pharm Technol Eur 2004;16:18-27.
12. Glomme A, März A, Dressman JB. Predicting the Intestinal Solubility of Porly Soluble Drugs. In: Testa B, Krämer SD, Wunderli-Allenspach H, Folkers G, editors, Pharmacokinetics profiling in drug research. Zürich and Weinheim: Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta and Wiley-VCH, 2006. p. 259-80.
13. Avdeef A, Testa B. Physicochemical profiling in drug research: A brief survey of the state-of-the-art of experimental techniques. Cell Mol Life Sci 2002;59:1681-9.
14. The Physical Properties Database (PHYSPROP) is a trademark of Syracuse Research Corporation .
15. Yalkowsky SH, He Y. Handbook of aqueous solubility data. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2003.
16. Huuskonen JJ, Livingstone DJ, Tetko IV. Neural network modeling for estimation of partition coefficient based on atom-type electrotopological state indices. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2000;40:947-55.
17. Tetko IV, Tanchuk VY, Kasheva TN, Villa AE. Estimation of aqueous solubility of chemical compounds using E-state indices. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2001;41:1488-93.
18. Yan A, Gasteiger J. Prediction of aqueous solubility of organic compounds based on a 3D structure representation. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003;43:429-34.
19. Lobell M, Sivarajah V. In silico prediction of aqueous solubility, human plasma protein binding and volume of distribution of compounds from calculated p Ka and AlogP98 values. Mol Divers 2003;7:69-87.
20. Bergstrom CA, Wassvik CM, Norinder U, Luthman K, Artursson P. Global and local computational models for aqueous solubility prediction of drug-like molecules. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2004;44:1477-88.
21. Katritzky AR, Wang YL, Sild S, Tamm T, Karelson M. QSPR studies on vapor pressure, aqueous solubility, and the prediction of water-air partition coefficients. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1998;38:720-5.
22. Balakin KV, Savchuk NP, Tetko IV. In silico approaches to prediction of aqueous and DMSO solubility of drug-like compounds: trends, problems and solutions. Curr Med Chem 2006;13:223-41.
23. Irmann F. A Simple correlation between water solubility and structure of hydrocarbons and halohydrocarbons. Chem Ing Tech 1965;37:789-98.
24. Wakita K, Yoshimoto M, Miyamoto S, Watanabe H. A method for calculation of aqueous solubility of organic compounds using new fragment solubility constants. Chem Pharm Bull 1986;34:4663-81.
25. Nirmalakhandan NN, Speece RE. Prediction of aqueous solubility of organic chemicals based on molecular structure: 2. Application to PNAs, PCBs, PCDDs, etc. Environ Sci Technol 1989;23:708-13.
26. Suzuki T. Development of an automatic estimation system for both the partition coefficient and aqueous solubility. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1991;5:149-66.
27. Kühne R, Ebert R-U, Kleint F, Scmidt G, Schuurmann G. Group contribution methods to estimate water solubility of organic chemicals. Chemosphere 1995;30:2061-77.
28. Hansch C, Quinlan JE, Lawrence GL. The linear free-energy relationship between partition coefficients and the aqueous solubility of organic liquids. J Org Chem 1968;33:347-50.
29. Yalkowsky SH, Valvani SC. Solubility and partitioning: I. Solubility of nonelectrolytes in water. J Pharm Sci 1980;69:912-22.
30. Yalkowsky SH, Valvani SC, Roseman TJ. Solubility and partitioning: VI. Octanol solubility and octanol-water partition coefficients. J Pharm Sci 1983;72:866-70.
31. Jain N, Yalkowsky SH. Estimation of the aqueous solubility: I. Application to organic nonelectrolytes. J Pharm Sci 2001;90:234-52.
32. Delaney JS. Predicting aqueous solubility from structure. Drug Discov Today 2005;10:289-95.
33. Meylan WM, Howard PH. Estimating log P with atom/fragments and water solubility with log P. Perspect Drug Discov Des 2000;19:67-84.
34. Abraham MH, Le J. The correlation and prediction of the solubility of compounds in water using an amended solvation energy relationship. J Pharm Sci 1999;88:868-80.
35. Ruelle P, Kesselring UW. The hydrophobic effect. 2. Relative importance of the hydrophobic effect on the solubility of hydrophobes and pharmaceuticals in H-bonded solvents. J Pharm Sci 1998;87:998-1014.
