Predicting aqueous solubility from structure

Drug Discovery Today

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 289-295

  Delaney, John S ^a  

^a JEALOTT S HILL INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE; SOLVENT; WATER;

ACCURACY; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DRUG SCREENING; DRUG SOLUBILITY; DRUG STRUCTURE; ELECTRICITY; ENTROPY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SURVEY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PREDICTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SOLUTE; THEORY; VELOCITY;

MODELS, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SOLUBILITY; SOLVENTS; WATER;

EID: 13544270908     PISSN: 13596446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6446(04)03365-3     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Musha D. Body water in man. I. Total body water in normal subjects and edematous patients. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 63:1956;309-317
2. Lipinski C.A., et al. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 23:1997;3-25
3. Clarke E.D., Delaney J.S. Physical and molecular properties of agrochemicals: An analysis of screen inputs, hits, leads and products. Chimia (Aarau). 57:2003;731-734
4. Kariv I., et al. Improvement of "hit-to-lead" optimization by integration of in vitro HTS experimental models for early determination of pharmacokinetic properties. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 5:2002;459-472
5. Yang G., et al. Prediction of the aqueous solubility: comparison of the general solubility equation and the method using an amended solvation energy relationship. J. Pharm. Sci. 91:2002;517-533
6. Valko K. Application of high-perfomance liquid chromatography based measurements of lipophilicity to model biological distribution. J. Chromatogr. A. 1037:2004;299-310
7. Morris J.J., Bruneau P.P. Prediction of physicochemical properties. Bohm H.G., Schneider G. Virtual Screening for Bioactive Molecules. 2002;33-58 Wiley-VCH
8. Popa-Burke I.G., et al. Streamlined system for purifying and quantifying a diverse library of compounds and the effect of compound concentration measurements on the accurate interpretation of biological assay results. Anal. Chem. 76:2004;7278-7287
9. Clark D.E., Grootenhuis P.D.J. Progress in computational methods for the prediction of ADMET properties. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 5:2002;382-390
10. Sanghvi T., et al. Estimation of aqueous solubility by the general solubility equation (GSE) the easy way. QSAR & Combinatorial Science. 22:2003;258-262
11. Jorgensen W.L., Duffy E.M. Prediction of drug solubility from Monte Carlo simulations. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 10:2000;1155-1158
12. Kier L.B., et al. Cellular automata models of aqueous solution systems. Lipkowitz K.B., Boyd D.B. Reviews in Computational Chemistry. 17:2001;205-254 Wiley-VCH
13. Gardner M. The fantastic combinations of John Conway's new solitaire game "life" Sci. Am. 223:1970;120-123
14. Cramer C.J., Truhlar D.G. Continuum solvation models: Classical and quantum mechanical implementations. Lipkowitz K.B., Boyd D.B. Reviews in Computational Chemistry. 6:1995;1-72 Wiley-VCH
15. Klamt A. Prediction of aqueous solubility of drugs and pesticides with COSMO-RS. J. Comput. Chem. 23:2002;275-281
16. Chickos J.S., et al. Estimating entropies and enthalpies of fusion of organic compounds. J. Org. Chem. 56:1991;927-938
17. Dannenfelser R.M., Yalkowsky S.H. Estimation of entropies of fusion of organic compounds. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals. 18:1979;108-111
18. Dearden J.C. The prediction of melting points. Charton M., Charton B.I. Advances in Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships. 2:1999;127-175 JAI Press
19. Tesconi M., Yalkowsky S.H. Melting point. Boethling R.S., Mackay D. Handbook of Property Estimation Methods for Chemicals: Environmental and Health Sciences. 2000;1-27 CRC Press
20. Bergström C.A.S., et al. Molecular descriptors influencing melting point and their role in classification of solid drugs. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43:2003;1177-1185
21. Butina D., Gola J.M.R. Modeling aqueous solubility. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43:2003;837-841
22. Cheng A., Merz K.M. Prediction of aqueous solubility of a diverse set of compounds using quantitative structure-property relationships. J. Med. Chem. 46:2003;3572-3580
23. Delaney J.S. ESOL: Estimating aqueous solubility directly from molecular structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44:2004;1000-1005
24. Kubinyi H. Mannhold R,, et al. QSAR: Hansch Analysis and Related Approaches (Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry. 1:1993;Wiley-VCH
25. Topliss J.G., Edwards R.P. Chance factors in studies of quantitative structure-activity relationships. J. Med. Chem. 22:1979;1238-1244
26. Diaconis P., Efron B. Computer-intensive methods in statistics. Sci. Am. 248:1983;116-130
27. Rouvray D.H. The evolution of the concept of molecular similarity. Johnson M.A., Maggiora G.M. Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity. 1990;15-42 Wiley
28. Abraham M.H., Le J. The correlation and prediction of the solubility of compounds in water using an amended solvation energy relationship. J. Pharm. Sci. 88:1999;868-880
29. Ghose A.K., et al. Prediction of hydrophobic (lipophilic) properties of small organic molecules using fragmental methods: An analysis of ALOG P and CLOG P methods. J. Phys. Chem. A. 102:1998;3762-3772
30. Myrdal P.B., et al. AQUAFAC: Aqueous functional group activity coefficients: Application to the estimation of aqueous solubility. Chemosphere. 24:1995;1619-1637
31. Kuhne R., et al. Group contribution methods to estimate water solubility of organic chemicals. Chemosphere. 30:1995;2061-2077
32. Klopman G. Estimation of aqueous solubility of organic compounds by the group contribution approach. application to the study of biodegradation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 32:1992;474-482
