Physical and molecular properties of agrochemicals: An analysis of screen inputs, hits, leads, and products

Chimia

Volumn 57, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 731-734

  Clarke, Eric D ^a   Delaney, John S ^a  

^a JEALOTT S HILL INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

'Rule of five'; Agrochemicals; Bioavailability; Design guidelines; Property profiles

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL; FUNGICIDE; HERBICIDE;

COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; REVIEW; SCREENING;

EID: 0345732338     PISSN: 00094293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2533/000942903777678641     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. C.A. Lipinski, F. Lombardo, B.W. Dominy, P.J. Feeney, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 1997, 23, 3.
2. a) S.J. Teague, A.M. Davis, P.D. Leeson, T.I. Oprea, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3743;
3. b) T.I. Oprea, A.M. Davis, S.J. Teague, P.D. Leeson, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1308;
4. c) M.M. Hann, A.R. Leach, G. Harper, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 856;
5. d) T.I. Oprea, J. Comp. Aided Molec. Design. 2002, 16, 325;
6. e) M.C. Wenlock, R.P. Austin, P. Barton; A.M. Davies, P.D. Leeson, J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 1250.
7. G.G. Briggs, 'Predicting uptake and movement of agrochemicals from physical properties' talk given at the SCI Meeting on uptake of agrochemicals and pharmaceuticals, London, UK, December, 1997.
8. G.G. Briggs, P. Desbordes, P. Genix, 'Are there limits to the physical properties of fungicides?' poster presentation, 10th IUPAC Int. Congress on the Chemistry of Crop Protection, Basel, Switzerland, August 2002. (philippe.desbordes@bayercropscience.com).
9. a) C.M. Tice, Pest. Manag. Sci. 2001, 57, 3;
10. b) C. M. Tice, Pest. Manag. Sci. 2002, 58, 219.
11. a) C.D.S Tomlin (Ed.), 'The Pesticide Manual', 12th Edition, 2000, Brit. Crop Protect. Council; Farnham, Surrey, UK;
12. b) The e-Pesticide Manual, 2002-2003, version 2.2.
13. a) E.D. Clarke, J.S. Delaney, UK QSAR & Chemoinformatics Meeting, Syngenta, UK, April 2001, talk (http://www.ukqsar.co.uk);
14. b) E.D. Clarke, J.S. Delaney, 10th IUPAC Int. Congress on the Chemistry of Crop Protection, Basel, Switzerland, August 2002, poster & talk.
15. E.D. Clarke, J.S. Delaney, in 'Euro QSAR 2002:Designing Drugs and Crop Protectants' (Proceedings of the 14th European Symposium on Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, 8-13 September 2002, Bournemouth, UK), Eds. M. Ford, J. Dearden, D. Livingstone, H. van de Waterbeemd,; Blackwell Publishing, UK, 2003 (in press).
16. D.W. Bartlett, J.M. Clough, J.R. Godwin, A.A. Hall, M. Hamer, B. Parr-Dobrzanski, Pest. Manag. Sci. 2002, 58, 649.
17. G. Mitchell, D.W. Bartlett, T.E.M. Fraser, T.R. Hawkes, D.C. Holt, J.K. Townson, R.A. Wichert, Pest. Manag. Sci. 2001, 57, 120.
18. P. Maienfisch, H. Huerlimann, A. Rindlisbacher, L. Gsell, H. Dettwiler, J. Haettenschwiler, E. Sieger, M. Walti, Pest. Manag. Sci. 2001, 57, 165.
19. For current review of fragment-based methods see P. Japertas, R. Didziapetris, A. Petrauskas, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 2002, 21, 23; also see a) R. Mannhold, A. Petrauskas, QSAR Comb. Sci. 2003, 22, 466; b) A. J. Leo, D. Hoekman, Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design. 2000, 18, 19. AlogP predictions were made using Diamond Discovery (version 1.5) software obtained from Accelrys Inc., San Diego, California, USA and ACD logP values obtained using ACD Phys. Chem. Batch (version 4.76) software obtained from Advanced Chemistry Development Inc., Toronto, Canada.
20. For current review of fragment-based methods see P. Japertas, R. Didziapetris, A. Petrauskas, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 2002, 21, 23; also see a) R. Mannhold, A. Petrauskas, QSAR Comb. Sci. 2003, 22, 466; b) A. J. Leo, D. Hoekman, Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design. 2000, 18, 19. AlogP predictions were made using Diamond Discovery (version 1.5) software obtained from Accelrys Inc., San Diego, California, USA and ACD logP values obtained using ACD Phys. Chem. Batch (version 4.76) software obtained from Advanced Chemistry Development Inc., Toronto, Canada.
21. For current review of fragment-based methods see P. Japertas, R. Didziapetris, A. Petrauskas, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 2002, 21, 23; also see a) R. Mannhold, A. Petrauskas, QSAR Comb. Sci. 2003, 22, 466; b) A. J. Leo, D. Hoekman, Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design. 2000, 18, 19. AlogP predictions were made using Diamond Discovery (version 1.5) software obtained from Accelrys Inc., San Diego, California, USA and ACD logP values obtained using ACD Phys. Chem. Batch (version 4.76) software obtained from Advanced Chemistry Development Inc., Toronto, Canada.
22. P. Seiler, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1974, 9, 473.
23. Absolv (v. 1.4) software obtained from Sirius Analytical Instruments, Forest Row, East Sussex, UK. See J.A. Platts, D. Butina, M.H. Abraham, A. Hersey, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 835.
24. N. Jain, S.H. Yalkowsky, J. Pharm. Sci. 2001, 90, 234.
25. Daylight Toolkits and ClogP (v. 4.71) software obtained from Chemical Information Systems, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
26. a) M.H. Abraham, J.A. Platts, J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3484;
27. b) M.H. Abraham, K. Enomoto, E.D. Clarke, G. Sexton, J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 4782.
28. P. Kenny, Handling heterocyclic tautomerism. Daylight User Group Meeting, Santa Fe, New Mexico, February 1999, talk.