36. Hilal SH, Karickhoff SW, Carreira LA. Prediction of the solubility, activity coefficient and liquid/liquid partition coefficient of organic compounds. QSAR Combin Sci 2004;23:709-20.
37. Thompson JD, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG. Predicting aqueous solubilities from aqueous free energies of solvation and experimental or calculated vapor pressures of pure substances. J Chem Phys 2003;119:1661-70.
38. Miller MM, Ghodbane S, Wasik SP, Tewari YB, Martire DE. Aqueous solubilities, octanol/water partition coefficients, and entropies of melting of chlorinated benzenes and biphenyls. J Chem Eng Data 1984;29:184-90.
39. Yaws CL, Xiang P, Xiaoyin L. Water solubility data for 151 hydrocarbons. Chem Eng 1993;100:108.
40. Platts JA, Abraham MH, Butina D, Hersey A. Estimation of molecular linear free energy relationship descriptors by a group contribution approach: 2. Prediction of partition coefficients. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2000;40:71-80.
41. Ghose AK, Viswanadhan VN, Wendoloski JJ. Prediction of hydrophobic (lipophilic) properties of small organic molecules using fragmental methods: An analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP methods. J Phys Chem A 1998;102:3762-72.
42. Lobell M. Advances in the in-silico prediction of aqueous solubility from structure. Cerius2 User Group Meeting. Cerep, Paris, 2001.
43. Tetko IV, Tanchuk VY, Villa AE. Prediction of n-octanol/water partition coefficients from PHYSPROP database using artificial neural networks and E-state indices. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2001;41:1407-21.
44. Dearden JC. In silico prediction of aqueous solubility. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2006;1:31-52.
45. Jorgensen WL, Duffy EM. Prediction of drug solubility from Monte Carlo simulations. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2000;10:1155-8.
46. Jorgensen WL, Duffy EM. Prediction of drug solubility from structure. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002;54:355-66.
47. Klamt A, Eckert F, Hornig M, Beck ME, Burger T. Prediction of aqueous solubility of drugs and pesticides with COSMO-RS. J Comput Chem 2002;23:275-81.
48. Hornig M, Klamt A. COSMOfrag: A novel tool for high-throughput ADME property prediction and similarity screening based on quantum chemistry. J Chem Inf Model 2005;45:1169-77.
49. Molconn Z. Quincy, MA: Hall Associates Consulting.
50. Selma. Mölndal: AstraZeneca in house software package.
51. Goller AH, Hennemann M, Keldenich J, Clark T. In silico prediction of buffer solubility based on quantum-mechanical and HQSAR-and topology-based descriptors. J Chem Inf Model 2006;46:648-58.
52. Kier LB, Hall LH. Molecular structure description: The electrotopological state. London: Academic Press, 1999.
53. Kier LB, Hall LH. An electrotopological-state index for atoms in molecules. Pharml Res 1990;7:801-7.
54. Tetko IV. Neural network studies: 4. Introduction to associative neural networks. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2002;42:717-28.
55. Votano JR, Parham M, Hall LH, Kier LB, Hall LM. Prediction of aqueous solubility based on large datasets using several QSPR models utilizing topological structure representation. Chem Biodiver 2004;1:1829-41.
56. Cheng A, Merz KM, Jr. Prediction of aqueous solubility of a diverse set of compounds using quantitative structure-property relationships. J Med Chem 2003;46:3572-80.
57. Yan AX, Gasteiger J. Prediction of aqueous solubility of organic compounds by topological descriptors. QSAR Combin Sci 2003;22:821-9.
58. Yan A, Gasteiger J, Krug M, Anzali S. Linear and nonlinear functions on modeling of aqueous solubility of organic compounds by two structure representation methods. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2004;18:75-87.
59. Taskinen J, Yliruusi J. Prediction of physicochemical properties based on neural network modelling. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2003;55:1163-83.
60. Overton E. Über die osmotischen Eigenschaften der Zelle in ihrer Bedeutung für die Toxikologie und Pharmakologie. Z Phys Chem 1897;22:189-209.
61. Meyer H. Lipoidtheorie der Narkose. Arch Exp Path Pharm 1899;42:109-18.
62. Hansch C, Maloney PP, Fujita T, Muir RM. Nature 1962;194:178-80.
63. Wang PH, Lien EJ. Effects of different buffer species on partition coefficients of drugs used in quantitative structure-activity relationships. J Pharm Sci 1980;69:662-8.
64. Hansch C, Leo A, Hoekman D. Hydrophobic, electronic, and steric constants. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1995.