33. Marrero J., Gani R. Group-contribution-based estimation of octanol/water partition coefficient and aqueous solubility. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41:2002;6623-6633
34. Sun H. A universal molecular descriptor system for prediction of Log P, LogS, LogBB, and absorption. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44:2004;748-757
35. Hou T.J., et al. ADME evaluation in drug discovery: 4. Prediction of aqueous solubility based on atom contribution approach. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44:2004;266-275
36. Huuskonen J. Estimation of aqueous solubility for a diverse set of organic compounds based on molecular topology. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40:2000;773-777
37. Liu R., So S. Development of quantitative structure-property relationship models for early ADME evaluation in drug discovery: 1. Aqueous solubility. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41:2001;1633-1639
38. Tetko I.V., et al. Estimation of aqueous solubility of chemical compounds using E-state indices. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41:2001;1488-1493
39. Hall L.H., Kier L.B. The molecular connectivity Chi indexes and Kappa shape indexes in structure-property modeling. Lipkowitz K.B., Boyd D.B. Reviews in Computational Chemistry. 2:1991;367-422 Wiley-VCH
40. Livingstone D.J., et al. Simultaneous prediction of aqueous solubility and octanol/water partition coefficient based on descriptors derived from molecular structure. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 15:2001;741-752
41. Huuskonen J. Estimation of water solubility from atom-type electrotopological state indices. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20:2001;491-497
42. Huuskonen J. Prediction of aqueous solubility for a diverse set of organic compounds based on atom-type electrotopological state indices. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 35:2000;1081-1088
43. Huuskonen, J. and Tetko, I.V.(2000) Application of neural networks for estimating partition coefficient based on atom-type electrotopological state indices. Molecular modeling and prediction of bioactivity, Proceedings of the European Symposium on Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships: Molecular Modeling and Prediction of Bioactivity, Copenhagen, Denmark, 23-28 Aug. 1998, pp. 470-471
44. Yan A., Gasteiger J. Prediction of aqueous solubility of organic compounds by topological descriptors. QSAR & Combinatorial Science. 22:2003;821-829
45. Engkvist O., Wrede P. High-throughput, in silico prediction of aqueous solubility based on one- and two-dimensional descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42:2002;1247-1249
46. Yaffe D. A fuzzy ARTMAP based on quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPRs) for predicting aqueous solubility of organic compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41:2001;1177-1207
47. Yan A., Gasteiger J. Prediction of aqueous solubility of organic compounds based on a 3D structure representation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43:2003;429-434
48. Yan A., et al. Linear and nonlinear functions on modeling of aqueous solubility of organic compounds by two structure representation methods. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 18:2004;75-87
49. Beck B., et al. QM/NN QSPR models with error estimation: Vapor pressure and log P. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40:2000;1046-1051
50. Clark T. Quantum cheminformatics: An oxymoron? Hicks M.G. Chemical Data Analysis in the Large: The Challenge of the Automation Age. 2000;Beilstein Institut
51. Zhong C., Hu Q. Estimation of the aqueous solubility of organic compounds using molecular connectivity indices. J. Pharm. Sci. 92:2003;2284-2294
52. Bergström C.A.S., et al. Global and local computational models for aqueous solubility prediction of drug-like molecules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44:2004;1477-1488
53. Wanchana S., et al. Quantitative structure/property relationship analysis on aqueous solubility using genetic algorithm-combined partial least squares method. Pharmazie. 57:2002;127-129
54. Wegner J.K., Zell A. Prediction of aqueous solubility and partition coefficient optimized by a genetic algorithm based descriptor selection method. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43:2003;1077-1084
55. Lind P., Maltseva T. Support vector machines for the estimation of aqueous Solubility. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43:2003;1855-1859
56. Bruneau P. Search for predictive generic model of aqueous solubility using Bayesian neural nets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41:2001;1605-1616
57. Gao H., et al. Estimation of aqueous solubility of organic compounds with QSPR approach. Pharm. Res. 19:2002;497-503
58. Lobell M., Sivarajah V. In silico prediction of aqueous solubility, human plasma protein binding and volume of distribution of compounds from calculated pKa and Alog P98 values. Mol. Divers. 7:2003;69-87
59. Jorgensen W.L., Duffy E.M. Prediction of drug solubility from structure. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 54:2002;355-366
60. Lipinski C.A. Aqueous solubility in discovery, chemistry, and assay changes. Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry. 18:2003;215-231
61. Lu, J. and Bakken, G.A. (2004) Building classification models for DMSO solubility: Comparison of five methods. Abstracts of Papers, 228th ACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, USA, August 22-26
62. Balakin K.V., et al. In silico estimation of DMSO solubility of organic compounds for bioscreening. J. Biomol. Screen. 9:2004;22-31
63. Bergström C.A.S., et al. Experimental and computational screening models for prediction of aqueous drug solubility. Pharm. Res. 19:2002;182-188