65. Leo AJ, Hoekman D. Calculating log P(oct) with no missing fragments: The problem of estimating new interaction parameters. Perspect Drug Discov Des 2000;18:19-38.
66. oct from structures. Chem Rev 1993;93:1281-306.
67. Lombardo F, Shalaeva MY, Tupper KA, Gao F. ElogD(oct): A tool for lipophilic-ity determination in drug discovery. 2. Basic and neutral compounds. J Med Chem 2001;44:2490-7.
68. Yoshida F, Topliss JG. QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability. J Med Chem 2000;43:2575-85.
69. Abraham MH, Chadha HS, Whiting GS, Mitchell RC. Hydrogen bonding: 32. An analysis of water-octanol and water-alkane partitioning and the delta log P parameter of seiler. J Pharm Sci 1994;83:1085-100.
70. Raevsky OA, Trepalin SV, Trepalina HP, Gerasimenko VA, Raevskaja OE. SLIPPER-2001-Software for predicting molecular properties on the basis of physicochemical descriptors and structural similarity. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2002;42:540-9.
71. Hilal SH, Karickhoff SW, Carreira LA. Prediction of the vapor pressure boiling point, heat of vaporization and diffusion coefficient of organic compounds. QSAR Combin Sci 2003;22:565-74.
72. Ruelle P. Universal model based on the mobile order and disorder theory for predicting lipophilicity and partition coefficients in all mutually immiscible two-phase liquid systems. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2000;40:681-700.
73. Ruelle P. The n-octanol and n-hexane/water partition coefficient of environmentally relevant chemicals predicted from the mobile order and disorder (MOD) thermodynamics. Chemosphere 2000;40:457-512.
74. Petrauskas AA, Kolovanov EA. ACD/log P method description. Perspect Drug Discov Des 2000;19:99-116.
75. Meylan WM, Howard PH. Atom/fragment contribution method for estimating octanol-water partition coefficients. J Pharm Sci 1995;84:83-92.
76. Mannhold R, Rekker RF. The hydrophobic fragmental constant approach for calculating log P in octanol/water and aliphatic hydrocarbon/water systems. Perspect Drug Discov Des 2000;18:1-18.
77. Mannhold R, Rekker RF, Dross K, Bijloo G, de Vries G. The lipophilic behaviour of organic compounds: 1. An updating of the hydrophobic fragmental constant approach. Quant Struc-Act Rel 1998;17:517-36.
78. Klopman G, Li J-Y, Wang S, Dimayuga M. Computer automated log P calculations based on an extended group contribution approach. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1994;34:752-81.
79. Viswanadhan VN, Ghose AK, Wendoloski JJ. Estimating aqueous solvation and lipophilicity of small organic molecules: A comparative overview of atom/group contribution methods. Perspect Drug Discov Des 2000;19:85-98.
80. Japertas P, Didziapetris R, Petrauskas A. Fragmental methods in the design of new compounds: Applications of the Advanced Algorithm Builder. Quant Struct-Act Rel 2002;21:23-37.
81. Japertas P, Didziapetris R, Petrauskas A. Fragmental methods in the analysis of biological activities of diverse compound sets. Mini Rev Med Chem 2003;3:797-808.
82. Mannhold R, van de Waterbeemd H. Substructure and whole molecule approaches for calculating log P. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2001;15:337-54.
83. Mannhold R, Petrauskas A. Substructure versus whole-molecule approaches for calculating log P. QSAR Combin Sci 2003;22:466-75.
84. Tetko IV, Livingstone DJ. Rule-based systems to predict lipophilicity. In: Testa B, van de Waterbeemd H, editors, Comprehensive medicinal chemistry: II. In silico tools in ADMET. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006;5: pp. 649-68.
85. Artemenko NV, Palyulin VA, Zefirov NS. Neural-network model of the lipophi-licity of organic compounds based on fragment descriptors. Doklady Chem 2002;383:114-6.
86. Zhu H, Sedykh A, Chakravarti SK, Klopman G. A new group contribution approach to the calculation of log P. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des 2005;1:3-9.
87. Cherkasov A, Jonsson M. Substituent effects on thermochemical properties of free radicals: New substituent scales for C-centered radicals. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1998;38:1151-6.
88. Carrupt P-A, Gaillard P, Billois F, Weber P, Testa B, Meyer C, et al. The molecular lipophilicity potential (MLP): A new tool for log P calculations and docking, and in comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). In: Pliska V, Testa B, van de Waterbeemd H, editors, Lipophilicity in drug action and toxicology. Weinheim: VCH, 1996. p. 195-217.
89. Duffy EM, Jorgensen WL. Prediction of properties from simulations: Free energies of solvation in hexadecane, octanol, and water. J Am Chem Soc 2000;122:2878-88.
90. oct) using autocorrelation descriptors. SAR QSAR Environ Res 1997;7:151-72.
91. Gombar VK, Enslein K. Assessment of n-octanol/water partition coefficient: When is the assessment reliable? J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1996;36:1127-34.
92. Gombar VK. Reliable assessment of log P of compounds of pharmaceutical relevance. SAR QSAR Environ Res 1999;10:371-80.
93. Wang RX, Gao Y, Lai LH. Calculating partition coefficient by atom-additive method. Perspect Drug Discov Des 2000;19:47-66.
94. Tetko IV, Tanchuk VY. Application of associative neural networks for prediction of lipophilicity in ALOGPS 2.1 program. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2002;42:1136-45.
95. Vidal D, Thormann M, Pons M. LINGO, an efficient holographic text based method to calculate biophysical properties and intermolecular similarities. J Chem Inf Model 2005;45:386-93.
96. Tetko IV, Poda GI. Property-based log P calculations. In: Mannhold R, editor, Drug properties: Measurement and computation. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2007.
97. Tetko IV, Bruneau P. Application of ALOGPS to predict 1-octanol/water distribution coefficients, log P, and log D, of AstraZeneca in-house database. J Pharm Sci 2004;93:3103-10.
98. Tetko IV, Poda GI. Application of ALOGPS 2.1 to predict log D distribution coefficient for Pfizer proprietary compounds. J Med Chem 2004;47:5601-4.
99. Tetko IV, Bruneau P, Mewes HW, Rohrer DC, Poda GI. Can we estimate the accuracy of ADME-Tox predictions? Drug Discov Today 2006;11:700-7.
100. Tetko IV, Bruneau P, Mewes HW, Rohrer DC, Poda GI. Can we estimate the accuracy of ADMET predictions? 232th ACS National Meeting. San Francisco, CA, 2006.
101. Boethling RS, Howard PH, Meylan WM. Finding and estimating chemical property data for environmental assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 2004;23:2290-308.
102. Mishra DS, Yalkowsky SH. Estimation of vapor pressure of some organic compounds. Ind Eng Chem Res 1991;30:1609-12.
103. Bondi A. Physical properties of molecular crystals, liquids, and gases. New York: Wiley, 1968.
104. Mackay D, Bobra AM, Chan D, Shiu WY. Vapor pressure correlations for low volatility environmental chemicals. Environ Sci Technol 1982;16:645-9.
105. Kühne R, Ebert RU, Schuurmann G. Estimation of vapour pressures for hydrocarbons and halogenated hydrocarbons from chemical structure by a neural network. Chemosphere 1997;34:671-86.
106. Ambrose D, Sprake CHS. Thermodynamic properties of organic oxygen compounds XXV: Vapour pressures and normal boiling temperatures of aliphatic alcohols. J Chem Thermodynamics 1970;2:631-45.
107. Macknick AB, Prausnitz JM. Vapor pressures of heavy liquid hydrocarbons by a group-contribution method. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 1979;18:348-51.
108. Burkhard LP. Estimation of vapor pressures for halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons by a group-contribution method. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 1985;24:119-20.
109. Jensen T, Fredenslund A, Rasmussen P. Pure-component vapor pressures using UNIFAC group contribution. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 1981;20:239-46.
110. Tu CH. Group-contribution method for the estimation of vapor pressures. Fluid Phase Equilibria 1994;99:105-20.
111. Asher WE, Pankow JF, Erdakos GB, Seinfeld JH. Estimating the vapor pressures of multi-functional oxygen-containing organic compounds using group contribution methods. Atmos Environ 2002;36:1483-98.
112. Artemenko NV, Baskin II, Palyulin VA, Zefirov NS. Artificial neural network and fragmental approach in prediction of physicochemical properties of organic compounds. Russ Chem Bull 2003;52:20-9.
113. Chalk AJ, Beck B, Clark T. A temperature-dependent quantum mechanical/ neural net model for vapor pressure. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2001;41:1053-9.
114. Chalk AJ, Beck B, Clark T. A quantum mechanical/neural net model for boiling points with error estimation. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2001;41:457-62.
115. Dearden JC. Quantitative structure-property relationships for prediction of boiling point, vapor pressure, and melting point. Environ Toxicol Chem 2003;22:1696-709.
116. Rucker G, Rucker C. On topological indices, boiling points, and cycloalkanes. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1999;39:788-802.
117. Stein SE, Brown RL. Estimation of normal boiling points from group contributions. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1994;34:581-7.
118. Wiener H. Structural determination of paraffin boiling points. J Am Chem Soc 1947;69:17-20.
119. Katritzky AR, Lobanov VS, Karelson M. Normal boiling points for organic compounds: Correlation and prediction by a quantitative structure-property relationship. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1998;38:28-41.
120. Todeschini R, Consonni V. Handbook of molecular descriptors. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2000.
121. Devillers J, Balaban AT. Topological indices and related descriptors in QSAR and QSPR. Philadelphia: Gordon and Breach, 1999.
122. Joback KG, Reid RC. Estimation of pure-component properties from group contributions. Chem Eng Commun 1987;57:233-43.
123. Ehresmann B, de Groot MJ, Alex A, Clark T. New molecular descriptors based on local properties at the molecular surface and a boiling-point model derived from them. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2004;44:658-68.
124. Gavezzotti A. Are crystal-structures predictable? Acc Chem Res 1994;27:309-14.
125. Endres F, Zein El Abedin S. Air and water stable ionic liquids in physical chemistry. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2006;8:2101-16.
126. Mills EJ. On melting point and boiling point as related to composition. Phil Mag 1884;17:173-87.
127. Horvath AL. Molecular design: Chemical structure generation from the properties of pure organic compounds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1992.
128. Dearden JC. The QSAR prediction of melting point, a property of environmental relevance. Sci Total Environ 1991;109-10:59-68.
129. Baum EJ. Chemical property estimation: Theory and application. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1998.
130. Tesconi M, Yalkowsky SH. Melting point. In: Boethling RS, Mackay D, editors, Handbook of property estimation methods for chemicals. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis, 2000. p. 2-27.
131. Gold PI, Ogle GJ. Estimating thermophysical properties of liquids: Part 4. Boiling, freezing and triple-point temperatures. Chem Eng 1969;76.
132. Tu CH, Wu YS. Group-contribution estimation of normal freezing points of organic compounds. J Chin Inst Chem Eng 1996;27:323-8.
133. Karthikeyan M, Glen RC, Bender A. General melting point prediction based on a diverse compound data set and artificial neural networks. J Chem Inf Model 2005;45:581-90.
134. Pearlman RS. CONCORD: Rapid generation of high quality approximate 3D molecular structures. Chem Des Autom News 1987;2:5-7.
135. Varnek A, Kireeva N, Tetko IV, Baskin II, Solov'ev VP. Exhaustive QSPR studies of large diverse set of ionic liquids: how accurately can we predict the melting point? J Chem Inf Mod 2007.
136. Tetko IV. Computing chemistry on the Web. Drug Discov Today 2005;10:1497-500.
137. Sadowski J, Gasteiger J, Klebe G. Comparison of automatic three-dimensional model builders using 639 X-ray structures. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1994;34:1000-8.
138. Clark M. Generalized fragment-substructure based property prediction method. J Chem Inf Model 2005;45:30-8.
139. Morris JJ, Bruneau PP. Prediction of physicochemical properties. In: Bohm HJ, Schneider G, editors, Virtual screening for bioactive molecules. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2000. p. 33-58.
140. Walker MJ. Training ACD/log P with experimental data. QSAR Combin Sci 2004;23:515-20.
141. Netzeva TI, Worth A, Aldenberg T, Benigni R, Cronin MT, Gramatica P, et al. Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 52. Altern Lab Anim 2005;33:155-73.
142. Tetko IV. The WWW as a tool to obtain molecular parameters. Mini Rev Med Chem 2003;3:809-20.
143. Landers P. Cost of developing a new drug increases to about $1.7 billion. Wall Street Journal, 2003. p. B4.
144. Wilson EK. Is safe exchange of data possible? Chem Eng News 2005;83:24-9.
145. Tetko IV, Abagyan R, Oprea TI. Surrogate data-A secure way to share corporate data. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2005;19:749-64.
146. Morrissey SR. NIH initiatives target chemistry. Chem Eng News 2005;83:23-4.
147. Tetko IV, Gasteiger J, Todeschini R, Mauri A, Livingstone D, Ertl P, et al. Virtual computational chemistry laboratory-Design and description. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2005;19:453-63.